1. bookVolume 20 (2020): Issue 5 (October 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1335-8871
First Published
07 Mar 2008
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Using a Gauge Block for Derivation of Parameters of Four Laser Triangulation Sensors in a Local Coordinate System

Published Online: 29 Oct 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 20 (2020) - Issue 5 (October 2020)
Page range: 210 - 217
Received: 06 Jul 2020
Accepted: 30 Sep 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1335-8871
First Published
07 Mar 2008
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The paper discusses the derivation of an accurate coordinate measuring system consisting of two, three, or four sensors based on the records of four fixed laser triangulation sensors done for a gauge block in movement. Three-dimensional case is considered. In the simulations, using a set of distances quadruplets, parameters of sensors in a local sensors coordinate system are determined through a least squares minimization process using the Differential Evolution approach. The influence of the measurement and rounding inaccuracy on the identification accuracy using numerical simulation methods are assessed.

Keywords

[1] Weckenmann, A., Kraemer, P., Hoffmann, J. (2007). Manufacturing metrology – state of the art and prospects. In: 9thInternational Symposium on Measurement and Quality Control (9thISMQC). IMEKO.Search in Google Scholar

[2] MTI Instruments, Inc. (2020) Laser triangulation sensors. https://www.mtiinstruments.com/technology-principles/laser-triangulation-sensors/.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Micro-Epsilon Messtechnik. (2020). Micro-epsilon sensors. https://www.micro-epsilon.com/.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Berkovic, G., Shafir, E. (2012). Optical methods for distance and displacement measurements. Advances in Optics and Photonics, 4(4), 441–471. https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.4.000441.10.1364/AOP.4.000441Search in Google Scholar

[5] MTI Instruments Inc. (2019). An introduction to laser triangulation sensors. https://www.azosensors.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=523.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Zhang, Z., Feng, Q., Gao, Z., Kuang, C., Fei, C., Li, Z., Ding, J. (2008). A new laser displacement sensor based on triangulation for gauge real-time measurement. Optics & Laser Technology, 40, 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2007.04.009.10.1016/j.optlastec.2007.04.009Search in Google Scholar

[7] Soave, E., D’Elia, G., Mucchi, E. (2020). A laser triangulation sensor for vibrational structural analysis and diagnostics. Measurement and Control, 53(1-2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020294019877484.10.1177/0020294019877484Search in Google Scholar

[8] Li, X.-Q., Wang, Z., Fu, L.-H. (2016). A laser-based measuring system for online quality control of car engine block. Sensors, 16(11), 1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16111877.10.3390/s16111877513453627834839Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wikimedia Foundation. (2020). Gauge block. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_block.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Storn, R. M., Price, K. V. (1995). Differential evolution – A simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. International Computer Science Institute (ICSI), TR-95-012.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Buša, J., Dovica, M., Kačmár, L. (2018). Derivation of a coordinate system of three laser triangulation sensors in a plane. In Numerical Methods and Applications: 9th International Conference. Springer, LNCS 11189, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10692-8_7.10.1007/978-3-030-10692-8_7Search in Google Scholar

[12] Price, K. V., Storn, R. M., Lampinen, J. A. (2005). Differential Evolution. A Practical Approach to Global Optimization. Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31306-0.10.1007/3-540-31306-0Search in Google Scholar

[13] Das, S., Suganthan, P. N. (2011). Differential evolution: A survey of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 15(1), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2010.2059031.10.1109/TEVC.2010.2059031Search in Google Scholar

[14] Zhabitskaya, E., Zhabitsky, M. (2013). Asynchronous differential evolution with adaptive correlation matrix. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO’13). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1145/2463372.2463428.10.1145/2463372.2463428Search in Google Scholar

[15] Zhabitskaya, E., Zhabitsky, M. (2012). Asyn-chronous differential evolution. In Mathematical Modeling and Computational Science: International Conference (MMCP 2011). Springer, LNCS 7125, 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28212-6_41.10.1007/978-3-642-28212-6_41Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zhabitsky, M. (2016). Comparison of the asynchronous differential evolution and jade minimization algorithms. EPJ Web of Conferences, 108, 02048. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201610802048.10.1051/epjconf/201610802048Search in Google Scholar

[17] Zhabitskaya, E., Zhabitsky, M. (2013). Asynchronous differential evolution with restart. In: Numerical Analysis and Its Applications: 5th International Conference (NAA 2012). Springer, LNCS 8236, 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41515-9_64.10.1007/978-3-642-41515-9_64Search in Google Scholar

[18] Eaton, J.W. (2020). GNU Octave. https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/.Search in Google Scholar

[19] The MathWorks, Inc. (2020). MATLAB. https://ch.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo