Open Access

Stability in Times of Change: Trends in Newspaper Executives’ Attitudes towards Digital Media


Cite

Figure 1

Opportunities and ThreatsNote: 1 = totally disagree. 6 = totally agree. Visualization of results presented in Table 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Opportunities and ThreatsNote: 1 = totally disagree. 6 = totally agree. Visualization of results presented in Table 2, 3, 4, and 5.

Figure 2

Online Newspapers Should Charge Their Users. Linear regression. StepwiseNote: 1 = totally disagree. 6 = totally agree.
Online Newspapers Should Charge Their Users. Linear regression. StepwiseNote: 1 = totally disagree. 6 = totally agree.

Online Newspapers Should Charge Their Users. Management Role

Year 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Mean 4.45 3.68 3.9 4.37 4.83
  Editors 4.28 3.56 3.91 4.28 4.82
  Managers 4.79 3.76 4.06 4.54 4.88
  Publisher - 3.96 3.87 4.27 5.07
STD 1.658 1.586 1.627 1.309 1.281
N 197 237 214 213 190

Multiple Comparisons, Bonferroni, 2013

95% Confidence Interval
(I) Print Circulation: (J) Print Circulation: Mean Difference (I–J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
Under 5,000 5,000–10,000 −.483 .200 .099 −1.02 .05
10,000–40,000 −1.072 * .200 .000 −1.60 −.54
Over 40,000 −1.430 * .417 .004 −2.54 −.32
5,000–10,000 Under 5,000 .483 .200 .099 −.05 1.02
10,000–40,000 −.589 * .211 .035 −1.15 −.03
Over 40,000 −.946 .422 .157 −2.07 .18
10,000–40,000 Under 5,000 1.072 * .200 .000 .54 1.60
5,000–10,000 .589 * .211 .035 .03 1.15
Over 40,000 −.357 .422 1.000 −1.48 .77
Over 40,000 Under 5,000 1.430 * .417 .004 .32 2.54
5,000–10,000 .946 .422 .157 −.18 2.07
10,000–40,000 .357 .422 1.000 −.77 1.48

All in All, How Satisfied Are You with the Newspaper’s Online Activities Today? Print Circulation

Year 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Mean 3.41 3.51 3.61 3.64 3.58
  Under 5,000 3.19 3.21 3.51 3.18 3.07
  5–10,000 3.29 3.38 3.33 3.65 3.55
  10–40,000 3.5 3.91 3.86 4.0 4.14
  Over 40,000 4.46 4.06 4.38 4.0 4.5
STD 1.147 1.095 1.093 1.154 1.208
N 167 229 204 214 192

The Surveys

Year 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Month April March November April April
N 200 240 216 229 212
Response Rate 68% 70% 65% 59% 60%

The Use of Internet Represents a Threat to My Newspaper

Year 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Mean 2.53 2.28 2.34 2.39 2.43
STD 1.347 1.219 1.242 1.251 1.506
N 189 233 212 212 191

The Use of Internet Represents an Opportunity for the Newspaper Industry

Year 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Mean 4.57 4.9 4.72 4.78 4.96
STD 1.205 1.038 1.255 1.062 1.068
N 198 238 215 212 191

The Use of Internet Represents an Opportunity for My Newspaper. Print Circulation

Year 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Mean 4.84 5.11 4.91 4.88 5.14
STD 1.145 1.079 1.206 1.153 1.071
N 188 238 215 213 192

The Use of Internet Represents a Threat to the Newspaper Industry.

Year 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Mean 3.01 2.87 3.01 3.13 2.94
STD 1.363 1.305 1.470 1.363 1.578
N 198 237 214 213 189

Number of Years in Current Executive Position, 2013. Percent

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Less than 2 years 36 17.0 18.8 19.3
2–5 years 43 20.3 22.4 41.7
5–10 years 49 23.1 25.5 67.2
More than 10 years 63 29.7 32.8 100.0
Total 192 90.6 100.0
Missing 20 9.4
N 212 100.0

Functions of the Newspaper’s Online Edition? 14 Valid Percent

2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

** * ** * ** * ** * ** *
Part of multi-channel strategy 79 34 81 34 81 32 77 36 75 39
Marketing print paper 71 14 68 16 61 10 51 7 42 8
Defending market position 69 28 70 25 77 29 71 36 67 34
Image of paper/company 60 10 59 6 56 10 43 4 41 3
Reusing content from paper 55 5 55 3 41 3 37 5 40 4
New revenue sources 47 5 59 12 55 10 55 10 61 9
Exploring opportunities 37 3 44 4 41 5 39 3 36 2
eISSN:
2001-5119
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Social Sciences, Communication Science, Mass Communication, Public and Political Communication