1. bookVolume 59 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1508-5791
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Assessment of the control rods shadow effect in the VENUS-F core

Published Online: 30 Dec 2014
Volume & Issue: Volume 59 (2014) - Issue 4 (December 2014)
Page range: 137 - 143
Received: 03 Mar 2014
Accepted: 16 Sep 2014
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1508-5791
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The partitioning and transmutation (P&T) of spent nuclear fuel is an important field of present development of nuclear energy technologies. One of the possible ways to carry out the P&T process is to use the accelerator driven systems (ADS). This technology has been developed within the EURATOM Framework Programmes for several years now. Current research in this field is carried out within the scope of 7th FP project FREYA. Important parts of the project are experiments performed in the GUINEVERE facility devoted to characterising the subcritical core kinetics and development of reactivity monitoring techniques. The present paper considers the effects of control rods use on the core reactivity. In order to carry out the evaluation of the experimental results, it is important to have detailed core characteristics at hand and to take into consideration the differences in the effect of control rods acting separately or together (the so-called shadow effect) on both the reactivity value and the measured neutron flux. Also any core asymmetry should be revealed. This goal was achieved by both MCNP simulations and the experimental results. However, in the case of experimental results, the need for calculating respective correction factors was unavoidable.

Keywords

1. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. (2002). Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS) and Fast Reactors (FR) in advanced nuclear fuel cycles: A comparative study. Paris, France.Search in Google Scholar

2. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. (2009). Independent evaluation of the MYRRHA project: Report by an international team of experts. Paris, France.Search in Google Scholar

3. Billebaud, A., Baeten, P., Aït Abderrahim, H., Ban, G., Baylac, M., Bergmans, G., Bondoux, D., Bouvier, J., Chabod, S., De Conto, J. M., Dessagne, P., Gaudiot, G., Gautier, J. M., Granget, G., Heitz, G., Kerveno, M., Kochetkov, A., Laune, B., Lecolley, F. R., Lecouey, J. L., Marie, N., Mellier, F., Merrer, Y., Nuttin, A., Reynet, D., Steckmeyer, J. C., Uyttenhove, W., Vandeplassche, D., Vermeersch, F., & Vittiglio, G. (2009). The GUINEVERE Project for Accelerator Driven System Physics, International Conference GLOBAL 2009 “The Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Sustainable Options & Industrial Perspectives”. Paris, France.Search in Google Scholar

4. Mellier, F. (2009). Status of core design. In 2nd EUROTRANS ECATS Progress Meeting, 28-29 January 2009. Aix-en-Provence, France.Search in Google Scholar

5. X-5 Monte Carlo Team. (2003). MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5 - Volume II: User’s guide. Los Alamos National Laboratory. (LA-CP-03-0245).Search in Google Scholar

6. Tsuji, M., Suzuki, N., & Shimazu, Y. (2003). Subcriticality measurement by neutron source multiplication method with a fundamental mode extraction. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 40(3), 158-169.10.1080/18811248.2003.9715346Search in Google Scholar

7. Endo, T., Yamamoto, A., & Yamane, Y. (2011). Detected-neutron multiplication factor measured by neutron source multiplication method. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 38(11), 2417-2427.10.1016/j.anucene.2011.01.007Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo