[
Agic, E. 2018. Marketing analitika 2: Napredne metode statističke analize sa primjenom u Stati. Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina: Ekonomski fakultet u Sarajevu
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Al-Fraihat, D., Alzaidi, M. and Joy, M. 2023. Why Do Consumers Adopt Smart Voice Assistants for Shopping Purposes? A Perspective from Complexity Theory. Intelligent Systems with Applications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allen, J. F. 1998. AI growing up: the changes and opportunities. AI Magazine 19 (4):13–23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alt, M., Vizeli, I., and Saplacan, Z. 2021. Banking with a Chatbot – A Study on Technology Acceptance. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Oeconomica 66. 13–35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alwin, D. F. and Hauser, R. M. 1975. The Decomposition of Effects in Path Analysis. American Sociological Review 40 (1): 37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Araujo, T.B. 2018. Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Computers in human behavior 85: 183–189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aslam, W., Ahmed Siddiqui, D., Arif, I. and Farhat, K. 2023. Chatbots in the frontline: drivers of acceptance. Kybernetes 52 (9): 3781–3810.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bentler, P. M. and Chou, C.-P. 1987. Practical Issues in Structural Modeling. Sociological Methods & Research 16 (1): 78–117.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bollen, K. A. 1987. Total, Direct, and Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methodology 17: 37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boobier, T. 2018. Advanced Analytics and AI: Impact, Implementation, and the Future of Work. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boomsma, A. 1985. Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in Lisrel maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika 50 (2): 229–242.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brendel, A. B., Hildebrandt, F., Dennis, A. R. and Riquel, J. 2023. The Paradoxical Role of Humanness in Aggression Toward Conversational Agents. Journal of Management Information Systems 40 (3): 883–913.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, S. 2020. The Innovation Ultimatum: How Six Strategic Technologies Will Reshape Every Business in the 2020s. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, T. A. 2015. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, US: The Guilford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Citi. 2018. Bank of the Future: The ABCs of Digital Disruption in Finance. http://www.smallake.kr/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/AHDX6.pdf (accessed June 17, 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cocheo, S. 2020. AI’s Real Impact on Banking: The Critical Importance of Human Skills. https://thefinancialbrand.com/103893/artificial-intelligence-financial-institution-trend-digital-transformation/ (accessed June 17, 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D. and Bressgott, T. 2019. How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Miranda, L. 2019. 30-Second AI and Robotics. Lewes, UK: Ivy Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dickinger, A., Arami, M. and Meyer, D. 2008. The role of perceived enjoyment and social norm in the adoption of technology with network externalities. European Journal of Information Systems 17 (1): 4–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S. and Dwivedi, Y. K. 2019. Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data – evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management 48: 63–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fernandes, T. and Oliveira, E. 2021. Understanding consumers’ acceptance of automated technologies in service encounters: Drivers of digital voice assistants adoption. Journal of Business Research 122: 180–191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C. and Glick, P. 2007. Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science 11 (2): 77–83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gobat, J. n.d. Banks: At the Heart of the Matter. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/Series/Back-to-Basics/Banks (accessed June 3, 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodhue, D.L., Lewis, W. and Thompson, R. 2012. Does PLS Have Advantages for Small Sample Size or Non-Normal Data? MIS Quarterly 36 (3): 981.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gursoy, D., Chi, O.H., Lu, L. and Nunkoo, R. 2019. Consumers Acceptance of Artificially Intelligent Device Use in Service Delivery. International Journal of Information Management 49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., Ray, S. 2021. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. 2013, 2022. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19 (2): 139–152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V. and Wielinga, B. 2010. Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model. International Journal of Social Robotics 2 (4): 361–375.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heeter, C. 1992. Being There: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1 (2): 262e271.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M. 2007. Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6: 1–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Illum, S. F., Ivanov, S. H. and Liang, Y. 2010. Using virtual communities in tourism research. Tourism Management 31 (3): 335–340.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jayaram, J., Kannan, V. R. and Tan, K. C. 2004. Influence of initiators on supply chain value creation. International Journal of Production Research 42 (20): 4377–4399.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
J.P.Morgan. 2021. Innovations in Finance with Machine Learning, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence: Summary of the latest research and trends. https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/research/machine-learning (accessed June 17, 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karmakar, A. 2020. In Bartoletti, I., Leslie, A. and Millie, S.M. (Eds). The AI Book: The Artificial Intelligence Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and FinTech Visionaries. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons
]Search in Google Scholar
[
King, B. 2014. Breaking Banks: The Innovators, Rogues, and Strategists Rebooting Banking. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
King, B. 2018. Bank 4.0: Banking everywhere, never at a bank. Singapore, Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Business.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, H., So, K.K.F., Wirtz, J. 2022. Service robots: Applying social exchange theory to better understand human–robot interactions. Tourism Management 92.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirsh, D. 1991. Foundations of AI: The big issues. Artificial Intelligence 47 (1–3): 3–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kline, R. B. 2016. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York City, US: Guilford Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kock, N. and Hadaya, P. 2016. Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal 28 (1): 227–261.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levitt, K. 2024. AI Takes Center Stage: Survey Reveals Financial Industry’s Top Trends for 2024. NVIDIA. https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/ai-in-financial-services-survey-2024/. (accessed June 3, 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lumley, L. 2022. RIP the humble ATM?. https://www.thebanker.com/RIP-the-humble-ATM-1664785916. (accessed June 1, 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ma, X. and Huo, Y. 2023. Are users willing to embrace ChatGPT? Exploring the factors on the acceptance of chatbots from the perspective of AIDUA framework. Technology in Society 75 (5):102362.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S. and Hong, S. 1999. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods 4 (1): 84–99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manser Payne, L., Dahl, A. and Peltier, J. 2021. Digital servitization value co-creation framework for AI services: a research agenda for digital transformation in financial service ecosystems. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marous, J. 2017. Banking Must Move From Mobile-First to AI-First. https://thefinancialbrand.com/65338/banking-ai-ui-artificial-intelligence-data/ (accessed June 17, 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
G. McLean, K. and Osei-Frimpong 2019. Hey Alexa examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants. Computers in Human Behavior 99 (2019): 28–37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Monett, D., and Lewis, C. W. P. 2018. Getting clarity by defining Artificial Intelligence - A Survey. In Muller, V. C., ed. Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. Springer. 212–214.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ng, C-W. 2020. The Future of AI in Finance. In Bartoletti, I., Leslie, A. and Millie, S.M. (Eds). The AI Book: The Artificial Intelligence Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and FinTech Visionaries. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nilsson, N.J. 2010. The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T. and Wen, Z. 2004. In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 11 (3): 320–341.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pasikowski, S. 2023. Snowball Sampling and Its Non-Trivial Nature, Przeglad Badan Edukacyjnych 2 (43): 105–120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Premathilake, G.W., Li, H. 2024. Users’ responses to humanoid social robots: A social response view. Telematics and Informatics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rafiq, F., Dogra, N., Adil, M., and Wu, J.-Z. 2022. Examining Consumer’s Intention to Adopt AI-Chatbots in Tourism Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Method. Mathematics 10: 2190.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rai, A., Constantinides, P. and Sarker, S. 2019. Next Generation Digital Platforms: Toward Human-AI Hybrids. MIS Quarterly 43 (1): iii–ix.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richad, R., Vivensius, V., Sfenrianto, S., Kaburuan, E. R. 2019. Analysis of factors influencing millennial’s technology acceptance of chatbot in the banking industry in Indonesia. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 10 (4): 1270–1281.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. and Becker, J-M. 2024. SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com (accessed June 17, 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryu, E. and Cheong, J. 2017. Comparing Indirect Effects in Different Groups in Single-Group and Multi-Group Structural Equation Models. Frontiers in Psychology 8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. and Müller, H. 2003. Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online 8: 23–74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A. and King, J. 2006. Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. The Journal of Educational Research 99 (6): 323–338.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solomon, M., Surprenant, C., Czepiel, J. and Gutman, E. 1985. A Role Theory Perspective on Dyadic Interactions: The Service Encounter. Journal of Marketing 49: 99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Svenningsson, N. and Faraon, M. 2019. Artificial intelligence in conversational agents: A study of factors related to perceived humanness in chatbots.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tan, O. 2017. How AI Can Improve The Customer Experience. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2017/08/09/how-ai-can-improve-the-customer-experience/?sh=4c7b7279757d (accessed June 3, 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tan, S.M. and Liew, T.W. 2022. Multi-Chatbot or Single-Chatbot? The Effects of M-Commerce Chatbot Interface on Source Credibility, Social Presence, Trust, and Purchase Intention. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turnadzic, T., Pestek, A., Cinjarevic, M. 2023. Readiness of develoing economies’ banking sectors for AI-enhances services: The example of the banking sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina. 8th International Scientific Conference CRODMA 2023. https://crodma.hr/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/8th-CRODMA-2023.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walch, K. 2019. AI’s Increasing Role In Customer Service. https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitive-world/2019/07/02/ais-increasing-role-in-customer-service/?sh=c8661fc73fcf (accessed June 3, 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, X., Luo, R., Liu, Y., Chen, P., Tao, Y., He, Y. 2023. Revealing the complexity of users’ intention to adopt healthcare chatbots: A mixed-method analysis of antecedent condition configurations. Information Processing & Management 60 (5).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verhagen, T., van Nes, J., Feldberg, F., and van Dolen, W. 2014. Virtual customer service Agents: Using social presence and personalization to shape online service encounters. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 19 (3): 529e545.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vieira, A., Sehgal, A. 2017. How banks can better serve their customers through artificial techniques. Digital Marketplaces Unleashed.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Winston, P. 1982. Artificial Intelligence: A Perspective. MIT Press. https://mitpress-request.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/content/9780262570770_sch_0001.pdf (accessed June 17, 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wirtz, J., Patterson, P. G., Kunz, W. H., Gruber, T., Lu, V. N., Paluch, S. and Martins, A. 2018. Brave new world: service robots in the frontline. Journal of Service Management.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L. and Miller, M. W. 2013. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement 73 (6): 913–934.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wong, K-T., Osman, R., Goh, P.S.C., Rahmat, M.K. 2013. Understanding Student Teachers’ Behavioural Intention to Use Technology: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Validation and Testing. International Journal of Instruction 6 (1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xiang, J. 2020. AI in Lending. In Bartoletti, I., Leslie, A. and Millie, S.M. (Eds). The AI Book: The Artificial Intelligence Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and FinTech Visionaries. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zamora, J. 2017. I’m Sorry, Dave, I’m Afraid I Can’t Do That: Chatbot Perception and Expectations: 253-260.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, S., Meng, Z., Chen, B., Yang, X. and Zhao, X. 2021. Motivation, Social Emotion, and the Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Virtual Assistants—Trust-Based Mediating Effects. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 728495.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhu, D.-S., Lin, T. C.-T. and Hsu, Y.-C. 2012. Using the technology acceptance model to evaluate user attitude and intention of use for online games. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 23 (7–8): 965–980.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhu, W. 2016. p < 0.05, < 0.01, < 0.001, < 0.0001, < 0.00001, < 0.000001, or < 0.0000001 …. Journal of Sport and Health Science 5 (1): 77–79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zulfakar, Z. Abd Rahim, F., Yat, D., Mun, L. and Cham, T-H. 2022. Say Aye to AI: Customer Acceptance and Intention to Use Service Robots in the Hospitality Industry.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 