1. bookVolume 29 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Superstructure of ISO/TS 16949 for the Measurement of Material-Technological Parameters of the Products in Automotive Production

Published Online: 24 Jun 2021
Page range: 178 - 183
Received: 01 Sep 2020
Accepted: 01 May 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The paper is aimed at measuring innovation and qualification of technological operations in automotive production within the quality management system. Quality requirements according to ISO/TS 16949 promote a process approach for the design and development, production, installation and servicing of automotive products, which can result in increased quality, reduced variation and increase of efficiency. The solution focuses on the process of approval of parts in series production (Production Part Approval Process – PPAP). The PPAP purpose is to determine whether an organization properly understood all customer requirements listed in the specifications and records of the technical design of the product. PPAP further verifies that the process has the potential to produce a product in series production so that customer requirements will be met, in actual production volume and at the agreed rate of production. Specifically, a toothed winch of hydroelectric generator is solved by the case study.

Keywords

[1] J. Smutná, R. Farana. “Understanding the quality concept in the higher education”. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, vol. 15, no 1, 2010, pp. 54-57. Search in Google Scholar

[2] K. Chad. “Effective ISO/TS 16949 Audits“. Quality, vol. 45, no 2, 2006, pp. 44-47. Search in Google Scholar

[3] P.W. Brennecke. “Safety Aspects in Radioactive Waste Management”. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, vol. 12, no 1, 2007, pp. 42-47. Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. Lavrin, M. Zelko. “Moving toward the digital factory in raw material resources area”. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, vol. 15, no 3, 2010, pp. 225-231. Search in Google Scholar

[5] A.B. Pop, A.M. Ţîţu. “Implementation of Advanced Product Quality Planning in the Aerospace Industry A Way to improve the Quality Management. Calitatea: Access la Success; Bucharest”. QualityAccess to Success, vol. 21, no 177, 2020, pp. 56-61. Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Kuba. (2012). Production and Part Approval Process. Available: <https://members.marticonet.sk/jkuba/QMS/PPAP%20prirucka.pdf>. Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. Hasan, S. Shah and J. Gao. “A collaboration framework to support decision making in new product development with the supply chain,” In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Manufacturing Research (ICMR2013), Cranfield University, UK, 19th-20th September 2013, pp. 531-536. Search in Google Scholar

[8] D.C. Montgomery. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. Sixth Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2009. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Z. Alot. “The Model of the Production Process for the Quality Management”. Foundations of Management, vol. 9, no 1, 2017, pp. 43-60. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Z. Alot, W. Izdebski.” Identification of model of the production process for the purposes of quality management.” Materialy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Sotsial’no-ekonomi-cheskoye razvitiye organizatsiy iregionov Belarusi: effektivnost’ iinnovatsii” (ed. Vankevich Ye.V., Sharstnev V.L., Kasayeva T.V., Prokof’yeva N.L., Savitskaya T.B., Yasheva. Witebsk: UO “WGTU”, 2015, pp. 84-96. Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. Gonos, M. Muchová, L. Domaracká. “Controlling as an efficient tool for the strategic management of industrial companies”. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, vol. 21, no 3, 2016, pp. 229-237. Search in Google Scholar

[12] K. Jiang, D.P. Lepak, J. Hu and J.C. Baer. “How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms”. AMJ, vol 55, 2012, pp. 1264-1294, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088. Search in Google Scholar

[13] D.F. Dianda, M.B. Quaglino, J.A. Pagura. “Performance of Multivariate Process Capability Indices Under Normal and Non-Normal Distributions”. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 32, no 7, 2016, pp. 2165-2632. Search in Google Scholar

[14] H.Ch. Co. Effectiveness of high-priority supplier selection process for advanced product quality planning implementation on new model programs at a North American automaker. Eastern Michigan University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

[15] A.R. Mileham, S.J. Culley, G.W. Owen, R.I. McIntosh. “Rapid changeover – a pre-requisite for responsive manufacture”. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 19, no 8, 1999, pp. 785-796. Search in Google Scholar

[16] B. Tanguy, J. Besson, R. Piques, A. Pineau. “Ductile to brittle transition of an A508 steel characterized by Charpy impact test: Part II: Modelling of the Charpy transition curve”. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 72, no 3, 2005, pp. 413-434. Search in Google Scholar

[17] J.S. Oakland. Total Quality Management and Operational Excellence: Text with Cases. Fourth Edition. New York, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[18] K.L. Chen, K.S. Chen, R.K. Li. “Suppliers capability and price analysis chart”. International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 98, no 3, 2005, pp. 315-327. Search in Google Scholar

[19] M.A. Broy. “A logical approach to systems engineering artifacts: semantic relationships and dependencies beyond traceability – from requirements to functional and architectural views”. Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 17, no 2. 2018, pp. 365-393. Search in Google Scholar

[20] F. Misopoulos, R. Michaelides, M. Salehuddin, V. Manthou, Z. Michaelides. “Addressing Organisational Pressures as Drivers towards Sustainability in Manufacturing Projects and Project Management Methodologies”. Sustainability, vol. 10, no 6, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kulkarni, Damodar, Deore, Pankaj. “Cost reduction in Low-cost Emerging Economies for Sustainable Growth – Principles, Processes, Tools & Techniques”. SAE Technical Paper Series. 2015. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Hebei Shida Seal Group Co. (2016). Ltd. Production Part Approval Process (PPAP). Available: <http://www.shida-rubber.com/technical-resources/production-part-approval-process-ppap/>. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Y. J. Chen. “Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain”. Journal of Information science, vol. 18, no 1, 2010, pp. 1651-1670. Search in Google Scholar

[24] PPAP Documents. (2017). Available <http://ppapdocuments.com/ppap-documents/. Search in Google Scholar

[25] I. Petrašová I. Proces schvalování dílů do sériové výroby (PPAP): referenční příručka. 4. vyd. Praha: Česká společnost pro jakost. 69 p. 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[26] B. Jung Hyun, H. Tack-Don. „PPAP: Perspective Projection Augment Platform with Pan – Tilt Actuation for Improved Spatial Perception“. Sensors, vol. 19, no 12, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[27] D. Edgar. “Valid data demanded”. Modern machine shop, vol. 88, no 11, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

[28] D. McCoy. Production Part Approval Process (PPAP). Global Standard. 2010. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo