[
Abdulkareem, A. K., Abdulkareem, Z. J., Ishola, A. A., & Akindele, I. T. (2022). Does e-government impact e-participation? The influence of trust in e-government. International Review of Public Administration, 27(2), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2071540
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alderete, M.V. (2022). Can small cities from developing countries be smart cities? The case of Argentina. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 17(4), November, 36-51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Al-Mannaei, M., Al-Jayyousi, O., Mahmood, A., Dornberger, U., & Al-Jayousi, N. (2023). Evaluating innovation performance for financial technology within the national innovation system: A case study of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110210
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anarfo, E. B., Abor, J. Y., Osei, K. A., & Gyeke-Dako, A. (2019). Financial inclusion and financial sector development in Sub-Saharan Africa: a panel VAR approach. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 15 (4), 444-463. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-07-2018-0205
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Androniceanu, A. (2023). The new trends of digital transformation and artificial intelligence in public administration. Administraţie si Management Public, 40,147-155. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2023.40-09
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2021). E-Government in European Countries, A comparative approach using the principal components analysis. Nispacee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(2), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2023). Public administration digitalization and government effectiveness in EU countries. Central European Public Administration Review, 21(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2023.L01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, I., & Kinnunen, J. (2022a). Public administration digitalization and corruption in the EU member states. A comparative and correlative research analysis. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 65 E, 5-22. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.65E.l
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, L, & Sabie, O. M. (2022b). The impact of digitalization on Public Administration, Economic Development, and Well-Being in the EU countries. Central European Public Administration Review, 20(2), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2022.2.01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baltagi, B. H. (2014). Panel Data Econometrics (1st edition). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barro, R. J. (2001). Human Capital and Growth. American Economic Review, 91 (2). 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937943
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bartczak, K. (2022). Changes in business models implied by the use of digital technology platforms. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(4), 262-281. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.9.4(14)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., & Samoliuk, N. (2023). Digital Skills of Civil Servants: Assessing Readiness for Successful Interaction in e-society. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 20(3), 155-174. https://doi.org/10.12700/aph.20.3.2023.3.10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bouckaert, G. & Van de Walle S. (2001, September 5-8). Government Performance and Trust in Government. Paper for the permanent study group of productivity and quality in the public sector. EGPA Annual Conference, Vaasa, Finland
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burger, A., Cichiwskyj, C., Schmeißer, S., & Schiele, G. (2020). The Elastic Internet of Things - A platform for self-integrating and self-adaptive IoT-systems with support for embedded adaptive hardware. Future Generation Computer Systems, 113, 607-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.07.035
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colesca, S. E. (2009). Understanding trust in e-Government. The Engineering Economics, 63(4). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.63.4.11637
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colesca, S. E., & Dobrica, L. (2008). Adoption and use of E-Government services: The case of Romania. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 6(3), 204 - 217. https://doi.org/10.22201/icat.16656423.6.03.526
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Datta, S. K., & Singh, K. (2019). Variation and determinants of financial inclusion and their association with human development: A cross-country analysis. limb Management Review, 31(4), 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.07.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dhaoui, I. (2021). E-Government for Sustainable Development: Evidence from MENA Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2070-2099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00791-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dobrolyubova, E. (2021). Measuring Outcomes of Digital Transformation in Public Administration: Literature Review and Possible Steps Forward. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(1), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dobrolyubova, E., Klochkova, E., & Alexandrov, O. (2019). Digitalization and Effective Government: What Is the Cause and What Is the Effect? In D. A. Alexandrov, A. V. Boukhanovsky, A. V. Chugunov, Y. Kabanov, O. Koltsova & I. Musabirov (Eds.), Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 1038, pp. 55-67). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37858-5_5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doran, N. M., Puiu, S., Bădîrcea, R. M., Pirtea, M., Doran, M. D., Ciobanu, G., & Mihit, L. D. (2023). E-Government Development—A key factor in government administration effectiveness in the European Union. Electronics, 12(3), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030641
