[Aithal, B. H., Settur, B., Durgappa, S. and Ramachandra, T.V. (2012). Empirical patterns of the influence of Spatial Resolution of Remote Sensing Data on Landscape Metrics. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA). 2 (3): 767-775.]Search in Google Scholar
[Asner, G. P. and Warner, A. S. (2003). Canopy shadow in IKONOS satellite observations of tropical forests and savannas. Remote Sens Environ 87: 521–533.10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyle, S. A., Kennedy, C. M., Torres, J., Colman, K., Pérez-Estigarribia, P. E. and de la Sancha, N. U. (2016). High-Resolution Satellite Imagery Is an Important yet Underutilized Resource in Conservation Biology. PLoS One. 9:1.10.1371/journal.pone.0086908]Search in Google Scholar
[Foody, G. M. (2006). Harshness in image classification accuracy assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 29 (11).10.1080/01431160701442120]Search in Google Scholar
[Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.10.1017/9781107050327]Search in Google Scholar
[Frohn, R.C. (1998). Remote sensing for landscape ecology: new metric indicators for monitoring, modeling and assessment of ecosystems. CRC-Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gagnon, J. (2016). Forests of Virginia: Importance, Composition, Ecology, Threats, and Management. Virginia Master Naturalist Basic Training Course: Forests of Virginia. Retrieved August 25, 2018, from https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/465/465-315/465-315_pdf.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Garcia-Gigorro, S. and Saura, S. (2005). Forest fragmentation estimated from remotely sensed data: is comparison across scales possible? Forest Science. 51: 51–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Geza, M. and McCray, J. E. (2008). Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions. Journal of Environmental Management. 88, 393–406.10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.01617475392]Search in Google Scholar
[Haila, Y. (1999). Islands and fragments. Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom. Pp: 234–264.10.1017/CBO9780511613029.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Hurd, J. D. and Civco, D. L. (2008). Assessing the impact of land cover spatial resolution on forest fragmentation modelling. ASPRS 2008 Annual Conference Proceedings: Portland, Oregon: April 28 - May 2, 2008. Retrieved September 5, 2008, from http://clear.uconn.edu/publications/research/tech_papers/Hurd_Civco_ASPRS2008.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, C. M. (2009). Matrix effects on individual and community-level responses of birds to forest fragmentation in Jamaica. Dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lausch, A. and Herzog, F. (2002). Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Ecological Indicators. 2: 3–15.10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00053-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, S., Jing, C., Chaplot, V., Yu, X., Zhang, Z. and Moore, N. (2010). Effect of DEM resolution on SWAT outputs of runoff, sediment and nutrients. Hydrology and Earth System Science. 7, 4411–4435.10.5194/hessd-7-4411-2010]Search in Google Scholar
[Loyn, R. H., and Mcalpine, C. (2001). Spatial patterns and fragmentation: indicators for conserving biodiversity in forest landscapes. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. In Raison, R.J., A.G. Brown, and D.W. Flinn (eds.). IUFRO Research Series 7 (pp: 391–422), CABI Publishing, United Kingdom.10.1079/9780851993928.0391]Search in Google Scholar
[Lu, D. and Weng, Q. (2007). A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 28: 823–870.10.1080/01431160600746456]Search in Google Scholar
[Masuoka, P. M., Claborn, D. M., Andre, R. G., Nigro, J. and Gordon, S. W. (2003). Use of IKONOS and Landsat for malaria control in the Republic of Korea. Remote Sensing and Environment. 88: 187–194.10.1016/j.rse.2003.04.009]Search in Google Scholar
[McGarigal, K. and Marks, B. J. (1995). Fragstats: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. Corvallis, Oregon, USA.10.2737/PNW-GTR-351]Search in Google Scholar
[Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. and Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403:853–858.10.1038/35002501]Search in Google Scholar
[Narayanan, R. M., Desetty, M. K. and Reichenbach, S. E. (2002). Effect of spatial resolution on information content characterization in remote sensing imagery based on classification accuracy. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 23 (3): 537–553.10.1080/01431160010025970]Search in Google Scholar
[Pontius, R. G. and Cheuk, M. L. (2006). A generalized cross-tabulation matrix to compare soft-classified maps at multiple resolutions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 20: 1–30.10.1080/13658810500391024]Search in Google Scholar
[Riitters, K., Wickham, J., O’Neill, R., Jones, B. and Smith, E. (2000). Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conservation Ecology. 4(2): 3.10.5751/ES-00209-040203]Search in Google Scholar
[Rose, A. K. (2015). Forests of Virginia, 2013. USDA Forest Service Resource Update FS-37. Asheville, NC: USDA Forest Service.10.2737/FS-RU-37]Search in Google Scholar
[Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J. and Margules, C. R. (1991). Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conservation Biology. 5:18–32.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Saura, S. (2004). Effects of remote sensor spatial resolution and data aggregation on selected fragmentation indices. Landscape Ecology. 19: 197–209.10.1023/B:LAND.0000021724.60785.65]Search in Google Scholar
[Soledad, G. and Saura, S. (2005). Forest Fragmentation Estimated from Remotely Sensed Data: Is Comparison Across Scales Possible? Forest Science. 51: 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Virginia Department of Forestry (VDOF) (2014). 2014 State of the Forest. Annual Report on Virginia’s Forests. VDOF 00129. Richmond: VDOF.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vizarri, M. and Sigura, M. (2013). Urban-rural gradient detection using multivariate spatial analysis and landscape metrics. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 44 (1): 453-459.10.4081/jae.2013.333]Search in Google Scholar
[Wickham, J. D. and Riitters, K. H. (1995). Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 16: 3585–3594.10.1080/01431169508954647]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu, J., Shen, W., Sun, W. and Tueller, P.T. (2002). Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology. 17: 761-782.10.1023/A:1022995922992]Search in Google Scholar