Density-Based Topological Optimization of 3D-Printed Casts for Fracture Treatment with Freefem Software

1 Ranaldo, D., Zonta, F., Florian, S., & Lazzaro, J. (2023). A Facile, Semi-Automatic Protocol for the Design and Production of 3D Printed, Anatomical Customized Orthopedic Casts for Forearm Fractures. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 42, 102206. Search in Google Scholar

2 Lin, H., Shi, L., & Wang, D. (2015). A Rapid and Intelligent Designing Technique for Patient-Specific and 3D-Printed Orthopedic Cast. 3D Printing in Medicine, 2 (1), 4. Search in Google Scholar

3 Zhang, X., Fang, G., Dai, Ch., Verlinden, J., Wu, J., Whiting, E. & Wang, Ch. (2017). Thermal-comfort design of personalized casts. In UIST ‘17: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 243–254). ACM, New York, USA. Search in Google Scholar

4 Rao, C., Tianc, L., Yan, D.-M., Liao, Sh., Deussen, O. & Lu, L. (2019). Computer Aided Geometric Design, 71, 130–141. Search in Google Scholar

5 Zhang, Y., & Kwok, Tsz. (2019). Customization and Topology Optimization of Compression Casts/Braces on Two-Manifold Surfaces. Computer-Aided Design, 111, 113–122. Search in Google Scholar

6 Sigmund, O., & Maute, K. (2013). Topology Optimization Approaches. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48, 1031–1055. Search in Google Scholar

7 Bendsoe, M. P. (1989). Optimal Shape Design as a Material Distribution Problem. Structural Optimization, 1, 193–202. Search in Google Scholar

8 Hecht, F. (2012). New Development in FreeFem++. Journal of Numerical Mathematics, 20, 251–265. Search in Google Scholar

9 Bonnetier, E., & Dapogny, C. (n.d.). Optimization of a Cantilever Beam with Density-Based Topology Optimization Algorithm. An Introduction to Shape and Topology Optimization. Available at https://membres-ljk.imag.fr/Charles.Dapogny/coursoptim.html Search in Google Scholar

10 Geuzaine, C., & Remacle, J.-F. (2009). Gmsh: A 3-D Finite Element Mesh Generator with Built-in Pre- and Post-Processing Facilities. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 79, 1309–1331. Search in Google Scholar

11 Balarac, G., Basile, F., Bénard, F. P., Bordeu, F., Chapelier, J.-B., Cirrottola, L., … & Zakari, M. (2022). Tetrahedral Remeshing in the Context of Large-Scale Numerical Simulation and High Performance Computing. MathematicS In Action, 11 (1), 129–164. Search in Google Scholar

12 Pszczółkowski, B., Nowak, K.W., Rejmer, W., Bramowicz, M., Dzadz, Ł., & Gałęcki, R. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young’s Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method. Materials, 15, 149. Search in Google Scholar

13 Van Kuilenburg, J., Masen, M. A., & van der Heide, E. (2012). Contact Modelling of Human Skin: What Value to Use for the Modulus of Elasticity? Proc IMechE Part J: J. Engineering Tribology, 227 (4), 349–361. Search in Google Scholar