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Durkiewicz, J., & Janowski, T. (2018). Is digitalization improving governance quality? Correlating analog and digital benchmarks. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Digital Government ECDG 2018, pp. 48-56. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eynon, R. (2007). Breaking barriers to e-government: Overcoming obstacles to improving European public services (Modinis study Contract no. 29172). European Commission.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farris, J. S. (1969). On the Cophenetic Correlation Coefficient. Systematic Zoology, 18(3), 279. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412324
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferraz, D., Mariano, E. B., Rebelatto, D. a. D. N., & Hartmann, D. (2020). Linking Human Development and the Financial Responsibility of Regions: Combined Index Proposals Using Methods from Data Envelopment Analysis. Social Indicators Research, 150(2), 439-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/sll205-020-02338-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gancarczyk, M., Łasak, P., & Gancarczyk, J. (2022). The fmtech transformation of banking: Governance dynamics and socio-economic outcomes in spatial contexts. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(3), 143-165. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2022.100309
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gatautis, R. (2008). The impact of ICT on public and private sectors in Lithuania. The Engineering Economics, 59(4), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.59.4.11558
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Georgescu, I., & Kinnunen, J. (2021). The Digital Effectiveness on Economic Inequality: A Computational Approach. In A. M. Dima & F. D’Ascenzo (Eds.), Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics (pp. 223-239). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59972-0_16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Georgescu, I., Androniceanu, A. M., & Drăgulănescu, I. V. (2023). A Deep Learning Approach to Digitalization and Economic Growth. In M. Busu (Ed) Digital Economy and the Green Revolution. ICBE 2022. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics (pp. 79-92). Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19886-1_6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Głodowska, A., Maciejewski, M., & Wach, K. (2023). Navigating the digital landscape: A conceptual framework for understanding digital entrepreneurship and business transformation. International Entrepreneurship Review, 9(3), 7-18
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gulati, G. J., Williams, C. B., & Yates, D. J. (2014). Predictors of on-line services and e-participation: A cross-national comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 526-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Idzi, F. M., & Gomes, R. C. (2022). Digital governance: government strategies that impact public services. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(4), 427-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00055-w
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jurczuk, A., & Florea, A. (2022). Future-Oriented Digital Skills for Process Design and Automation. Human Technology, 18(2), 122-142. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-2.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kassambara, R. (2017). Practical Guide to Cluster Analysis in R (1st ed.). STHDA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2005). Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kemeç, A. (2022). Analysis of smart global research trends with network map technique. Management Research and Practice, 14(2), 46-59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kersan-Škabić, L, & Vukašina, M. (2023). Contribution of ESIFs to the digital society development in the EU. Journal of International Studies, 16(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2023/16-2/13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kézai, P. K., & Páthy, A. (2023). Sister city network’s development in Central-Eastern European regional centres. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 18(3), 5-26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krishnan, S., Teo, T., & Lim., V. (2013). Examining the relationships among e-government maturity, corruption, economic prosperity and environmental degradation: a cross-country analysis. Information & Management, 50(8):638-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kubičková, L., Kormanakova, M., Veselá, L., & Jelinkova, Z. (2021). The implementation of industry 4.0 elements as a tool stimulating the competitiveness of engineering enterprises. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(1), 76-94. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.01.05
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lăzăroiu, G., Androniceanu, A., Grecu, I., Grecu, G., & Negurita, O. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things sensing networks, and sustainable cyber-physical management systems in big data-driven cognitive manufacturing. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1047-1080. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, T., Lee-Geiller, S., & Lee, B. (2021). A validation of the modified democratic e-governance website evaluation model. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101616
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, EL, & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2019). National e-government performance and citizen satisfaction: a multilevel analysis across European countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 506-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317703691
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macintosh, A., Coleman, S., Schneeberger, A. (2009). eParticipation: The Research Gaps. In A. Macintosh, & E. Tambouris (Eds) Electronic Participation. ePart 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5694 (pp. 1-11). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03781-8_l
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Małkowska, A., Urbaniec, M., & Kosala, M. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on European countries: insights from a comparative analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16 (2), 325-355. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marino, A., & Pariso, P. (2021). Digital government platforms: issues and actions in Europe during pandemic time. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(1), 462-485. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.1(29)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marino, A., Pariso, P., & Picariello, M. (2022). Transition towards the artificial intelligence via re-engineering of digital platforms: comparing European Member States. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 350-368. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.9.3(21)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martins, J., & Veiga, L. G., (2022). Digital government as a business facilitator. Information Economics and Policy, 60, 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2022.100990
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matei, A., & Dogaru, T. C. (2010). The administrative convergence in the Balkan area - Empirical analysis of social policy in Romania and Bulgaria. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 17(3 (544)), 5-24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Medaglia, R. (2012). eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 346-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mellouli, M., Bouaziz, F., & Bentahar, O. (2020). E-government success assessment from a public value perspective. International Review of Public Administration, 25(3), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2020.1799517
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mesa, D. (2023). Digital divide, e-government and trust in public service: The key role of education. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1140416
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meyer, D. F., & Meyer, N. (2020). The relationships between entrepreneurial factors and economic growth and development: The case of selected European countries. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 268-283. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mishchuk, H., Bilan, Y., Androniceanu, A., & Krol, V. (2023). Social capital: Evaluating its roles in competitiveness and ensuring human development. Journal of Competitiveness, 15(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2023.02.01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morvai, J., Ormos, M., Antalik, I., Mura, L., Páldi, A., & Szabo, B. (2022). Financial planning in Slovakia: results of empirical research. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 10 (2), 572-589. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.10.2(36)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nowak, P. (2021). Cooperation of enterprises in innovative activities on the example of Polish regions. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(4), 839-857. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ntshangase, B.A., & Msosa, S.K. (2022). Enhancing service delivery for metropolitan municipalities in South Africa via project management. Insights into Regional Development, 4(3), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2022.4.3(8)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Okunola, J. L., & Fakunle, S. O. (2021). Community participation: a pragmatic solution to negative impacts of Covid-19 on household’s socioeconomic lives. Insights into Regional Development, 3(4), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2021.3.4(2)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oláh, J., Hidayat, Y. A., Gavurova, B., Khan, M. A., & Popp, J. (2021). Trust levels within categories of information and communication technology companies. PLOS ONE, 16 (6), e0252773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252773
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phimolsathien, T. (2022). Guidelines for promoting understanding of blockchain’s influence on business operations in service sector. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 25(1), 327-345. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2022.25.L20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pirannejad, A., Janssen, M., & Rezaei, J. (2019). Towards a balanced E-Participation Index: Integrating government and society perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101404
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pollitt, C. (2001). Convergence: the useful myth? Public Administration, 79(4), 933-947. https://doi.org/10T111/1467-9299.00287
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Potter, J., (1988). Consumerism and the public sector: how well does the coat fit? Public Administration, 66(2), 149 - 164. https://doi.org/10.1111/jT467-9299.1988.tb00687.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pucheanu, F., Colesca, S.E., Pacesila, M., & Burcea, S.G. (2022). Industry 4.0. Sustainability and Innovation at the Crossroad: A Review Analysis. Management Research and Practice, 14(3), 47-69.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ringold, D., Holla, A., Koziol, M., & Srinivasan, S. (2011). Citizens and Service Delivery: Assessing the Use of Social Accountability Approaches in Human Development Sectors. In The World Bank eBooks. World Bank, https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8980-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodríguez-Martínez, C. C., Cubilla-Montilla, M., Vicente-Galindo, P., & Galindo-Villardón, P. (2023). X-STATIS: A Multivariate Approach to Characterize the Evolution of E-Participation, from a Global Perspective. Mathematics, 11(6), 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/mathl1061492
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romesburg, H. C. (2004). Cluster Analysis for Researchers. Lulu Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Grzelak, M. M. (2021). Multi-dimensional analysis of regional investment attractiveness in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(1), 103-138. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sá, F., Rocha, Á., & Cota, M. P. (2016). Potential dimensions for a local e-Government services quality model. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 270-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Flak, L. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanford, C., & Rose, J. (2007). Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management, 27(6), 406-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.08.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santiso, C. (2022). Trust with integrity: Harnessing the integrity dividends of digital government for reducing corruption in developing countries. In UN Digital Library (DESA working paper 176). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3956989?ln=en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sen, A. (1997). Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shava, E., & Vyas-Doorgapersad, S. (2023). Inclusive participation in information and communication technologies (ICTs) processes for smart services in the city of Johannesburg. Insights into Regional Development, 5(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2023.5.1(2)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shishmanov, K. (2022). Digital Transformation in Romania and Bulgaria. In I. Panagoreţ & G. Gorghiu (Eds.), Lumen Proceedings: Vol. 18. Globalization, Innovation and Development, Trends and Prospects (GIDTP 2019). LUMEN Publishing House, https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/gidtp2022/20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simionescu, M., Szeles, M. R., Gavurova, B., & Mentei, U. (2021). The Impact of Quality of Governance, Renewable Energy and Foreign Direct Investment on Sustainable Development in CEE Countries. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.765927
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, S., Macintosh, A., & Millard, J. (2011). A three-layered framework for evaluating e-participation. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 4(4), 304. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeg.2011.046013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Straková, J., Talíř, M., & Váchal, J. (2022). Opportunities and threats of digital transformation of business models in SMEs. Economics & Sociology, 15(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2022/15-3/9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sun, C., Lin, Z., Vochozka, M., & Vincúrová, Z. (2022a). Digital transformation and corporate cash holdings in China’s A-share listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1081-1116. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sun, C., Zhang, Z., Vochozka, M., & Vozňáková, I. (2022b). Enterprise digital transformation and debt financing cost in China’s A-share listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(3), 783-829. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suzuki, R., & Shimodaira, H. (2015). pvclust: Hierarchical Clustering with P-Values via Multiscale Bootstrap Resampling, cran.r-project. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pvclust/index.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2012). Grammatical Variation in British English Dialects: A Study in Corpus-Based Dialectometry. Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763380
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Škare, M., Gavurova, B., & Rigelsky, M. (2023). Innovation activity and the outcomes of B2C, B2B, and B2G E-Commerce in EU countries. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113874
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomkova, J. (2009). E-consultations: New tools for civic engagement or facades for political correctness. European Journal of ePractice, 7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United Nations. (2014). E-Government for the Future We Want, E-Government Survey 2014. In United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, https://desapublications.un.org/publications/un-e-government-survey-2014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United Nations. (2018a). Gearing e-government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies, E-Government Survey 2018. In United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, https://desapublications.un.org/publications/un-e-government-survey-2018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United Nations. (2018b). Working together: Integration, institutions and the Sustainable Development Goals, World Public Sector Report 2018. In United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, https://desapublications.un.org/publications/world-public-sector-report-2018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United Nations. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals 16: Focus on Public Institutions, World Public Sector Report 2019. In United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, https://desapublications.un.org/publications/world-public-sector-report-2019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waheduzzaman, W., & Khandaker, S. (2022). E-participation for combating corruption, increasing voice and accountability, and developing government effectiveness: A cross-country data analysis. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 81(4), 549-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12544
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55(301), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wauters, P., & Lörincz, B. (2008). User satisfaction and administrative simplification within the perspective of e-government impact: Two faces of the same coin? European Journal of ePractice, 4, 1-10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Welch, E. (2012). The Rise of Participative Technologies in Government. In Transformational Government through EGov Practice: Socioeconomic, Cultural, and Technological Issues (pp. 347-367). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zambrano-Yepez, C., Guillén-Rodríguez, Y., & Henriquez-Coronel, P. (2023). Multivariate analysis of the determinants of e-government. Administraţie Şi Management Public, 40, 132-146. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2023.40-08
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zautashvili, D. (2017). E-government Maturity Model by Growth Level of E-services Delivery. Journal of Technical Science & Technologies, 6 (2), 17-22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, Y., & Kimathi, F. A. (2022). Exploring the stages of e-government development from public value perspective. Technology in Society, 69, 101942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101942
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zsigmond, T., & Mura, L. (2023). Emotional intelligence and knowledge sharing as key factors in business management – evidence from Slovak SMEs. Economics and Sociology, 16(2), 248-264. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2023/16-2/15
]Search in Google Scholar
