<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

During the fifty years that mark the historical reception of Apostolo Zeno’s libretto <italic>Venceslao</italic> (1703–1754), no less than forty-two opera productions based on this text were staged throughout Europe. In most cases, these performances are documented in the form of printed libretti. As far as I was able to establish, the text of <italic>Venceslao</italic> was reproduced <italic>verbatim</italic> only once: the Kraków print of 1725 is identical with the Venetian one of 1722. Otherwise, Zeno’s <italic>Venceslao</italic> was subjected to constant changes; new elements were appearing in the successive versions along with older ones, which led to the emergence of <italic>sui generis</italic> literary pasticci.
I have attempted to single out the versions which were crucial for <italic>Venceslao</italic>’s reception and determined its stages of development: 1. the Milan edition (1705/06), based on the Venetian <italic>editio princeps</italic> (1703) and the Florentine variant (1703/04); 2. the Neapolitan edition (1714/15) based on the Florentine version and, indirectly, on the Milanese one as well, 3. Domenico Lalli’s edition from Venice (1722); 4. The Turin-Prague version (1720/21–1725/26), which provided the lifeblood for later <italic>Venceslao</italic> operatic productions by the Mingottis’ troupe in Graz, Linz, Hamburg, and Copenhagen in the late 1730s and 40s. Subsequently, I have outlined the key characteristics of several unusual late <italic>Venceslao</italic> versions from Florence, Venice, and Genoa.
Finally, I have distinguished two main phases in <italic>Venceslao</italic>’s reception. The first, incorporating the first three stages, lasted till the late 1720s / early 1730s. It was characterised by strong interconnections between the successive <italic>Venceslao</italic> versions. The new editions were built on the principle of continuous elimination and accumulation of elements taken from earlier variants, mixed with new ones. The second phase, from the 1730s onwards, was characterised by loose interconnections, especially on the level of so-called numbers (arias and ensembles). It seems that Zeno’s own original versions definitely played a minor role in <italic>Venceslao</italic>’s reception on European stages as compared with editions prepared by third parties.
</abstract>

During the fifty years that mark the historical reception of Apostolo Zeno’s libretto Venceslao (1703–1754), no less than forty-two opera productions based on this text were staged throughout Europe. In most cases, these performances are documented in the form of printed libretti. As far as I was able to establish, the text of Venceslao was reproduced verbatim only once: the Kraków print of 1725 is identical with the Venetian one of 1722. Otherwise, Zeno’s Venceslao was subjected to constant changes; new elements were appearing in the successive versions along with older ones, which led to the emergence of sui generis literary pasticci.
I have attempted to single out the versions which were crucial for Venceslao’s reception and determined its stages of development: 1. the Milan edition (1705/06), based on the Venetian editio princeps (1703) and the Florentine variant (1703/04); 2. the Neapolitan edition (1714/15) based on the Florentine version and, indirectly, on the Milanese one as well, 3. Domenico Lalli’s edition from Venice (1722); 4. The Turin-Prague version (1720/21–1725/26), which provided the lifeblood for later Venceslao operatic productions by the Mingottis’ troupe in Graz, Linz, Hamburg, and Copenhagen in the late 1730s and 40s. Subsequently, I have outlined the key characteristics of several unusual late Venceslao versions from Florence, Venice, and Genoa.
Finally, I have distinguished two main phases in Venceslao’s reception. The first, incorporating the first three stages, lasted till the late 1720s / early 1730s. It was characterised by strong interconnections between the successive Venceslao versions. The new editions were built on the principle of continuous elimination and accumulation of elements taken from earlier variants, mixed with new ones. The second phase, from the 1730s onwards, was characterised by loose interconnections, especially on the level of so-called numbers (arias and ensembles). It seems that Zeno’s own original versions definitely played a minor role in Venceslao’s reception on European stages as compared with editions prepared by third parties.

Tortuous Roads. Tracing Back the Reception Paths of Apostolo Zeno’s Libretto <italic>Venceslao</italic> (1703–1754)<xref ref-type="fn" rid="j_muso-2021-0013_fn_001a">*</xref>

Musicology Today

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Tortuous Roads. Tracing Back the Reception Paths of Apostolo Zeno’s Libretto  (1703–1754)

During the fifty years that mark the historical reception of Apostolo Zeno’s libretto Venceslao (1703–1754), no less than forty-two opera productions based on...

Tortuous Roads. Tracing Back the Reception Paths of Apostolo Zeno’s Libretto Venceslao (1703–1754)*

Published Online: Dec 31, 2021

Page range: 138 - 147

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/muso-2021-0013

Keywords
Apostolo Zeno, libretto reception, editions, literary pasticci

© 2021 Anna Ryszka-Komarnicka, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Tortuous Roads. Tracing Back the Reception Paths of Apostolo Zeno’s Libretto Venceslao (1703–1754)*

Published Online: Dec 31, 2021

Page range: 138 - 147

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/muso-2021-0013

KeywordsApostolo Zeno, libretto reception, editions, literary pasticci

© 2021 Anna Ryszka-Komarnicka, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Keywords
Apostolo Zeno, libretto reception, editions, literary pasticci