1. bookVolume 63 (2020): Issue 2 (December 2020)
Journal Details
First Published
30 Sep 2018
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
access type Open Access

Alkali-reduced Bauxite Residue as Novel SCM

Published Online: 31 Dec 2020
Page range: 1 - 20
Received: 28 Sep 2020
Accepted: 26 Nov 2020
Journal Details
First Published
30 Sep 2018
Publication timeframe
2 times per year

Bauxite residue is a major waste stream available in large volumes globally that can cause risks to the surrounding environment (e.g. ecotoxicity) when disposed and stored by conventional methods. There is yet no large-scale application and the utilization as supplementary cementitious material might be the best way to re-use bauxite residue. The main obstacle for the utilization of bauxite residue in the construction industry is the high alkalinity. This paper presents first results of a study on alkali reduction of bauxite residue by acetic acid treatment and the potential application of this alkali reduced bauxite residue as pozzolan in cementitious binders. A process of alkali reduction is presented that can help solving waste management problems of alumina refineries by transforming bauxite residue to a less hazardous waste, while producing a reactive pozzolan and Na-acetate that can find application in the construction and infrastructure market. 90% alkalinity reduction of bauxite residue could be achieved by simply washing with diluted acetic acid. Alkali-reduced bauxite residue showed good pozzolanic reactivity regarding portlandite consumption, bound water and 28-day compressive strength of mortars with 20% replacement of OPC.


1. Yang J & Xiao B: “Development of unsintered construction materials from red mud wastes produced in the sintering alumina process”. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 22, No. 12, 2008, pp. 2299-2307.Search in Google Scholar

2. Evans K: “The History, Challenges, and New Developments in the Management and Use of Bauxite Residue”. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2016, pp. 316-331.Search in Google Scholar

3. Data published annually by World Aluminium. 2020, world-aluminium.org.Search in Google Scholar

4. “International Aluminium Institute, Bauxite Residue Management: Best Practice”. London, United Kingdom, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

5. Xue S-g, Wu Y-j, Li Y-w, Kong X-f, Zhu F, William H, Li X-f & Ye Y-z: “Industrial wastes applications for alkalinity regulation in bauxite residue: A comprehensive review”. Journal of Central South University, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2019, pp. 268-288.Search in Google Scholar

6. Hind A R, Bhargava S K & Grocott S C: “The surface chemistry of Bayer process solids: a review”. Colloids and Surfaces; A: Physiochemical and Engineering Aspects, No. 146, 1998, pp. 359-374.Search in Google Scholar

7. Hertel T & Pontikes Y: “Geopolymers, inorganic polymers, alkali-activated materials and hybrid binders from bauxite residue (red mud) – Putting things in perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 258, 2020, pp. 120610.Search in Google Scholar

8. Gräfe M, Power G & Klauber C: “Bauxite residue issues: III. Alkalinity and associated chemistry”. Hydrometallurgy, Vol. 108, No. 1, 2011, pp. 60-79.Search in Google Scholar

9. CEMBUREAU: “Annual Activity Report - Built in concrete, made with cement”. The European Cement Association, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

10. WBCSD: “Cement Industry Energy and CO2 Performace - Getting the Numbers Right (GNR)”. The Cement Sustainability Initiative, 2016,.Search in Google Scholar

11. Scrivener K, Vanderley J & Gartner E: “Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry”. The United Nations Environment Programme, Paris, FRance, 2016,.Search in Google Scholar

12. Pontikes Y & Angelopoulos G N: “Bauxite residue in cement and cementitious applications: Current status and a possible way forward”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 73, 2013, pp. 53-63.Search in Google Scholar

13. Venkatesh C, Chand M S R & Nerella R: “A State of the Art on Red Mud as a Substitutional Cementitious Material”. Annales de Chimie: Science des Materiaux, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2019, pp. 99-106.Search in Google Scholar

14. Montini M, Li X, Rodrigues J A, Pileggi R G & Scrivener K. “Cementitious Activity Evaluation of Bauxite Residue and Fly Ash combination on Portland Blended Cement “. Proceedings, TRAVAUX 48, Proceedings of the 37th International ICSOBA Conference and XXV Conference “Aluminium of Siberia”, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

15. Danner T & Justnes H: “Bauxite Residue as Supplementary Cementitious Material – Efforts to Reduce the Amount of Soluble Sodium”. Nordic Concrete Research, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1-20.Search in Google Scholar

16. “Opportunities for using bauxite residue in Portland cement clinker production”. World Aluminium, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

17. Kótai L, Sajó I, Gács I, Papp K, Bartha A & Bánvölgyi G: “An Environmentally Friendly Method for Removing Sodium in Red Mud”. Chemistry Letters - CHEM LETT, Vol. 35, 2006, pp. 1278-1279.Search in Google Scholar

18. Rai S, Wasewar K, Mukhopadhyay J, Yoo C & Uslu H: “Neutralization and Utilization of red mud for its better waste management”. Arch. Environ. Sci., Vol. 6, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

19. Suss A, Damaskin A, Panov A, Fennell M & Foley S. “Specifics of Alkali Recovery from Bauxite Residue of Different Alumina Refineries”. Proceedings, TRAVAUX 48, Proceedings of the 37th International ICSOBA Conference and XXV Conference “Aluminium of Siberia”, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

20. Wang S, Nguyen T, Peng H & Huang L: “On the Mechanism of Sodic Removal from Bauxite Residue and Bauxite Desilication Products (BDP) Using Acetic Acid”. JOM, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2020, pp. 309-318.Search in Google Scholar

21. Snellings R, Chwast J, Cizer Ö, De Belie N, Dhandapani Y, Durdzinski P, Elsen J, Haufe J, Hooton D, Patapy C, Santhanam M, Scrivener K, Snoeck D, Steger L, Tongbo S, Vollpracht A, Winnefeld F & Lothenbach B: “RILEM TC-238 SCM recommendation on hydration stoppage by solvent exchange for the study of hydrate assemblages”. Materials and Structures, Vol. 51, No. 6, 2018, pp. 172.Search in Google Scholar

22. Plusquellec G, Geiker M R, Lindgård J, Duchesne J, Fournier B & De Weerdt K: “Determination of the pH and the free alkali metal content in the pore solution of concrete: Review and experimental comparison”. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 96, 2017, pp. 13-26.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kong X, Li M, Xue S, Hartley W, Chen C, Wu C, Li X & Li Y: “Acid transformation of bauxite residue: Conversion of its alkaline characteristics”. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 324, 2017, pp. 382-390.Search in Google Scholar

24. Zeng H, Lyu F, Hu G, Tang H, Wang L, Sun W, Hu Y, Liu R & Chen P. “Dealkalization of Bauxite Residue through Acid Neutralization and its Revegation Potential”. Proceedings, TRAVAUX 48, Proceedings of the 37th International ICSOBA Conference and XXV Conference “Aluminium of Siberia”, Krasnoyarsk, Russia., 2019.Search in Google Scholar

25. Scrivener K L, Juilland P & Monteiro P J M: “Advances in understanding hydration of Portland cement”. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 78, 2015, pp. 38-56.Search in Google Scholar

26. Berodier E & Scrivener K: “Understanding the Filler Effect on the Nucleation and Growth of C-S-H”. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 97, No. 12, 2014, pp. 3764-3773.Search in Google Scholar

27. Nguyen D D, Devlin L P, Koshy P & Sorrell C C: “Effects of acetic acid on early hydration of Portland cement”. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Vol. 123, No. 1, 2016, pp. 489-499.Search in Google Scholar

28. Avet F, Snellings R, Alujas Diaz A, Ben Haha M & Scrivener K: “Development of a new rapid, relevant and reliable (R3) test method to evaluate the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays”. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 85, 2016, pp. 1-11.Search in Google Scholar

29. Jawed I & Skalny J: “Alkalies in cement: A review: II. Effects of alkalies on hydration and performance of Portland cement”. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1978, pp. 37-51.Search in Google Scholar

30. XRF analysis of fly ash, data from an unpublished report. 2019.Search in Google Scholar

31. Thomas M, Supplementary Cementing Materials in Concrete. 2017: Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar

32. Shehata M H & Thomas M D A: “The effect of fly ash composition on the expansion of concrete due to alkali–silica reaction”. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 30, No. 7, 2000, pp. 1063-1072.Search in Google Scholar

33. Rønning T F, Lindgård J, Karlsen J, Heimdal E, Rodum E, Hagby C, Pedersen B & Sæter Ø: “Publikasjon nr. 21 - Bestandig betong med alkalireaktivt tilslag”. Norsk Betongforening Oslo, Norway, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

34. Bang S S & Johnston D: “Environmental Effects of Sodium Acetate/Formate Deicer, Ice Shear™”. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1998, pp. 580-587.Search in Google Scholar

35. Al-Kheetan M J & Rahman M M: “Integration of anhydrous sodium acetate (ASAc) into concrete pavement for protection against harmful impact of deicing salt”. JOM, Vol. 71, No. 12, 2019, pp. 4899-4909.Search in Google Scholar

36. Al-Kheetan M J, Ghaffar S H, Madyan O A & Rahman M M: “Development of low absorption and high-resistant sodium acetate concrete for severe environmental conditions”. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 230, 2020, pp. 117057.Search in Google Scholar

37. Justnes H: “Durable Aluminium Reinforced Environmentally-friendly Concrete Construction – DARE2C”. Nordic Concrete Research, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2017, pp. 71-81.Search in Google Scholar

38. Duflou J R, Tekkaya A E, Haase M, Welo T, Vanmeensel K, Kellens K, Dewulf W & Paraskevas D: “Environmental assessment of solid state recycling routes for aluminium alloys: Can solid state processes significantly reduce the environmental impact of aluminium recycling?”. CIRP Annals, Vol. 64, No. 1, 2015, pp. 37-40.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo