[Anunciação, P. F. & Zorrinho, C. (2006). Organizational Urbanism - How Managing Technological Shock in Companies, Lisbon, Sílabo Publishing (In Portuguese)]Search in Google Scholar
[ASEAN. (2013). About ASEAN Single Window. Retrieved June 21, 2016, from http://asw.asean.org]Search in Google Scholar
[Bezic, H., Tijan, E., & Aksentijevic, S. (2011). Port Community Systems: economic feasibility evaluation. Osijek: University of Osijek]Search in Google Scholar
[Carbone, V., & Martino, M. (2003). The Changing role of ports in supply-chain management: an empirical analysis. London: Taylor & Francis10.1080/0308883032000145618]Search in Google Scholar
[Carlan, V., Sys, C., & Vanelslander, T. (2015). Port Community System cost and benefits: from competition to collaboration within the supply chain]Search in Google Scholar
[Competition Authority. (2015). Study on competition in the port sector (In Portuguese)]Search in Google Scholar
[Doing Business. (2011). Doing Business 2012: Trading Across Borders. The World Bank]Search in Google Scholar
[EPCSA - European Port Community Systems Association - (2013a). EPCSA Policy Statement - May 2013: EU Port Policy Proposals]Search in Google Scholar
[EPCSA - European Port Community Systems Association - (2013b). Message Standards in the EU]Search in Google Scholar
[ESPO - European Sea Ports Organisation. (2010). European Port Governance. Brussel: ESPO]Search in Google Scholar
[ESPO - European Sea Ports Organisation. (2014). Position of the European Sea Ports Organisation on the implementation of reporting formalities Directive 2010/65/EU. Bruxelas: ESPO]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2009). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, “Strategic goals and recommendations for the EU’s maritime transport policy until 2018. COM(2009) (In Portuguese)]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2011). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network. COM (2011) 650 final (In Portuguese)]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2013a). Blue Waist, a unique space for growth. COM(2013) 510 final (In Portuguese)]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2013b). Ports an engine for growth. COM(2013) 295 final (In Portuguese)]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2014a). Building the main transport network: the main network corridors and the Connecting Europe Facility. COM(2013) 940 final]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2014b). Report from the Comission to the European Parliament and the Council: “on the functioning of Directive 2010/65/EU on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the Member States. COM(2014) 320 final]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. (2015). National Single Window Guidelines. Directorate General for Mobility and Transport, Directorate D - Logistic, maritime & land transport and passenger rights, Brussels]Search in Google Scholar
[GS1. (2007). Logistics Interoperability Model, Version 1]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermans, P. (2015). The Zachman Framework for architecture revisited. On conceiving the informational enterprise. Retrieved May 18, 2016, from www.zachman.com]Search in Google Scholar
[IMO. (2011). Guidelines for setting up a Single Window System in maritime transport. FAL.5/Circ.36]Search in Google Scholar
[IPCSA. (2011). White Paper: The role of Port Community Systems in the development of the Single Window. Brussels]Search in Google Scholar
[ISO 28005-1. (2013). Security management systems for the supply chain - Electronic port clearance (EPC) - Part 1: Message structure]Search in Google Scholar
[ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010. (2011). Systems and software engineering - Architecture description]Search in Google Scholar
[Josey, A. (2011). TOGAF Version 9.1 Enterprise Edition: An Introduction. Retrieved June 10, 2016, from https://www2.opengroup.org/ogsys/catalog/W118]Search in Google Scholar
[Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise Architecture at work: Modelling, communication and analysis. New York: Springer]Search in Google Scholar
[Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2010). Management Information Suystems: Managing the digital firm. New Jersey: Pearson]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee-Partrige, J., Teo, T., & Lim, V. (2000). Information technology management: the case od the Port of Singapore Authority. Jornal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(1), 85-99.10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00035-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Long, A. (2009). Port Community Systems. World Customs Jornal, 3, 63-67]Search in Google Scholar
[Mobility and Transport Authority. (2016). Follow-up of the Port Market: Report for December 2015 (In Portuguese)]Search in Google Scholar
[Notteboom, T. (2008). The relationship between seaports and the intermodal hinterland in light of global supply chain. Paris: OECD/ITF10.1787/9789282102251-3-en]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD/ITF. (2008). Port Competion and hinterland connections. Paris: OECD/ITF]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD/ITF. (2015). The impact of Mega-Ships. Paris: OECD/ITF]Search in Google Scholar
[Pereira, C. M., & Sousa, P. (2004). A method to define an enterprise architecture using the Zachman Framework. Nicosia, Cyprus: SAC ‘0410.1145/967900.968175]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodon, J., & Ramis-Pujol, J. (2006). Exploring the intricacies of integrating with a Port Community System. 19th Bled eConference. Bled]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodrigue, J. (2010). Maritime Transportation: Drivers for the Shipping and Port Industries. Leipzig: OECD/ITF]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodrigues, L. (2014). Determining Factors of the Value of Enterprise Architectures, New Academic editions Publishing (In Portuguese)]Search in Google Scholar
[Sessions, R. (2007). A comparison between the four main methodologies of corporate architecture. Retrieved June 10, 2016, from https://msdn.microsoft.com/pt-br/library/bb466232.aspx(In Portuguese)]Search in Google Scholar
[Smit, S. (2014). A Comparison of Port Community Systems: A framework to compare Port Community Systems and an application to the Port Community Systems of Hamburg, Rotterdam and Antwerp. Rotterdam: Master Thesis]Search in Google Scholar
[Srour, F. J., van Oosterhout, M., van Baalen, P., & Zuidwijk, R. (2007). Port Community System Implementation: Lessons Learned from an International Scan. Rotterdam]Search in Google Scholar
[Tijan, E., Kos, S., & Ogrizovic, D. (2009). Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity in Port Community Systems. Rijeka: University of Rijeka]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsen, J. K. (2001). Ten years of Single Window implementation: Lessons learned for the future. Global Trade Facilitation Conference 2011]Search in Google Scholar
[UN/CEFACT. (2005). Recommendation and Guidelines on establishing a Single Window: to enhance the efficient exchange of information between trade and government. United Nations, The United Nations Center for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business. Geneva: United Nations Publications]Search in Google Scholar
[UNCTAD. (2004). Assessment of seaport land interface: an analytical framework. UNCTAD. UNCTAD/SDTE/TLB/MISC/2004/3]Search in Google Scholar
[UNECE. (2011). Single Window Implementation Framework. Geneva and New York]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Oosterhout, M., Zielinski, M., & Tan, Y. (2000). Inventory of flows & processes in the port. Virtuele Haven [Virtual Port], deliverable T2.D1a]Search in Google Scholar
[WCO. (2008). Single Window Information Store. Retrieved May 10, 2016, from http://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/facilitation/activities-and-programmes/single-window/single-window.aspx]Search in Google Scholar
[WCO. (2011). WCO Compendium: How to build a Single Window Environment, Volume 1 The executive guide. World Customs Organisation]Search in Google Scholar
[Zachman, J. (2008). John Zachman’s concise definition of the Zachman Framework. Retrieved May 18, 2016, from www.zachman.com]Search in Google Scholar
[Zachman, J. A. (2016). The framework for enterprise architecture: background, description and utility. Retrieved June 22, 2016, from www.zachman.com]Search in Google Scholar