1. bookVolume 38 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)
    Special Issue on Respondent Burden
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2001-7367
First Published
01 Oct 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Determination of the Threshold in Cutoff Sampling Using Response Burden with an Application to Intrastat

Published Online: 03 Dec 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 38 (2022) - Issue 4 (December 2022) - Special Issue on Respondent Burden
Page range: 1205 - 1234
Received: 01 Jan 2021
Accepted: 01 Sep 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2001-7367
First Published
01 Oct 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

Abowd, J.M., and I.M. Schmutte. 2019. “An Economic Analysis of Privacy Protection and Statistical Accuracy as Social Choices.” American Economic Review 109(1): 171–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170627. Search in Google Scholar

Adler, M.D. 2019. Measuring Social Welfare: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190643027.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Adler, M.D., and E.A. Posner. 1999. “Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis.” The Yale Law Journal 109(2): 165–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/797489. Search in Google Scholar

AJPES. 2014. “Annual Balance Sheets and Income Statements Data, 2013.” [data collection]. Available at: https://www.ajpes.si/Letna_porocila/Splosno. (accessed January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Axtell, R. 2001. “Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes.” Science 293: 1818–1820. DOI: https://www.ajpes.si/Letna_porocila/Splosno.10.1126/science.106208111546870 Search in Google Scholar

Baillargeon, S., and L.-P. Rivest. 2009. “A general algorithm for univariate stratification.” International Statistical Review 77(3): 331–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00093.x. Search in Google Scholar

Bavdaž, M., D. Giesen, S. KorenjakČerne, T. Löfgren, and V. Raymond-Blaess. 2015. “Response Burden in Official Business Surveys: Measurement and Reduction Practices of National Statistical Institutes.” Journal of Official Statistics 31(4): 559–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2015-0035. Search in Google Scholar

Bee M., R. Benedetti, E. Espa, and F. Piersimoni. 2011. “Cut-Off Approach To The Design Of Longitudinal Business Surveys,” In Proceedings of the Section on Government Statistics, Joint Statistical Meetings, July 30–August 4, 2011: 2488–2500, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Search in Google Scholar

Bee, M., and S. Schiavo. 2018. “Powerless: gains from trade when firm productivity is not Pareto distributed.” Review of World Economics 154(1): 15–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-017-0295-z. Search in Google Scholar

Benedetti, R., M. Bee, and G. Espa. 2010. “A framework for cut-off sampling in business survey design.” Journal of Official Statistics 26(4): 651–671. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/20200206/jos_cutoff_benedetti-mfl.pdf. (accessed January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Bikhchandani, S., and J.W. Mamer. 2013. “Decreasing marginal value of information under symmetric loss.” Decision Analysis 10(3): 245–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2013.0274. Search in Google Scholar

Bradburn, N. 1978. “Respondent burden.” In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, Joint Statistical Meetings. August 14–17, 1978: 35–40, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/papers/1978_007.pdf. (accessed July 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Cabral, L.M.B., and J. Mata. 2003. “On the Evolution of the Firm Size Distribution: Facts and Theory.” American Economic Review 93(4): 1075–1090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803769206205. Search in Google Scholar

Chaudron, R., and K. Carlier. 2015. “The advantages of random sampling versus cutting-of-the-tail: the application of a stratified sample design for the collection of data on special financial institutions in the Netherlands.” IFC Bulletin 39: 37. Available at: https://EconPapers.repec.Org/RePEc:bis:bisifc:39-37. (accessed July 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, L.R., and W. Green. 1976. “Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power.” Journal of Political Economy 84(4): 655–676. Available at: https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:84:y:1976:i:4:p:655-76. (accessed January 2021).10.1086/260470 Search in Google Scholar

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (Text with EEA relevance) (2020). Official Journal L271, 18.8.2020: 1–170. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32020R1197. (accessed July 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Dalén, J. 2005. “Sampling Issues in Business Surveys.” PHARE 2002 Multi Beneficiary Statistics Programme (Lot 1). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/64157/4374310/20-Quality-in-statistics-sampling-issues-in-business-statistics-2005.pdf. (accessed July 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2007a. Impact of a change in threshold on the number of PSIs. Doc QA/G3/05-07/10 (SIM A/10). Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2007b. Impact of a change in threshold on data quality at detailed level. Doc QA/G3/05-07/11 (SIM A/11). Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2018. European Statistics Code of Practice. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/4031688/8971242/KS-02-18-142-EN-N.pdf. (accessed January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2020a. ICT usage in enterprises (isoc_e). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/isoc_e_esms.htm. (accessed January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2020b. Labour costs survey 2008, 2012 and 2016–NACE Rev. 2 activity (lcs_r2). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/lcs_r2_esms.htm. (accessed January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2020c. Results of the community innovation survey (CIS2-CIS7). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/inn_cis2_esms.htm. (accessed January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2020d. Statistics on the production of manufactured goods (prom). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/prom_esms.htm. (accessed January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2021a. European business statistics compilers’ manual for international trade in goods statistics. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/12399711/KS-GQ-21-004-ENN.pdf. (accessed June 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2021b. National requirements for the Intrastat system. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/12889594/KS-GQ-21-011-EN-N.pdf. (accessed June 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Fernandes, A.M., P.J. Klenow, S. Meleshchuk, M.D. Pierola, and A. Rodriguez-Clare. 2018. The Intensive Margin In Trade. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8625. Search in Google Scholar

