1. bookVolume 11 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2543-831X
First Published
25 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Relations of University Values and Competences of University Teachers

Published Online: 04 Dec 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 11 (2019) - Issue 3 (September 2019)
Page range: 134 - 157
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2543-831X
First Published
25 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Objective: The paper deals with the theoretical and empirical examination of university values in relation to key competences of university teachers. The combination of values that universities should prioritize and the competences that university teachers should possess is seen in the paper as an important precondition for improving the quality and acceleration of modern university progress. The theoretical part analyzes, compares and synthesizes opinions on key terms examined in the paper, i.e. higher education, university, values, and competences. The empirical part presents, on the one hand, the results of the questionnaire survey aimed at defining important university values. The survey was carried out on a sample of n = 279 students of the University of Žilina, Slovak Republic, and obtained 1,786 statements on crucial values or sub-values of the university. On the other hand, based on results of the previous survey (n = 27 university teachers) which was targeted on key competences of the great university teachers, the empirical part seeks to experimentally link university key values with teachers’ key competences.

Methodology: Analysis, synthesis, comparison, abstraction, questionnaire survey, thinking experiment. Hypothesis H1: University values defined by students will be repeated in the survey, i.e. student views on the core values of university will be identical or similar in content. Negation hypothesis H0: University values defined by students will not be repeated in the survey.

Findings: Respondents reported a total of n0 = 1,786 statements regarding the university values or sub-values. A substantial consensus was found: many of values were repeated for respondents. Defined values were subsequently grouped: from the initially defined n1 = 229 values, n2 = 32 complex values were generated. This leads to a rejection of H0, in favor of H1: the university values generated by students are similar in the content.

The results in the evaluative question confirmed the assumption that respondents considered most important mostly those values that the previous open question most frequently reported. Although depending on the study program is always the quality of education in the first place of importance, the order of importance of other values varies to some extent.

Value Added: Opinions on university teachers’ competences and university’s values were discussed. Experimental linking of university values to competences of teachers was performed based on the survey results conducted by the authors in 2012 (this one consisted of three sequential interviews/workshops with teachers of University of Žilina). A logical conclusion was formulated: All the university teachers and scientists are becoming authorities competent to build, preserve and transform universal knowledge into an ever-higher level.

Recommendations: A conclusion of the paper contains the characteristics recommended for achieve an effective process of developing university competences.

Keywords

JEL Classification

Adamonienė, R., Ruibytė, L., & Šikšnianaitė, N. (2017). Problematic Aspects of the Police Personnel Education System: Sight from Organization’s and Employees’ Perspectives. Human Resources Management and Ergonomics, 11(2), 6–14.Search in Google Scholar

Agiomirgianakis, G., Lianos, T., & Tsounis, N. (2018). Returns to Investment in Higher Education: Is There a Difference between Distance Learning and Traditional Universities in the Fields of Physics, Mathematics, Social Studies, Computer Science and Economics?. Creative Education, 9(16), 19. doi: 10.4236/ce.2018.916220.10.4236/ce.2018.916220Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher Education over Ten Years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Blašková, M., Blaško, R., Jankalová, M., & Jankal, R. (2014). Key Personality Competences of University Teacher: Comparison of Requirements Defined by Teachers and/versus Defined by Students. ELSEVIER: Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 114(2014), 466–475. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.731.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.731Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Blašková, M., Blaško, R., Matuska, E., & Rosak-Szyrocka, A. (2015). Development of Key Competences of University Teachers and Managers. 4th World Conference on Educational Technology Researches (WCETR-2014), Barcelona, October 2014. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182(2015), 187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.755.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.755Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Blašková, M., & Hriníková, D. (2019). Axiological Management in Higher Education and Values Defined by Students. Aksiologiceskije aspecty v sovremennych naucnych issledovanijach. Omsk, Russia: Omskij gosudarstvennyj universitet soobscenia. 5–14.Search in Google Scholar

Bowen, H. R., & Fincher, C. (2018a).Efficiency and accountability in higher education. In H. R. Bowen (Ed.), Investment in Learning. (Chapter 1). e-Book. (Online). Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351309929. Access: 3.04.2019.10.4324/9781351309929.Access:3.04.2019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bowen, H. R., & Fincher, C. (2018b). Cognitive learning. In H. R. Bowen (Ed.), Investment in Learning (Chapter 3). e-Book (Online). Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351309929. Access: 1.04.2019.10.4324/9781351309929.Access:1.04.2019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Čandík, M. (2018). New Trends in Education of Employees of State Organizations. Human Resources Management and Ergonomics, 12(1), 32–46.Search in Google Scholar

CBI (2017). Helping the UK Thrive: CBI/Pearson Education and Skills Survey 2017, July 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Cewińska, J., & Striker, M. (2018). Lifestyle as a Determinant of Managerial Decisions. Human Resources Management and Ergonomics, 12(1), 47–58.Search in Google Scholar

Coates, H. (2005). The Value of Student Engagement for Higher Education Quality Assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25–36. doi: 10.1080/13538320500074915.10.1080/13538320500074915Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and Identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

D’Aguiar, S., & Harrison, N. (2016). Returning from Earning: UK Graduates Returning to Postgraduate Study, with Particular Respect to STEM Subjects, Gender and Ethnicity. Journal of Education and Work, 29, 584–613. doi: 10.1080/13639080.2014.1001332.10.1080/13639080.2014.1001332Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dorri, M., Yarmohammadian, M. H., & Nadi, M. A. (2012). A Review on Value Chain in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(2012), 3842–3846. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.157.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.157Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Figurska, I. (2017). Dignity Management as a New Approach to Human Resources Management. Human Resources Management and Ergonomics, 11(2), 23–37.Search in Google Scholar

Figurska, I., Sokół, A. (2016). The Process of Knowledge Acquisition with the Use of Various Teaching Methods and Its Effect on the Creativity of Employees... Mediterian Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 143–151.10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n6p143Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, R. B. (1981). The Changing Economic Value of Higher Education in Developed Economies: A Report to the O.E.C.D. NBER Working Paper, 820. doi: 10.3386/w0820.10.3386/w0820Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Grant, G., Elbow, P., Ewens, T., Gamson, Z., Kohli, W., Neumann, W., Olesen, V., & Riesman, D. (1979).On Competence: A Critical Analysis of Competence-Based Reforms in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Grover, S. L., & Brockner, J. (1989). Empathy and the relationship between attitudinal similarity and attraction. Journal of Research Personality, 23, 469–479.10.1016/0092-6566(89)90015-9Search in Google Scholar

Hill, K., Hoffman, D., & Rex, T. R. (2005).The Value of Higher Education: Individual and Societal Benefits (With Special Consideration for the State of Arizona). Arizona State University: W. P. Carey School of Business, Productivity and Prosperity Projects (P3).Search in Google Scholar

House of Commons Education Committee (2018).Value for Money in Higher Education. Seventh Report of Session 2017–2019. (Online). Available at: www.parliament.uk/education-committee. Access: 6.04.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Jibeen, T., & Khan, M. A. (2015). Internationalization of Higher Education: Potential Benefits and Costs. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 4(4), 196–199.10.11591/ijere.v4i4.4511Search in Google Scholar

Kim, H. S., & Chu, T. Q. (2011).Cultural variation in the motivation of self-expression. In D. Dunning (Ed.), Social Motivation. New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Krasnova, A. (2017). Competences of Coworkers Responsible for Decruitment, Viewed from the Perspective of Young Employees – Survey Results. Proceedings of 14th International Scientific Conference Human Potential Development (pp. 68–78). Benešov near Prague, 6 – 8 June, 2017. Prague: Institute for Public Administration.Search in Google Scholar

Law, D. (2013). Educational Values and the Values of Higher Education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 17(3), 81–83. doi: 10.1080/13603108.2013.856355.10.1080/13603108.2013.856355Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Li, D., Granizo, M. G., & Gardó, T. F. (2016). The Value Trade-off in Higher Education Service: A Qualitative Intercultural Approach to Students’ Perceptions. Intangible Capital, 12(4), 855–880. doi: 10.3923/ic.706.10.3923/ic.706Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lozano, J. F., Boni, A., Peris, J., & Hueso, A. (2012). Competencies in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis from the Capabilities Approach. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(1), 132–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00839.x.10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00839.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Majchrzak-Lepczyk, J. (2015). Logistyczno-marketingowe aspekty w sieci tworzenia wartości (Logistics and Marketing Aspects in the Value Creation Network). Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 217, 72.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, M. T., & Nadler, D. P. (2016). Creating a Value Added College Environment: The Role of the Hidden Curriculum. In W. Nuninger, J.-M. Chatelet (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Quality Assurance and Value Management in Higher Education (pp. 85–100). Hershey: Information Science Reference – IGI Global.Search in Google Scholar

Mohamadi, Z., & Malekshahi, N. (2018). Designing and Validating a Potential Formative Evaluation Inventory for Teacher Competences. Language Testing in Asia, 8(6). (Online). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0059-2. Access: 24.04.2019.10.1186/s40468-018-0059-2.Access:24.04.2019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mulder, M., Guligers, J., Wesselink, R., & Biemans, H. (2008).The New Competence Concept in Higher Education: Error or Enrichment?. International Scientific Conference AERA. New York, March 25.Search in Google Scholar

O’Doherty, D., O’Hare, J. A., Hyde, S., & McGrath, D. (2019). Humanities in Medicine: A Qualitative Study of Graduate and Student Experiences of Completing a Student Selected Component. Creative Education, 10(2), 15. doi: 10.4236/ce.2019.102022.10.4236/ce.2019.102022Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pinto, S. (2018). Intercultural competence in higher education: academics’ perspectives. On the Horizon, 26(2), 137–147. doi: 10.1108/OTH-02-2018-0011.10.1108/OTH-02-2018-0011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Reeve, J. (2009).Understanding motivation and emotion (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Rosi, M., Tuček, D., Potočan, V., & Jurše, M. (2018). Market Orientation of Business Schools: A Development Opportunity for the Business Model of University Business Schools in Transition Countries. Economics and Management (E & M), 21(4), 175–194.10.15240/tul/001/2018-4-012Search in Google Scholar

Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003)Key Competencies for a Successful Life and a Well-Functioning Society. Gottingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Sellar, S. (2013). Equity, markets and the politics of aspiration in Australian higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 245–258.Search in Google Scholar

Slavík, M. et al. (2012).Vysokoškolská pedagogika (Higher Education Pedagogy). Prague: Grada.Search in Google Scholar

Tomlinson, M. (2018). Conceptions of the value of higher education in a measured market. Higher Education, 75, 711–727. doi: 1 0.1007/s10734-017-0165-6.10.1007/s10734-017-0165-6Search in Google Scholar

Watts, R. (2017).Public Universities, Managerialism and the Value of Higher Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-53599-3.10.1057/978-1-137-53599-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo