Open Access

The influence of high and low doses of acrylamide on porcine erythropoiesis

Anna Snarska

Anna Snarska

Department and Clinic of Internal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and MazuryOlsztyn, Poland
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Snarska, Anna
, 
Katarzyna Palus

Katarzyna Palus

Department of Clinical Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and MazuryOlsztyn, Poland
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Palus, Katarzyna
, 
Dominika Wysocka

Dominika Wysocka

Department and Clinic of Internal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and MazuryOlsztyn, Poland
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Wysocka, Dominika
 and 
Liliana Rytel

Liliana Rytel

Department and Clinic of Internal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and MazuryOlsztyn, Poland
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Rytel, Liliana
  
Oct 15, 2020
The influence of high and low doses of acrylamide on porcine erythropoiesis's Cover Image
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Cite
Download Cover
Published Online: Oct 15, 2020
Page range: 609 - 614
Received: Mar 26, 2020
Accepted: Sep 30, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2020-0065
Keywords
© 2020 A. Snarska et al. published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing a Howell– Jolly body in erythrocyte in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing a Howell– Jolly body in erythrocyte in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 2

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic and normochromatic erythroblasts in the control group on day 0; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic and normochromatic erythroblasts in the control group on day 0; 1,000×

Fig. 3

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic erythroblasts in the LD group on day 28; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic erythroblasts in the LD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 4

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing polychromatic erythroblasts in the LD group on day 28; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing polychromatic erythroblasts in the LD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 5

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing polychromatic erythroblasts in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing polychromatic erythroblasts in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 6

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic erythroblasts in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic erythroblasts in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×

The average number of cells from the erythroblastic cell line in relation to 1,000 of all porcine bone marrow cells (mean ± SD) on day 28

ParameterControlLDHD
PROERBL21.2b ± 1.8418.6c ± 2.4826ac ± 6.4
BASO ERBL24.4a ± 2.2718.8ac ± 3.7625.8c ± 3.84
POLY ERBL70.2ab ± 6.260.6ac ± 15.1256.6bc ± 7.92
ORTO ERBL190ab ± 11.2165ac ± 7.291.2bc ± 10.96
TOTAL NORMO305.8ab ± 14.96263ac ± 14201.8bc ± 11.84
PROMEGALOBL000
BASO MEGALO000
POLY MEGALO000
TOTAL MEGALO000
NORMO/MEGALO000
PARA ERBL000
TOTAL ERBL305.8ab ± 14.96263ac ± 14201.8bc ± 11.84

The average number of cells from the erythroblastic cell line in relation to 1,000 of all porcine bone marrow cells (mean ± SD) on day 0

ParameterControlLDHD
PROERBL20.6 ± 2.7220.2 ± 2.2421 ± 1.6
BASO ERBL25.8 ± 3.7627.2 ± 2.5624.6 ± 3.68
POLY ERBL75.8 ± 13.7669.2 ± 9.8478.4 ± 9.52
ORTHO ERBL202 ± 15.6196.2 ± 9.36201.2 ± 7.36
TOTAL NORMO324.2 ± 29.84312.8 ± 15.76325.2 ± 16.96
PROMEGALOBL000
BASO MEGALO000
POLY MEGALO000
TOTAL MEGALO000
NORMO/MEGAL000
PARA ERB0.6 ± 0.7200
TOTAL ERBL324.8 ± 29.76312.8 ± 15.76325.2 ± 16.96
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Molecular Biology, Microbiology and Virology, Life Sciences, other, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine
Journal RSS Feed