[
[1] M.S.S. Larsen, & A.H. Lassen. Design parameters for smart manufacturing innovation processes. Denmark: Elsevier B.V, 2020, pp. 365-370.10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.068
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] V. Singh, A. Kumar and T. Singh, “Impact of TQM on organisational performance: The case of Indian manufacturing and service industry,” Operations Research Perspectives 5, pp. 199-217, 2018.10.1016/j.orp.2018.07.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] S. Hannah, et al. “Identifying categories of service innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature”. Journal of Business Research, vol. 69, pp. 2401-2408, 2016.10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] K.W. Lewandowska & M.K. Olejnik. Logistics 4.0 Maturity in Service Industry: Empirical Research Results. Ireland: Elsevier B.V, 2019, pp. 1058-1065.10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.192
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] C. Oraedu. “How relationship value and quality motivate positive word-of-mouth behaviour”. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 1-24, 2020.10.1108/IJQRM-07-2018-0188
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] P. Chan-Sik, et al. “BIM-based idea bank for managing value engineering ideas”. International Journal of Project Management, pp. 699-713, 2017.10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.09.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] P.H.P. Setti, O.C. Junior, & C.C.A. Estorilio. “Integrated product development method based on Value Engineering and design for assembly concepts”. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2021.10.1016/j.jii.2020.100199
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] M.C. Peñate-Valentín, M.d.C. Sánchez-Carreira, & Á. Pereira. “The promotion of innovative service business models through public procurement: An analysis of Energy Service Companies in Spain”. Sustainable Production and Consumption, pp. 1857-1868, 2021.10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] X. Vence and Á. Pereira, “Eco-innovation and Circular Business Models as drivers for a circular economy,” Contaduría y Administración 64 (1), pp. 1-19, 2019.10.22201/fca.24488410e.2019.1806
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] F.H. Taques, M.G. Lopez, L.F. Basso, & N. Areal. “Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing”. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 6, pp. 11-26, 2021.10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] M. Lewandowski. “Designing the business models for circular economy-towards the conceptual framework”. Sustainability (Switzerland), pp. 1-28, 2016.10.3390/su8010043
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] S. Fernando, K. Panuwatwanich, & D. Thorpe. “Introducing an innovation promotion model for construction projects”. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 1-19, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] M. Cinelli, M. Kadzinski, M. Gonzalez, & R. Slowinski. “How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis?”. Omega, vol. 96, 2020.10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261797050433746337
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] E. Taghavi, A. Fallahpour, K.Y. Wong, & S.A. Hoseini. “Identifying and prioritizing the effective factors in the implementation of green supply chain management in the construction industry”. Sustainable Operations and Computers, pp. 97-106, 2021.10.1016/j.susoc.2021.05.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] M. Marzouk, & M. Sabbah. “AHP-TOPSIS social sustainability approach for selecting supplier in construction supply chain”. Cleaner Environmental Systems, vol. 2, 2021.10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] A. Haruna, N. Shafiq, & O. Montasir. “Building information modelling application for developing sustainable building”. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, pp. 293-302, 2021.10.1016/j.asej.2020.06.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] J. Aoun, et al. “A hybrid Delphi-AHP multi-criteria analysis of Moving Block and Virtual Coupling railway signalling”. Transportation Research Part C, vol. 129, 2021.10.1016/j.trc.2021.103250
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] S. Farshidi, S. Jansen, & M. Deldar. “A decision model for programming language ecosystem selection: Seven industry case studies”. Information and Software Technology, 2021.10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106640
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] S. Markovic, et al. “Business-to-business open innovation: COVID-19 lessons for small and medium-sized enterprises from emerging markets”. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 170, 2021.10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120883
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] B. Schmid, E. Raju and P. K. M. Jensen, “COVID-19 and business continuity – learning from the private sector and humanitarian actors in Kenya,” Progress in Disaster Science 11, p. 100181, 2021.10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100181
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] O. Tønnessen, A. Dhir, & B.T. Flåten. “Digital knowledge sharing and creative performance: Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic”. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 170, 2021.10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120866876462135068596
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] M. Zhong, et al. “Emerging Organic Contaminants in Chinese Surface Water: Identification of Priority Pollutants”. Engineering, 2021.10.1016/j.eng.2020.12.023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[23] M. Haddad, & D. Sanders. “Selection of discrete multiple criteria decision making methods in the presence of risk and uncertainty”. Operations Research Perspectives, vol. 5, pp. 357-370, 2018.10.1016/j.orp.2018.10.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[24] L. Miles, Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering, New York: McGraw – Hill Book Company, 1972.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[25] F. Abastante, et al. “A new parsimonious AHP methodology: assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects”. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 127, pp. 109-120, 2019.10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[26] N. Iheanachor, Y. David-West, & I. O. Umukoro. “Business model innovation at the bottom of the pyramid – A case of mobile money agents”. Journal of Business Research, vol. 127, pp. 96-107, 2021.10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.029796063133814650
]Search in Google Scholar
