Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Volume 12 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
Open Access
Comparison of electrical impedance tomography and ultrasonography for determination of solid and cystic lesion resembling breast tumor embedded in chicken phantom
L. Choridah
L. Choridah
,
D. Kurniadi
D. Kurniadi
,
K. Ain
K. Ain
,
M.F. Ulum
M.F. Ulum
,
U. Mukhaiyar
U. Mukhaiyar
,
A.D. Garnadi
A.D. Garnadi
and
N.H. Setyawan
N.H. Setyawan
| Nov 20, 2021
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Volume 12 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Nov 20, 2021
Page range:
63 - 68
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2021-0008
Keywords
Electrical impedance
,
ultrasound
,
phantom
© 2021 L. Choridah, D. Kurniadi, K. Ain, M.F. Ulum, U. Mukhaiyar, A.D. Garnadi, N.H. Setyawan, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig.1
Chicken meat phantom with olive filled with carrot as artificial solid tumor (two green olives) and small balloon filled with water as artificial cystic tumor.
Fig.2
Ultrasound of chicken meat phantom using linear transducer and EIT with electrodes.
Fig.3
Ultrasound images of two artificial solid tumors made of olive and carrot pieces to represent oval inhomogeneous lesions. Olive flesh appeared as a mildly hyperechoic area at the edge of the lesion, while carrot pieces appeared as a hypoechoic area in the middle portion with a posterior shadow and several small linear hyperechoic areas.
Fig.4
GREIT method with 16 electrodes of artificial solid tumor shows discordance between the reconstructed image and the original object in which only one anomaly is displayed instead of two.
Fig.5
GREIT method with 32 electrodes of artificial solid tumor shows a match between the reconstructed image and the original object containing two anomalies.
Fig.6
NOSER method with 16 electrodes (a) and 32 electrodes (b) of artificial solid tumor ion shows a match between the reconstructed image and the original object containing two anomalies.
Fig.7
A water-filled balloon was used to mimic a cystic lesion. This ultrasound image demonstrated the cystic lesion as a well-defined, oval-shaped anechoic area with posterior enhancement.
Fig.8
GREIT method with 16 electrodes of artificial cystic tumor has shown a match between the reconstructed image and the original object containing one anomaly.
Fig.9
GREIT method with 32 electrodes of artificial cystic tumor showed a match between the reconstructed image and the original object containing one anomaly that shows clear oval with smooth borders resembling the real cystic tumor.
Fig.10
NOSER method with 16 (a) and 32 electrodes (b) of artificial cystic tumor shows a match between the reconstructed image and the original object containing one anomaly.