[
Bates, N., J. Dahlhamer, P. Phipps, A, Safir, and L. Tan. 2010. “Assessing Contact History Paradata Quality Across Several Federal Surveys,” In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association 2010 Joint Statistical Meeting, Vancouver, Canada. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/v2010f.html (accessed July 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biemer, P., P. Chen, and K. Wang. 2013. “Using Level-Of-Effort Paradata in Non-Response Adjustments with Application to Field Surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A176: 147–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01058.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biffignandi, S., and J. Bethlehem. 2021. Web Surveys and Other Modes of Data Collection. In Handbook of Web Surveys. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119371717.ch6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calinescu, M., S. Bhulai, and B. Schouten. 2013. “Optimal Resource Allocation in Survey Designs,” European Journal of Operations Research 226: 115–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.046.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Census Bureau. 2008. A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2008/acs/ACSGeneralHandbook.pdf (accessed October 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Census Bureau. 2016. Planning Database Documentation. Available at: https://www.census.gov/research/data/planning_database/2016/docs/PDB_Block_Group_2016-07-28a.pdf (accessed July 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chesnut, J. 2013. “Model-based mode of data collection: switching from internet to mail in the American Communities Survey.” 2013 American Communities Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memo Series #ACS-13RER, 18, 1–17. Available at: https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2013/acs/2013_Chesnut_01.html (accessed July 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christy, J. 2014. “Use of Response Propensity Scores to Direct CAPI Field Activity.” In Proceedings of the American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, May 15–18, Anaheim, CA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01058.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coffey, S., B. Reist, and P.V. Miller. 2019. “Interventions On-Call: Dynamic Adaptive Design in the 2015 National Survey of College Graduates,” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 8: 726–747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz026.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Couper, M.P. 2000. “Usability Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Survey Instruments,” Social Science Computer Review 18: 384–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930061800402.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Couper, M.P. 2017. “Birth and Diffusion of the Concept of Paradata” Advances in Social Research 18: 14–26. Available at: https://jasr.or.jp/english/JASR_Birth%20and%20-Diffusion%20of%20the%20Concept%20of%20Paradata.pdf (accessed October 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Durrant, G.B., and F. Steele. 2009. “Multilevel Modelling of Refusal and Non-Contact in Household Surveys: Evidence from Six UK Government Surveys,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A172: 361–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00565.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edwards, B., H. Sun, and R. Hubbard. 2020. “Behavior change techniques for reducing interviewer contributions to total survey error.” In Interviewer Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective: 77–90. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feng, C.X. 2021. “A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data,” Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications 8: 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40488-021-00121-4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groves, R.M., and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys, New York: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groves, R.M., and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Designing for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A169: 439–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hobbs, B.P., B.P. Carlin, S.J. Mandrekar, and D.J. Sargent. 2011. “Hierarchical commensurate and power prior models for adaptive incorporation of historical information in clinical trials.” Biometrics 67: 1047–1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01564.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ibrahim, J.G., and M.H. Chen. 2000. “Power prior distributions for regression models.” Statistical Science 15: 46–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1009212673.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, M.T., C.B. McPhee, and P.J. Lavrakas. 2020. “Using Response Propensity Modeling to Allocate Noncontingent Incentives in an Address-Based Sample: Evidence from a National Experiment,” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 8: 385–411, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laflamme, F., and M. Karaganis. 2010. “Implementation of Responsive Collection Design for CATI Surveys at Statistics Canada.” In Proceedings of the Q2010, 3–6 May, Helsinki, Finland. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Francois-Laflamme-3/publication/228583181_Implementation_of_Responsive_Collection_Design_for_CATI_Surveys_at_Statistics_Canada/links/5436b2120cf2dc341db46d70/Implementationof-Responsive-Collection-Design-for-CATI-Surveys-at-Statistics-Canada.pdf (accessed July 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Luiten, A., J. Hox, and E. de Leeuw. 2020. “Survey Nonresponse Trends and Fieldwork Effort in the 21st Century: Results of an International Study across Countries and Surveys,” Journal of Official Statistics 36(3): 469–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/-JOS-2020-0025.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ma, L., M. Yan, and J. Weng. 2015. “Modeling Traffic Crash Rates of Road Segments through a Lognormal Hurdle Framework with Flexible Scale Parameter,” Journal of Advanced Transportation 49: 928–940.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mittereder, F., and B.T. West. 2021. “A Dynamic Survival Modeling Apporach to the Prediction of Web Survey Breakoff.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 10: 945–978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mneimneh, Z., L. Lyberg, S. Sharma, M. Vyas, D.B. Sathe, F. Malter, and Y. Altwaijri. 2018. “Case Studies on Monitoring Interviewer Behavior in International and Multinational Surveys.” In Advances in Comparative Survey Methods. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mullahy, J. 1986. “Specification and Testing of some Modified Count Data Models,” Journal of Econometrics 33: 341–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90002-3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics. 2018. National Health Interview Survey: Survey Description. Technical Report. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/NHIS/2017/srvydesc.pdf (accessed July 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peytchev, A., J. Rosen, S. Riley, J. Murphy, and M. Lindblad. 2010. “Reduction of Nonresponse Bias through Case Prioritization.” Survey Research Methods 4: 21–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i1.3037.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peytchev A. 2014. Models and Interventions in adaptive and responsive survey designs. DC-AAPOR Panel on Adaptive Survey Design. Washington D.C. Available at: http://dc-aapor.org/ModelsInterventionsPeytchev.pdf (accessed July 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peytchev, A., D. Pratt, and M. Duprey. 2020. “Responsive and Adaptive Survey Design: Use of Bias Propensity During Data Collection to Reduce Nonresponse Bias,” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 10: 131–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smaa013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roberts, C., C. Vandenplas, and M.E. Stahli. 2014. “Evaluating the Impact of Response Enhancement Methods on the Risk of Nonresponse Bias and Survey Costs.” Survey Research Methods 8: 67–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2014.v8i2.5459.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rose, C., S. Martin, K. Wannemuehler, and B. Plikaytis. 2006. “On the Use of Zero-Inflated and Hurdle Models for Modeling Vaccine Adverse Event Count Data,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 16: 463–481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400600719384.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 39: 29–58. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2009001/article/10887-eng.pdf?st=Ox4bRwqM.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response,” Journal of Official Statistics 27(2): 231–253. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/indicators-for-monitoring-and-improving-representativeness-of-response.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schouten, B., N. Mushkudiani, N. Shlomo, G. Durrant, P. Lundquist, and J. Wagner. 2018. “A Bayesian Analysis of Design Parameters in Survey Data Collection,” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 6: 431–464: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smy012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smithson, M., and E. Merkle. 2013. “Chapter 5: Count Variables,” In Generalized Linear Models for Categorical and Continuous Limited Dependent Variables. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC. Print.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sun, J. 2006. The Statistical Analysis of Interval-Censored Failure Time Data New York: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tolliver, K., J. Fields, S. Coffey, and A. Nagle. 2019. “Combating Attrition Bias Using Case Prioritization in the Survey of Income and Program Participation.” In Proceedings from the 2019 AAPOR Conference, Toronto, Ontario, USA. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2019/files/1199523.pdf (accessed July 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wagner, J., and T.E. Raghunathan. 2010. “A New Stopping Rule for Surveys.” Statistics in Medicine 29: 1014–1024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3834.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wagner, J., and F. Hubbard. 2014. “Producing Unbiased Estimates of Propensity Models during Data Collection,” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2: 323–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smu009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wagner, J., B.T. West, N. Kirgis, J.M. Lepkowski, W.G. Axinn, and S.K. Ndiaye. 2012. “Use of Paradata in a Responsive Design Framework to Manage a Field Data Collection.” Journal of Official Statistics 28: 477–499. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/f6bcee6f397c4fd68db6452fc9643e68/use-of-paradata-in-a-responsive-design-framework-to-manage-a-field-data-collection.pdf (accessed July 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walejko, G., and J. Wagner. 2018. “A Study of Interviewer Compliance in 2013 and 2014 Census Test Adaptive Designs” Journal of Official Statistics 34(3): 649–670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0031.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walsh, R., and J. Coombs. 2013. “Case Reassignment: When making contact is a two-person job.” In Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, Boston, MA, USA: 3690–3700. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296847275_Case_Reassignment_When_making_contact_is_a_two-person_job (accessed July 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, B.T., and R.M. Groves. 2013. “The PAIP Score: A Propensity-Adjusted Interviewer Performance Indicator,” Public Opinion Quarterly 77: 352–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, B.T., and F. Kreuter. 2013. “Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Interviewer Observations: Evidence from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG).” Public Opinion Quarterly 77: 522–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, B.T., J. Wagner, S. Coffey, and M.R. Elliott. 2021. “Deriving Priors for Bayesian Prediction of Daily Response Propensity in Responsive Survey Design: Historical Data Analysis vs. Literature Review.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 11: 367–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab036.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, D., and J.M. Brick. 2018. “Trends in U.S Face-to-Face Household Survey Nonresponse and Level of Effort.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 6: 186–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx019.
]Search in Google Scholar