[
Barsalou, L. W., 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barthes, R., 1975. S/Z. London: Jonathan Cape.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolisani, E., Bratianu, C., 2018. The elusive definition of knowledge. In Bolisani, E., Bratianu, C., Emergent knowledge strategies: Strategic thinking in knowledge management. Cham etc.: Springer, pp. 1–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bunnell, P., 2015. Dancing with ambiguity. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 22(4), 101–112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiu, C., 2011. Language and Culture. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 4(2), available at: < https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1098 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., 2014. Linguistic embodiment and verbal constraints: human cognition and the scales of time. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, available at: < DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01085. >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., Gahrn-Andersen, R., 2022. Simplexifying: harnessing the power of enlanguaged cognition. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 18(1), 97–119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S., Kuhle, A., 2020. The rise of languaging. Biosystems, 198, 104264, available at: < doi. org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104264 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davidson, A., 2019. Writing: re-constructing language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eco, U., 1987. Meaning and denotation. Synthese, 73(3), 549–568.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foerster, H. von, 1973. On constructing a reality. In Preiser, W. F. E. (Ed.), Environmental design research, Vol. 2. Stroudsburg PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, pp. 35–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foerster, H. von, 2002. Vision, language and knowledge: The double blind. In Schnitman, D. F., Schnitman, J. (Eds.), New Paradigms, Culture, and Subjectivity. Hampton Press, Cresskill NJ, pp. 65–81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frege, G., 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, N. F., Vol. 100/1, 25–50. English transl.: Frege, G., Sense and reference. In Moore, A. W. (Ed.), 1993, Meaning and reference. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frixione, M., Lieto, A., 2014. Concepts, perception and the dual process theories of mind. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, Vol. 9, available at: < https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-3676.1084 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gahrn-Andersen, R., 2019. But language too is material! Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18, 169–183.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gahrn-Andersen, R., 2023. Perception as conceptual orderliness in enlanguaged practices. In Secchi, D., Gahrn-Andersen, R., Cowley, S. J. (Eds.), Organizational cognition: The theory of social organizing. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, V., Lakoff, G., 2005. The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gardelle, L., Sorlin, S. (Eds.), 2018. From culture to language and back: The Animacy Hierarchy in language and discourse. Special issue of International Journal of Language and Culture, 5(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gasparyan, D., 2020. Semiosis as Eigenform and observation as recursive interpretation. Constructivist Foundations, 15(3), 271–279.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harris, R., 1981. The language myth. London: Duckworth.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hebb, D. O., 1949. The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heidegger, M., 1978. Letter on humanism. In Krell, D. F. (Ed.), Basic writings (Martin Heidegger). London: Routledge, pp. 213–265.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackendoff, R., 1989. What is a concept, that a person may grasp it? Mind & Language, 4(1–2), 68–102.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keller, R., 1998. A theory of linguistic signs. Duenwald, K. (Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kauffman, L. H., 2005. EigenForm. Kybernetes, 34(1/2), 129–150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kravchenko, A. V., 2007. Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code. Language Sciences, 29(5), 650–671.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kravchenko, A. V., 2009. The experiential basis of speech and writing as different cognitive domains. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 527–548.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kravchenko, A. V., 2016. Constructivism and the epistemological trap of language. Constructivist Foundations, 12(1), 110–112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kravchenko, A. V., 2020. From “observer” to “observers”: The multiplicity of constructed realities. Constructivist Foundations, 16(1), 90–91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kravchenko, A. V., 2022. The Maturanian turn: Good prospects for the language sciences. Constructivist Foundations, 18(1), 30–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kravchenko, A. V., 2024. A constructivist approach to meanings in the universe. In Sharov, A., Mikhailovsky, G. (Eds.), Pathways to the origin and evolution of meanings in the universe. Beverly MA: Scrivener Publishing LLC, pp. 167–186.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lidov, D., 1998. Sign. In Bouissac, P. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of semiotics. Oxford University Press, available at: < https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195120905.001.0001/acref-9780195120905-e-263. >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linell, P., 2005. The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Love, N., 2007. Are languages digital codes? Language Sciences, 29(5), 690–709.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H. R., 1970. Biology of cognition. BCL Report # 9.0. University of Illinois, Urbana.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H. R., 1978. Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In Miller, G., Lenneberg, E. (Eds.), Psychology and biology of language and thought. New York: Academic Press, pp. 28–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H. R., 1986. Some reflections. Continuing the conversation. ASC Newsletter, 2(5), 2–3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H. R., 1988a. Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9, 25–82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H. R., 1988b. Ontology of observing: The biological foundations of self-consciousness and of the physical domain of existence. In Donaldson, R. E. (Ed.), Texts in cybernetic theory: An in-depth exploration of the thought of Humberto Maturana, William T. Powers, and Ernst von Glasersfeld. American Society for Cybernetics, 1–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H. R., 2014. Understanding social systems? Constructivist Foundations, 9(2), 187–188.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H. R., Varela, F., 1987. The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H. R., Verden-Zöller, G., 2008. The origin of humanness in the biol ogy of love. Bunnell, P. (Ed.). Exeter: Im print Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mick, D. G., Politi, L. G., 1989. ‘Consumers’ interpretations of advertising imagery: a visit to the hell of connotation. In Hirschman, E. C. (Ed.), Interpretive consumer research. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 85–96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oeberst, A., Kimmerle, J., Cress, U., 2016. What is knowledge? Who creates it? Who possesses it? The need for novel answers to old questions. In Cress, U., Moskaliuk, J., Jeong, H. (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham etc.: Springer, pp. 105–124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ogden, C. K., Richards, I. A., 1923. The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pascal, B., 1966. Human happiness. Krailsheimer, A. J. (Trans.). London: Penguin Books. Originally published in French as: Pascal, B., 1669. Pensees de M. Pascal sur la religion, et sur quelques autres sujets, qui ont este trouvees apres sa mort parmy ses papiers. Paris: Guillaume Desprez.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Premack, D., 1990. The infant’s theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 36(1), 1–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raczaszek-Leonardi, J., Cowley, S. J., 2012. The evolution of language as controlled collectivity. Interaction Studies, 13(1), 1–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raimondi, V., 2022. Maturana on language origins and human sociality. Constructivist Foundations, 18(1), 52–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Russell, B., 1905. On denoting. Mind, 14(4), 479–493.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sinha, C., 1999. Grounding, mapping, and acts of meaning. In Janssen, Th., Redeker, G. (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 223–255.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Speake, J. (Ed.), 2015. Oxford Dictionary of Proverbs. 6th ed. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sperber, D., Wilson, D., 1986. Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voloshinov, V. N., 1973. Marxism and the philosophy of language. Matejka, L., Titunik, I. R. (Trans.). New York: Seminar Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wittgenstein, L., 1953. Philosophical investigations. Anscombe, G. E. M. (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zlatev, J., 1997. Situated embodiment: Studies in spatial semantics. Stockholm: Gotab.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zlatev, J., 2002. Meaning = life (+ culture) An outline of a unified biocultural theory of meaning. Evolution of Communication, 4(2), 253–296.
]Search in Google Scholar
