1. bookVolume 28 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Integrating Principles of Excellence and of Socially Responsible Entrepreneurship

Published Online: 17 Mar 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 28 (2020) - Issue 1 (March 2020)
Page range: 23 - 28
Received: 01 Sep 2018
Accepted: 01 Mar 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Social responsibility is seen as an institutional innovation, which leads to a chance of social rules. Social responsibility also stimulates other types of innovation, which could work as feedback to keep or as a strategic change of social responsibility. The strategy for improvement of quality creates opportunities to identify and to learn from those who are farther along the road to exceptionality and have improved quality or their products and services by improving their organization. The initiative to improve quality of products and services by improving the organization has to be based on clearly defined principles that help define key functions that support organization’s activities, required resources and serve as supporting tools to improve quality. For an organization to have long term and continuous success it needs to fulfill expectations of all stakeholders and as part of this we can discuss Corporate Social Responsibility – CSR. This includes behaviour of organizations that goes beyond the prescribed legislative requirements, but includes activities that benefit not only the organization itself, but also its employees and the public.

Keywords

[1] B. Burg, Mann, J. D. „Giving it your all – five principles for creating a culture of Excellence“. Qual. Particip. 31 (1), 7-11, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[2] F. Luthans, P. J. Doh. „International Management: Culture, Strategy and´d Behavior“. 7. Edition New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,2009. pp. 619, 14-4. 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[3] E. Sujová, H. Čierna, „Corporate culture as a tool to improve safety culture“ In: Management Systems in Production Engineering“. Vol. 11, no. 3. pp. 49-52. 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[4] H. Čierna. „ Spoločensky zodpovedné podnikanie a model výnimočnosti“. Banská Bystrica UMB EF, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[5] H. Čierna, E. Sujová, M. Ťavodová. “Vybrané aspekty manažmentu pre technikov“. Zvolen: TU vo Zvolene, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[6] M.J. Ligarski, “Problem identification method in certified quality management systems”, Quality & Quantity, vol. 46(1), pp. 315-321. 2012.10.1007/s11135-010-9356-2Search in Google Scholar

[7] M. Molenda, Effectiveness of planning internal audits of the quality system”, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie, no. 32, z. 1, pp. 48-54. 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Molenda, “The intelligent integrated system management”, in Proc. of the 15th Int. Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2015 - Ecology, economics, education and legislation, Environmental economics, education & accreditation in geosciences, vol. 3, Albena, Bulgaria, pp. 681-688, 2015.10.5593/SGEM2015/B53/S21.088Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Molenda, I. Ratman-Kłosińska, E. Sujova, „Enviromental Technology Verification: The European Scheme as a New Quality in Validating The Performance of Ecoinnovation“. [In]: 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM, 2017. Conference Proceedings Volume 17. Ecology, economics, education and legislation, Issue 51. Ecology and Environmental Protection. Bulgaria, Albena, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. Nenadál, D. Noskievičová, R. Perříková a spol. 2008. Moderní management jakosti. Praha. ISBN 978-80-7261-186-7, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Národný program kvality Slovenskej republiky. 2016. Úrad pre normalizáciu mertológiu a skúšobníctvo Slovenskej republiky. www.npksr.sk/národný-program-kvality, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Onwuegbuzie, A., Leech, N.: Taking the „Q“ out of research: teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality & Quantity, 39(3), 267-295, 2005.10.1007/s11135-004-1670-0Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Hąbek, & J. Brodny, “Corporate Social Responsibility Report – An Important Tool to Communicate with Stakeholders”. 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences & Arts SGEM, Conference Proceedings, Volume 5, Business and Management, Albena, Bulgaria, https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[14] P. Hąbek, R. Wolniak, „Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states”, Quality & Quantity, vol. 50 (1), pp 399-420, 2016.10.1007/s11135-014-0155-z470511726792950Search in Google Scholar

[15] P. Hąbek. „Evaluation of sustainability reporting practices in Poland“. Quality & Quantity. 48(3), 1739-1752, 2014.10.1007/s11135-013-9871-zSearch in Google Scholar

[16] R. Mullerat. International Corporate Social Responsibilizy: The Role of Corpirations in the Economic Order of the 21st Century. Kluwer Law Intrernational, pp 510. ISBN 978-9-04-11-2590-3, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[17] R.W.Griffin, M.W.Pustay. „International business: A managerial perspective“. 5. Edition Pheonix: Quebecor World – Versailles. pp 632, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo