1. bookVolume 13 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Questioning the Real Citizen-Centricity of e-Government Development: Digitalization of G2C Services in Selected CEE Countries

Published Online: 02 Jun 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 13 (2020) - Issue 1 (June 2020)
Page range: 213 - 243
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This paper presents findings of a pilot research study that focused on a selected area of e-government – digitalization of core government services to citizens (G2C) in selected Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries – namely in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Romania. Taking into account the literature available to date, it is a first attempt of its kind, even if mainly a qualitative study. The findings clearly indicate that the level of digitalization of the administrative services for citizens is rather low. All three countries are roughly at the same level of electronic government development (with the Czech Republic slightly ahead), despite vastly different strategies and levels of centralization. This could change in the future, after the results of their respective national strategies become visible, and we are also interested in applying our method to other CEE countries, with the clear aim of refining it.

Keywords

Almuftah, H., V. Weerakkody and U. Sivarajah. 2016. “Comparing and Contrasting e-Government Maturity Models: A Qualitative-Meta Syhntesis.” In Electronic Government and Electronic Participation. Available at https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/13415/1/Fulltext.pdf (last accessed 12 April 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, K. V. and H. Z. Henriksen. 2006. “E-Government Maturity Models: Extension of the Layne and Lee Model.” Government Information Quarterly 23, 236 – 248.Search in Google Scholar

Aranyossy, M. 2018. “Citizen Adoption of e-Government Services: Evidence from Hungary.” Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325769045_Citizen_adoption_of_e-government_services_-_Evidence_from_Hungary (last accessed 8 August 2019).10.18690/978-961-286-170-4.3Search in Google Scholar

Borovitz, T., M. Csótó, L. Juhász, S. Molnár, A. Rab and L. Székely. 2007. “Elektronikus Közigazgatás Éves Jelentés 2006” [Annual report on e-government services 2006]. Információs Társadalom 7(1), 61 – 85.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, D. 2005. “Electronic Government and Public Administration.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 71(2), 241 – 254.Search in Google Scholar

Budai, B., B. Gerencsér and B. Veszprémi. 2018. A digitális kor hazai közigazgatási specifikumai. Budapest: Dialóg Campus Kiadó.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Y. Ch. 2010. “Citizen-Centric E-Government Services: Understanding Integrated Citizen Service Information Systems.” Social Science Computer Review 28(4), 427 – 442.Search in Google Scholar

Csótó, M. 2019a. “Mérni annyi, mint tudni ? Az elektronikus közigazgatás közösségi mérőszámairól.” Vezetéstudomány – Budapest Management Review 50(2), 14 – 31.Search in Google Scholar

Csótó, M. 2019b. “Examining the Role of the Knowledge Gap as a Driver towards e-Government Service Adoption.” In A. Nemeslaki et al. (eds). Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2019. Wien: Austrian Computer Society, 45 – 56.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. 2001. Summary Report – Web-based Survey on Electronic Public Services (Results of the first measurement: October 2001).Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. 2018. E-Government in Romania. Luxembourg: Wavestone Luxembourg.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. 2019. Digital Government Factsheet 2019 Hungary. Available at https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/inline-files/Digital_Government_Factsheets_Hungary_2019.pdf (last accessed 15 August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Fath-Allah, A., L. Cheikhi, R. E. Al-Qutaish and A. Idri. 2014. “E-Government Maturity Models: A Comparative Study.” International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications 5(3), 71 – 91.Search in Google Scholar

Garson, G. D. 2006. Public Information Technology and E-Governance: Managing the Virtual State. London: Jones and Barlett.Search in Google Scholar

Gil-Garcia, J. R., S. S. Dawes and T. Pardo. 2018. “Digital Government and Public Management Research: Finding the Crossroads.” Public Management Review 20(5), 633 – 646.Search in Google Scholar

Hajnal, G., K. Kádár and E. Kovács. 2018. “Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28: Hungary.” In N. Thijs et al. Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28. Available at https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ae181e42-9601-11e8-8bc1-01aa75ed71a1 (last accessed 8 August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Heeks, R. 2006. Implementing and Managing eGovernment. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446220191Search in Google Scholar