Gabaix, X. 2009. “Power Laws in Economics and Finance.” Annual Review of Economics 1: 255–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.142940. Search in Google Scholar

Giesen, D., M. Vella, C.F. Brady, P. Brown, D. Ravindra, and A. Vaasen-Otten. 2018. “Response Burden Management for Establishment Surveys at Four National Statistical Institutes.” Journal of Official Statistics 34(2): 397–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0018. Search in Google Scholar

Guadarrama, M., I. Molina, and Y. Tillé. 2020. “Small area estimation methods under cutoff sampling.” Survey Methodology 46(1): 51–75. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/12-001-X202000100004. (accessed July 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Haziza, D., G. Chauvet, and J.C. Deville. 2010. “Sampling and estimation in the presence of cut-off sampling.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics 52(3): 303–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2010.00584.x. Search in Google Scholar

Head, K., T. Mayer, and M. Thoenig. 2014. “Welfare and Trade Without Pareto.” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 104(5): 310–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.310. Search in Google Scholar

Knaub, J.R. 2007. Cutoff Sampling and Inference. InterStat. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2010.00584.x. (accessed January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Lavallée, P., and M.A. Hidiroglou. 1988. “On the stratification of skewed populations.” Survey Methodology 14: 33–43. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/12-001-X198800114602. (accessed July 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Layard, R., and S. Gleister. 1994. “Introduction.” In Cost-Benefit Analysis, edited by R. Layard, and S. Gleister: 1–56, Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521942.001.10.1017/CBO9780511521942.001 Search in Google Scholar

Lee, S.E., and K.-I. Shin. 2016. “The cut-off point based on underlying distribution and cost function.” Journal of Applied Statistics 43(6): 1061–1073. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2015.1089222.10.1080/02664763.2015.1089222 Search in Google Scholar

Melitz, M.J. 2003. “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity.” Econometrica 71(6): 1695–1725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467. Search in Google Scholar

Nerlove, M. 1963. “Returns to scale in electricity supply”. In Measurement in Economics-Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics in Memory of Yehuda Grunfeld, by C.F. Christ, M. Friedman, L.A. Goodman, Z. Griliches, A.C. Harberger, Y. Mundlak, M. Nerlove, D. Patinkin, L.G. Telser, and H. Theil: 167–198, Stanford (Calif.): Stanford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Office for Statistics Regulation. 2020. The Public Good of Statistics: What we know so far. London: Office for Statistics Regulation. Available at: https://osr.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/publication/the-public-good-of-statistics-what-we-know-so-far/. (accessed January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Perše, S. 2016. Analiza stroskov in koristi moznih razvojnih scenarijev sistema Intrastat v Sloveniji (Cost-Benefit Analysis of Intrastat Development Options in Slovenia). MSc dissertation. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, School of Economics and Business. Available at: http://www.cek.ef.uni-lj.si/magister/perse5068.pdf. (accessed January 2021) Search in Google Scholar

Prest, A.R., and R. Turvey. 1965. “Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Survey.” The Economic Journal 75(300): 683–735. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2229670.10.2307/2229670 Search in Google Scholar

Regulation (EC) No 638/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on Community statistics relating to the trading of goods between Member States and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3330/91 (2004). Official Journal L102, 7.4.2004: 1–8. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0638 (accessed July 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Regulation (EC) No 222/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 638/2004 on Community statistics relating to the trading of goods between Member States (2004). Official Journal L87, 31.3.2009: 160–163. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009R0222 (accessed July 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Samuelson, P.A. 1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 36: 386–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895. Search in Google Scholar

Smith, P.A., and W. Yung. 2023. “Introduction to sampling and estimation for business surveys.” In Advances in Business Statistics, Methods and Data Collection edited by G. Snijkers, M. Bavdaž, S. Bender, J. Jones, S. MacFeely, J.W. Sakshaug, K.J. Thompson, and A. van Delden: chap. 27. Hoboken: Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, B.D. 1985. “Optimal Data Quality.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 80(391): 564–573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1985.10478155. Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, B.D., and L.E. Moses. 1990. “Needed Data Expenditure for an Ambiguous Decision Problem.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85(412): 1099–1104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1990.10474981. Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, B.D., and Z.H. Seeskin. 2015. “Effects of Census Accuracy on Apportionment of Congress and Allocations of Federal Funds.” In JSM Proceedings, Government Statistics Section, August 8–13: 3061–3075. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: https://www.norc.org/PDFs/Publications/SeeskinZ_Effects%20of%20Census%20Accuracy_2015.pdf. (accessed January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Stern, N.H. 1976. “On the specification of models of optimum income taxation.” Journal of Public Economics 6(1–2): 123–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(76)90044-X. Search in Google Scholar

SURS. 2014. Survey on current response burden in Intrastat, 2013. [data collection]. Search in Google Scholar

SURS and FURS. 2014. Intra-EU and Extra-EU Trade Flows, 2013. [data collection]. Available at: https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/DataCollection/Intrastat (accessed January 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Trottini, M., and S.E. Fienberg. 2002. “Modelling User Uncertainty for Disclosure Risk and Data Utility.” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10(5): 511–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488502001612. Search in Google Scholar

Yorgason, D., B. Bridgman, Y. Cheng, A.H. Dorfman, J. Lent, Y.K. Liu, J. Miranda, and S. Rumburg. 2011. “Cutoff Sampling in Federal Surveys: an Inter-Agency Review.” In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Government Statistics: 76–90. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2011/pdf/st110050.pdf. (accessed June 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo