[
Aravena, F. (2016). Preparing school principals in Chile: Lessons from Australia, England and US. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 48, 1-16. Aravena, F., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Latin America, 1991–2017. Educational Management Administration & Leadership.46(2), 207-225.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aravena, F., & Madrid, R. (2020). The shock absorbers: School principals and their conflicts in Chile. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 52(4), 417-431. Beerens, D. (2000). Evaluating teachers for professional growth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bridges, E. (1992). The Incompetent teacher: Managerial response. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bridges, E., & Gumport, P. (1984). The dismissal of tenured teachers for incompetence. Stanford, California: Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance, Technical Report.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bush, T. (2008). From management to leadership: Semantic or meaningful change. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 36(2), 271–288.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, J. (2014). Attitudes of principals and teachers toward approaches used to deal with teacher incompetence. Social behavior and personality, 42(1), 155-176. Dandoy, J. (2012). Principals’ perceptions of barriers to dismissal of poor-performing teachers. University of Kansas: Doctoral dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Darling-Hammond, L., & Rothman, R. (2015). Teaching in the flat world: Learning from high-performing systems. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Gu Q Brown, E., & Ahtaridou, E. (2011). School leadership and student outcomes: Building and sustaining success. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Falabella, A. (2020). The ethics of competition: Accountability policy enactment in Chilean schools’ everyday life. Journal of Educational Policy, 35(1), 23-45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fuhr, D. (1993). Managing mediocrity in the classroom. School Administrator, 50(4), 26–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Futernick, K. (2010). Incompetent teachers or dysfunctional systems? Phi Delta Kappan, 92(2), 59-64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanushek, E. (2009). Teacher deselection. Dan Goldhaber, D., & Hannaway (Eds.). Creating a new teaching profession (pp. 163-180). Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hallinger, P., & Lee, M. (2013). Exploring principal capacity to lead reform of teaching and learning quality in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(4), 305–315.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hallinger, P., & Wang, W. (2015). Assessing instructional leadership with the principal instructional management rating scale. Dordrecht: Springer
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hattie, J. (2015). High impact leadership. Educational Leadership, 72(5), 37-40. Hollinger, T. (2016). Self-reported principal leadership practices that support struggling teachers for improvement. Middle Tennessee State University: Doctoral Dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ing, M. (2010). Using informal classroom observations to improve instruction. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(3), 337–358.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kerrins, J., &Cushing, K. (2000). Taking a second look: Expert and novice differences when observing the same classroom teaching segment a second time. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14, 5-24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2019). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership and Management, 40(1), 5-22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Machell, J. (1995). The teacher evaluation environment: An examination of attributes related to teacher growth. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 9, 259-273.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marfan, J., & Pascual, J. (2017). Comparative study of school principals’ leadership practices. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(2), 279-300.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
May, H., & Supovitz, J. (2011). The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 332-352.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Menuey, B. (2007) Teachers’ perceptions of professional incompetence and barriers to the dismissal process. Journal Personal Evaluation Education, 18, 309–325.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Education. (2018). National results of teacher´s evaluation process 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.cpeip.cl/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Resultados--Evaluaci%C3%B3n-Docente-2018.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Education. (2015). Framework for good school leadership and management (Marco Para La Buena Dirección Y El Liderazgo Escolar) Santiago, Chile.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montecinos, C., Bush, T., & Aravena, F. (2018). Moving the school forward: Problems reported by novice and experienced principals during a succession process in Chile. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 201-208.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. (2004) How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237-257.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. (2016). School leadership for learning: Insights from TALIS 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Owings, W., Kaplan, L., Nunnery, J., Marzano, R., Myran, S., & Blackburn, D. (2006) Teacher quality and troops to teachers: A national study with implications for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 90, 102-131.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Painter, S. (2000). Principals’ perceptions of barriers to teacher dismissal. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14, 253-264.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed). Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peterson, K. (2000). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quiroga, M., & Aravena, F. (2018). The new teaching career policy in Chile: Perspectives from school principals. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 15(2), 105-120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Range, B., Duncan, E., Day, S., & Haines, C. (2012) School leaders´ perceptions about incompetent teachers: Implications for supervision and evaluation. NASSP Bulletin, 96(4), 302-322.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rivers, J., & Sanders, L. (2002). Teacher quality and equity in educational opportunity: findings and policy implications. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rhodes, C., & Beneicke, S. (2003). Professional development support for poorly performing teachers: challenges and opportunities for school managers in addressing teacher learning needs. Journal of In-Service Education, 29(1), 123-140.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2008) School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why: Best evidence synthesis iteration [BES]. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Ministry of Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shaked, H., Gross, Z., & Glanz, J. (2019). Between Venus and Mars: Sources of gender differences in instructional leadership. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership 47(2), 291–309.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed). Sage, Thousand Oaks: CA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stronge, J. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thoonen, E., Sleegers, P., Oort, F., Peetsma, T., & Geijsel, F. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496-536.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torff, B., & Sessions, D. (2009). Principals’ perceptions of the causes of teacher ineffectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 530-537.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tucker, P. (1997). Lake Wobegon: Where all teachers are competent (or, have we come to terms with the problem of incompetent teachers?). Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 103-126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tucker, P. (2001). Helping struggling teachers. Educational Leadership, 58(5), 52-55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weinstein, J., Marfan, J., & Horn, A. (2016). Chile: School leadership challenged by double accountability towards schools. In: Easley, J, & Tuliwitzki, P. (Eds.) Educational Accountability: International Perspectives on Challenges and Possibilities for School Leadership (pp.54-72). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weinstein, J., & Muñoz, G. (2014). What do we know about school principals?: Lessons from the case of Chile. Interamerican dialogue. Retrieved from: https://prealblog.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/final-school-principals-in-chile-english--fs-12-1-14.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whitehead, B., Boschee, F., Decker, R. (2013). The principal: Leadership for a global society. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Witziers, B. (2004) Educational leadership and students achievements: The elusive search for an association. Council of Education Administration Published, 39, 398–425.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wragg, E., Haynes, G., Wragg, C., & Chamberlin, R. (2000). Failing Teachers? London, UK: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yariv, E. (2004). “Challenging” teachers. Educational Management Administration Quarterly, 32, 149-169.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yariv, E. (2009). Principals’ informal methods for appraising poor-performing teachers. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(4), 283–298.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yariv, E., & Coleman, M. (2005). Managing “challenging” teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(4), 330-346.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yariv, E, & Kass, E. (2019). Assisting struggling teachers effectively. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 47(2), 310-325.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, Q. (2007). Teacher misbehaviors as learning demotivators in college classrooms: A cross-cultural investigation in China, Germany, Japan and the United States. Communication Education, 56(2), 209-227.
]Search in Google Scholar
