1. bookVolume 16 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)
Journal Details
First Published
04 May 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Open Access

Investigating Estonian Teachers’ Expectations for the General Education Curriculum

Published Online: 11 Mar 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 16 (2014) - Issue 2 (December 2014)
Page range: 54 - 70
Journal Details
First Published
04 May 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year

Catlaks, G. (2003). Curriculum development and teacher training in Latvia. In Teacher training and curriculum reform in the South Caucasus religion. From vision to practice. Retrieved April 15, 2013, from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/publications/regworkshops/finrep_pdf/finrep_tbilisi_03.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Cheung, D., & H. Wong. (2002). Measuring teacher beliefs about alternative curriculum design. The Curriculum Journal, 13(2), 225–48.10.1080/09585170210136868Search in Google Scholar

Craig, C. J. (2006). Why is dissemination so difficult? The nature of teacher knowledge and the spread of curriculum reform. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 257–293.10.3102/00028312043002257Search in Google Scholar

Drake, C., & Sherin. M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153–187.10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00351.xSearch in Google Scholar

Eesti põhi – ja keskhariduse riiklik õppekava [Estonian national curriculum for basic and secondary education]. (1996). Retrieved July 4, 2014, from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/29725Search in Google Scholar

Eash, M. J. (1991). Curriculum components. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of curriculum (pp. 67–69). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Egelund, N. (2005). Educational assessment in Danish schools. Assessment in Education, 12(2), 203–212.10.1080/09695940500143886Search in Google Scholar

Ennis, C. D., & Hooper, L. M. (1988). Development of an instrument for assessing educational value orientations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 277–280.10.1080/0022027880200308Search in Google Scholar

Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency P9 Eurydice. (2007). School autonomy in Europe. Policies and measures. Retrieved May 29, 2014, from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/090EN.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Fraenkel, R. F., & Wallen, E. N. (2010). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). Boston: McGrow-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Handler, B. (2010). Teacher as a curriculum leader: A consideration of the appropriateness of that role assignment to classroom-based practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 3(3), 32–42.Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, S. B. (2009). Measuring teacher beliefs about curriculum orientations using the modified-curriculum orientations questionnaire. The Curriculum Journal, 20(2), 103–120.10.1080/09585170902948798Search in Google Scholar

Karlsen, G. E. (2000). Decentralized centralism: Framework for a better understanding of governance in the field of education. Journal of Education Policy, 15(5), 525–538.10.1080/026809300750001676Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, K. J. (2010). School-based curriculum development for new times: A comparative analysis. In E. H. F. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies. Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 3–20). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (2001). Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(5), 551–567.10.1080/00220270010016874Search in Google Scholar

Krull, E., & Trasberg, K. (2007). Changes in Estonian general education from the collapse of the Soviet Union to EU entry. Tartu: Tartu University.Search in Google Scholar

Lam, C. C., & Yeung, S. S. Y. (2010). School-based curriculum development in Hong-Kong: An arduous journey. In E. H. F. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies. Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 61–82). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Law, E. H. F., Galton, M., & Wan, S. W. Y. (2007). Developing curriculum leadership in schools: Hong Kong perspectives. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 143–159.10.1080/13598660701268569Search in Google Scholar

Lundahl, L. (2002). Sweden: Decentralization, deregulation, quasi-markets – and then what? Journal of Education Policy, 17(6), 687–697.10.1080/0268093022000032328Search in Google Scholar

Lundahl, L. (2005). A matter of self-governance and control. The reconstruction of Swedish education policy: 1980–2003. European Education, 37(1), 10–25.Search in Google Scholar

McNeil, J. D. (1992). Curriculum organization. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed.) (Vol 1., pp. 273–279). New York: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

März, V., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Sense-making and structure in teachers’ reception of educational reform. A case study on statistics in the mathematics curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 13–24.10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Nieveen, N., & Kuiper, W. (2012). Balancing curriculum freedom and regulation in Netherlands. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 357–368.10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.357Search in Google Scholar

Nilsen, S. (2010). Moving towards an educational policy for inclusion? Main reform stages in the development of the Norwegian unitary school system. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(5), 479–497.10.1080/13603110802632217Search in Google Scholar

Olek, H. (1998). Educational research in Central and Eastern Europe: A diverging tradition. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(1), 78–93.10.1076/edre. in Google Scholar

Osei, G. M., & Brock, C. (2006). Decentralisation in education, institutional culture and teacher autonomy in Ghana. Journal of Education Policy, 21(4), 437–458.10.1080/02680930600731880Search in Google Scholar

Polyzoi, E., & Cerna, M. (2001). A dynamic model of forces affecting the implementation of educational change in the Czech Republic. Comparative Education Review, 45(1), 64–84.10.1086/447645Search in Google Scholar

Priestley, M., Edwards, R., & Priestley, A. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214.10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.xSearch in Google Scholar

Põhikooli ja gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava [National curriculum for basic schools and gymnasia]. (2002). Retrieved July 4, 2014, from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/174787Search in Google Scholar

Põhikooli riiklik õppekava [National curriculum for basic schools]. (2011). Retrieved September 3, 2013, from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/114012011001Search in Google Scholar

Schubert, W. H, Hansen, D. T., Wulf, C., Kliebard, H. M., Lawton, D., Connell, W. F., & Zhang, L. (1998). Curriculum history: National profiles. In T. Husén, T. N. Postlethwaite, B. R. Clark & G. Neave (Eds.), Education: The complete encyclopedia. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Shawer, S. F. (2010). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum developers, curriculum makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 173–184.10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.015Search in Google Scholar

Shkedi, A. (1998). Can the curriculum guide both emancipate and educate teachers? Curriculum Inquiry, 28(2), 209–229.10.1111/0362-6784.00085Search in Google Scholar

Shkedi, A. (2006). Curriculum and teachers: An encounter of languages and literatures. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(6), 719–735.10.1080/00220270500221802Search in Google Scholar

Shriner, M., Schlee, B. M., & Libler, R. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes and beliefs regarding curriculum integration. The Australian Educational Researcher, 37(1), 51–62.10.1007/BF03216913Search in Google Scholar

Silberstein, M., & Ben-Peretz, M. (1987). The concept of teacher autonomy in curriculum materials: An operative interpretation. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3(1), 29–44.Search in Google Scholar

Sivesind, K. (2013). Mixed images and merging semantics in European curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(1), 52–66.10.1080/00220272.2012.757807Search in Google Scholar

Sloan, K. (2006). Teacher identity and agency in school worlds: Beyond the all-good/all-bad dscourse on accountability – explicit curriculum policies. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 119–152.10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00350.xSearch in Google Scholar

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development. Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Search in Google Scholar

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Unt, I., & Läänemets U. (Eds.). (1992). Põhikooli õppekava [Curriculum for basic schools]. Tallinn: Eesti Hariduse Arenduskeskus.Search in Google Scholar

Unt, I., & Läänemets U. (Eds). (1993). Keskkooli õppekava [Curriculum for secondary schools]. Tallinn: Eesti Hariduse Arenduskeskus.Search in Google Scholar

Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2007). The relationships between teachers’ general beliefs about teaching and learning and their domain specific curricular beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17, 156–171.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.010Search in Google Scholar

Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2008). Using the curriculum emphasis concept to investigate teachers’ curricular beliefs in the context of educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 107–122.10.1080/00220270601078259Search in Google Scholar

Vulliamy, G., Kimonen, E., Nevalainen, R., & Webb, R. (1997). Teacher identity and curriculum change: A comparative case-study analysis of small schools in England and Finland. Comparative Education, 33(1), 97–115.10.1080/03050069728668Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, C. S., & Priestley, M. (2011). Teacher beliefs and the mediation of curriculum innovation in Scotland: A socio-cultural perspective on professional development and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 357–381.10.1080/00220272.2011.563447Search in Google Scholar

Wermke, W., & Höstfält, G. (2014). Contextualizing teacher autonomy in time and space: A model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 58–80.10.1080/00220272.2013.812681Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, R. M. (1997). Questionnaires. In John P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 422–427). New York: Pergamon.Search in Google Scholar

Wong, J. (2006). Control and professional development: Are teachers being deskilled or reskilled within the context of decentralization? Educational Studies, 32(1), 17–37.10.1080/03055690500415910Search in Google Scholar

Wong, J. (2008). How does the new emphasis on managerialism in education redefine teacher professionalism? A case study in Guangdong Province of China. Educational Review, 60(3), 267–282.10.1080/00131910802195869Search in Google Scholar

Zogla, I. (2001). Democratisation in Latvian Education: Teachers’ attitudinal change. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(2), 143–156.10.1080/02619760120095543Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo