Open Access

Technological relatedness, knowledge space and smart specialisation: The case of Germany


Cite

ACS, Z., AUDRETSCH, D. B. (1989): Patents as a measure of innovative activity. Kyklos, 42(2): 171–180.10.1111/j.1467-6435.1989.tb00186.xSearch in Google Scholar

AGHION, P., HOWITT, P. (1990): A model of growth through creative destruction (No. 3223). Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w3223Search in Google Scholar

ARCHIBUGI, D., PIANTA, M. (1992): Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: The analysis of patent data. Research Policy, 21(1): 79–93.10.1016/0048-7333(92)90028-3Search in Google Scholar

ASHEIM, B. T., GERTLER, M. S. (2005): The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R. [eds.] (2005): The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford, Oxford University Press10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

AUDRETSCH, D. B., FELDMAN, M. P. (1996): R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American economic review, 86(3): 630–640.Search in Google Scholar

BAIER, E., KROLL, H., ZENKER, A. (2013): Templates of smart specialization: Experiences of place based regional development strategies in Germany and Austria. (Working Papers Firms and Region, R5/2013). Karlsruhe, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI [online] [cit. 10.05.2018]. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/74482/1/745637779.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

BALLAND, P. A., RIGBY, D. (2017): The geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography, 93(1): 1–23.10.1080/00130095.2016.1205947Search in Google Scholar

BALLAND, P. A., BOSCHMA, R., CRESPO, J., RIGBY, D. L. (2017): Relatedness, knowledge complexity and technological opportunities of regions: A framework for smart specialisation. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography. 17.17. Utrecht, Utrecht University.Search in Google Scholar

BATHELT, H., MALMBERG, A., MASKELL, P. (2004): Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in human geography, 28(1): 31–56.10.1191/0309132504ph469oaSearch in Google Scholar

BAYERISCHE STAATSREGIERUNG (2011): Gesamtkonzept für die Forschungs-, Technologie- und Innovationspolitik der Bayerischen Staatsregierung. [online] [cit. 10.05.2018]. Available at: http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/20182/229963/DE_Bayern_RIS3_201105_Final.pdf/dc9a6e62-c1c1-4a2d-b624-7fccf3fa0988)Search in Google Scholar

BEAUDRY, C., SCHIFFAUEROVA, A. (2009): Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research policy, 38(2): 318–337.10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010Search in Google Scholar

BEISE, M., STAHL, H. (1999): Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Research policy, 28(4): 397–422.10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00126-7Search in Google Scholar

BOSCHMA, R. (2005): Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional studies, 39(1): 61–74.10.1080/0034340052000320887Search in Google Scholar

BOSCHMA, R., FRENKEN, K. (2011): The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of economic geography, 11(2): 295–307.10.1093/jeg/lbq053Search in Google Scholar

BOSCHMA, R., IAMMARINO, S. (2009): Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85(3): 289–311.10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.xSearch in Google Scholar

BOSCHMA, R., MINONDO, A., MIKEL, N. (2013): Related variety and regional growth in Spain, Papers in Regional Sciences, 91 (2): 241–256.10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00387.xSearch in Google Scholar

BRESCHI, S., LISSONI, F., MALERBA, F. (2003): Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1): 69–87.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5Search in Google Scholar

BRÜLHART, M.; TRAEGER, R. (2005): An account of geographic concentration patterns in Europe. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(6): 597–624.10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.09.002Search in Google Scholar

COHEN, W. M., LEVINTHAL, D. A. (1990): Absorptive capacity: A new prospective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128–152.10.2307/2393553Search in Google Scholar

COHEN, W. M., GOTO, A., NAGATA, A., NELSON, R. R., WALSH, J. P. (2002): R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research policy, 31(8–9): 1349–1367.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00068-9Search in Google Scholar

CORONADO, D., FLORES, E. MARTÍNEZ, M. Á. (2017). The role of regional economic specialization in the production of university-owned patents. Annals of Regional Science. 59(2): 513–533.10.1007/s00168-017-0843-4Search in Google Scholar

CYTOSCAPE (2017): Cytoscape Manuals [online]. Available at: http://www.cytoscape.org/manual/Search in Google Scholar

EFRE NRW (2014): Regionale Innovationsstrategie des Landes Nordrhein Westfalen im Rahmen der EU-Strukturfonds 2014–2020 [online]. Available at: https://www.efre.nrw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Programmtexte/Regionale_Innovationsstrategie.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2016): RIO Country Report 2016: Germany [online]. Available at: https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/file/10849/download?token=H_FUucshSearch in Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2018): Smart Specialization Platform [online]. Available at: s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.euSearch in Google Scholar

FORAY, D., DAVID, P. A.; HALL, B. (2009): Smart specialisation–the concept. Knowledge economists policy brief, 9(85): 100.Search in Google Scholar

FREISTAAT SACHSEN (2013): Innovationsstrategie des Freistaates Sachsen [online]. Available at: http://www.innovationsstrategie.sachsen.de/download/Innovationsstrategie_des_Freistaates_Sachsen.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

FRENKEN, K., BOSCHMA, R. A. (2007): A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of economic geography, 7(5): 635–649.10.1093/jeg/lbm018Search in Google Scholar

GERTLER, M. S. (2003): Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of economic geography, 3(1): 75–99.10.1093/jeg/3.1.75Search in Google Scholar

GRILICHES, Z. (1998): R&D and productivity. Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research Books.Search in Google Scholar

GRUPP, H. (1998). Foundations of the Economics of Innovation. Books. Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781035303649Search in Google Scholar

HALL, B. H., JAFFE, A. B., TRAJTENBERG, M. (2001): The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (No. 8498). Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w8498Search in Google Scholar

HIDALGO, C. A., KLINGER, B., BARABÁSI, A. L., HAUSMANN, R. (2007): The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837): 482–487.10.1126/science.114458117656717Search in Google Scholar

IAMMARINO, S., MCCANN, P. (2006): The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Research policy, 35(7): 1018–1036.10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.004Search in Google Scholar

JOO, S. H., KIM, Y. (2010): Measuring relatedness between technological fields. Scientometrics, 83(2): 435–454.10.1007/s11192-009-0108-9Search in Google Scholar

KIESE, M. (2008): Mind the Gap: regionale Clusterpolitik im Spannungsfeld von wissenschaft, politik und praxis aus der perspektive der neuen politischen Ökonomie. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftsgeographie, 52(1): 129–145.10.1515/zfw.2008.0011Search in Google Scholar

KIESE, M., WROBEL, M. (2011): A public choice prospective on regional cluster and network promotion in Germany. European Planning Studies, 19(10): 1691–1712.10.1080/09654313.2011.615134Search in Google Scholar

KIESE, M. (2012): Regionale Clusterpolitik in Deutschland: Bestandsaufnahme und interregionaler Vergleich im Spannungsfeld von Theorie und Praxis. Marburg, Metropolis.Search in Google Scholar

KOGLER, D. F., RIGBY, D. L., TUCKER, I. (2013): Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities. European Planning Studies, 21(9): 1374–1391.10.1080/09654313.2012.755832Search in Google Scholar

KOGLER, D. F., ESSLETZBICHLER, J., RIGBY, D. L. (2017): The evolution of specialization in the EU 15 knowledge space. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(2): 345–373.10.1093/jeg/lbw024Search in Google Scholar

KOGLER, D., WHITTLE, A. (2018): The Geography of Knowledge Creation: Technological Relatedness and Regional Smart Specialization Strategies. In: Paasi, A., Harrison, J., Jones, M. [eds.] (2018): Handbook on the Geographies of Regions and Territories. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781785365805.00022Search in Google Scholar

KOSCHATZKY, K., KROLL, H., SCHNABL, E., STAHLECKER, T. (2017): Cluster policy adjustments in the context of smart specialization? Impressions from Germany. The Life Cycle of Clusters: A Policy Prospective, 173.10.4337/9781784719289.00018Search in Google Scholar

KROLL, H., BÖKE, I., SCHILLER, D., STAHLECKER, T. (2016): Bringing owls to Athens? The transformative potential of RIS3 for innovation policy in Germany’s Federal States. European Planning Studies, 24(8): 1459–1477.10.1080/09654313.2016.1159666Search in Google Scholar

LETEN, B., BELDERBOS, R., VAN LOOY, B. (2007): Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6): 567–579.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00272.xSearch in Google Scholar

MARTIN, R., SUNLEY, P. (2006): Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of economic geography, 6(4): 395–437.10.1093/jeg/lbl012Search in Google Scholar

MASKELL, P., MALMBERG, A. (2007): Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5): 603–618.10.1093/jeg/lbm020Search in Google Scholar

MORGAN, K. (2015): Smart Specialisation: Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policy, Regional Studies 49(3): 480–482.10.1080/00343404.2015.1007572Search in Google Scholar

McCANN, P., ORTEGA-ARGILÉS, R. (2015): Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8): 1291–1302.10.1080/00343404.2013.799769Search in Google Scholar

NAUWELAERS, C., MAGRO, E., ARANGUREN, M. J., NAVARRO, M., WILSON, J., TRIPPL, M., HEALY, A. (2014): Smart specialization for regional innovation. Underpinning effective strategy design: Reflection paper. Workpackage 4. Seventh Framework Programme.Search in Google Scholar

NEFFKE, F., HENNING, M., BOSCHMA, R. (2011): How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3): 237–265.10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.xSearch in Google Scholar

OECD (2011): OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011: Innovation and Growth in Knowledge Economies. Paris, OECD.Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2013): Innovation-driven Growth in Regions: The Role of Smart Specialisation [online]. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/smart-specialisation.pdf#page113Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2016): OECD REGPAT database [online]. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/the-oecd-regpat-database_241437144144Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2017): Innovation and technology statistics [online]. Available at: https://data.oecd.org/innovation-and-technology.htmSearch in Google Scholar

ORTEGA–ARGILÉS, R. (2012): The transatlantic productivity gap: a survey of the main causes. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(3): 395–419.10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00725.xSearch in Google Scholar

PAVITT, K. (1982): R&D, patenting and innovative activities: a statistical exploration. Research Policy, 11(1): 33–51.10.1016/0048-7333(82)90005-1Search in Google Scholar

PETERS, B. (2008): Innovation and firm performance: An empirical investigation for German firms. Springer Science & Business Media.Search in Google Scholar

PONDS, R., OORT, F. V., FRENKEN, K. (2009): Innovation, spillovers and university–industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2): 231–255.10.1093/jeg/lbp036Search in Google Scholar

RIGBY, D. L., ESSLETZBICHLER, J. (1997): Evolution, process variety, and regional trajectories of technological change in US manufacturing. Economic Geography, 73(3): 269–284.10.2307/144484Search in Google Scholar

RIGBY, D. L. (2015): Technological relatedness and knowledge space: entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies, 49(11): 1922–1937.10.1080/00343404.2013.854878Search in Google Scholar

SANTOALHA, A. (2016): New Indicators of Smart Specialization: A related diversification approach applied to European Regions. Working Paper No. 20161220. Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.Search in Google Scholar

SAXENIAN, A. (1996): Regional advantage. Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjnrsqhSearch in Google Scholar

SCHANKERMAN, M., PAKES, A. (1985): Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During thePost-1950 Period. Economic Journal, 96(384): 1052–1076.10.3386/w1650Search in Google Scholar

SCHERER, F. M. (1982): Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. The review of economics and statistics, 627–634.10.2307/1923947Search in Google Scholar

SONN, J. W.; STORPER, M. (2008): The increasing importance of geographical proximity in knowledge production: an analysis of US patent citations, 1975–1997. Environment and Planning A, 40(5): 1020–1039.10.1068/a3930Search in Google Scholar

SUEDEKUM, J. (2006): Concentration and specialization trends in Germany since re-unification. Regional Studies, 40(8): 861–873.10.1080/00343400600985087Search in Google Scholar

TANRIVERDI, H., VENKATRAMAN, N. (2005): Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2): 97–119.10.1002/smj.435Search in Google Scholar

TEECE, D. J., RUMELT, R., DOSI, G., WINTER, S. (1994): Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 23(1): 1–30.10.1016/0167-2681(94)90094-9Search in Google Scholar

VLČKOVÁ J., NOSEK, V., NOVOTNÝ, J. LUPÍŠEK, A. (2015): Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade in Central Europe between 1995 and 2008. Moravian Geographial Reports 23(4): 2–13.10.1515/mgr-2015-0020Search in Google Scholar

VLČKOVÁ, J., KASPŘÍKOVÁ, N. (2015): Knowledge relatedness and knowledge space based on EPO patents. Prague economic papers, 2015(4): 399–415.10.18267/j.pep.544Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1210-8812
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Business and Economics, Business Management, Industries, Environmental Management, Geosciences, Geography