This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Albæk, E., Hopmann, D. N., & de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Kunsten at holde balancen: Dækningen af folketingsvalgkampe i tv-nyhederne på DR1 og TV2 1994–2007 [The art of balancing: The coverage of general election campaigns in television news on DR1 and TV2 1994–2007]. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.AlbækE.HopmannD. N.de VreeseC. H.2010Syddansk UniversitetsforlagSearch in Google Scholar
Albæk, E., van Dalen, A., Pihl-Tingvad, S., Skovsgaard, M., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). Den danske journalist: værdier, produktion, indhold [The Danish journalist: Values, production, content]. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.AlbækE.van DalenA.Pihl-TingvadS.SkovsgaardM.de VreeseC. H.2015Syddansk UniversitetsforlagSearch in Google Scholar
Andersen, K, de Vreese, C. H., & Albæk, E. (2016). Measuring media diet in a high-choice environment – Testing the list-frequency technique. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150973AndersenKde VreeseC. H.AlbækE.2016Measuring media diet in a high-choice environment – Testing the list-frequency technique102–38198https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150973Search in Google Scholar
Andersen, K., Johansson, J., Johansson, B., & Shehata, A. (2022). Maintenance and reformation of news repertoires: A latent transition analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 99(1), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211019750AndersenK.JohanssonJ.JohanssonB.ShehataA.2022Maintenance and reformation of news repertoires: A latent transition analysis991237261https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211019750Search in Google Scholar
Andersen, K., Shehata, A., & Andersson, D. (2021). Alternative news orientation and trust in mainstream media: A longitudinal audience perspective. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1986412AndersenK.ShehataA.AnderssonD.2021Alternative news orientation and trust in mainstream media: A longitudinal audience perspective115833852https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1986412Search in Google Scholar
Arguedas, A., Robertson, C. T., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2022). Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: A literature review. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. https://doi.org/10.60625/RISJ-ETXJ-7K60ArguedasA.RobertsonC. T.FletcherR.NielsenR. K.2022Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxfordhttps://doi.org/10.60625/RISJ-ETXJ-7K60Search in Google Scholar
Atton, C. (2002). News cultures and new social movements: Radical journalism and the mainstream media. Journalism Studies, 3(4), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670022000019209AttonC.2002News cultures and new social movements: Radical journalism and the mainstream media34491505https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670022000019209Search in Google Scholar
Blach-Ørsten, M., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). Det politiske informationslandskab i Danmark 2.0. [The political information landscape in Denmark 2.0]. Politica, 53(2), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v53i2.130381Blach-ØrstenM.MayerhöfferE.2021Det politiske informationslandskab i Danmark 2.0. [The political information landscape in Denmark 2.0]53299124https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v53i2.130381Search in Google Scholar
Brems, M. K. (2022). Party-political and ideological partisanship in Danish alternative media: How distinguishing between types of partisanship can advance our understanding of the political roles of alternative media. Journalism Studies, 24(2), 244–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2157316BremsM. K.2022Party-political and ideological partisanship in Danish alternative media: How distinguishing between types of partisanship can advance our understanding of the political roles of alternative media242244269https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2157316Search in Google Scholar
Brems, M. K.. (2023). From stark opposition to partial adaption: How 12 Danish alternative media construct and position themselves vis-à-vis the media- and political mainstream. Journalistica, 17(1), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v17i1.134823BremsM. K..2023From stark opposition to partial adaption: How 12 Danish alternative media construct and position themselves vis-à-vis the media- and political mainstream171141165https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v17i1.134823Search in Google Scholar
Cushion, S. (2023). Beyond mainstream media: Alternative media and the future of journalism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003360865CushionS.2023Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003360865Search in Google Scholar
Cushion, S., McDowell-Naylor, D., & Thomas, R. (2021). Why national media systems matter: A longitudinal analysis of how UK left-wing and right-wing alternative media critique mainstream media (2015–2018). Journalism Studies, 22(5), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1893795CushionS.McDowell-NaylorD.ThomasR.2021Why national media systems matter: A longitudinal analysis of how UK left-wing and right-wing alternative media critique mainstream media (2015–2018)225633652https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1893795Search in Google Scholar
Downing, J. (2001). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. Sage.DowningJ.2001SageSearch in Google Scholar
Figenschou, T., & Ihlebæk, K. (2019). Challenging journalistic authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies, 20(9), 1221–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868FigenschouT.IhlebækK.2019Challenging journalistic authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media20912211237https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868Search in Google Scholar
Freudenthaler, R., & Wessler, H. (2022). Mapping emerging and legacy outlets online by their democratic functions – Agonistic, deliberative, or corrosive? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(2), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211015077FreudenthalerR.WesslerH.2022Mapping emerging and legacy outlets online by their democratic functions – Agonistic, deliberative, or corrosive?272417438https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211015077Search in Google Scholar
Frischlich, L., Kuhfeldt, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Clever, L. (2022). Alternative counter-news use and fake news recall during the Covid-19 crisis. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259FrischlichL.KuhfeldtL.Schatto-EckrodtT.CleverL.2022Alternative counter-news use and fake news recall during the Covid-19 crisis11180102https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, K. M. (2021). Vælgernes sociodemografiske træk fordelt på partierne [The electorate’s sociodemographic traits by the parties]. In K. M. Hansen, & R. Stubager (Eds.), Klimavalget [The climate election] (pp. 103–122). DJØF Forlag.HansenK. M.2021Vælgernes sociodemografiske træk fordelt på partierne [The electorate’s sociodemographic traits by the parties]InHansenK. M.StubagerR.(Eds.),103122DJØF ForlagSearch in Google Scholar
Hansen, K. M., & Hjort, F. (2021). Udkantsdanmark og landlig bevidsthed [Outskirt Denmark and rural consciousness]. In K. M. Hansen, & R. Stubager (Eds.), Klimavalget [The climate election] (pp. 159–178). DJØF Forlag.HansenK. M.HjortF.2021Udkantsdanmark og landlig bevidsthed [Outskirt Denmark and rural consciousness]InHansenK. M.StubagerR.(Eds.),159178DJØF ForlagSearch in Google Scholar
Hansen, K. M., & Stubager, R. (2020). The Danish national election study 2019 [4. CVAP Working Paper Series]. Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.HansenK. M.StubagerR.2020Department of Political Science, University of CopenhagenSearch in Google Scholar
Heft, A., Mayerhöffer E., Reinhardt, S., & Knüpfer, C. (2020). Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right-wing digital news infrastructures in six western democracies. Policy & Internet, 12(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.219HeftA.MayerhöfferE.ReinhardtS.KnüpferC.2020Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right-wing digital news infrastructures in six western democracies1212045https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.219Search in Google Scholar
Helberger, N., & Wojcieszak, M. (2018). Exposure diversity. In P.M. Napoli (Ed.), Mediated communication (pp. 535–560). De Gruyter Mouton.HelbergerN.WojcieszakM.2018Exposure diversityInNapoliP.M.(Ed.),535560De Gruyter MoutonSearch in Google Scholar
Hjarvard, S. (2010). The views of the news: The role of political newspapers in a changing media landscape. Nothern Lights, 8(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.8.25_1HjarvardS.2010The views of the news: The role of political newspapers in a changing media landscape812548https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.8.25_1Search in Google Scholar
Holt, K. (2020). Right-wing alternative media. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454691HoltK.2020Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454691Search in Google Scholar
Holt, K., Figenschou, T., & Frischlich L. (2019). Key dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715HoltK.FigenschouT.FrischlichL.2019Key dimensions of alternative news media77860869https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715Search in Google Scholar
Kenix, L. J. (2011). Alternative and mainstream media: The converging spectrum. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849665421KenixL. J.2011Bloomsbury Academichttps://doi.org/10.5040/9781849665421Search in Google Scholar
Klawier, T., Prochazka, F., & Schweiger, W. (2022). Comparing frame repertoires of mainstream and right-wing alternative media. Digital Journalism, 10(8), 1387–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2048186KlawierT.ProchazkaF.SchweigerW.2022Comparing frame repertoires of mainstream and right-wing alternative media10813871408https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2048186Search in Google Scholar
Kristensen, I. T., Kjeldsen, C., & Dalgaard, T. (2007). Landdistriktskommuner: Indikatorer for landdistrikt [Country district municipalities: Indicators for country district]. Danmarks Jord-brugsforskning.KristensenI. T.KjeldsenC.DalgaardT.2007Danmarks Jord-brugsforskningSearch in Google Scholar
Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). News media, knowledge, and political interest: Evidence of a dual role from a field experiment. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12314LechelerS.de VreeseC. H.2017News media, knowledge, and political interest: Evidence of a dual role from a field experiment674545564https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12314Search in Google Scholar
Leung, D. K. K., & Lee, F. L. F. (2014). Cultivating an active online counterpublic: Examining usage and political impact of internet alternative media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214530787LeungD. K. K.LeeF. L. F.2014Cultivating an active online counterpublic: Examining usage and political impact of internet alternative media193340359https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214530787Search in Google Scholar
Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). How do Danish right-wing alternative media position themselves against the mainstream? Advancing the study of alternative media structure and content. Journalism Studies, 22(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1814846MayerhöfferE.2021How do Danish right-wing alternative media position themselves against the mainstream? Advancing the study of alternative media structure and content222119136https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1814846Search in Google Scholar
Mayerhöffer, E., & Schwartz, S. (2020). Fake eller partisk? Hyperpartiske onlinemedier i den danske valgkamp 2019 [Fake or partisan? Hyperpartisan online media in the Danish election campaign 2019]. In S. Just, & I. Guldbrandsen (Eds.), #FV19: Politisk kommunikation på digitale medier [#FV19: Political communication on digital media] (pp. 203–226). Samfundslitteratur.MayerhöfferE.SchwartzS.2020Fake eller partisk? Hyperpartiske onlinemedier i den danske valgkamp 2019 [Fake or partisan? Hyperpartisan online media in the Danish election campaign 2019]InJustS.GuldbrandsenI.(Eds.),203226SamfundslitteraturSearch in Google Scholar
McDowell-Naylor, D., Cushion, S., & Thomas, R. (2023). A typology of alternative online political media in the United Kingdom: A longitudinal content analysis (2015–2018). Journalism, 24(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211059585McDowell-NaylorD.CushionS.ThomasR.2023A typology of alternative online political media in the United Kingdom: A longitudinal content analysis (2015–2018)2414161https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211059585Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Kiley, J., & Matsa, K. E. (2014, October 21). Political polarization and media habits. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/MitchellA.GottfriedJ.KileyJ.MatsaK. E.2014October21Pew Research Centerhttps://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/Search in Google Scholar
Müller, P., & Bach, R. L. (2021). Populist alternative news use and its role for elections: Webtracking and survey evidence from two campaign periods. New Media & Society, 25(10), 2663–2683. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211032969MüllerP.BachR. L.2021Populist alternative news use and its role for elections: Webtracking and survey evidence from two campaign periods251026632683https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211032969Search in Google Scholar
Müller, P., & Schulz, A. (2021). Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and co. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646778MüllerP.SchulzA.2021Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and co242277293https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646778Search in Google Scholar
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D., & Nielsen, R. (2018). Reuters Institute digital news report 2018. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/digital-news-report-2018NewmanN.FletcherR.KalogeropoulosA.LevyD.NielsenR.2018Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxfordhttps://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/digital-news-report-2018Search in Google Scholar
Noppari, E., Hiltunen, I., & Ahva, L. (2019). User profiles for populist counter-media websites in Finland. Journal of Alternative and Community Media, 4(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00041_1NoppariE.HiltunenI.AhvaL.2019User profiles for populist counter-media websites in Finland412337https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00041_1Search in Google Scholar
Nygaard, S. (2019). The appearance of objectivity: How immigration-critical alternative media report the news. Journalism Practice, 13(10), 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1577697NygaardS.2019The appearance of objectivity: How immigration-critical alternative media report the news131011471163https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1577697Search in Google Scholar
Pampel, F. C. (2021). Logistic regression: A primer (2nd ed.). Sage.PampelF. C.20212nd ed.SageSearch in Google Scholar
Rae, M. (2021). Hyperpartisan news: Rethinking the media for populist politics. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820910416RaeM.2021Hyperpartisan news: Rethinking the media for populist politics23511171132https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820910416Search in Google Scholar
Rauch, J. (2019). Comparing progressive and conservative audiences for alternative media and their attitudes towards journalism. In J. D. Atkinson, & L. J. Kenix (Eds.), Alternative media meets mainstream politics: Activist nation rising (pp. 19–38). Lexington Books.RauchJ.2019Comparing progressive and conservative audiences for alternative media and their attitudes towards journalismInAtkinsonJ. D.KenixL. J.(Eds.),1938Lexington BooksSearch in Google Scholar
Reinemann, C., Matthes, J., & Sheafer, T. (2016). Citizens and populist political communication: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stromback, & C. De Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 381–393). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016ReinemannC.MatthesJ.SheaferT.2016Citizens and populist political communication: Cross-national findings and perspectivesInAalbergT.EsserF.ReinemannC.StrombackJ.De VreeseC.(Eds.),381393Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016Search in Google Scholar
Schrøder, K., Blach-Ørsten, M., & Eberholst, M. K. (2018). Danskernes brug af Nyhedsmedier 2018 [The Danish population’s use of news media 2018]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1285599SchrøderK.Blach-ØrstenM.EberholstM. K.2018https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1285599Search in Google Scholar
Schrøder, K., Blach-Ørsten, M., & Eberholst, M. K. (2021). Danskernes brug af Nyhedsmedier 2021 [The Danish population’s use of news media 2021]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5749233SchrøderK.Blach-ØrstenM.EberholstM. K.2021https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5749233Search in Google Scholar
Schulz, A. (2019.) Where populist citizens get the news: An investigation of news audience polarization along populist attitudes in 11 countries. Communication Monographs, 86(1), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1508876SchulzA.2019Where populist citizens get the news: An investigation of news audience polarization along populist attitudes in 11 countries86188111https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1508876Search in Google Scholar
Schulze, H. (2020). Who uses right-wing alternative online media? An exploration of audience characteristics. Politics and Governance, 8(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2925SchulzeH.2020Who uses right-wing alternative online media? An exploration of audience characteristics83618https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2925Search in Google Scholar
Schwarzenegger, C. (2021). Communities of darkness? Users and uses of anti-system alternative media between audience and community. Media and Communication, 9(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3418SchwarzeneggerC.2021Communities of darkness? Users and uses of anti-system alternative media between audience and community9199109https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3418Search in Google Scholar
Steppat, D., Castro, L., & Esser, F. (2021). What News users perceive as ‘alternative media’ varies between countries: How media fragmentation and polarization matter. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 741–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1939747SteppatD.CastroL.EsserF.2021What News users perceive as ‘alternative media’ varies between countries: How media fragmentation and polarization matter115741761https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1939747Search in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J., Djerf-Pierre, M., & Shehata, A. (2013). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds018StrömbäckJ.Djerf-PierreM.ShehataA.2013The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective254414435https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds018Search in Google Scholar
Stubager R., Hansen, K. M., Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Nadeau, R. (2021). The Danish voter: Democratic ideals and challenges. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10031711StubagerR.HansenK. M.Lewis-BeckM. S.NadeauR.2021University of Michigan Presshttps://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10031711Search in Google Scholar
Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital age. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001SyvertsenT.EnliG.MjøsO.MoeH.2014University of Michigan Presshttps://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001Search in Google Scholar
Theorin, N., & Strömbäck, J. (2020). Some media matter more than others: Investigating media effects on attitudes toward and perceptions of immigration in Sweden. International Migration Review, 54(4), 1238–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319893292TheorinN.StrömbäckJ.2020Some media matter more than others: Investigating media effects on attitudes toward and perceptions of immigration in Sweden54412381264https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319893292Search in Google Scholar
Thorbjørnsrud, K., & Figenschou, T. U. (2020). The alarmed citizen: Fear, mistrust, and alternative media. Journalism Practice, 16(5), 1018–1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1825113ThorbjørnsrudK.FigenschouT. U.2020The alarmed citizen: Fear, mistrust, and alternative media16510181035https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1825113Search in Google Scholar
Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371TsfatiY.CappellaJ. N.2003Do people watch what they do not trust?305504529https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371Search in Google Scholar
Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2005). Why do people watch news they do not trust? The need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Media Psychology, 7(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0703_2TsfatiY.CappellaJ. N.2005Why do people watch news they do not trust? The need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure73251271https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0703_2Search in Google Scholar
von Nordheim, G., Müller, H., & Scheppe, M. (2019). Young, free and biased: A comparison of mainstream and right-wing media coverage of the 2015–16 refugee crisis in German newspapers. Journal of Alternative and Community Media, 4(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00042_1von NordheimG.MüllerH.ScheppeM.2019Young, free and biased: A comparison of mainstream and right-wing media coverage of the 2015–16 refugee crisis in German newspapers413856https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00042_1Search in Google Scholar