This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Andrade S.F., Palozzi R.J., Giuffrida R., de Campos R.J., de Campos Santos G., Fukui R.M.: Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between the Tono-Pen XL® and Perkins® applanation tonometers in dogs and cats. Vet Ophthalmol 2012, 15, 14–20.AndradeS.F.PalozziR.J.GiuffridaR.deCampos R.J.deCampos Santos G.FukuiR.M.Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between the Tono-Pen XL® and Perkins® applanation tonometers in dogs and catsVet Ophthalmol20121514–2010.1111/j.1463-5224.2011.00926.x22050624Search in Google Scholar
Christoffersen T., Holtedahl K., Ringberg U., Fors T.: Can the Tono-Pen replace the Schiotz tonometer in general practice? Scand J Prim Health Care 1998, 16, 238–241.ChristoffersenT.HoltedahlK.RingbergU.ForsT.Can the Tono-Pen replace the Schiotz tonometer in general practice?Scand J Prim Health Care199816238–24110.1080/0281343987500030259932318Search in Google Scholar
Estrovich I., Shen C., Chu Y., Downs J., Gardiner S., Straiko M., Mansberger S.: Schiotz tonometry accurately measures intraocular pressure in Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis eyes. Cornea 2015, 34, 682–685.EstrovichI.ShenC.ChuY.DownsJ.GardinerS.StraikoM.MansbergerS.Schiotz tonometry accurately measures intraocular pressure in Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis eyesCornea201534682–68510.1097/ICO.000000000000040625782403Search in Google Scholar
Gelatt K.N., MacKay E.O.: Distribution of intraocular pressure in dogs. Vet Ophthalmol 1998, 1, 109–114.GelattK.N.MacKayE.O.Distribution of intraocular pressure in dogsVet Ophthalmol19981109–11410.1046/j.1463-5224.1998.00024.x11397218Search in Google Scholar
Iester M., Mermoud A., Achache F., Roy S.: New Tonopen XL: Comparison with the Goldmann tonometer. Eye 2001, 15, 52–58.IesterM.MermoudA.AchacheF.RoyS.New Tonopen XL: Comparison with the Goldmann tonometerEye20011552–5810.1038/eye.2001.1311318296Search in Google Scholar
Kok M., Berendschot T., Hardus P.: Schiotz tonometry for glaucoma: are there simple alternatives? Trop Med Int Health 1998, 3, 210–213.KokM.BerendschotT.HardusP.Schiotz tonometry for glaucoma: are there simple alternatives?Trop Med Int Health19983210–21310.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00220.x9593360Search in Google Scholar
Knollinger A.M., La Croix N.C., Barrett P.M., Miller P.E.: Evaluation of a rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs and horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005, 227, 244–248.KnollingerA.M.LaCroix N.C.BarrettP.M.MillerP.E.Evaluation of a rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs and horsesJ Am Vet Med Assoc2005227244–24810.2460/javma.2005.227.24416047660Search in Google Scholar
Leiva M., Naranjo C., Peña M.T.: Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs. Vet Ophthalmol 2006, 9, 17–21.LeivaM.NaranjoC.PeñaM.T.Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogsVet Ophthalmol2006917–2110.1111/j.1463-5224.2005.00429.x16409240Search in Google Scholar
Li Y., Shi J., Duan X., Fan F.: Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010, 248, 1765–1770.LiY.ShiJ.DuanX.FanF.Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometryGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol20102481765–177010.1007/s00417-009-1243-y20495818Search in Google Scholar
Maggs D.J.: Basic diagnostic techniques. In: Slatter’s Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology edited by J. Garncarz, Elsevier Urban & Partner, Wrocław, 2009, pp. 88–116.MaggsD.J.Basic diagnostic techniquesSlatter’s Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmologyedited by J. Garncarz, Elsevier Urban & PartnerWrocław2009pp88–116Search in Google Scholar
Martin-Suárez E., Molleda C., Tardón R., Galán A., Gallardo J., Molleda J.: Diurnal variations of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in dogs from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm. Can Vet J 2014, 55, 361–365.Martin-SuárezE.MolledaC.TardónR.GalánA.GallardoJ.MolledaJ.Diurnal variations of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in dogs from 8:00 am to 8:00 pmCan Vet J201455361–365Search in Google Scholar
Miller P.E., Pickett J.P., Majors L.J., Kurzman I.D.: Clinical comparison of the Mackay-Marg and Tono-Pen applanation tonometer in the dog. Prog Vet Comp Ophthalmol 1991, 1, 171–176.MillerP.E.PickettJ.P.MajorsL.J.KurzmanI.D.Clinical comparison of the Mackay-Marg and Tono-Pen applanation tonometer in the dogProg Vet Comp Ophthalmol19911171–176Search in Google Scholar
Ponka D., Baddar F.: Schiotz tonometry. Can Fam Physician 2014, 60, 252.PonkaD.BaddarF.Schiotz tonometryCan Fam Physician201460252Search in Google Scholar
Stevens S.: How to measure intraocular pressure: Schiötz tonometry. Comm Eye Health J 2008, 21, 34.StevensS.How to measure intraocular pressure: Schiötz tonometryComm Eye Health J20082134Search in Google Scholar
Tonnu P.A., Ho T., Sharma K., White E., Bunce C., Garway-Heath D.: A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability. Br J Ophthalmol 2005, 89, 847–850.TonnuP.A.HoT.SharmaK.WhiteE.BunceC.Garway-HeathD.A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variabilityBr J Ophthalmol200589847–85010.1136/bjo.2004.056614177271615965164Search in Google Scholar
Whitacre M.M., Emig M., Hassanein K.: The effect of Perkins, Tono-Pen, and Schiötz tonometry on intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 1991, 111, 59–64.WhitacreM.M.EmigM.HassaneinK.The effect of Perkins, Tono-Pen, and Schiötz tonometry on intraocular pressureAm J Ophthalmol199111159–6410.1016/S0002-9394(14)76898-9Search in Google Scholar
Von Spiessen L., Karck J., Rohn K., Meyer-Lindenberg A.: Clinical comparison of the TonoVet(®) rebound tonometer and the Tono-Pen Vet(®) applanation tonometer in dogs and cats with ocular disease: glaucoma or corneal pathology. Vet Ophthalmol 2015, 18, 20–27.VonSpiessen L.KarckJ.RohnK.Meyer-LindenbergA.Clinical comparison of the TonoVet(®) rebound tonometer and the Tono-Pen Vet(®) applanation tonometer in dogs and cats with ocular disease: glaucoma or corneal pathologyVet Ophthalmol20151820–2710.1111/vop.1210124131625Search in Google Scholar
Yamamoto L.G., Young D.A.: Tonometry methods in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2010, 26, 678–683.YamamotoL.G.YoungD.A.Tonometry methods in the pediatric emergency departmentPediatr Emerg Care201026678–68310.1097/PEC.0b013e3181f0cce820838192Search in Google Scholar
Yilmaz I., Altan C., Ayqit E.D., Alaqoz C., Baz O., Ahmet S., Urvasizoqlu S., Yasa D., Demirok A.: Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL. Clin Ophthalmol 2014, 8, 1069–1074.YilmazI.AltanC.AyqitE.D.AlaqozC.BazO.AhmetS.UrvasizoqluS.YasaD., Demirok A.Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XLClin Ophthalmol201481069–107410.2147/OPTH.S63915Search in Google Scholar
