Cite

Balkaran, L. (2007). A solid reporting line. The Internal Auditor, 64(1), 96–97.Search in Google Scholar

Beasley, M.S., Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R. and Lapides, P.D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14 (4), 441-454.10.2308/acch.2000.14.4.441Search in Google Scholar

Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson and K. Raghunandan (2005). Factors associated with U.S. public companies’ investment in internal auditing. Accounting Horizons, 19 (2), 69-84.Search in Google Scholar

Carey, P., Craswell, A. and Simnett, R. (2000). Voluntary demand for internal and external auditing by family businesses. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19, 37-51.10.2308/aud.2000.19.s-1.37Search in Google Scholar

Chadwick, W. E. (2000). Keeping internal auditing in-house. International Auditor. 57(3), p. 88.Search in Google Scholar

Coram, P., Ferguson, C. and Moroney, R. (2008). Internal audit, alternative audit structures and the level of misappropriation of assets fraud. Accounting and Finance, 48(4), 1-17.10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00247.xSearch in Google Scholar

Demski, J. S. (2003). Corporate conflicts of interest. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(2), 51–72.10.1257/089533003765888421Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, J. and Kent, P. (2004). Factors affecting the voluntary use of internal audit. Working Paper, Queensland University of Technology, 1-41.Search in Google Scholar

The Institute of Internal Auditors (2011). International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing -Međunarodni standardi za profesionalnu praksu interne revizije. Retrieved from URL: https://global.theiia.org/translations/PublicDocuments/Standards_2011_Bosnian.pdf (Accessed March 25, 2021.)Search in Google Scholar

International Federation of Accountants (2009). International Standards on Auditing 240 – The Auditor’s Responsibility to Consider Fraud in the Audit of Financial Statements (ISA 240). Retrieved from URL: https://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a012-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-240.pdf (Accessed March 10, 2021.)Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. and Schultz, J. (2007). Intentions to report questionable acts: An examination of the influence of anonymous reporting channel, internal audit quality, and setting. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 109–124.10.1007/s10551-006-0021-6Search in Google Scholar

Keitsh, D. (2000). Riskomanagement. Stuttgart: Schaffer-Poeschel.Search in Google Scholar

King, R. (2002). An experimental investigation of self-serving biases in an auditing trust game: the effect of group affiliation. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 265–284.10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.265Search in Google Scholar

Moeller, R. (2007). COSO Enterprise Risk Management – Understanding the New Integrated ERM Framework. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Nestor, S. (2004). The impact of changing corporate governance norms on economic crime. Journal of Financial Crime, 11(4), 347-352.10.1108/13590790410809293Search in Google Scholar

Osmanagić-Bedenik, N. (2003). Kriza kao šansa: kroz poslovnu krizu do poslovnog uspjeha. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Search in Google Scholar

Salierno, D. (2007). Managing change. The Internal Auditor, 64(1), 51–54.Search in Google Scholar

Savez računovođa, revizora i finansijskih radnika FBiH (2017). MRevS 240 – Revizorove odgovornosti u vezi sa prevarama u reviziji finansijskih izvještaja. Retrieved from URL: http://www.srr-fbih.org/File/Download?idFi=645 (Accessed March 10, 2021.)Search in Google Scholar

The IIA Research Foundation (2007). Risk Management: Proffesional Practices Framework. Altamonte Springs: The IIA Research Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, P., Shenkir, W. And Barton, T. (2002). Enterprise Risk Management: Pulling in All Together. Altamonte Springs: The Institute of Internal Auditors Reseach Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, W. and Kreutzfeldt, R. (1991). Distinctive characteristics of entities with an internal audit department and the association of the quality of such departments with errors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 7(2), 485-512.10.1111/j.1911-3846.1991.tb00826.xSearch in Google Scholar