<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>An improved understanding of the geographical unevenness of the global energy transition is important. The concept of ‘sociotechnical imaginaries’ has been used extensively for understanding how desired technology futures are envisioned and differentially articulated in various contexts. Supplementing this, the concept of ‘nature imaginaries’ is proposed in this article, to specifically address collective moral visions of human/nature relations that underwrite discourses and actions by various actors. Nature plays an active role in both types of imaginaries. Their complex interactions play a part in how energy transitions unfold. The article uses this framework for a description of the energy situation in Iceland, and its largely successful transition towards renewable energy through the development of hydropower and geothermal resources. Particular sociotechnical and nature imaginaries, sometimes opposed to each other, are discernible. The article argues that the analysis of conflicting imaginaries at work in specific energy transitions might help in identifying leverage points from where it is possible to work in a small way towards a global transition.</p>
</abstract>

An improved understanding of the geographical unevenness of the global energy transition is important. The concept of ‘sociotechnical imaginaries’ has been used extensively for understanding how desired technology futures are envisioned and differentially articulated in various contexts. Supplementing this, the concept of ‘nature imaginaries’ is proposed in this article, to specifically address collective moral visions of human/nature relations that underwrite discourses and actions by various actors. Nature plays an active role in both types of imaginaries. Their complex interactions play a part in how energy transitions unfold. The article uses this framework for a description of the energy situation in Iceland, and its largely successful transition towards renewable energy through the development of hydropower and geothermal resources. Particular sociotechnical and nature imaginaries, sometimes opposed to each other, are discernible. The article argues that the analysis of conflicting imaginaries at work in specific energy transitions might help in identifying leverage points from where it is possible to work in a small way towards a global transition.

Conflicting imaginaries in the energy transition? Nature and renewable energy in Iceland

Department of Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences

Moravian Geographical Reports

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

An improved understanding of the geographical unevenness of the global energy transition is important. The concept of ‘sociotechnical imaginaries’ has been...

Conflicting imaginaries in the energy transition? Nature and renewable energy in Iceland

Published Online: Jul 15, 2021

Page range: 88 - 100

Received: Oct 07, 2020

Accepted: Jan 11, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2021-0008

Keywords
sociotechnical imaginary, nature imaginary, energy transition, renewable energy, energy landscape, Iceland

© 2021 Karl Benediktsson, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Conflicting imaginaries in the energy transition? Nature and renewable energy in Iceland

Published Online: Jul 15, 2021

Page range: 88 - 100

Received: Oct 07, 2020

Accepted: Jan 11, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2021-0008

Keywordssociotechnical imaginary, nature imaginary, energy transition, renewable energy, energy landscape, Iceland

© 2021 Karl Benediktsson, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Keywords
sociotechnical imaginary, nature imaginary, energy transition, renewable energy, energy landscape, Iceland