[Barrett, K., M. Sloan, and D. Wright. 2006. “Interviewer Perceptions of Interview Quality”. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methodology Section, 4026–4033. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2006/Files/JSM2006-000644.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Block, E.S. and L. Erskine. 2012 “Interviewing by Telephone: Specific Considerations, Opportunities, and Challenges.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11(4): 428–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100409.10.1177/160940691201100409]Search in Google Scholar
[Casas-Cordero, C., F. Kreuter, Y. Wang, and S. Babey. 2013. “Assessing the Measurement Error Properties of Interviewer Observations of Neighbourhood Characteristics”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 176: 229–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01065.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01065.x380438224159255]Search in Google Scholar
[Chun, A., B. Schouten and J. Wagner. 2017. JOS Special Issue on Responsive and Adaptive Survey Design: “Looking Back to See Forward-Editorial”. Journal of Official Statistics 33(3): 571–577. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2017-0027.10.1515/jos-2017-0027]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P. and M.B. Ofstedal. 2009 “Keeping in Contact with mobile Sample Members.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 183–203. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9780470743874.ch11]Search in Google Scholar
[Eckman, S., J. Sinibaldi, and A. Möntmann-Hertz. 2013. “Can Interviewers effectively rate the Likelihood of Cases to cooperate?” Public Opinion Quarterly 77(2): 561–573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft012.10.1093/poq/nft012]Search in Google Scholar
[Feldman, J.J., H. Hyman, and C.W. Hart. 1951. “A Field Study of Interviewer Effects on the Quality of Survey Data.” Public Opinion Quarterly 15(4): 734–761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/266357.10.1086/266357]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler, M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2009. Survey Methodology. 2nd Ed., Wiley Series in Survey Methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for actively controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 169(3): 439–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Haynes, M., M. Western, and M. Spallek. 2005. “Methods for categorical longitudinal Survey Data: Understanding Employment Status of Australian Women.” Paper prepared for the HILDA Survey Research Conference, University of Melbourne, Australia, 29–30 September, 2005. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjfrIGR1sbnAhUkShUIHf1PAQgQFjABegQIBRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F43458841_Methods_for_Categorical_Longitudinal_Survey_Data_Understanding_Employment_Status_of_Australian_Women&usg=AOvVaw26JHyUI5MCUOF5FqgSI1Nc (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, C.K. 2010. Nonresponse and Measurement Error in Mobile Phone Surveys. Doctoral thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Available at: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/75977 (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalton, G., J. Lepkowski, G.E. Montanari, and D. Maligalig. 1990. Characteristics of second Wave Nonrespondents in a Panel Survey. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methodology Section, 462–467. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaminska, O., A.L. McCutcheon, and J. Billiet. 2010. “Satisficing among reluctant Respondents in a Cross-National Context.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5): 956–984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq062.10.1093/poq/nfq062]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirchner, A., K. Olson, and J.D. Smyth. 2017. “Do Interviewer Postsurvey Evaluations of Respondents’ Engagement measure who Respondents are or what they do?” A Behavior coding Study. Public Opinion Quarterly: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx026.10.1093/poq/nfx026]Search in Google Scholar
[Laurie, H., R. Smith, and L. Scott. 1999. “Strategies for reducing Nonresponse in a longitudinal Panel Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 15(2): 169–282. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/strategies-for-reducing-nonresponse-in-a-longitudinal-panel-survey.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lemay, M. 2009. Understanding the Mechanism of Panel Attrition. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, U.S.A.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lepkowski, J.M. and M.P. Couper. 2002. “Nonresponse in the second Wave of longitudinal Household Surveys.” In Survey nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J. Little, 259–272. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lipps, O. 2012a. Using Information from Telephone Panel Surveys to predict Reasons for Refusal. Methods, data, analyses 6(1): 3–20. Available at: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-314544 (accessed August 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lipps, O. 2012b. “A Note on improving Contact Times in Panel Surveys.” Field Methods 24(1): 95–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X11417966.10.1177/1525822X11417966]Search in Google Scholar
[Little, R.J. and S. Vartivarian. 2005. “Does weighting for Nonresponse increase the Variance of Survey Means?” Survey Methodology 31(2): 161–168. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=2ahUKEwiTkPGq2MbnAhXHUBUIHWLjCq4QFjACegQIBRAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.692.507%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&usg=AOvVaw1fkEbnvfviCWWInhD3jfs6 (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lugtig, P. 2014. “Panel Attrition: Separating Stayers, fast Attriters, gradual Attriters, and Lurkers.” Sociological Methods & Research 43(4): 699–723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113520305.10.1177/0049124113520305]Search in Google Scholar
[Perez, F.P. and B. Baffour. 2018. “Respondent mental Health, mental Disorders and Survey Interview Outcomes.” Survey Research Methods 12(2): 161–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2018.v12i2.7225.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peytchev, A. and K. Olson. 2007. “Using Interviewer Observations to improve Nonresponse Adjustments: NES 2004.” In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methodology Section, 3364–3371. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1149&context=sociologyfacpub (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Plewis, I., L. Calderwood, and T Mostafa. 2017. “Can Interviewer Observations of the Interview Predict future Response?” Methods, data, analyses 11(1): 29–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2016.010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schonlau, M., N. Watson, and M. Kroh. 2010 “Household Survey Panels: How much do following Rules affect Sample Size?” Survey Research Methods 5(2): 53–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2011.v5i2.4665.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., A. Peytchev, and J. Wagner. 2017. Adaptive Survey Design. Boca Raton: CRC Press.10.1201/9781315153964]Search in Google Scholar
[Sinibaldi, J., G. Durrant, and F. Kreuter. 2013. “Evaluating the Measurement Error of Interviewer observed Paradata.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77: 173–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs062.10.1093/poq/nfs062]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoop, I. 2005. The Hunt for the Last Respondent, Nonresponse in Sample Surveys. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands. Available at: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/2900/full.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Tillmann, R., M. Voorpostel, U. Kuhn, F. Lebert, V-A. Ryser, O. Lipps, B. Wernli, and E. Antal. 2016. “The Swiss Household Panel Study: Observing social Change since 1999.” Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 7(1): 64–78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v7i1.360.10.14301/llcs.v7i1.360]Search in Google Scholar
[Uhrig, N.S.C. 2008. The Nature and Causes of Attrition in the British Household Panel Survey. ISER Working Paper 2008-05. Colchester: ISER, University of Essex. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sc_Uhrig/publication/242116089_The_Nature_and_Causes_of_Attrition_in_the_British_Household_Panel_Survey/links/0a85e537c6cd161804000000/The-Nature-and-Causes-of-Attrition-in-the-British-Household-Panel-Survey.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Voorpostel, M. 2010. Attrition Patterns in the Swiss Household Panel by Demographic Characteristics and Social Involvement. Swiss Journal of Sociology 36(2): 359–377. Available at: https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_78D83DD99A6F.P001/REF (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Voorpostel, M. and O. Lipps. 2011. Attrition in the Swiss Household Panel: Is change associated with drop-out? Journal of Official Statistics 27(2): 301–318. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/attrition-in-the-swiss-household-panel-is-change-associated-with-drop-out.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, James. 2008. Adaptive Survey Design to Reduce Nonresponse Bias, Dissertation, University of Michigan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, Nicole, and Mark Wooden. 2004. Sample attrition in the HILDA survey. Australian Journal of Labour Economics 7(2): 293–308. Available at: https://businesslaw.curtin.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2016/05/AJLE-v7n2-watson.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar