Open Access

Cloning and identification of PK15 cells for enhanced replication of classical swine fever virus

Mei Yin

Mei Yin

College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Institute of Science and TechnologyXinxiang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Yin, Mei
, 
Dongfang Hu

Dongfang Hu

College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Institute of Science and TechnologyXinxiang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Hu, Dongfang
, 
Peng Li

Peng Li

College of Life Science and Technology, Xinxiang UniversityXinxiang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Li, Peng
, 
Lingyun Kong

Lingyun Kong

Xinxiangxian Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Bureau (Xinxiangxian Forestry Bureau)Xinxiang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Kong, Lingyun
, 
Hongmei Ning

Hongmei Ning

College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Institute of Science and TechnologyXinxiang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ning, Hongmei
, 
Feng Yue

Feng Yue

College of Life Science and Technology, Xinxiang UniversityXinxiang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Yue, Feng
, 
Jinqing Jiang

Jinqing Jiang

College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Institute of Science and TechnologyXinxiang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Jiang, Jinqing
 and 
Xuannian Wang

Xuannian Wang

College of Life Science and Technology, Xinxiang UniversityXinxiang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Wang, Xuannian
  
Mar 24, 2020
Cloning and identification of PK15 cells for enhanced replication of classical swine fever virus's Cover Image
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Cite
Download Cover
Published Online: Mar 24, 2020
Page range: 9 - 14
Received: Jul 17, 2019
Accepted: Feb 27, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2020-0020
Keywords
© 2020 M. Yin et al. published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

The percentages of CSFV-infected cells in the parent cell line and cloned PK15 cells. A – mock-infected PK15 cells (negative control); B – high-permissive (clone 1A6); C – low-permissive (clone 3B1); D – infected parent PK15 cells; E – percentages of positively stained cells. The cells were infected with CSFV and stained with CSFV-specific monoclonal antibodies (400×). Five visual fields were randomly selected to be photographed in each group. The percentages of positively stained cells in the photos were counted and shown as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01
The percentages of CSFV-infected cells in the parent cell line and cloned PK15 cells. A – mock-infected PK15 cells (negative control); B – high-permissive (clone 1A6); C – low-permissive (clone 3B1); D – infected parent PK15 cells; E – percentages of positively stained cells. The cells were infected with CSFV and stained with CSFV-specific monoclonal antibodies (400×). Five visual fields were randomly selected to be photographed in each group. The percentages of positively stained cells in the photos were counted and shown as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01

Fig. 2

Growth curves of parent PK15, clone PK15-1A6, and PK15-3B1 cells. The cells were trypsinised and counted at 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h post seeding. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed. The differences between the number of parent cells and that of PK15-1A6 cells are shown above the squares. The differences between the number of parent cells and that of PK15-3B1 cells are shown below the triangles. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01
Growth curves of parent PK15, clone PK15-1A6, and PK15-3B1 cells. The cells were trypsinised and counted at 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h post seeding. The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed. The differences between the number of parent cells and that of PK15-1A6 cells are shown above the squares. The differences between the number of parent cells and that of PK15-3B1 cells are shown below the triangles. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01

Fig. 3

Mean CSFV titres produced by the parent PK15, PK15-1A6, and PK15-3B1 cells. The replication abilities of CSFV in each type of PK15 cells (TCID50) were detected by the IPMA method. ** P < 0.01
Mean CSFV titres produced by the parent PK15, PK15-1A6, and PK15-3B1 cells. The replication abilities of CSFV in each type of PK15 cells (TCID50) were detected by the IPMA method. ** P < 0.01

Fig. 4

IPMA results demonstrating the replication abilities of CSFV in high- and low-permissive PK15 cells at different time points. Different cell lines were fixed at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h post CSFV infection and stained with CSFV-specific antibodies followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (400×)
IPMA results demonstrating the replication abilities of CSFV in high- and low-permissive PK15 cells at different time points. Different cell lines were fixed at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h post CSFV infection and stained with CSFV-specific antibodies followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (400×)

Fig. 5

The synthesis of CSFV genome in parent PK15 cells and PK15-1A6 (HP) and PK15-3B1 (LP) cell lines. The genomic RNA extractions from infected cells were quantitated by RT-PCR (amplification of partial E2 gene). The copy numbers of CSFV were determined by referring to a standard curve. ** P < 0.01
The synthesis of CSFV genome in parent PK15 cells and PK15-1A6 (HP) and PK15-3B1 (LP) cell lines. The genomic RNA extractions from infected cells were quantitated by RT-PCR (amplification of partial E2 gene). The copy numbers of CSFV were determined by referring to a standard curve. ** P < 0.01
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Molecular Biology, Microbiology and Virology, Life Sciences, other, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine
Journal RSS Feed