1. bookVolume 36 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)
    Special Issue on Nonresponse
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2001-7367
First Published
01 Oct 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

The Action Structure of Recruitment Calls and Its Analytic Implications: The Case of Disfluencies

Published Online: 24 Jul 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 36 (2020) - Issue 3 (September 2020) - Special Issue on Nonresponse
Page range: 529 - 559
Received: 01 Sep 2018
Accepted: 01 Oct 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2001-7367
First Published
01 Oct 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

Arnold, J.E., C.L.H. Kam, and M.K. Tanenhaus. 2007. “If You Say Thee uh You Are Describing Something Hard: The On-Line Attribution of Disfluency During Reference Comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33(5): 914–930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914.10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, J.E., M.K. Tanenhaus, R.J. Altmann, and M. Fagnano. 2004. “The Old and Thee, uh, New: Disfluency and Reference Resolution.” Psychological Science 15(9): 578–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x.10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.xSearch in Google Scholar

Barr, D.J. and M. Seyfeddinipur. 2010. “The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency.” Language and Cognitive Processes 25(4): 441–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903047122.10.1080/01690960903047122Search in Google Scholar

Boomer, D.S. 1965. “Hesitation and Grammatical Encoding.” Language and Speech 8(3): 148–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002383096500800302.10.1177/002383096500800302Search in Google Scholar

Bortfeld, H., S.D. Leon, J.E. Bloom, M.F. Schober, and S.E. Brennan. 2001. “Disfluency Rates in Conversation: Effects of Age, Relationship, Topic, Role, and Gender.” Language and Speech 44(2): 123–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00238309010440020101.10.1177/00238309010440020101Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, S.E. and M.F. Schober. 2001. “How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech.” Journal of Memory and Language 44: 274–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2753.10.1006/jmla.2000.2753Search in Google Scholar

Chamberlain, G. 1980. “Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data.” The Review of Economic Studies 47(1): 225–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297110.10.2307/2297110Search in Google Scholar

Christenfeld, N. 1995. “Does it hurt to say um?” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 19(3): 171–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02175503.10.1007/BF02175503Search in Google Scholar

Clark, H.H. and J.E. Fox Tree. 2002. “Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking.” Cognition 84(1): 73–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3.10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3Search in Google Scholar

Conrad, F.G., J.S. Broome, J.R. Benkí, F. Kreuter, R.M. Groves, D. Vannette, and C. McClain. 2013. “Interviewer speech and the success of survey invitations.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 176(1): 191–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01064.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01064.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dijkstra, W. and J. Smit. 2002. “Persuading Reluctant Recipients in Telephone Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.A. Little, 121–134. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Draisma, S. and W. Dijkstra. 2004. “Response Latency and (Para)linguistic Expression as Indicators of Response Error.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J.M. Rothgeb, M.P. Couper, J.T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 131–148. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1002/0471654728.ch7Search in Google Scholar

Draisma, S., Y. Ongena, and W. Dijkstra. 2005. “Qualified Answers and Other Doubt Expressions as Indicators of Cognitive Problems in a Health Survey.” American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, Miami Beach, FL, May 2005. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2005f.html (accessed June 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Fox Tree, J.E. 2002. “Interpreting Pauses and Ums at Turn Exchanges.” Discourse Processes 34(1): 37–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3401_2.10.1207/S15326950DP3401_2Search in Google Scholar

Fox Tree, J.E. 2007. “Folk notions of um and uh, you know, and like.” Text & Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies 23(3): 297–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.012.10.1515/TEXT.2007.012Search in Google Scholar

Garbarski, D., N.C. Schaeffer, and J. Dykema. 2011. “Are Interactional Behaviors Exhibited When the Self-Reported Health Question Is Asked Associated with Health Status?“ Social Science Research 40(4): 1025–1036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.04.002.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.04.002317377721927518Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 1996. “Contact-Level Influences on Cooperation in Face-to-Face Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 12(1): 63–83. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/contact-level-influences-on-cooperation-in-face-to-face-surveys.pdf (accessed June 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. and K. McGonagle. 2001. “A Theory-Guided Interviewer Training Protocol Regarding Survey Participation.” Journal of Official Statistics 17(2): 249–266. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/a-theory-guided-interviewer-training-protocol-regardingsurvey-participation.pdf (accessed June 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M., B.C. O’Hare, D. Gould-Smith, J.R. Benkí, and P. Maher. 2008. “Telephone Interviewer Voice Characteristics and the Survey Participation Decision.” In Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by J.M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, J.M. Brick, E.D. De Leeuw, L. Japec, P.J. Lavrakas, M.W. Link, and R.L. Sangster, 385–400. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470173404.ch18Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, R.M. 2005. “Survey Response in the Long Run: The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.” Field Methods 17(1): 3–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1525822X04272452.10.1177/1525822X04272452Search in Google Scholar

Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. and H. van den Bergh. 2002. “Effects of Introductions in Large-Scale Telephone Survey Interviews.” In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by D.W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer, and J. van der Zouwen, 205–218. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Mathiowetz, N.A. 1999. “Respondent Uncertainty as Indicator of Response Quality.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 11(3): 289–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.3.289.10.1093/ijpor/11.3.289Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, D.W., J. Freese, and N.C. Schaeffer. 2010. “Calling for Participation: Requests, Blocking Moves, and Rational (Inter)action in Survey Introductions.” American Sociological Review 75(5): 791–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0003122410379582.Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, D.W. and N.C. Schaeffer. 1997. “Keeping the Gate: Declinations of the Request to Participate in a Telephone Survey Interview.” Sociological Methods & Research 26(1): 34–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0049124197026001002.10.1177/0049124197026001002Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, D.W., H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaffer, and J. van der Zouwen. 2002. Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by D.W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer, and J. van der Zouwen. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Morton-Williams, J. 1993. Interviewer Approaches. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Oksenberg, L. and C.F. Cannell. 1988. “Effects of Interviewer Vocal Characteristics on Nonresponse.” In Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by R.M. Groves, P.P. Biemer, L.E. Lyberg, J.T. Massey, W.L. Nicholls II, and J. Waksberg, 257–272. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Schaeffer, N.C. forthcoming. “Interaction before and during the survey interview: Insights from conversation analysis.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology.Search in Google Scholar

Schaeffer, N.C. and J. Dykema. 2011. “Response 1 to Fowler’s Chapter: Coding the Behavior of Interviewers and Respondents to Evaluate Survey Questions.” In Question Evaluation Methods: Contributing to the Science of Data Quality, edited by J. Madans, K. Miller, A. Maitland, and G. Willis, 23–39. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118037003.ch3Search in Google Scholar

Schaeffer, N.C., D. Garbarski, J. Freese, and D.W. Maynard. 2013. “An Interactional Model of the Call for Participation in the Survey Interview: Actions and Reactions in the Survey Recruitment Call.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77(1): 323–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft006.10.1093/poq/nft006407289424976648Search in Google Scholar

Schaeffer, N.C. and D.W. Maynard. 2002. “Occasions for Intervention: Interactional Resources for Comprehension in Standardized Survey Interviews.” In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by D.W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer, and J. van der Zouwen, 261–280. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Schaeffer, N.C., B.H. Min, T. Purnell, D. Garbarski, and J. Dykema. 2018. “Greeting and Response: Predicting Participation from the Call Opening?” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1(1): 122–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx014.10.1093/jssam/smx014Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. 2010. “Some Other “Uh(m)”s.” Discourse Processes 47(2): 130–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903223380.10.1080/01638530903223380Search in Google Scholar

Schober, M.F. and J.E. Bloom. 2004. “Discourse Cues that Respondents Have Misunderstood Survey Questions.” Discourse Processes 38(3): 287–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3803_1.10.1207/s15326950dp3803_1Search in Google Scholar

Schober, M.F., F.G. Conrad, W. Dijkstra, and Y.P. Ongena. 2012. “Disfluencies and Gaze Aversion in Unreliable Responses to Survey Questions.” Journal of Official Statistics 28(4): 555–582. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/disfluencies-and-gaze-aversion-in-unreliable-responses-to-survey-questions.pdf (accessed June 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Sharf, D.J. and M.E. Lehman. 1984. “Relationship between the speech characteristics and effectiveness of telephone interviewers.” Journal of Phonetics 12(3): 219–228. Abstract: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-22253-001 (accessed June 2019).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30878-2Search in Google Scholar

Shriberg, E. 1996. “Disfluencies in Switchboard.” Proceedings, International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP ’96), Vol. Addendum, 11–14. Philadelphia, PA, October 3–6, 1996. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.16.5822&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed June 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Smith, V.L. and H.H. Clark. 1993. “On the Course of Answering Questions.” Journal of Memory and Language 32(1): 25–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1002.10.1006/jmla.1993.1002Search in Google Scholar

Sturgis, P. and P. Campanelli. 1998. “The Scope for Reducing Refusals in Household Surveys: An Investigation Based on Transcripts of Tape-Recorded Doorstep Interactions.” Journal of the Market Research Society 40(2): 121–139. Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/214805239/fulltextPDF/7DBB4A59542349A9PQ/1?accountid=465 (accessed June 2019).10.1177/147078539804000207Search in Google Scholar

Van der Vaart, W., Y. Ongena, A. Hoogendoorn, and W. Dijkstra. 2006. “Do Interviewers’ Voice Characteristics Influence Cooperation Rates in Telephone Surveys?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18(4): 488–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh117.10.1093/ijpor/edh117Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo