Fig wasp females
Once in the fig, they leave their fig wasp host to seek out immature anthers where they mature and propagate (see morphological and morphometric differences between pre-reproductive entomophilic and mature reproductive females of
So far,
Most nematodes in the family Aphelenchoididae are fungal feeders that use their stylets to pierce mycelia and suck the contents out, and some plant and insect parasites and predators in the family also feed on their food using stylets (Hunt, 1993). Feeding in the relatively few plant-parasitic members of the family Aphelenchoididae typically involves ecto- or endoparasitism and movement through stomata/direct penetration into leaf tissue (Hunt, 1993), or through pine or coconut palm stem tissue (Kanzaki and Giblin-Davis, 2018), protrusion of the stylet through the cell wall into parenchymal or mesophyll cells (Sanwal, 1959; Wallace, 1959), secretion of pharyngeal derived cellulases (Fu, 2012), withdrawal of the cytoplasm and/or organelles through the stylet into the pharynx, retraction of the stylet, and movement to a new cell for continued feeding. This type of behavior often results in the death of the injured cell and can cause tissue necrosis (Dropkin, 1969; Jones and De Waele, 1990). This same “stick, suck, and kill” method of feeding is common among the less specialized representatives of the Tylenchomorpha (Siddiqi, 2000), but there are also several lineages culminating in increased specialization with induced uni- or multinucleate feeder cells that are initiated through effector molecules secreted into selected root cells from the dorsal or subventral glands of the pharynx, e.g., Heteroderidae and Meloidogynidae (Davis et al., 2004).
Light microscopic (LM) observations of sections of paraffin-embedded figs parasitized by different
Late phase C
One nematode-infested anther from a nematode-infested fig and three un-infested (control) anthers from an un-infested (control) fig were examined. The anthers were sagittally (or near sagittally) sectioned, observed, and photographed for comparisons through the anther, anther filament, endothecium, and pollen tubes. Photographs were taken at 2.5K magnification in an overlapping linear series starting at the ventral side (along the anther endothecium) and running completely through to the dorsal side of the anther filament, from ensheathing perianth lobe to ensheathing perianth lobe. In all cases, the orientation of the series was standardized just below the vertical midline of the anther, where the anther filament connected to the anther, allowing for examination of the anther epidermal cells connecting to the ventral anther filament epidermal cells, because nematode-associated pathology was consistently observed in this region in LM sections (Giblin-Davis et al., 1995). A total of 90 photographs were taken using Kodak EM film 4489, including some at magnifications up to 50K for better discernment of specific targets.
The photographs were edited with Photoshop Elements 9 (Adobe) for contrast and brightness adjustments and to construct the figures. The original captures are available upon request.
For general orientation, light photographs of near sagittal sections of healthy (Fig. 1; Suppl. Fig. S1) and
Figure 1:
Light micrographs of near sagittal sections of

Figure 2:
Transmission electron micrograph of near sagittal series of

The endothecium in the healthy anthers appeared as described by Center et al. (1999) with LM (Fig. 1A; Suppl. Fig. S1) as a two-to-three-cell layer of highly vacuolated cells with cellular components, mostly relegated to the periphery near the cell walls, and surrounding an electron lucent vacuole (Fig. 3). The cells in the endothecium of the nematode parasitized anther in this study were similar in size and cytoplasmic density to healthy anthers (Fig. 4). Thus, the effect of nematodes occurring in the space between the anther filament and the back of the anther on the endothecium was relatively minor. Center et al. (1999) observed that the effects on the endothecium were relatively minor when compared to the anther epidermal and anther filament epidermal cells that were in direct or close contact with the nematodes/exudate; however, the endothecium lost cell integrity as the densities of nematodes increased (Fig. 2; Suppl. Figs. S1, S2).
Figure 3:
Transmission electron micrograph of near sagittal section of the ventral side of a healthy

Figure 4:
Transmission electron micrograph of near sagittal section of the ventral side of a

Sagittal sections of the healthy anther epidermis comprised a single layer of cells with large central storage vacuoles filled with very electron-dense and darkly staining material and cellular components that were mostly arranged on the periphery near the cell walls (Fig. 5A; Suppl. Figs. S3,S4). This epidermal layer bounded a lightly staining multilayer of parenchymal cells that surrounded the pollentubes/tapetum. In the nematode-infested anther, this single layer of epidermal cells was hypertrophied and 2 to 5 times the size of the cells in the healthy epidermis with thickened cell walls (Figs. 2, 5B). Each hypertrophied cell had an enlarged and often irregularly shaped nucleus with an enlarged nucleolus, and were metabolically active as indicated by increased numbers of mitochondria and what appeared to be pro-plastids as well as endoplasmic reticulum. The darkly stained central storage vacuole had broken up into many smaller darkly stained globs, or less electron-dense granular cytoplasm of much higher volume in the enlarged cells (Figs. 6, 7; Suppl. Fig. S5). The bounded parenchymal cells were also slightly enlarged and had slightly thickened cell walls (Fig. 5B; Suppl. Fig. S6).
Figure 5:
Transmission electron micrographs of near sagittal sections of

Figure 6:
Transmission electron micrographs of near sagittal sections of

Figure 7:
Transmission electron micrographs of near sagittal sections of

Sagittal sections of healthy ventral anther filament epidermis near the connection to the backside of the anther showed a single to double (rarely triple) layer of cells that were smaller or near to the same size as the adjacent anther epidermal cells with similarly large central storage vacuoles, filled with very electron-dense and darkly stained material, and with cellular components arranged mostly at the periphery near the cell walls (Fig. 8A; Suppl. Figs. S3,S4). This layer of cells bounded a light-staining multilayer of parenchymal cells that was marbled with short runs of 3-7 larger, more squared-looking cells with similarly large central storage vacuoles, filled with very electron-dense and darkly stained material, and with cellular components mostly present at the periphery near the cell walls (Fig. 1; Suppl. Fig. S3) (these latter cells were equivalent to the safranin-rich red-staining cells in the filaments of healthy and nematode-infested anthers observed with LM by Giblin-Davis et al.,1995). Ventral anther filament epidermal cells near the propagating nematodes were similar to the adjacent anther epidermal cells with hypertrophy of the single or multiple layers with increases in cell size of 2-5x, a decentralization and dissipation of the dense material in the storage vacuoles creating a more granular-looking cytoplasm, enlargement of the irregularly bounded nucleus and spherical nucleolus, thickening of cell walls, and an apparent increase in cell metabolism (Figs. 8B-10). Mobilization of electron-dense vacuolar material appeared to be occurring in some epidermal cells (Figs. 9B, 10A).
Figure 8:
Transmission electron micrographs of near sagittal sections of

Figure 9:
Transmission electron micrographs of near sagittal sections of

Figure 10:
Transmission electron micrographs of near sagittal sections of

We also observed a few strands of fungal mycelium in the area between the anther and anther filament but found nothing that could reasonably have nourished the population of propagating nematodes or that could explain induction of the pathological effects observed in association with the nematodes (Fig. 11).
Figure 11:
Transmission electron micrographs of near sagittal sections of

Healthy pollen was observed in pollen tubes in each of the three un-infested anthers that were sectioned and photographed (Fig. 3). In addition, relatively healthy pollen was observed in one of the two pollen tubes observed in the nematode-infested anther (Fig. 4). The pollen tube expressing the most pathology was closest to the hypertrophied anther epidermal cells nearest nematodes in the sectioned anther (Fig. 2), suggesting a proximity-based systemic reaction to the nematode infestation. This supports the observations of Giblin-Davis et al. (1995) from LM observations of paraffin-sectioned material where “pollen production often appeared normal in one or more pollen sacs of lightly infested male florets. However, in heavily infested male florets, the four pollen sacs were completely deformed. The tapetum was sometimes necrotic and (or) disorganized.”
We arbitrarily sectioned through more than ten
Figure 12:
Transmission electron micrographs A, B: Two near serial and transverse-sections of the head of

Figure 13:
Transmission electron micrographs of the anterior regions of

Figure 14:
Transmission electron micrographs of the mid-region of Ficophagus laevigatus within a Ficus laevigata anther. A: A near transverse-section of body wall muscle (Bwm), hypodermis (H), intestine (Int), and secretory globules (Sg); B: Close-up of the intestinal lumen from subfigure A showing microvilli and intestinal contents.

The ultrastructure of the perianth lobes was very similar in both healthy and infested anthers (Fig. 1).
In comparing nematode-induced plant pathology using LM versus TEM, the adage “A picture is worth a thousand words” comes quickly to mind. We were able to corroborate the findings of Giblin-Davis et al. (1995) and Center et al. (1999) concerning the association of highly enlarged hypertrophied anther and anther filament epidermal cells in phase C figs of
Although everything points to plant parasitism via population feeding of
The authors sincerely thank Barbara J. Center for her assistance during this study and previous support of RGD and NK throughout her outstanding career in support of nematology and life sciences at the University of Florida/IFAS, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center.
Figure 1:

Figure 2:

Figure 3:

Figure 4:

Figure 5:

Figure 6:

Figure 7:

Figure 8:

Figure 9:

Figure 10:

Figure 11:

Figure 12:

Figure 13:

Figure 14:

Figure S1:

Figure S2:

Figure S3:

Figure S4:

Figure S5:

Figure S6:
