Heat stress has an adverse impact on livestock production as elevation of temperature can result in compensatory changes in animal behaviour, physiology, and metabolism. This impact is particularly marked in pigs as they are more poorly adapted to heat dissipation than other livestock species because of the paucity of sweat glands and the thick subcutaneous fat. The porcine response to increasing environmental temperatures appears to be based on reducing metabolic heat production to maintain euthermia (16). One example of a behavioural response in pigs is the reduction of metabolic heat by decreasing feed intake, which is effective because digestion and nutrient absorption generate heat (17). Physiologically, elevations in environmental temperature also directly alter pigs’ nutrient utilisation, energy metabolism, and hormonal regulation (5, 9, 24). Consequently, heat stress can cause substantial economic losses for the swine industry through its effect on growth rates, carcass composition, sow performance, mortality and morbidity (2, 22, 27).
Researchers have proposed a number of potential markers of porcine heat stress, often based on studies of it at elevated temperatures under laboratory conditions.
Candidates have been suggested based on the inflammatory and acute-phase response known to be induced by heat in humans and pigs (5, 26). Among the proteins involved in the acute response, serum amyloid A (SAA) and serum albumin have been identified as positive and negative acute-phase reactants, respectively (6). Acute phase proteins (APPs) such as SAA, haptoglobin, and C-reactive protein are recognised markers of inflammation and have also been proposed as indicators of stress in cattle (14) and pigs (20).
Heat stress under laboratory conditions may not always accurately reflect the field conditions under which pigs are raised. Consequently, the swine industry could benefit from further research on sensitive biomarkers of the type of heat stress experienced by pigs under field conditions. Recent advances in detecting reactive oxygen species (ROS) using derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs) and biological antioxidant potential (BAP) have opened potential avenues in biomarker research which could be exploited for strategies to combat porcine heat stress. Heat stress is generally considered to trigger oxidative stress in livestock animals (21), and acute heat stress in pigs has been shown to cause oxidative damage and up-regulation of antioxidant enzymes in their oxidative muscle (21). Chronic exposure to high environmental temperatures accelerates ROS generation, potentially inducing cytotoxicity ranging from lipid peroxidation to oxidative damage to protein damage (1).
Oxidative stress may be involved in various disorders and pathogeneses in humans (7, 10, 11). As demonstrably established markers of oxidative stress in areas of bioresearch such as human lifestyle diseases (7), d-ROMs and BAP represent a promising line of investigation as markers of such stress in animals, but have only been evaluated in a limited number of studies in domestic animals so far (18, 23, 25, 29).
Field conditions vary with season and climate zone, meaning that research during different seasons in diverse areas of the globe can yield data which complement each other. Kagoshima Prefecture in southwest Japan is a major pig-producing area located in the subtropical zone. The Kagoshima Berkshire pigs raised in this prefecture are used by one of the most famous pork brands in Japan, called ‘Kagoshima Kurobuta’. Pigs raised in the subtropical summer are likely to be subject to a milder form of heat stress than those investigated previously in many laboratory-based studies. The subtropical summer represents a chronic form of heat stress, and Kagoshima Prefecture is thus a suitable location to elucidate sensitive markers of chronic heat stress in pigs under field conditions.
Accordingly, in this study, we set out to investigate potential markers of chronic heat stress by comparing Kagoshima Berkshire pigs finished in the summer (a period of chronic heat stress) and in the winter (a thermoneutral period) in Kagoshima Prefecture. The evaluations included assessment of carcass traits (made at the time of slaughter), biomarkers previously established for heat stress, and d-ROMs and BAP as markers of oxidative stress.
The temperature and relative humidity (RH, %) in the pig housing area were recorded on an hourly basis (Thermo-Hygro Data Logger RX-350TH; AS ONE Corporation, Osaka, Japan) and represented as mean ± SD (Table 1).
Environmental temperature and relative humidity in the pig house
Temperature (℃) | Relative humidity (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | Whole day | Daytime (time) | Night (time) | Whole day | Daytime(time) | Night (time) |
Summer1 | 28.3 ± 2.4 | 29.3 ± 2.6 | 27.1 ± 1.6 | 80.7 ± 6.4 | 80.5 ± 6.8 | 81.0 ± 6.0 |
(6:00–18:00) | (19:00–5:00) | (6:00–18:00) | (19:00–5:00) | |||
22.2 ± 4.5 | 18.5 ± 4.6 | 71.4 ± 4.7 | 71.9 ± 4.5 | |||
Winter2 | 20.2 ± 4.9 | (7:00–17:00) | (18:00–6:00) | 71.7 ± 4.6 | (7:00–17:00) | (18:00–6:00) |
1– Summer-finished pigs. The data for this group was recorded from July to September
2– Winter-finished pigs. The data for this group was recorded from October to December
The pigs were slaughtered at the end of the two-month finishing period and whole blood was collected during the pigs’ exsanguination. The research was carried out according to the Institutional Guidelines for Animal Experiments, in compliance with the Japanese Act on Welfare and Management of Animals (Act No. 105 and Notification No. 6).
Results of inspection of carcasses and incidences of internal organ condemnation
Group | Carcass result score* | Internal organs condemnation# (Incidence, %) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Result (Score$) | Back fat thickness (cm) | Weight (kg) | Heart | Liver | Stomach and intestines | |
Summer1 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 78.7 ± 3.3 | 0 | 50.0 | 41.7 |
Winter2 | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 2.5 ± 0.8 | 80.6 ± 4.3 | 0 | 50.0 | 33.3 |
P value | 0.065 | 0.000 | 0.340 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
1– Summer-finished pigs slaughtered from August to September
2– Winter-finished pigs slaughtered from November to December
– 3: high grade, 2: middle grade, 1: low grade
$Data were analysed using Pearson’s chi-square test (*) and Fisher’s exact test (#)
Common blood biochemistry analyte concentrations
Analyte | Unit | Summer1 | Winter2 | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
LDH | U/L | 1143.6 ± 829.8 | 737.9 ± 207.4 | 0.119 |
CK | U/L | 11149.8 ± 23757.1 | 3778.4 ± 4034.7 | 0.453 |
TP | g/dL | 8.2 ± 0.5 | 7.9 ± 0.6 | 0.052 |
Alb | g/dL | 4.5 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 0.163 |
Glb | g/dL | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 0.015* |
A/G | ratio | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 0.019* |
Na | mEq/L | 148.5 ± 4.0 | 151.8 ± 4.3 | 0.032* |
Cl | mEq/L | 98.6 ± 2.3 | 101.1 ± 3.4 | 0.048* |
1 – Summer-finished pigs slaughtered from August to September
2 – Winter-finished pigs slaughtered from November to December LDH – Lactate dehydrogenase; CK – Creatinine kinase; TP – Total protein; Alb – Albumin; Glb – Globulin; A/G – Albumin/globulin ratio
* – P < 0.05; significantly different between summer and winter
Blood stress marker concentrations
Marker | Unit | Summer1 | Winter2 | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cortisol | μg/dL | 4.6 ± 2.3 | 4.5 ± 2.4 | 0.931 |
Adrenalin | ng/mL | 42.9 ± 15.7 | 46.2 ± 28.7 | 0.729 |
Noradrenaline | ng/mL | 49.3 ± 19.9 | 41.2 ± 26.5 | 0.299 |
Dopamine | ng/mL | not detected | not detected | |
Serum amyloid A | mg/L | 6.0 ± 4.7 | 6.0 ± 5.1 | 0.773 |
1 – Summer-finished pigs slaughtered from August to September
2 – Winter-finished pigs slaughtered from November to December
Blood oxidative stress
Parameter | Unit | Summer1 | Winter2 | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
d-ROMs | U. CARR | 1106.2 ± 136.6 | 970.8 ± 83.0 | 0.017* |
BAP | μmol/L | 4123.0 ± 771.7 | 4000.2 ± 306.4 | 0.356 |
BAP/d-ROMs | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 4.1 ± 0.4 | 0.488 |
1 – Summer-finished pigs slaughtered from August to September
2 – Winter-finished pigs slaughtered from November to December d-ROMs – derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolite-derived compounds (1 U. CARR = 0.08 mg H2O2/dL); BAP – biological antioxidant potential
* – P < 0.05; significantly different between summer and winter
We investigated d-ROMs and BAP as indices of ROS production and antioxidant potential, respectively. The summer-finished pigs’ levels of d-ROMs were significantly higher than those of the winter-finished pigs, although BAP and BAP/d-ROMs did not differ between the two seasonal cohorts (Table 5).
To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first evaluation of porcine heat stress in a subtropical region by comparing summer-finished and winter-finished pigs slaughtered at the end of a two-month finishing period. Also, we believe this study is a valuable attempt at the relative characterisation of markers of heat stress and particularly of d-ROMs and BAP as indices of ROS derivates and antioxidant potential, respectively, in farm-reared pigs under seasonal conditions expected to produce chronic heat stress (summer) and thermoneutral temperatures (winter).
Based on the results of environmental temperature in the pig house and the large summer variance there from the thermoneutrality of the temperature range of 10 to 23.9℃ (17) in which the winter-finished pigs were raised, we consider that the summer-finished pigs experienced chronic heat stress. Previous studies have expanded the definition of acute and chronic heat stress in terms of exposure time and temperature for pigs (9, 21, 28). Reportedly, chronic heat stress has been induced under laboratory conditions in finishing pigs exposed to constant temperatures of 30°C or more for three weeks (5, 6). In this study, the summer-finished pigs experienced a slightly lower daytime temperature (around 29℃), with a further decrease in nocturnal hours, but for a more prolonged period (two months). We thus consider that the conditions of the summer finishing period correspond to chronic heat stress.
The results of carcass quality assessment suggest a chronic heat stress effect. The greater back fat thickness in summer-finished pigs is considered to be a poorer result. More than 90% of the summer-finished pigs were measured at back fat thickness exceeding the upper limit of the criterion of the Japan Meat Grading Association (12). Although the difference in carcass quality was significant, our study results do not allow for definite conclusions on fat accumulation as a heat stress effect under field conditions. However, heat stress has been previously implicated in the upregulation of lipoprotein lipase (13) and fatty acid synthase activities (19), resulting in increased adipose tissue. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of heat stress-induced metabolic changes under field conditions, and to explain the subsequent alterations in carcass phenotype.
Heat stress alters metabolism, structure and antioxidant mechanisms in skeletal muscle (4). Heat exposure of sows during pregnancy affects foetal development and post-growth carcass quality (3, 27). In growing pigs, it has been reported that acute heat stress disrupts muscle redox balance and inflammatory signalling (8, 21). The differences between summer-and winter-finishing cohorts were considered to reflect adverse effects of seasonal heat stress, with Na and Cl levels suggestive of hypotonic dehydration; however, the blood biochemistry profiles of summer-finished pigs did not correspond to a state of disease. Our data on blood chemistry and blood stress markers provide an interesting contrast to previous studies of chronic heat stress under laboratory conditions. Finishing pigs housed at 30°C for three weeks exhibited increased cortisol, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and creatinine kinase (CK) (9). The mean values of LDH and CK in our study were considerably higher in the summer-finished pigs, although the differences were not statistically significant. Our data implies that the adverse effect on muscle tissue was apparently not of sufficient magnitude to be detected in the measurements, including those of cortisol and other blood stress markers.
The presence of a chronic heat stress phenomenon in our study is further substantiated by the A/G ratio and SAA. The A/G ratio decreases with an increase in the globulin level, which implies chronic inflammation (15), and SAA is an acute-phase protein. The significantly lower A/G ratio (Table 3) in summer-finished pigs was not accompanied by any change in SAA (Table 4). Taken together with the other biochemistry and stress marker results, this suggests that the seasonal heat stress was chronic, but not sufficiently severe to elevate stress marker levels. Furthermore, the A/G ratio might be a potential marker of chronic heat stress under field conditions.
Set against our results of blood biochemistry and stress markers, the novel findings on markers of blood oxidative stress in this study are of considerable interest. Short-term heat exposure reportedly increases oxidative stress marker levels (malondialdehyde, catalase activity and superoxide dismutase) in porcine skeletal muscles (21, 28), which could be consistent with the elevated plasma d-ROM levels in this study. This elevation in d-ROMs was not accompanied by any increase in stress hormone levels, and we consider that this change might be detectable before any changes in hormonal regulation of cortisol and other blood stress markers. Accordingly, we consider that d-ROMs might be more sensitive markers of heat stress than the blood stress markers previously suggested.
In conclusion, the summer-finished pigs reared under subtropical field conditions in this study showed evidence of chronic heat stress, reflected in lower carcass quality than that of winter-finished pigs. This demonstrates the potential adverse effects of such high temperature levels on the swine industry, and underlines the need for sensitive markers to monitor chronic heat stress. We further consider that d-ROMs and the A/G ratio may have utility as sensitive markers for such heat stress under field conditions.
Environmental temperature and relative humidity in the pig house
Temperature (℃) | Relative humidity (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | Whole day | Daytime (time) | Night (time) | Whole day | Daytime(time) | Night (time) |
Summer1 | 28.3 ± 2.4 | 29.3 ± 2.6 | 27.1 ± 1.6 | 80.7 ± 6.4 | 80.5 ± 6.8 | 81.0 ± 6.0 |
(6:00–18:00) | (19:00–5:00) | (6:00–18:00) | (19:00–5:00) | |||
22.2 ± 4.5 | 18.5 ± 4.6 | 71.4 ± 4.7 | 71.9 ± 4.5 | |||
Winter2 | 20.2 ± 4.9 | (7:00–17:00) | (18:00–6:00) | 71.7 ± 4.6 | (7:00–17:00) | (18:00–6:00) |
Results of inspection of carcasses and incidences of internal organ condemnation
Group | Carcass result score* | Internal organs condemnation# (Incidence, %) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Result (Score$) | Back fat thickness (cm) | Weight (kg) | Heart | Liver | Stomach and intestines | |
Summer1 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 78.7 ± 3.3 | 0 | 50.0 | 41.7 |
Winter2 | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 2.5 ± 0.8 | 80.6 ± 4.3 | 0 | 50.0 | 33.3 |
P value | 0.065 | 0.000 | 0.340 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Blood stress marker concentrations
Marker | Unit | Summer1 | Winter2 | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cortisol | μg/dL | 4.6 ± 2.3 | 4.5 ± 2.4 | 0.931 |
Adrenalin | ng/mL | 42.9 ± 15.7 | 46.2 ± 28.7 | 0.729 |
Noradrenaline | ng/mL | 49.3 ± 19.9 | 41.2 ± 26.5 | 0.299 |
Dopamine | ng/mL | not detected | not detected | |
Serum amyloid A | mg/L | 6.0 ± 4.7 | 6.0 ± 5.1 | 0.773 |
Blood oxidative stress
Parameter | Unit | Summer1 | Winter2 | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
d-ROMs | U. CARR | 1106.2 ± 136.6 | 970.8 ± 83.0 | 0.017* |
BAP | μmol/L | 4123.0 ± 771.7 | 4000.2 ± 306.4 | 0.356 |
BAP/d-ROMs | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 4.1 ± 0.4 | 0.488 |
Common blood biochemistry analyte concentrations
Analyte | Unit | Summer1 | Winter2 | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
LDH | U/L | 1143.6 ± 829.8 | 737.9 ± 207.4 | 0.119 |
CK | U/L | 11149.8 ± 23757.1 | 3778.4 ± 4034.7 | 0.453 |
TP | g/dL | 8.2 ± 0.5 | 7.9 ± 0.6 | 0.052 |
Alb | g/dL | 4.5 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 0.163 |
Glb | g/dL | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 0.015* |
A/G | ratio | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 0.019* |
Na | mEq/L | 148.5 ± 4.0 | 151.8 ± 4.3 | 0.032* |
Cl | mEq/L | 98.6 ± 2.3 | 101.1 ± 3.4 | 0.048* |