[
Babbie, E. (2011). The Basics of Social Research, Fifth edition. Cengage Learning.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bábíková, A. (2019). Leaders in Rural Development Structures (Case Study on the Territory of the LAG Dolní Morava, Moravia). European Countryside, 11(3), 404–416. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baldersheim, H., Bucek, J., & Swianiewicz, P. (2002). Mayors Learning across Borders: The International Networks of Municipalities in East-Central Europe. Regional and Federal Studies, 12(1), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/714004723
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barke, M., & Newton, M. (1997). The EU LEADER Initiative and Endogenous Rural Development: the Application of the Programme in Two Rural Areas of Andalusia, Southern Spain. Journal of Rural Studies, 13(3), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00027-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bedrac, M., & Cunder, T. (2010). “Leader” approach and local development strategies in Slovenia. In A. Fieldsend (Ed.), Linking competitiveness with equity and sustainability: new ideas for the socio-economic development of rural areas (pp. 245–256). European Rural Development Network.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biczkowski, M., Jezierska-Thöle, A., & Rudnicki, R. (2021). The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland. Agriculture, 11(3), 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030253
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Binek, J., Konečný, O., Šilhan, Z., Svobodová, H., & Chaloupková, M. (2020). Místní akční skupiny: leadeři venkova? GaREP.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Böhm, H., Boháč, A., & Wróblewski, Ł. (2023). Evaluation of cross-border cooperation in Czechia since 1993: Euroregions on the way to authentic cross-border regions? Geografický Časopis—Geographical Journal, 75(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.31577/geogrcas.2023.75.3.13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Böhm, H., & Drápela, E. (2017). Cross-border cooperation as a reconciliation tool: Example from the East Czech-Polish borders. Regional and Federal Studies, 27(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1350650
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Böhm, H., & Opioła, W. (2019). Czech–Polish Cross-Border (Non) Cooperation in the Field of the Labor Market: Why Does It Seem to Be Un-De-Bordered? Sustainability, 11(10), 2855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102855
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Böhm, H., Opioła, W., & Siatkowski, J. (2021). Cross-border Cultural Cooperation as the Principle Paradiplomacy Form: Evidence from the Czech-Polish Borderland. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 5(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.30819/cmse.5-1.08
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Böhm, H., & Šmída, J. (2019). Borders on the old maps of Jizera Mountain. Miscellanea Geographica—Regional Studies on Development, 23(4), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2019-0021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bosworth, G., Rizzo, F., Marquardt, D., Strijker, D., Haartsen, T., & Aagaard Thuesen, A. (2016). Identifying social innovations in European local rural development initiatives. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 29(4), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1176555
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cańete, A. J., Navarro, F. & Cejudo, E. (2018). Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain). European Planning Studies, 26(4), 726–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1424118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carmin, J. (2010). NGO capacity and environmental governance in Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica, 45(1–2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2009.21
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carmin, J., Hicks, B., & Beckmann, A. (2003). Leveraging Local Action Grassroots Initiatives and Transboundary Collaboration in the Formation of the White Carpathian Euroregion. International Sociology, 18(4), 703–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580903184004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Charycka, B., Gumkowska, M., & Bednarek, J. (2022). The Capacity of NGOs in Poland: Key Facts. The Klon/Jawor Association.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chloupkova, J., Svendsen, G. L. H. & Svendsen, G. T. (2003). Building and destroying social capital: The case of cooperative movements in Denmark and Poland. Agriculture and Human Values, 20(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026141807305
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chmieliński, P. (2011). On Community Involvement in Rural Development – a Case of Leader Programme in Poland. Economics and Sociology, 4(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2011/4-2/11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chmieliński, P., Faccilongo, N., Fiore, M., & La Sala, P. (2018). Design and implementation of the Local Development Strategy: a case study of Polish and Italian Local Action Groups in 2007–2013. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 120(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1726
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Conway, G., & Waage, J. (2010). Science and Innovation for Development. UK Collaborative on Development Sciences (UKCDS).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Da Re, R., Franceschetti, G., & Pisani, E. (2017). LEADER and Social Capital in Veneto: The Case Studies of Prealpi e Dolomiti and Bassa Padovana Local Action Groups. In E. Pisani, G. Franceschetti, L. Secco & A. Christoforou (Eds.), Social Capital and Local Development. From Theory to Empirics (pp. 305–326). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Luca, A. I., Iofrida, N., Gulisano, G., & Strano, A. (2018). Toward an evaluation model for transnational cooperation activities in rural areas: a case study within an EU LEADER project. Bulletin of Geography. Socio–economic Series, 42, 19–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2018-0029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doitchinova, J., Stoyanova, Z., & Harizanova-Bartos, H. (2019). Innovative Approaches and Innovations in Rural Development in Bulgaria. CBU International Conference Proceedings, 7: 81–87. https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v7.1344
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dołzbłasz, S. (2013). Cross-Border Co-Operation in the Euroregions at the Polish-Czech and Polish-Slovak Borders. European Countryside, 5(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2013-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dołzbłasz, S. (2015). Symmetry or asymmetry? Cross-border openness of service providers in Polish-Czech and Polish-German border towns. Moravian Geographical Reports, 23(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2015-0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dołzbłasz, S. (2017). From Divided to Shared Spaces: Transborder Tourism in the Polish-Czech Borderlands. In D. Hall (Ed.), Tourism and geopolitics: issues and concepts from Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 163–177). CABI.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dołzbłasz, S., & Raczyk, A. (2015). Different Borders—Different Cooperation? Transborder Cooperation in Poland. Geographical Review, 105(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2015.12077.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duguet, D. (2006). Networking: The Leader experience. Leader+ Observatory Contact Point.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duguet, D. (2007). Cooperation in Leader+. The actual benefits for the local areas. Leader Observatory Contact Point.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dvořáková Líšková, Z., Klufová, R., & Rost, M. (2019). Ex-post Evaluation of Local Action Groups in LEADER Programme (Visegrád Countries). DETUROPE – The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism, 11(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.32725/det.2019.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EKOTOXA & IREAS (2016). EX-post hodnocení Programu rozvoje venkova ČR za období 2007–2013. Závěrečná zpráva EKOTOXA, s. r. o.; IREAS centrum, s. r. o.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esparcia, J., & Abbasi, F. (2020). Territorial Governance and Rural Development: Challenge or Reality? In E. Cejudo & F. Navarro (Eds.), Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas (pp. 33–60). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esparcia, J., Escribano, J., & Serrano, J. J. (2015). From development to power relations and territorial governance: Increasing the leadership role of LEADER Local Action Groups in Spain. Journal of Rural Studies, 42, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2006). The LEADER approach: a basic guide. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2008). The EU rural development policy: facing the challenges. European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2018). European Structural and Investment Funds. Guidance for Local Actors on Community-Led Local Development (EGESIF_18-0034-00; 17/09/2018). European Commission.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Floriańczyk, Z., Janc, K., & Czapiewski, K. Ł. (2012). The importance and diffusion of knowledge in the agricultural sector: the Polish experiences. Geographia Polonica, 85(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2012.1.4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furmankiewicz, M. (2005). Town-twinning as a factor generating international flows of goods and people—the example of Poland. Belgeo. Revue belge de géographie, 1–2, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.12466
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furmankiewicz, M. (2007). International Cooperation of Polish Municipalities: Directions and Effects. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(3), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00402.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furmankiewicz, M., Knieć, W., & Atterton, J. (2015). Rural governance in the new EU member states: The experience of the Polish LEADER+ Pilot Programme (2004–2008). In J. Buček & A. Ryder (Eds.), Governance in Transition (pp. 133–153). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furmankiewicz, M., Macken-Walsh, Á. & Stefańska, J. (2014). Territorial governance, networks and power: cross-sectoral partnerships in rural Poland. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 96(4), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12056
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furmankiewicz, M., & Trnková, G. (2022). Cross-border Cooperation Between Local Action Groups from Poland and the Czech Republic: Three Case Studies. Hradec Economic Days, 12(1), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.36689/uhk/hed/2022-01-020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gąsior-Niemiec, A., & Pawłowska, A. (2014). Local Self-Government as an Architect of Coalitions for Local Development. Journal of Universal Excellence, 3(4), A1–A17. https://www.fos-unm.si/media/pdf/RUO_2014_31_Gasior.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guzal-Dec, D. (2018). Local Action Groups as a New Marketing Entity in Local Governments: a Case Study from the Lubelskie Province. Olsztyn Economic Journal, 13(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.31648/oej.2770
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heidenreich, M. (2019). The Europeanisation of social fields and the social space: a theoretical framework. In M. Heidenreich (Ed.), Horizontal Europeanisation: The Transnationalisation of Daily Life and Social Fields in Europe (pp. 9–35). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffmann, R., & Hoffmann, N. (2018). The LEADER Programme as an Impulse for New Projects in Rural Areas. Quaestiones Geographicae, 37(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jędruch, M., Furmankiewicz, M., & Kaczmarek, I. (2020). Spatial Analysis of Asymmetry in the Development of Tourism Infrastructure in the Borderlands: The Case of the Bystrzyckie and Orlickie Mountains. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(8), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9080470
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kachniarz, M., Szewranski, S., & Kazak, J. (2019). The Use of European Funds in Polish and Czech Municipalities. A Study of the Lower Silesia Voivodship and Hradec Kralove Region. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(11), 112047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/11/112047
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kafarski, K., & Kazak, J. K. (2022). Erasmus Staff Mobility in the Building of a European Network: The Case of a Central European University. Sustainability, 14(9), 4949. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094949
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kalisiak-Mędelska, M. (2013). Partnerstwo lokalne – istota i znaczenie na przykładzie lokalnych grup działania. Biblioteka Regionalisty, 13, 73–96. https://doi.org/10.15611/br.2013.1.06
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kis, K., & Szekeresne, K. R. (2011). Opportunities and obstacles of area-based partnerships in rural Hungary – main features of the operations of Leader Local Action Groups based on nationwide survey. APSTRACT – Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 5(3–4), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.19041/Apstract/2011/3-4/19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kola-Bezka, M. (2020). Community-led local development in urban and other areas: lessons from Kujawsko-Pomorskie voivodship. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 19, 505–521. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2020.034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kolejka, J., Żyszkowska, W., Batelková, K., Ciok, S., Dołzbłasz, S., Kirchner, K., …, & Zapletalová, J. (2015). Permeability of Czech-Polish border using by selected criteria. Geographia Technica, 10(1), 51–65. https://technicalgeography.org/pdf/1_2015/06_kolejka.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konečný, O. (2019). The Leader Approach Across The European Union: One Method of Rural Development, Many Forms of Implementation. European Countryside, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konečný, O., Binek, J., & Svobodová, H. (2020). The Rise and Limits of Local Governance: LEADER/Community-Led Local Development in the Czech Republic. In C. N. Silva (Ed.), Contemporary Trends in Local Governance. Reform, Cooperation and Citizen Participation (pp. 173–193). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koschatzky, K. (2000). A river is a river–Cross-border networking between Baden and Alsace. European Planning Studies, 8(4). 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/713666422
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kovács, K., Brooks, E., Zamfir, G. I., Shucksmith, M., & Nemes, G. (2023). Autonomy and LEADER. A comparative study of three local action groups. In M. Fritsch, P. Kahila, S. Németh, & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Spatial Justice and Cohesion. The Role of Place-Based Action in Community Development (pp. 247–269). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krasniqi, N. (2020). The Role and Impact of Local Action Groups in Rural Development of Kosovo. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 55(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.17306/J.JARD.2020.01306
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and Questionnaire Design. In P. V. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of Survey Research, Second Edition (pp. 263–313). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, M. (2014). European Integration and Rural Development: Actors, Institutions and Power. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lacquement, G., Chevalier, P., Navarro, F., & Cejudo, E. (2020). Public Action and Territorial Development: The LEADER Approach in the Recomposition of Rural Spaces in Languedoc-Roussillon (France) and Andalusia (Spain). In E. Cejudo & F. Navarro (Eds.), Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas. Results and Lessons (pp. 63–86). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lengerer, F., Haartsen, T., & Steinführer, A. (2023). Exploring Justice in the Process of Redesigning Local Development Strategies for LEADER: Representation, Distribution, and Recognition. World, 4(1), 56–79. https://doi.org/10.3390/world4010005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lepik, K., & Bremse, A. (2013). The Nordic-Baltic LEADER Cooperation Award. Maamajanduse Infokeskus – Rural Economy Research Centre.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lošťák, M., & Hudečková, H. (2010). Preliminary impacts of the LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics, 56(6), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.17221/27/2010-AGRICECON
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lucke, B., & Bellocchi, E. (1997). A Europe of towns and cities. A practical guide to town-twinning. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macken-Walsh, Á. (2009). Post-socialist community action in Lithuania. Community Development Journal, 44(4), 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marhoff, J. (2019). A LEADER Journey through Rural Europe: National LAG Networks Revealing the Diversity of LEADER Implementation. MINHA TERRA & ELARD.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martín-Uceda, J., & Jańczak, J. (2018). A View of German-Polish Cross-Border Cooperation: an Experience from the 2007–2013 INTERREG Programme. Pogranicze. Polish Borderlands Studies, 6(3), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.25167/ppbs369
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marquardt, D., Möllers, J., & Buchenrieder, G. (2009). EU-wide networking: an instrumental valuable for European rural development policies in Romania. European Countryside 1(4), 210–226.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marquardt, D., Möllers, J., & Buchenrieder, G. (2011). Why Do We Need Networking for European Rural Development Policies? The implementation of LEADER and the National Network for Rural Development in Romania. EuroChoices, 10(2), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2011.00196.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCall, C., & Williamson, A. (2000). Fledgling social partnership in the Irish Border Region: European Union ‘Community Initiatives’ and the voluntary sector. Policy and Politics, 28(3), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573002501045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, S. (2014). Emerging Trends and Challenges in Community-Led Local Development (CLLD). European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 2, 302–307. https://estif.lexxion.eu/article/ESTIF/2014/4/7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moseley, M. J. (2003). Local Partnerships for Rural Development. The European Experience. CABI Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks—a new paradigm of rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 16(4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00022-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nadalutti, E. (2015). The Effects of Europeanization on the Integration Process in the Upper Adriatic Region. Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Navarro, F. A., Woods, M., & Cejudo, E. (2016). The LEADER Initiative has been a Victim of Its Own Success. The Decline of the Bottom-Up Approach in Rural Development Programmes. The Cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(2), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12079
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Second Edition. Sage Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NSMAS (2015). Metoda LEADER. Komunitně vedený místní rozvoj (CLLD). Rozvoj venkova se zapojením místních komunit. Národní síť Místních akčních skupin České republiky.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NSMAS (2021). Výroční zpráva o činnosti a hospodaření spolku. Národní síť Místních akčních skupin České republiky.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nunn, S., & Rosentraub, M. S. (1997). Dimension of interjurisdictional cooperation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975915
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Opria, A.-M., Roşu, L., & Corodescu-Roşca, E. (2023). West–East Differences in LEADER Program Results – The Expression of Wider Political and Governance Systems. In G. Ruepert & T. Ilić (Eds.), Young Geographers. Showcasing Research Contributions in Geography (pp. 19–35). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pappalardo, G., Sisto, R., & Pecorino, B. (2018). Is the Partnership Governance Able to Promote Endogenous Rural Development? A Preliminary Assessment Under the Adaptive Co-Management Approach. European Countryside, 10(4), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pawłowska, A. (2016). Territorial Partnerships—Utilitarian Constructions or Genuine Ingenuities: The Case of Local Action Groups in Sub-Carpathia. Contemporary European Studies, 2, 19–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pisani, E. & Burighel, L. (2014). Structures and dynamics of transnational cooperation networks: evidence based on Local Action Groups in the Veneto Region, Italy. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 3(3), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.13128/BAE-14681
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Potocki, J., Kachniarz, M., & Piepiora, Z. (2014). Sudetes—cross-border region? In P. Jedlicka (Ed.), Hradec Economic Days Vol. 4(2). Double-blind peer-reviewed proceedings part V. of the international scientific conference Hradec Economic Days 2014. Economic Development and Management of Regions, February 4th and 5th, 2014 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (pp. 191–200). Gaudeamus.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Průša, J., Konečný, O., Hrabák, J. & Lošťák, M. (2022). Beyond the story of the LEADER projects: Are organic farmers actors of multifunctionality and rural development? Land Use Policy, 116, 106046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Przybyła, K., & Kulczyk-Dynowska, A. (2017). Transformations of Tourist Functions in Urban Areas of the Karkonosze Mountains. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245(7), 072001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/7/072001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pylkkänen, P., Hyyryläinen, T., & Navarro, F. (2020). Transnational Cooperation—The Underutilized Potential of the European LEADER Method. In E. Cejudo & F. Navarro (Eds.), Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas. Results and Lessons (pp. 133–148). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ray, C. (2000). The EU LEADER Programme: Rural Development Laboratory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00138
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ray, C. (2001). Transnational co-operation between rural areas: Elements of a political economy of EU rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 41(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00183
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 278–291). Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Qualitative Analysis: What It Is and How to Begin. Research in Nursing and Health, 18(4), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180411
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saraceno, E. (1999). The Evaluation of Local Policy Making in Europe: Learning from the LEADER Community Initiative. Evaluation, 5(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/135638999400830101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šaradín, P., & Zapletalová, M. (2022). Innovative Democratic Potential of Local Action Groups: The Case of ‘Moravian Way’ LAG (Czech Republic). Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 18(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.943
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scheuch, E. K. (1993). The Cross-Cultural Use of Sample Surveys: Problems of Comparability. Historical Social Research, 18(2), 104–138. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.18.1993.2.104-138
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schiller, H. (2008). Networks of Local Action Groups in Rural Areas. The example of the EU Initiative Broads and Rivers LEADER+. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott, J. W. (2018). Rebordering Central and Eastern Europe Cohesion Policy, cross-border cooperation and ‘differential Europeanisation’. In G. Lux & G. Horváth (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Regional Development in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 175–187). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Servillo, L., & De Bruijn, M. (2018). From LEADER to CLLD: The Adoption of the New Fund Opportunities and of Their Local Development Options. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 6(3), 223–233. https://estif.lexxion.eu/article/estif/2018/3/5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shishkova, M. (2020). Implementation of Community-Led Local Development strategies – evidence from southern Bulgaria. Scientific Papers-Series Management Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 20(3), 537–542. https://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.20_3/Art58.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sikorski, D., Latocha, A., Szmytkie, R., Kajdanek, K., Miodońska, P., & Tomczak, P. (2020). Functional changes in peripheral mountainous areas in East Central Europe between 2004 and 2016 as an aspect of rural revival? Kłodzko County case study. Applied Geography, 122, 102223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102223
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silina, L., Zvaigzne, A., & Diman, Z. (2012). Implementation Evaluation of Strategies of Local Action Groups in Latvia. European Integration Studies, 6, 69–76 http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.6.1501
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simard, J.-F., & Chiasson, G. (2008). Introduction. Territorial governance: a new take on development. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 31(3), 471–485.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Srsen, R., Murciano, M., Niedermoser, S., Eckhardt, M., Tammets, K., & Tillemann, K. (2017). Results of the reviews of the local development strategies in Borjomi, Kazbegi and Lagodekhi area. European LEADER Association for Rural Development.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šťastná, M., & Vaishar, A. (2023). Opportunities for the Development of a Borderland Rural Territory: A Case Study of the Hlučín Region. Quaestiones Geographicae, 42(4), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2023-0036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sykała, Ł., Dej, M., & Wolski, O. (2015). The LEADER Method. Transferring Experience of the Visegrad Group Countries to Georgia. Institute of Urban Development.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sykes W., & Collins M. (1988), Effects of mode of interview: experiments in the UK. In R. M. Groves, P. P. Biemer, L. E. Lyberg, J. T. Massey, W. L. Nicholls II, & J. Waksberg (Eds.), Telephone survey methodology (pp. 301–320). John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SZIF (2015). Realizace projektů spolupráce [dataset]. Státní zemědělský intervenční fond. https://www.szif.cz/cs/realizace-projektu-spoluprace.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SZIF (2023). 19.3.1 – Příprava a provádění činností spolupráce místní akční skupiny – Zpravodajství [dataset]. Státní zemědělský intervenční fond. https://www.szif.cz/cs/prv2014-1931
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thuesen, A. A. (2011). Partnerships as Associations: Input and Output Legitimacy of LEADER Partnerships in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548469
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trnková, G. (2021). The Economic and Social Importance of Farm Diversification towards Nonagricultural Activities in EU. Hradec Economic Days 11(1), 823–831. https://doi.org/10.36689/uhk/hed/2021-01-081
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vaishar, A., Dvořák, P., Hubačíková, V., & Zapletalová, J. (2013). Contemporary development of peripheral parts of the Czech-Polish borderland: Case study of the Javorník area. Geographia Polonica, 86(3), 237–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2013.21
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voth, A. (2024). The Role of Cooperation and Tourism in Rural Development – Long-term Research Activities in the Alpujarra of Almería (Spain). In E. Cejudo-García, F. A. Navarro-Valverde, & J. A. Cańete-Pérez (Eds.), Win or Lose in Rural Development. Case Studies from Europe (pp. 167–189). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska, A. (2017). Znaczenie podejścia LEADER 2007–2013 w rozwoju współpracy międzyregionalnej na obszarach wiejskich w Polsce. Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu, 19(5), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.6240
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Won Lee, I., & Jun Park, H. (2007). Choosing sides: Formation of regional partnership for economic development in metropolitan area and landscape theory of aggregation. International Review of Public Administration, 12(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2007.10805092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zabielska, I. (2020). Cooperation, partnership and integration in the cross-border area: the role of borders and cross-border cooperation. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 19(3), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2020.038
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zajda, K. (2013). Cooperation between local action groups. Comparison of networks created by organizations from the Lubuskie and Małopolskie voivodeships. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 1(27), 233–247. http://hdl.handle.net/11089/5789
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zajda, K. (2014a). New forms of social capital of rural areas. A case study of selected Polish local action groups. Lambert Academic Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zajda, K. (2014b). Problems of functioning of Polish local action groups from the perspective of the social capital concept. Eastern European Countryside, 20(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2014-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zajda, K. K. (2023). What Features Distinguish the Rural Nongovernmental Organisations that Implement Social Innovations? Evidence from Postcommunist Poland. Voluntas, 34, 1221–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00546-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zajda, K., Kołomycew, A., Sykała, Ł., & Janas, K. (2017). Leader and Community-Led Development Approach. Polish Experiences. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Züll, C. (2016). Open-Ended Questions. GESIS Survey Guidelines. GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15465/gesis-sg_en_002
]Search in Google Scholar