[
Austring, B. D., & Sørensen, M. (2006). Æstetik og læring. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Austring, B. D., & Sørensen, M. (2013). Aesthetics and learning, Conference paper. Conference: The Future of Education, vol. 2, 1–5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236172876_Aesthetics_and_Learning
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baumgarten, A.G. (1750/1992). Æstetikken (Aesthetica §§. 1–103) (Aesthetics). In S. Sørensen (Ed.), THEMATA 4. Klassisk poetik i moderne tid. Mellem klassicisme og romantik [Classical poetry in a modern era. Between classicism and romanticism], pp. 7–60. Agora-redaktionen, Institut for Oldtids- og Middelalderforskning, Aarhus Universitet.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennet, J. (2010). Vibrant matter – a political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blomgren, H. (2019). Æstetiske processer i daginstitutionen – aktionsforskningsinspireret projekt hvor pædagoger og kunstnere samarbejder. [Doctoral thesis, Institut for Kulturvidenskaber, Syddansk Universitet. Odense].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blomgren, H. (2021). Play pockets in kindergartens: On framing blurred practices with art, pedagogy, and play. In H. Park, & C. M. Schulte (Eds.), Visual arts with young children: Practices, pedagogies, and learning (pp. 100–110). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blume, M., & Blomgren, H. (2022). Jazz i børnehaven. In L. Geer Hammershøj (Ed.), Legekunst. Leg, dannelse, kunst og kultur i dagtilbud, pp. 181–198. Samfundslitteratur.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blomgren, H. (2023a). Med musikere og materialitet på legepladsen. BUKS – Tidsskrift for Børne- og Ungdomskultur, (67)39, 37-53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blomgren, H. (2023b). Følg det røde bånd – når vuggestuebørn gør sig æstetiske erfa-ringer på ’rejsen’, DRAMA Nordisk dramapedagogisk tidsskrift, (60)3, 1–14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cecchin, D. (2010). Med legen som inspiration. Fra børnenes spor til pædagogiske læreplaner. In G. Kragh Müller, F. Ørsted Andersen & L. V. Hvidtved (Eds.). Gode læringsmiljøer for børn, pp. 73–94. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Domanska, E. (2020). Hinsides antropocentrisme i historiske studier. Ny Jord – Tidsskrift for naturkritik, Nr. 5, 428–434. Forlaget Virkelig.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eng, H. (1918). Kunstpædagogik. Forlaget H. Aschehoug & Co. (W. Nygaard).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eng, H. (1961). Barne- og Ungdomstegningens psykologi. Fra det 9. til det 24. året. J. W. Cappelens Forlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177–192). The American Educational Research Association/Manwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gross, S. W. (2002). The neglected programme of aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics, 42(4), 403–414.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hohr, H. (1992). Det estetiske i et socialiseringsteoretisk perspektiv, Nordisk Pedagogik, (1), 41–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hohr, H., & Pedersen, K. (1996). Perspektiver på æstetiske læreprocesser. Dansklærerforeningen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huf, C., & Kluge, M. (2021): Being (with) batman – entangled research relations in ethnographic research in early childhood education and care. Ethnography and Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Häikiö, T. K. (2020). Aesthetic learning processes in early childhood and early years education. Reflections on educating for sustainable development and use of visual tools and materials. Techne serien - Forskning i slöjdpedagogik och slöjdvetenskap, 27(2), 15–30. https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/3567
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Illeris, H. (2012). Aesthetic learning processes for the 21st century: Epistemology, didactics, performance, Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 16(1), 10–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jørgensen, D. (2009). Why do we need philosophical aesthetics? Transfiguration: Nordisk Tidsskrift for kunst og kristendom, 17-34. Museum Tusculanum Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jørgensen, D. (2015). Experience, metaphysics, and immanent transcendence. In D. Jørgensen, G. Chiurazzi, & S. Thinning (Eds.), Truth and experience: Between phenomenology and hermeneutics (pp. 11-30). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jørgensen. D. (2018). The philosophy of imagination. In T. Zittun, & V. Glaveanu (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and culture (pp. 19–45). Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jørgensen, H. H. (2020). Det pædagogiske børnesyn, legen og det gode børneliv. In T. H. Mortensen, & T. Næsby (Eds.), Den styrkede pædagogiske læreplan. Grundbog til dagtilbudspædagogik (pp. 37–50). Dafolo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kind, S. (2014). Material encounters. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 5(4.2), 865–877.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kind, S. (2018). Collective improvisations: The emergence of the early childhood studio as an event-full place. In C. M. Schulte, & C. M. Thompson (Eds.), Communities of practice: Art, play, and aesthetics in early childhood, 5–22. Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knoblauch; H. (2005). Focused ethnography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3): Art. nr. 44., 1-14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knoblauch, H., & Schnettler, B. (2012). Videography: Analysing video data as ‘focused’ ethnographic and hermeneutical exercise. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 334–356.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lenz Taguchi, H. (2011). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lenz Taguchi, H. (2014). New materialisms and play. In E. Brooker, S. Edwards, & M. Blaise (Eds.), The Sage handbook on play and learning in early childhood (pp. 79–90). Sage Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindquist, H., & Moxnes, A. R. (2021). Abduksjon og improvisation i forskning. Om møter med de yngste barna i barnehage og forskningsprosesser. In Ø. Elle, & M. R. Nyhus (Eds.), Kunstmøter og estetiske prosesser med de yngste barna (0-3 år) (pp. 101–118). Fagbokforlaget.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1977). Kreativitet og vækst. Gjellerup.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Melhuus, E. C., & Nordtømme, S. (2022). Mellom steder, rom og materialer. Teoretiske utforskninger i barnehagen. Fagbokforlaget.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mouritsen, F. (2002). Child culture: Play culture. In F. Mouritsen, & J. Qvortrup (Eds.), Childhood and children’s culture (pp. 14–42). University Press of Southern Denmark.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mouritsen, F. (2003). Æstetisk refleksivitet og refleksionstyper i børns former for narrative udtryk og leg – en analyse af rolleleg som fortælling. In J. Gleerup, & F. Wiedemann (Eds.), Pædagogisk forskning og udvikling, pp. 181–203. University Press of Southern Denmark.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moxnes, A. R., & Osgood, J. (2018). Sticky stories from the classroom: From reflection to diffraction in early childhood teacher education, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 19(3), 297–309.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Kind, S., & Kocher, L. L. M. (2017). Encounters with materials in early childhood education. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peers, C., & Fleer, M. (2014). The theory of ‘belonging’: Defining concepts used within belonging, being and becoming – The Australian early years learning framework. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(8), 914-928.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pink, S. (2021). Doing visual ethnography. Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pink, S., Sumartojo, S., Lupton, D., & Heyes LaBond, C. (2017). Empathetic technologies: Digital materiality and video ethnography. Visual Studies, 32(4), 371–381.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raudaskoski, P. (2020). Observationsmetoder (herunder videoobservation). In S. Brinkmann, & L. Tanggaard (Eds.), Kvalitative metoder. En grundbog (pp. 117–136). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skilling, K., & Stylianides, G. J. (2020). Using vignettes in educational research: A framework for vignette construction. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(5), 541–556.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spyrou, S. (2018). Disclosing childhoods: Research and knowledge production for critical childhood studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spyrou, S. (2019). An ontological turn for childhood studies? Children and Society, 33, 316–323.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uprichard, E. (2008). Children as ‘beings’ and ‘becomings’: Children, childhood and temporality. Children & Society, 22(4), 303–313.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis. Theorizing qualitative research. The University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Children and Education (2020). The strengthened pedagogical curriculum. Framework and content. https://emu.dk/sites/default/files/2021-03/8077%20SPL%20Hovedpublikation_UK_WEB%20FINAL-a.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toft, H. (2019). FairyPlay: Recycling trash in Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tales and children’s play. Aktualitet – Litteratur, Kultur og Medier, 13(1), 249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toft, H. (2021). Connected play as intra-action. Doing CupSong with YouTube. In M. Alasuutari, M. Mustola, & N. Rutanen, Exploring materiality in childhood. Body, relations and space (pp. 55–72). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tuft, K. (1996). Det legende – det kunstneriske – leg, kunst, pædagogik, æstetik. Tidsskrift for Børne- og Ungdomskultur, Børn og opdragelse, 37, 39–56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tuft, K. (2017). Pædagogik – opdragelse. Forskning i Pædagogers Profession og Uddannelse 1(2), 85–100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tuft, K. (2018). Pædagogik og opdragelse – er nogle perspektiver ahistoriske? Demo-kratisk deltagelse? In K. Tuft, & C. Aabro (Eds.), Faget pædagogik (pp. 216–249). Billesø & Baltzer
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uprichard, E. (2008). Children as ‘being’ and ‘becomings’: Children, childhood and temporality. Children & Society, 22(4), 303-313.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Bonsdorff, P. (2009). Aesthetic of childhood: Phenomenology and beyond. Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, 1, 60–76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Bonsdorff, P. (2018). Children’s aesthetic agency: The pleasures and power of imagination. In C. Trevarthen, J. Delafield-Butt, & A.-W. Dunlop (Eds.), The child’s curriculum: Working with the natural values of young children, pp. 126–138. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wallin, K. (1997). Reggio Emilia og de hundrede sprog. Dafolo.
]Search in Google Scholar