Homburg, V. 2008. Understanding E-Government: Information Systems in Public Administration. Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203885642Search in Google Scholar

Ifinedo, P. and M. Singh. 2011. “Determinants of eGovernment Maturity in the Transition Economies of Central and Eastern Europe.” Electronic Journal of e-Government 9(2), 166 – 182.Search in Google Scholar

Janowski, T. 2015. “Digital Government Evolution: From Transformation to Contextualization.” Government Information Quarterly 32, 221 – 236.Search in Google Scholar

Laposa, T. 2017. “The Digital Transformation of EU-Cohesion Policy: How to Measure the Matury of e-Cohesion Services.” Paper prepared for the NISPAcee 2017 conference.Search in Google Scholar

Layne, K. and J. Lee. 2001. “Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four Stage Model.” Government Information Quarterly 18, 122 – 136.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J. 2010. “10 Year Retrospect on Stage Models of e-Government: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.” Government Information Quarterly 27, 220 – 230.Search in Google Scholar

van der Linden, N., A. Groeneveld, G. Cattaneo, S. Aguzzi and F. Pallaro. 2017. “eGovernment Benchmark Framework 2012 – 2017.” Method Paper for the benchmarking exercises (comprehensive rules from 2012 to 2017). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=55174 (last accessed 5 November 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Luna-Reyes, L. F., J. R. Gil-Garcia and G. Romero. 2012. “Towards a Multidimensional Model for Evaluating Electronic Government: Proposing a More Comprehensive and Integrative Perspective.” Government Information Quarterly 29, 324 – 334.Search in Google Scholar

Luna-Reyes, L. F., R. Sandoval-Almazan, G. Puron-Cid, S. Picazo-Vela, D. E. Luna and J. R. Gil-Garcia. 2017. “Understanding Public Value Creation in the Delivery of Electronic Services.” In M. Janssen, K. Axelsson, O. Glasey, B. Klievink, R. Krimmer, I. Lindgren, P. Parycek, H. J. Scholl and D. Trutnev (eds). Electronic Government. Berlin: Springer, 378 – 385.Search in Google Scholar

Madsen, Ch. Ø., J. B. Berger and M. Phythian. 2014. “The Development in Leading e-Government Articles 2001 – 2010: Definitions, Perspectives, Scope, Research Philosophies, Methods and Recommendations: An Update of Heeks and Bailur.” In M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, M. A. Wimmer and F. Bannister (eds). Electronic Government. Berlin: Springer, 17 – 34.Search in Google Scholar

Meyerhoff Nielsen, M. 2017. “Citizen Use of Government eServices: Comparing Use, Governance and Cooperation Models in Estonia and Georgia.” Paper prepared for the NISPAcee 2017 conference.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Interior, Deputy State Secretary for Information Technology. 2018. “Elektronikus közszolgáltatásokat és ügyfélszolgálati tevékenységet összefoglaló monitoring jelentés.” Available at https://nyilvantarto.hu/letoltes/statisztikak/2018_evi_adatokat_tartalmazo_monitoring_jelentes.pdf (last accessed 9 October 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Moon, M. J., J. Lee and Ch. Y. Roh. 2014. “The Evolution of Internal IT Applications and e-Government Studies in Public Administration: Research Themes and Methods.” Administration & Society 46(1), 3 – 36.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, S. D. and S. Skau. 2015. “Success Factors Influencing Implementation of E-Government at Different Stages of Maturity: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Electronic Governance 7(2), 136.Search in Google Scholar

Nicoară, A. 2018. România digital – Istoric. Lecții învățate. Opțiuni de viitor. România digital: Concepte și instrumente operaționale. București: Editura Club România.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 2009. “Rethinking e-Government Services: User-Centred Approach.” Available at http://www.oecd.org/document/7/0,3343,en_2649_34129_43864647_1_1_1_1,00.html (last accessed 16 December 2009).Search in Google Scholar

Orbán, A. 2019. “The New Customisable Electronic Administration User Interface in Hungary.” In A. Nemeslaki et al. Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2019. Wien: Austrian Computer Society, 83 – 95.Search in Google Scholar

Pásztor, M. Z. and A. Popovics. 2015. “Use of e-Government Services in Relation to Internet Use and Coverage.” Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279061310_USE_OF_EGOVERNMENT_SERVICES_IN_RELATION_TO_INTERNET_USE_AND_COVERAGE/link/5589ac2208ae4e384e25fe61/download (last accessed 8 August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Rana, N. P., Y. K. Dwivedi and M. D. Williams. 2013. “Analysing Challenges, Barriers and CSF of eGov Adoption.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 7(2), 177 – 198.Search in Google Scholar

Randma-Liiv, T. 2008. “New Public Management Versus the Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe.” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 1(2), 69 – 82.Search in Google Scholar

Rose, W. R. and G. G. Grant. 2010. “Critical Issues Pertaining to the Planning and Implementation of E-Government Initiatives.” Government Information Quarterly 27, 26 – 33.Search in Google Scholar

Șandor, S. D. 2012. “ICT and Public Administration.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 36E, 155 – 164.Search in Google Scholar

Schuppan, T. 2009. “E-Government in Developing Countries: Experiences from Sub-Saharan Africa.” Government Information Quarterly 26(2009), 118 – 127.Search in Google Scholar

Snead, J. and E. Wright. 2014. “E-Government Research in the United States.” Government Information Quarterly 31, 129 – 136.Search in Google Scholar

Špaček, D. 2015. “E-Government Policy and its Implementation in the Czech Republic: Selected Shortcomings.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 9(1), 78 – 100.Search in Google Scholar

Špaček, D. 2018. Strategy formulation in a large city – the case of Brno 2050 Strategy. Working Paper prepared for the 2018 IRSPM conference, 11. – 13. 4. 2018, Edinburg, UK, not published.Search in Google Scholar

Špaček, D. 2019. Public Administration Characteristics in the Czech Republic. Draft report prepared within the EUPACK2 project and finalized in March 2019, not published.Search in Google Scholar

Stamule, T. 2018. “Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28: Hungary.” In N. Thijs et al. (eds). Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28. Available at https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/90311e18-95fe-11e8-8bc1-01aa75ed71a1 (last accessed 8 August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Tinholt, D. et al. 2017. eGovernment Benchmark 2017: Taking Stock of User-Centric Design and Delivery of Digital Public Services in Europe. Final Background Report: Volume 2. Available at https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2017-egovernment-benchmark_background_v7.pdf (last accessed 10 April 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Tinholt, D. et al. 2018. eGovernment Benchmark 2018: Securing eGovernment for all. Background Report. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=55487 (last accessed 12 April 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Tsonev, I. et al. 2016. “Re-Designing Public Services for the 21st Century: Comparative Analysis of the e-Reforms in Estonia, Bulgaria, and Romania.” Available at https://www.liberalforum.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Redesigning_public_services_ENG_FINAL.pdf (last accessed 8 August 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Twizeyimana, J. D. and A. Andersson. 2019. “The Public Value of E-Government: A Literature Review.” Government Information Quarterly 36, 167 – 178.Search in Google Scholar

United Nations. 2018. E-Government Survey. Available at https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018 (last accessed 12 April 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Urs, N. 2018. “E-Government Development in Romanian Local Municipalities: A Complicated Story of Success and Hardships.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 55(E /2018), 118 – 129.Search in Google Scholar

Yildiz, M. 2007. “E-Government Research: Reviewing the Literature, Limitations, and Ways forward.” Government Information Quarterly 24, 646 – 665.Search in Google Scholar

Zahran, I., H. Al-Nuaim, M. Rutter and D. Benyon. 2015. “A Critical Analysis of e-Government Evaluation Models at National and Local Municipal Levels.” The Electronic Journal of e-Government Volume 13(1), 28 – 42.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, H., X. Xu and J. Xiao. 2014. “Diffusion of e-Government: A Literature Review and Directions for Future Directions.” Government Information Quarterly 31, 631 – 636.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, F., K. N. Shen and A. Collier. 2014. “Effects of National Culture on e-Government Diffusion: A Global Study of 55 Countries.” Information & Management 51, 1005 – 1016.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo