Genesis of Legal Regulation of Pre-Trial Detention in Sweden and Ukraine: Comparative Analysis

1 Åklagarmyndigheten, (2014). Häktningstider och restriktioner. https://www.aklagare.se/nyheter-press/aktuellt-pa-aklagarmyndigheten/haktningstider-ochrestriktioner/. Search in Google Scholar

2 Åklagarmyndigheten, (2021). Åklagarmyndighetens årsredovisning. https://www.aklagare.se/globalassets/dokument/planering-ochuppfoljning/arsredovisningar/arsredovisning-2021.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

3 Andersson, E., (2015). Maxtidsgräns för häktning - En välkommen åtgärd på vägen mot att lösa problemet med långa häktningstider? [Master thesis, Uppsala University]. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:817398/FULLTEXT01. Search in Google Scholar

4 Antidote, (2019). «Тримання під вартою» та «домашній арешт» в Україні: експертний аналіз. https://antydot.info/analytics/trymannia-pid-vartoiu-ta-domashniyaresht-v-ukraini-ekspertnyy-analiz/. Search in Google Scholar

5 Arksey, H., Malley, L., (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19–32. Search in Google Scholar

6 Barabash, T.M., (2010). Legislative prospects for reforming measures of procedural coercion in the criminal justice system of Ukraine. Scientific notes of the Institute of Legislation of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 41–46. Search in Google Scholar

7 Bogachova, L.L., Magda, E.V., (2021). Legal system of Ukraine: current state and development trends. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 4, 28–30. Search in Google Scholar

8 Brottsförebyggande rådet [Brå]. (2000–2021). Crime statistics. https://bra.se/bra-in-english/home/crime-and-statistics/crime-statistics.html. Search in Google Scholar

9 Council of Europe, Annual Penal Statistics (2000–2021). SPACE I Reports. https://wp.unil.ch/space/space-i/annual-reports/. Search in Google Scholar

10 Council of Europe anti-torture Committee, (2022). Response of the Swedish Government to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Sweden from 18 to 29 January 2021. https://rm.coe.int/1680a5a35d. Search in Google Scholar

11 Council of Europe anti-torture Committee [CPT], (2017). Report to the Ukrainian Government on the visit to Ukraine carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 21 to 30 November 2016. https://rm.coe.int/pdf/1680727930. Search in Google Scholar

12 Council of Europe anti-torture Committee [CPT], (2020). Report to the Ukrainian Government on the visit to Ukraine carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 4 to 13 August 2020. https://rm.coe.int/1680a0b93c. Search in Google Scholar

13 Council of Europe anti-torture Committee [CPT], (2021). Report to the Swedish Government on the visit to Sweden carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 18 to 29 January 2021. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/-/council-of-europe-anti-torture-committee-publishes-the-response-of-the-swedish-authorities-to-the-report-on-the-2021-vis-1. Search in Google Scholar

14 Crewe, B, A., Ievins, S., Larmour, J., Laursen, K.. Mjåland, A., Schliehe., (2022). Nordic penal exceptionalism: A comparative, empirical analysis. The British Journal of Criminology. Search in Google Scholar

15 Criminal Code of Ukraine, (2003). (as amended) https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14. Search in Google Scholar

16 Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, (1960). (as amended) https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1001-05#Text. Search in Google Scholar

17 Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, (2012). (as amended) https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text. Search in Google Scholar

18 Dahl, A.L., Ablamskyi, S.E., (2017). Detention as a preventive measure in criminal proceedings: monogr. National University of Internal Affairs affairs – Kharkiv: KhNUVS; Panov, - 238 p. Search in Google Scholar

19 Dykiy, O. V., (2017). Modern crime trends in Ukraine in the context of the dynamics of the criminal law. Traditions and innovations of legal science: past, present, future: Mater. International science and practice Conf. (Odesa, May 19, 2017), 2, 313–315. Search in Google Scholar

20 Dyky, O.V., (2017). Crediting the term of pre-trial detention to the term of punishment: problems and prospects. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University, ½, 99–102. Search in Google Scholar

21 Galai, A., (2016). Modern approaches to determining the term of pretrial detention. Scientific journal of the National Academy of Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine, 2, 59–66. Search in Google Scholar

22 General Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine, (2013–2022). A single report on criminal offenses by state. https://old.gp.gov.ua/ua/stst2011.html?dir_id=114140&libid=100820&c=edit&_c=fo. Search in Google Scholar

23 Gladun, O., (2016). The new procedure for including the term of pretrial detention by the court in the term of punishment: problems of law enforcement. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. https://www.akademia.gp.gov.ua/userfiles/file/Academia2016/Akt_schema/new_strok.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

24 Heard, C., Mansell, D., (2011). Detained without trial: Fair Trials International response to the European Commission’s Green Paper on detention. London, UK. https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/19791/. Search in Google Scholar

25 Hedstrom, J., (2018). The American and Swedish Criminal Justice System: A Comparative Study. [Master thesis, East Tennessee State University]. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd. Search in Google Scholar

26 Hidayat, A.T., (2016). Mot en humanare häktningsreglering?- En rättsvetenskaplig analys av SOU 2016:52. [Master thesis, Lund University]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8896977. Search in Google Scholar

27 ICPS, (2000–2022). World Prison Brief. https://www.prisonstudies.org. Search in Google Scholar

28 Jerlström, M., Olsson, E., (2019). Pre-trial detention. The compatibility of the Swedish Regulation with the European Convention on Human Rights. http://www.diva-portal.se/smash/get/diva2:1353003/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

29 Jönsson, E., (2015). International ideals and domestic reality: a qualitative study on Sweden’s pre-trial detention practices. [Master thesis, Lund University]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?fileOId=5472561&func=downloadFile&recordOId=5472557. Search in Google Scholar

30 Justitieutskottet, (2020). Justitieutskottets betänkande 2020/21:JuU43. Effektivare hantering av häktningar och minskad isolering. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokumentlagar/arende/betankande/effektivare-hantering-av-haktningar-ochminskad_H801JuU43/html. Search in Google Scholar

31 Kjällgren, A., (2020). Rättens diskursiva makt. En studie av det svenska rättsväsendets bemötande av häktningskritiken. [Master thesis, Lund University]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=9020935&fileOId=9020959. Search in Google Scholar

32 Knapen, M.M., (2009). Sweden. In C. Morgenstern (Ed.). Pre-trial Detention in the European Union (pp.901-929). Tilburg: Wolf Legal Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

33 Krykushenko, O.H. (2016). Modern practice of legislative regulation of the procedure for crediting the term of pre-trial detention by the court to the term of criminal punishment. Law and Society, 3(2), 155–163. Search in Google Scholar

34 Law on the Criminal Procedure Code of Romania https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDLREF(2018)043-e. Search in Google Scholar

35 Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine to improve the procedure for crediting pre-trial detention” https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/838-19#Text. Search in Google Scholar

36 Law of Ukraine “On pre-trial detention” (as amended) https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3352-12#Text. Search in Google Scholar

37 Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., O’Brien, K.K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Sci 5, 69. https://doi-org.libproxy.uregina.ca/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. Search in Google Scholar

38 Lönnqvist, E., (2020). The Forgotten Prisoners: Individual Rights and Collective Interests in Swedish Remand Policy 1955–2020 [Master thesis, Stockholm University]. https://www.criminology.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.509506.1594795890!/menu/standard/file/LönnqvistEmeli_Master.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

39 Midby, T., (2020). Maxgräns för häktning, en lösning på långa häktningstider? - En komparativ studie avseende svensk och norsk rätt. [Master thesis, Lund University]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=9010821&fileOId=9021381. Search in Google Scholar

40 Orleans, A.M., (2018). Peculiarities of extending the term of detention in the context of European standards. Journal of East European Law, 54, 4–10. Search in Google Scholar

41 Ortwein, B.M., (1995). The Swedish Legal System: An Introduction. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review. https://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/iiclr/article/view/17766. Search in Google Scholar

42 Pivnenko, L.V., (2016). Bail is an alternative to the use of a preventive measure in the form of detention. Collection of scientific works of Kharkiv National Pedagogical University named after H. S. Skovoroda “Law”, 24, 169–174. Search in Google Scholar

43 Prylutsky, S.V., (2010) Judicial review or prosecution? (Actual issues regarding pre-trial detention in the criminal process of Ukraine). Bulletin of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, 11, 65–73. Search in Google Scholar

44 Rudko, A.A., (2013). House arrest as an alternative to detention. International legal provision of stability and security of society: materials of the scientific and theoretical conference of teachers, graduate students and students, Faculty of Law, Sumy, 102–104. Search in Google Scholar

45 Semenov, K., (2010). Reforming the pretrial detention system in Ukraine. Quo Vadis? https://minjust.gov.ua/m/str_29590. Search in Google Scholar

46 Sharenko, S.L., Shilo, O.H., (2016). Precautionary measure in the form of detention: problems of legal regulation and law enforcement. Bulletin of Criminal Justice, 1, 50–57. Search in Google Scholar

47 Smith, P.S., (2017). Punishment Without Conviction? Scandinavian Pre-trial Practices and the Power of the “Benevolent” State. In T. Ugelvik (Ed.). Scandinavian Penal History, Culture and Prison Practice. Embraced by the Welfare state? (pp.129–155). London: Palgrave. Search in Google Scholar

48 Statens offentliga utredningar [SOU], (2016). Färre i häkte och minskad isolering. https://www.regeringen.se/4a4461/contentassets/17535107f07745839499d8de4e84eefa/farre-i-hakte-och-minskad-isolering-sou-201652. Search in Google Scholar

49 Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brå), (2017). Reducing isolation in detention Situation and proposals. English summary of Brå report 2017:6. https://bra.se/download/18.4a33c027159a89523b15ded3/1486540817077/2017_6_Reducing_isolation_in_detention.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

50 Swedish Parliamentary Ombudsmen [OPCAT], (2020). Isolation of inmates in remand prisons. https://www.jo.se/Global/NPM-protokoll/Opcat_thematic_report_isolation_of_inmates_2020_web.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

51 Tarasenko, R.V., (2015). The Detention to Ensure the Security of the Accused: Jesuit Practice or Exceptional Necessity? European Reforms Bulletin, 2, 57–61. Search in Google Scholar

52 Tishchenko, O.I., (2014). Detention: individual issues of law enforcement realities. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University, 135–138. Search in Google Scholar

53 Topchiy, V.V., (2015). Application of a preventive measure in the form of detention in the course of a pre-trial investigation. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, 32–36. Search in Google Scholar

54 US State Department, (2010). US State Department, 2010 Human Rights Report: Sweden. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2010/index.htm. Search in Google Scholar

55 Wigen, L., (2016). Restriktioner vid häktning. En analys av SOU 2016:52 i relation till CPT:s kritik och rekommendationer. [Master thesis, Lund University]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8897120. Search in Google Scholar

56 Yurchenko, V., (2020). Psychological features of the initiation and application of a preventive measure in the form of detention during a pre-trial investigation in Ukraine. Polish Scientific Bulletin, 27, 50–54. Search in Google Scholar

57 Rättegångsbalken, (1942). (as amended) https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokumentlagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/rattegangsbalk-1942740_sfs-1942-740. Search in Google Scholar