Thematic Issue: Re-inventing territorial organization of the local tier: municipal splits in Central and Eastern Europe. Guest Editors: Pawel Swianiewicz, Katarzyna Szmigiel-Rawska
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Băcanu, PM 2010, ‘Cum ar trebui să arate harta redesenată a României?’ [‘How should Romania’s redrawn map look like?’], România liberă, 11 March. Available from: <https://romanialibera.ro/opinii/interviuri/cum-ar-trebui-sa-arateharta-redesenata-a-romaniei-179771.html>. [28 March 2020].BăcanuPM2010‘Cum ar trebui să arate harta redesenată a României?’ [‘How should Romania’s redrawn map look like?’]11MarchAvailable from: <https://romanialibera.ro/opinii/interviuri/cum-ar-trebui-sa-arateharta-redesenata-a-romaniei-179771.html>. [28 March 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Bakk, M & Szász, AZ 2010, ‘Conflict and convergence: Regionalisation plans and autonomy movements in Romania’, European and Regional Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–32.BakkMSzászAZ2010‘Conflict and convergence: Regionalisation plans and autonomy movements in Romania’111932Search in Google Scholar
Benedek, J & Bajtalan, H 2015, ‘Recent regionalization discourses and projects in Romania with special focus on the Székelyland’, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 11, no. 44, pp. 23–41.BenedekJBajtalanH2015‘Recent regionalization discourses and projects in Romania with special focus on the Székelyland’11442341Search in Google Scholar
Bochsler, D & Szöcsik, E 2013, ‘The forbidden fruit of federalism: Evidence from Romania and Slovakia’, West European Politics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 426–446.BochslerDSzöcsikE2013‘The forbidden fruit of federalism: Evidence from Romania and Slovakia’36242644610.4324/9781003061410-7Search in Google Scholar
Brink, A 2004, ‘The break-up of municipalities: Voting behavior in local referenda’, Economics of Governance, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 119–135.BrinkA2004‘The break-up of municipalities: Voting behavior in local referenda’5211913510.1007/s10101-003-0068-0Search in Google Scholar
Chen, P 2002, ‘They’re not like us: The de-amalgamation process of Delatite Shire’, Paper proceedings of the Jubilee Conference of the Australian Political Science Association, Canberra, Australian National University. Available from <http://hdl.handle.net/11343/33707>. [28 March 2020].ChenP2002‘They’re not like us: The de-amalgamation process of Delatite Shire’CanberraAustralian National UniversityAvailable from <http://hdl.handle.net/11343/33707>. [28 March 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Dobre, AM 2009, ‘The dynamics of europeanisation and regionalisation: Regional reform in Romania’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 181–194.DobreAM2009‘The dynamics of europeanisation and regionalisation: Regional reform in Romania’10218119410.1080/15705850902899222Search in Google Scholar
Dollery, B, Kortt, M & Grant, B 2011, ‘A normative model for local government de-amalgamation in Australia’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 601–615.DolleryBKorttMGrantB2011‘A normative model for local government de-amalgamation in Australia’46460161510.1080/10361146.2011.623670Search in Google Scholar
Drew, J & Dollery, B 2014, ‘Separation anxiety: an empirical evaluation of the Australian Sunshine Coast Regional Council de-amalgamation’, Public Money & Management, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 213–220.DrewJDolleryB2014‘Separation anxiety: an empirical evaluation of the Australian Sunshine Coast Regional Council de-amalgamation’34321322010.1080/09540962.2014.908032Search in Google Scholar
Drew, J, Razin, E & Andrews, R 2019, ‘Rhetoric in municipal amalgamations: a comparative analysis’, Local Government Studies, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 748–767.DrewJRazinEAndrewsR2019‘Rhetoric in municipal amalgamations: a comparative analysis’45574876710.1080/03003930.2018.1530657Search in Google Scholar
Erlingsson, GÓ 2005, ‘Modelling secessions from municipalities’, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 141–159.ErlingssonGÓ2005‘Modelling secessions from municipalities’28214115910.1111/j.0080-6757.2005.00125.xSearch in Google Scholar
Gheorghiță, A 2010, Lideri politici și construcția deciziei de vot [Political leaders and the construction of voting decisions], Institutul European, Iași.GheorghițăA2010Institutul EuropeanIașiSearch in Google Scholar
Guvernul României [Government of Romania] 2001a, Hotărâre nr. 455 din 2001 privind aprobarea Planului de acţiune al Programului de guvernare pe perioada 2001-2004 [Decision no. 455 from 2001 approving the Action Plan of the 2001-2004 Governing Programme]. Monitorul Oficial, No. 267, Part I.Guvernul României [Government of Romania]2001aHotărâre nr. 455 din 2001 privind aprobarea Planului de acţiune al Programului de guvernare pe perioada 2001–2004 [Decision no. 455 from 2001 approving the Action Plan of the 2001–2004 Governing Programme]No. 267, Part I.Search in Google Scholar
Guvernul României [Government of Romania] 2001b, Hotărârea nr. 1006 din 2001 pentru aprobarea Strategiei Guvernului privind accelerarea reformei în administrația publică [Decision no. 1006 from 2001 approving the Government Strategy for the Acceleration of Public Administration Reform]. Monitorul Oficial, No. 660, Part I.Guvernul României [Government of Romania]2001bHotărârea nr. 1006 din 2001 pentru aprobarea Strategiei Guvernului privind accelerarea reformei în administrația publică [Decision no. 1006 from 2001 approving the Government Strategy for the Acceleration of Public Administration Reform]No. 660, Part I.Search in Google Scholar
Guvernul României [Government of Romania] 2016, ‘Participarea premierului Dacian Cioloș la cea de-a XIX-a sesiune ordinară a Adunării Generale a Asociaţiei Comunelor din România’ [The participation of prime-minister Dacian Cioloș to the XIXth meeting of the General Assembly of the Association of Communes from Romania]. Available from: <https://gov.ro/ro/stiri/comunicat-de-presa-si-discurs-participareapremierului-dacian-ciolos-la-ev-asociatiei-comunelor-din-romania>. [28 March 2020].Guvernul României [Government of Romania]2016Available from: <https://gov.ro/ro/stiri/comunicat-de-presa-si-discurs-participareapremierului-dacian-ciolos-la-ev-asociatiei-comunelor-din-romania>. [28 March 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Hsieh, H-F & Shannon, SE 2005, ‘Three approaches to qualitative content analysis’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277–1288.HsiehH-FShannonSE2005‘Three approaches to qualitative content analysis’1591277128810.1177/104973230527668716204405Search in Google Scholar
Iordan, I & Alexandrescu, V 1996, ‘Consideraţii geografice privind reorganizarea administrativă a teritoriului României’ [‘Geogrpahical assessment on the administrative reorganisation of Romanian territory‘], Revista Geografică, no. II–III, pp. 118–121.IordanIAlexandrescuV1996‘Consideraţii geografice privind reorganizarea administrativă a teritoriului României’ [‘Geogrpahical assessment on the administrative reorganisation of Romanian territory‘]II–III118121Search in Google Scholar
Kopric, I 2012, ‘Consolidation, fragmentation, and special statuses of local authorities in Europe’, Croatian & Comparative Public Administration, vol. 12, p. 1175–1196.KopricI2012‘Consolidation, fragmentation, and special statuses of local authorities in Europe’1211751196Search in Google Scholar
Lima, RC de A & Silveira Neto, R da M 2018, ‘Secession of municipalities and economies of scale: Evidence from Brazil’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 159–180.LimaRC de ASilveira NetoR da M2018‘Secession of municipalities and economies of scale: Evidence from Brazil’58115918010.1111/jors.12348Search in Google Scholar
Maxfield, E 2012, ‘Resistance to change: Romania’s debate over territorial reforms’, Sfera Politicii, vol. 20, no. 167, pp. 12–20.MaxfieldE2012‘Resistance to change: Romania’s debate over territorial reforms’201671220Search in Google Scholar
Miljan, LA & Spicer, Z 2015, De-Amalgamation in Canada: Breaking up is hard to do, Fraser Institute. Available from: <https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/de-amalgamation-in-canada.pdf>. [28 March 2020].MiljanLASpicerZ2015Fraser InstituteAvailable from: <https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/de-amalgamation-in-canada.pdf>. [28 March 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării Rurale [Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development] 2008, ‘Programul Naţional de Dezvoltare Rurală 2007–2013’ [‘National Rural Development Programme 2007–2013’]. Available from: <http://old.madr.ro/pages/dezvoltare_rurala/pndr_versiune_februarie_2008.pdf>. [28 March 2020].Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării RuraleAvailable from: <http://old.madr.ro/pages/dezvoltare_rurala/pndr_versiune_februarie_2008.pdf>. [28 March 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Nistor, IS 2000, Comuna şi judeţul. Evoluţia istorică [The commune and the county. The historical evolution], Dacia, Cluj-Napoca.NistorIS2000DaciaCluj-NapocaSearch in Google Scholar
O’Dwyer, C 2006, ‘Reforming regional governance in East Central Europe: Europeanization or domestic politics as usual?’, East European Politics & Societies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 219–253.O’DwyerC2006‘Reforming regional governance in East Central Europe: Europeanization or domestic politics as usual?’20221925310.1177/0888325404271286Search in Google Scholar
Parlamentul României [Parliament of Romania] 2000, Program de guvernare din 28 decembrie 2000 pe perioada 2001–2004 [Governing Programme from December 28, 2000 for 2001–2004]. Monitorul Oficial, No. 700, Part I.Parlamentul României [Parliament of Romania]2000Program de guvernare din 28 decembrie 2000 pe perioada 2001–2004 [Governing Programme from December 28, 2000 for 2001–2004]No. 700, Part I.Search in Google Scholar
Parlamentul României [Parliament of Romania] 2001a, Lege nr. 215 din 23 aprilie 2001 a administraţiei publice locale [Law no. 215 from April 23, 2001 on local public administration]. Monitorul Oficial, No. 204, Part I.Parlamentul României [Parliament of Romania]2001aLege nr. 215 din 23 aprilie 2001 a administraţiei publice locale [Law no. 215 from April 23, 2001 on local public administration]No. 204, Part I.10.1080/014904001316896909Search in Google Scholar
Parlamentul României [Parliament of Romania] 2001b, Lege nr. 351 din 6 iulie 2001 privind aprobarea Planului de amenajare a teritoriului național - Secțiunea a IV-a Rețeaua de localități [Law no. 351 from July 6, 2001 approving the National Spatial Plan – Section IV the network of localities]. Monitorul Oficial, No. 408, Part I.Parlamentul României [Parliament of Romania]2001bLege nr. 351 din 6 iulie 2001 privind aprobarea Planului de amenajare a teritoriului național - Secțiunea a IV-a Rețeaua de localități [Law no. 351 from July 6, 2001 approving the National Spatial Plan – Section IV the network of localities]No. 408, Part I.Search in Google Scholar
Preda, C 2013, ‘Partide, voturi şi mandate la alegerile din România (1990–2012)’ [‘Parties, votes and seats in Romanian elections (1990–2012)’], Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 27–110.PredaC2013‘Partide, voturi şi mandate la alegerile din România (1990–2012)’ [‘Parties, votes and seats in Romanian elections (1990–2012)’]13127110Search in Google Scholar
Preda, C & Soare, S 2008, Regimul, partidele și sistemul politic din România [The regime, the parties and the political system of Romania], Nemira, București.PredaCSoareS2008NemiraBucureștiSearch in Google Scholar
Profiroiu, CM, Profiroiu, AG & Szabo, SR 2017, ‘The decentralization process in Romania’ in The Palgrave Handbook of Decentralisation in Europe, eds JM Ruano & M Profiroiu, Springer, Cham, pp. 353–387.ProfiroiuCMProfiroiuAGSzaboSR2017‘The decentralization process in Romania’inedsRuanoJMProfiroiuMSpringerCham35338710.1007/978-3-319-32437-1_14Search in Google Scholar
Profiroiu, CM & Profiroiu, AG 2006, ‘Decentralization process in Romania’, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 2, no. 16, pp. 115–123.ProfiroiuCMProfiroiuAG2006‘Decentralization process in Romania’21611512310.1007/978-3-319-32437-1_14Search in Google Scholar
Săgeată, R 2011, ‘Administrative reforms in Romania-between political reasons and geographical realities’, Geograful/The geographer, vol. III, no. 1–2, pp. 3–26.SăgeatăR2011‘Administrative reforms in Romania-between political reasons and geographical realities’III1–2326Search in Google Scholar
Săgeată, R 2012, ‘Inter-communal cooperation and regional development: The case of Romania’, Quaestiones Geographicae, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 95–106.SăgeatăR2012‘Inter-communal cooperation and regional development: The case of Romania’3129510610.2478/v10117-012-0022-8Search in Google Scholar
Skaburskis, A 1992, ‘Goals for restructuring local government boundaries: Canadian lessons’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 159–172.SkaburskisA1992‘Goals for restructuring local government boundaries: Canadian lessons’10215917210.1068/c100159Search in Google Scholar
Soare, FS 2013, ‘IICCMER – 45 de ani de la ultima reorganizarea administrativ-teritorială a României’ [‘IICCMER – 45 years since Romania’s last administrative-territorial reorganisation’], IICCMER. Available from: <https://www.iiccr.ro/45-de-ani-de-la-ultima-reorganizarea-administrativteritoriala-a-romaniei/>. [28 March 2020].SoareFS2013‘IICCMER – 45 de ani de la ultima reorganizarea administrativ-teritorială a României’ [‘IICCMER – 45 years since Romania’s last administrative-territorial reorganisation’]Available from: <https://www.iiccr.ro/45-de-ani-de-la-ultima-reorganizarea-administrativteritoriala-a-romaniei/>. [28 March 2020].Search in Google Scholar
de Souza, SV, Dollery, BE & Kortt, MA 2015, ‘De-Amalgamation in action: The Queensland experience’, Public Management Review, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1403–1424.de SouzaSVDolleryBEKorttMA2015‘De-Amalgamation in action: The Queensland experience’17101403142410.1080/14719037.2014.930506Search in Google Scholar
Stănuș, C 2018, ‘The architecture of a complex system: The Oradea metropolitan area in Romania’ in Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe: Institutions and Governance, eds F Teles & P Swianiewicz, Springer, Cham, pp. 293–303.StănușC2018‘The architecture of a complex system: The Oradea metropolitan area in Romania’inedsTelesFSwianiewiczPSpringerCham29330310.1007/978-3-319-62819-6_16Search in Google Scholar
Stănuş, C & Pop, D 2011, ‘Romania’ in The Second Tier of Local Government in Europe: Provinces, Counties, Départements and Landkreise in Comparison, eds H Heinelt & X Bertrana, Routledge, London, pp. 223–241.StănuşCPopD2011‘Romania’inedsHeineltHBertranaXRoutledgeLondon22324110.4324/9781003009672-46Search in Google Scholar
Ștefan, L, Grecu, R, Todor, A & Cristescu, R 2004, ‘Local elections 2004: a turning point in Romanian politics’, Romanian Journal of Society and Politics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 66–126.ȘtefanLGrecuRTodorACristescuR2004‘Local elections 2004: a turning point in Romanian politics’4266126Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, R, Kaiser, C & Eythórsson, GT 2016, ‘A comparative analysis of amalgamation reforms in selected European countries’ in Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons, eds S Kuhlmann & G Bouckaert, Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 23–42.SteinerRKaiserCEythórssonGT2016‘A comparative analysis of amalgamation reforms in selected European countries’inedsKuhlmannSBouckaertGPalgrave MacmillanUK, London234210.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_2Search in Google Scholar
Swianiewicz, P 2010, ‘If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? An East European perspective’, Local Government Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 183–203.SwianiewiczP2010‘If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? An East European perspective’36218320310.1080/03003930903560547Search in Google Scholar
Swianiewicz, P 2018, ‘If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? – Ten years later’, Local Government Studies, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–10.SwianiewiczP2018‘If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? – Ten years later’44111010.1080/03003930.2017.1403903Search in Google Scholar
Swianiewicz, P 2021, ‘From post-communist democratic laissez-fair to prevention of territorial fragmentation: tightening rules of municipal splits in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990’, Miscellanea Geographica - Regional Studies on Development, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5–17.SwianiewiczP2021‘From post-communist democratic laissez-fair to prevention of territorial fragmentation: tightening rules of municipal splits in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990’25151710.2478/mgrsd-2020-0046Search in Google Scholar
Swianiewicz, P & Łukomska, J 2019, ‘Is small beautiful? The quasi-experimental analysis of the impact of territorial fragmentation on costs in Polish local governments’, Urban Affairs Review, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 832–855.SwianiewiczPŁukomskaJ2019‘Is small beautiful? The quasi-experimental analysis of the impact of territorial fragmentation on costs in Polish local governments’55383285510.1177/1078087417744676Search in Google Scholar
Tanguay, GA & Wihry, DF 2008, ‘Voters’ preferences regarding municipal consolidation: Evidence from the Quebec de-merger referenda’, Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 325–345.TanguayGAWihryDF2008‘Voters’ preferences regarding municipal consolidation: Evidence from the Quebec de-merger referenda’30332534510.1111/j.1467-9906.2008.00398.xSearch in Google Scholar
Tavares, AF 2018, ‘Municipal amalgamations and their effects: a literature review’, Miscellanea Geographica, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5–15.TavaresAF2018‘Municipal amalgamations and their effects: a literature review’22151510.2478/mgrsd-2018-0005Search in Google Scholar
Yoder, JA 2003, ‘Decentralisation and regionalisation after communism: Administrative and territorial reform in Poland and the Czech Republic’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 263–286.YoderJA2003‘Decentralisation and regionalisation after communism: Administrative and territorial reform in Poland and the Czech Republic’55226328610.1080/0966813032000055877Search in Google Scholar
Ziarul de Iași 1998, ‘LNJAD cere înființarea urgentă a județelor abuziv desființate’ [‘LNJAD demands the urgent reinstatement of abusively amalgamated counties’], Ziarul de Iași 4 December. Available from: <https://www.ziaruldeiasi.ro/local/suceava/lnjad-cere-infiintarea-urgentaa-judetelor-abuziv-desfiintate~nil2t>. [28 March 2020].Ziarul de Iași1998‘LNJAD cere înființarea urgentă a județelor abuziv desființate’ [‘LNJAD demands the urgent reinstatement of abusively amalgamated counties’]4DecemberAvailable from: <https://www.ziaruldeiasi.ro/local/suceava/lnjad-cere-infiintarea-urgentaa-judetelor-abuziv-desfiintate~nil2t>. [28 March 2020].Search in Google Scholar