[
Abbes, I., Hallem, Y. and Taga, N. 2020. Second-hand shopping and brand loyalty: The role of online collaborative redistribution platforms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 52: 101885.10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101885
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179-211.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Akbar, P. 2019. Guiding empirical generalization in research on access-based services. Journal of Business Research 100:16-26.10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.044
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Akbar, P., Mai, R. and Hoffmann, S. 2016. When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems. Journal of Business Research 69(10): 4215-4224.10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Albinsson, P. A., Perera, B. Y., Nafees, L. and Burman, B. 2019. Collaborative consumption usage in the US and India: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 27(4): 390-412.10.1080/10696679.2019.1644956
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ali, I., Ali, M., Grigore, G., Molesworth, M. and Jin, Z. 2020. The moderating role of corporate reputation and employee-company identification on the work-related outcomes of job insecurity resulting from workforce localization policies. Journal of Business Research 117: 825-838.10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.060
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Altinay, L. and Taheri, B. 2019. Emerging themes and theories in the sharing economy: A critical note for hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 31(1): 180-193.10.1108/IJCHM-02-2018-0171
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Armstrong, C. M., Niinimäki, K., Kujala, S., Karell, E. and Lang, C. 2015. Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: Exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production 97: 30-39.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Armstrong, J. C. M. and Park, H. 2017. Sustainability and collaborative apparel consumption: Putting the digital ‘sharing’ economy under the microscope. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education 10(3): 276-286.10.1080/17543266.2017.1346714
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arteaga-Sánchez, R., Belda-Ruiz, M., Ros-Galvez, A. and Rosa-Garcia, A. 2020. Why continue sharing: Determinants of behavior in ridesharing services. International Journal of Market Research 62(6): 725-742.10.1177/1470785318805300
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baek, E. and Oh, G.E.G. 2021. Diverse values of fashion rental service and contamination concern of consumers. Journal of Business Research 123: 165-175.10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.061
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bagozzi, R. 1975. Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing 39(4): 32-39.10.1177/002224297503900405
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balck, B. and Cracau, D. 2015. Empirical analysis of customer motives in the shareconomy. Working paper series, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg. https://www.fww.ovgu.de/fww_media/femm/femm_2015/2015_02-p-4074.pdf (accessed August 5, 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barbosa, B. and Fonseca, I. 2019. A phenomenological approach to the collaborative consumer. Journal of Consumer Marketing 36(6): 705-714.10.1108/JCM-11-2017-2468
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barclay, D.W., Higgins, C.A. and Thompson, R. 1995. The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as illustration. Technology Studies 2 (2): 285-309.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bardhi, F. and Eckhardt, G.M. 2012. Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research 39(4): 881-898.10.1086/666376
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnes, S. J. and Mattsson, J. 2016. Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 104: 200-211.10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnes, S. J. and Mattsson, J. 2017. Understanding collaborative consumption: Test of a theoretical model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 118: 281-292.10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Batool, M., Ghulam, H., Hayat, M. A., Naeem, M. Z., Ejaz, A., Imran, Z. A., Spulbar, C., Birau, R. and Gorun, T. H. 2021. How COVID-19 has shaken the sharing economy? An analysis using Google trends data. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 34(1): 2374-2386.10.1080/1331677X.2020.1863830
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Batson, D.C., Håansson, E.J., Chermok, V.J., Hoyt, J.L. and Ortiz, B.G. 2007. An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(1): 65-74.10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.65
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becker-Leifhold, C. V. 2018. The role of values in collaborative fashion consumption-A critical investigation through the lenses of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production 199: 781-791.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.296
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becker-Leifhold, C. and Iran, S. 2018. Collaborative fashion consumption - drivers, barriers and future pathways. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 22(2): 189-208.10.1108/JFMM-10-2017-0109
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belk, R.W. 1984. Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity and relationships to measures of happiness. In Advances in consumer research, edited by T. C. Kinnear, 291-297. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belk, R. W. 2014. You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research 67(8): 1595-1600.10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benoit, S., Baker, T. L., Bolton, R. N., Gruber, T. and Kandampully, J. 2017. A triadic framework for collaborative consumption (CC): Motives, activities and resources & capabilities of actors. Journal of Business Research 79: 219-227.10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Botsman, R. and Rogers, R. 2010. What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Böcker, L. and Meelen, T. 2017. Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 23: 28-39.10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bucher, E., Fieseler, C. and Lutz, C. 2016. What’s mine is yours (for a nominal fee)- Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing. Computers in Human Behavior 62: 316-326.10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cao, D., Meadows, M., Wong, D. and Xia, S. 2021. Understanding consumers’ social medial engagement behaviour: An examination of the moderation effect of social media context. Journal of Business Research 122: 835-846.10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, M. and Foley, C. 2018. The sharing economy and digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb. International Journal of Hospitality Management 70: 95-98.10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.11.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L. and Newsted, P. R. 2003. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research 14(2):189-217.10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Činjarević, M., Kožo, A. and Berberović, D. 2019. Sharing is caring and millennials do care: Collaborative consumption through the eyes of internet generation. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 14(1): 49-60.10.2478/jeb-2019-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davidson, A., Habibi, M. R. and Laroche, M. 2018. Materialism and the sharing economy: A cross-cultural study of American and Indian consumers. Journal of Business Research 82: 364-372.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, M. H., Mitchell, K.V., Hall, J.A., Lothert, J. Snapp, T. and Meyer, M. 1999. Empathy, expectations and situational preferences: Personality influences on the decision to participate in volunteer helping behaviors. Journal of Personality 67 (3): 469-503.10.1111/1467-6494.00062
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R.M. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. and Ryan, R. M. 1999. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 125: 627-668.10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Degli Esposti, P., Mortara, A. and Roberti, G. 2021. Sharing and sustainable consumption in the era of COVID-19. Sustainability 13(4): 1903.10.3390/su13041903
]Search in Google Scholar
[
del Mar Alonso-Almeida, M. 2019. Carsharing: Another gender issue? Drivers of carsharing usage among women and relationship to perceived value. Travel Behaviour and Society 17: 36-45.10.1016/j.tbs.2019.06.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dolnicar, S. and Zare, S. 2020. COVID19 and Airbnb-Disrupting the disruptor. Annals of Tourism Research 83:102961.10.1016/j.annals.2020.102961
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dommer, S.L. and Swaminathan, V. 2013. Explaining the endowment effect through ownership: The role of identity, gender, and self-threat. Journal of Consumer Research 39(5): 1034-1050.10.1086/666737
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edbring, E. G., Lehner, M. and Mont, O. 2016. Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: Motivations and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production 123: 5-15.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.107
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eisenberg, N. and Fabes, R. A. 1990. Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion 14(2): 131-149.10.1007/BF00991640
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Escalas, J. E. and Stern, B. B. 2003. Sympathy and empathy: Emotional responses to advertising dramas. Journal of Consumer Research 29(4):566-578.10.1086/346251
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farmaki, A., Miguel, C., Drotarova, M. H., Aleksić, A., Časni, A. Č. and Efthymiadou, F. 2020. Impacts of Covid-19 on peer-to-peer accommodation platforms: Host perceptions and responses. International Journal of Hospitality Management 91: 102663.10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102663
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39-50.10.1177/002224378101800104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Future Marketing Insights 2021. Online clothing rental market. https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/online-clothing-rental-market (accessed April 5, 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geisser, S. 1974. A predictive approach to the random effects model. Biometrika 61(1): 101-107.10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Graziano, W.G., Habashi, M.M., Sheese, B.E. and Tobin, R.M. 2007. Agreeableness, empathy and helping: A person× situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(4): 583-599.10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habibi, M. R., Kim, A. and Laroche, M. 2016. From sharing to exchange: An extended framework of dual modes of collaborative non-ownership consumption. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 1: 277-294.10.1086/684685
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. and Anderson, R. E. 2014. Multivariate data analysis: Pearson New International Edition. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C. and Nitzl, C. 2020. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research 109: 101-110.10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. A. 2017. Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd edition, Sage. CA: Thousand Oaks.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M. and Ringle, C. M. 2012. The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning 45(5-6): 320-340.10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M. and Mena, J. A. 2012. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40(3): 414-433.10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hallem, Y., Ben Arfi, W. and Teulon, F. 2020. Exploring consumer attitudes to online collaborative consumption: A typology of collaborative consumer profiles. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration 37(1): 82-94.10.1002/cjas.1554
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M. and Ukkonen, A. 2016. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67(9): 2047-2059.10.1002/asi.23552
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henninger, C. E., Brydges, T., Iran, S. and Vladimirova, K. 2021. Collaborative fashion consumption-A synthesis and future research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production 319: 128648.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128648
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henninger, C. E., Bürklin, N. and Niinimäki, K. 2019. The clothes swapping phenomenon- When consumers become suppliers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 23(3): 327-344.10.1108/JFMM-04-2018-0057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. A. 2015. New criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Academy of Marketing Science Journal 43(1):115-135.10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herbert, M. and Collin-Lachaud, I. 2017. Collaborative practices and consumerist habitus: An analysis of the transformative mechanisms of collaborative consumption. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) 32(1): 40-60.10.1177/2051570716678736
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Homer, P. M. and Kahle, L. R. 1988. A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Association 54: 638-646.10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hossain, M. 2020. Sharing economy: A comprehensive literature review. International Journal of Hospitality Management 87: 102470.10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102470
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hossain, M. 2021. The effect of the Covid-19 on sharing economy activities. Journal of Cleaner Production 280: 124782.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124782
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1): 1-55.10.1080/10705519909540118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hwang, J. and Griffiths, M. A. 2017. Share more, drive less: Millennials value perception and behavioral intent in using collaborative consumption services. Journal of Consumer Marketing 34 (2): 132-146.10.1108/JCM-10-2015-1560
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ianole-Calin, R., Druica, E., Hubona, G. and Wu, B. 2021. What drives Generations Y and Z towards collaborative consumption adoption? Evidence from a post-communist environment. Kybernetes 50(5): 1449-1466.10.1108/K-08-2019-0567
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ianole-Călin, R., Francioni, B., Masili, G., Druică, E. and Goschin, Z. 2020. A cross-cultural analysis of how individualism and collectivism impact collaborative consumption. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 157: 104762.10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104762
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iran, S. and Schrader, U. 2017. Collaborative fashion consumption and its environmental effects. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 21(4): 468-482.10.1108/JFMM-09-2016-0086
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iran, S., Geiger, S. M. and Schrader, U. 2019. Collaborative fashion consumption- A cross- cultural study between Tehran and Berlin. Journal of Cleaner Production 212: 313-323.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.163
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jin, B. E. and Shin, D.C. 2020. Changing the game to compete: Innovations in the fashion retail industry from the disruptive business model. Business Horizons 63(3): 301-311.10.1016/j.bushor.2020.01.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, K. K., Mun, J. M. and Chae, Y. 2016. Antecedents to internet use to collaboratively consume apparel. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 20(4): 370-382.10.1108/JFMM-12-2015-0092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, N. L. and Jin, B. E. 2020. Why buy new when one can share? Exploring collaborative consumption motivations for consumer goods. International Journal of Consumer Studies 44(2): 122-130.10.1111/ijcs.12551
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, N. L. and Jin, B. E. 2021. Addressing the contamination issue in collaborative consumption of fashion: Does ownership type of shared goods matter? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 25(2): 242-256.10.1108/JFMM-11-2019-0265
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lamberton, C. P. and Rose, R. L. 2012. When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing 76(4): 109-125.10.1509/jm.10.0368
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lang, C. and Armstrong, C. M. J. 2018. Collaborative consumption: The influence of fashion leadership, need for uniqueness and materialism on female consumers’ adoption of clothing renting and swapping. Sustainable Production and Consumption 13: 37-47.10.1016/j.spc.2017.11.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lang, C., Seo, S. and Liu, C. 2019. Motivations and obstacles for fashion renting: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 23(4): 519-536.10.1108/JFMM-05-2019-0106
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawson, S. J., Gleim, M. R., Perren, R. and Hwang, J. 2016. Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. Journal of Business Research 69(8): 2615-2623.10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, S. H. 2020. New measuring stick on sharing accommodation: Guest-perceived benefits and risks. International Journal of Hospitality Management 87:102471.10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102471
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Z. W., Chan, T. K., Balaji, M. S. and Chong, A. Y. L. 2018. Why people participate in the sharing economy: An empirical investigation of Uber. Internet Research 28(3): 829-850.10.1108/IntR-01-2017-0037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindblom, A., Lindblom, T. and Wechtler, H. 2018. Collaborative consumption as C2C trading: Analyzing the effects of materialism and price consciousness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 44: 244-252.10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, C. J. 2016. The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecological Economics 121: 149-159.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazodier, M. and Merunka, D. 2014. Beyond brand attitude: Individual drivers of purchase for symbolic cobranded products. Journal of Business Research 67(7):1552-1558.10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.01.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McNeill, L. and Venter, B. 2019. Identity, self-concept and young women’s engagement with collaborative, sustainable fashion consumption models. International Journal of Consumer Studies 43(4): 368-378.10.1111/ijcs.12516
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehrabian, A. and Epstein, N. 1972. A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality 40(4):525-543.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milanova, V. and Maas, P. 2017. Sharing intangibles: Uncovering individual motives for engagement in a sharing service setting. Journal of Business Research 75: 159-171.10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Minami, A. L., Ramos, C. and Bortoluzzo, A. B. 2021. Sharing economy versus collaborative consumption: What drives consumers in the new forms of exchange?. Journal of Business Research 128:124-137.10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.035
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mittendorf, C. 2018. Collaborative consumption: The role of familiarity and trust among millennials. Journal of Consumer Marketing 35(4): 377-391.10.1108/JCM-12-2016-2040
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Möhlmann, M. 2015. Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 14(3): 193-207.10.1002/cb.1512
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ozanne, L. K. and Ballantine, P. W. 2010. Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 9(6): 485-498.10.1002/cb.334
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pantano, E. and Stylos, N. 2020. The Cinderella moment: Exploring consumers’ motivations to engage with renting as collaborative luxury consumption mode. Psychology & Marketing 37(5): 740-753.10.1002/mar.21345
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parguel, B., Lunardo, R. and Benoit-Moreau, F. 2017. Sustainability of the sharing economy in question: When second-hand peer-to-peer platforms stimulate indulgent consumption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 125: 48-57.10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, H. and Armstrong, C. M. J. 2017. Collaborative apparel consumption in the digital sharing economy: An agenda for academic inquiry. International Journal of Consumer Studies 41(5): 465-474.10.1111/ijcs.12354
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, H. and Armstrong, C. M. J. 2019a. Is money the biggest driver? Uncovering motives for engaging in online collaborative consumption retail models for apparel. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 51: 42-50.10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, H. and Armstrong, C. M. J. 2019b. Will “no-ownership” work for apparel?: Implications for apparel retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 47: 66-73.10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.10.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paro, C. E., da Silva, H. M. R., Spers, E. E., Jugend, D. and Hamza, K. M. 2021. The technology effect, green consumption and age in propensity to collaborative consumption. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption 2: 100008.10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pedersen, E.R.G. and Netter, S. 2015. Collaborative consumption: Business model opportunities and barriers for fashion libraries. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 19(3): 258-273.10.1108/JFMM-05-2013-0073
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pena-Vinces, J., Solakis, K. and Guillen, J. 2020. Environmental knowledge, the collaborative economy and responsible consumption in the context of second-hand perinatal and infant clothes in Spain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 159:104840.10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104840
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piscicelli, L., Cooper, T. and Fisher, T. 2015. The role of values in collaborative consumption: Insights from a product-service system for lending and borrowing in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production 97: 21-29.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. and Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879-903.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W.E., Luchs, M.G., Ozanne, L.K. and Thogersen, J. 2011. Sustainable consumption: Opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 30(1): 31-38.10.1509/jppm.30.1.31
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PwC 2015. Consumer intelligence series: The sharing economy. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/technology/publications/assets/pwc-consumer-intelligence-series-the-sharing-economy.pdf (accessed August 11, 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richins, M. L. 2004. The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research 31(1): 209-219.10.1086/383436
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rigdon, E. E. 2016. Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal 34: 598-605.10.1016/j.emj.2016.05.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ringle C. M, Wende S, Becker J. M. 2015. SmartPLS. Available at https://www.smartpls.com
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roos, D. and Hahn, R. 2019. Understanding collaborative consumption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior with value-based personal norms. Journal of Business Ethics 158(3): 679-697.10.1007/s10551-017-3675-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M. and Hair, J. F. 2017. Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Handbook of Market Research 26: 1-40.10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stone, M. 1974. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 36(2):111-133.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tian, K. T. and McKenzie, K. 2001. The long-term predictive validity of the consumers’ need for uniqueness scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology 10(3): 171-193.10.1207/s15327663jcp1003_5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vella, M. 2012. The “mega trend” that swallowed Silicon Valley. https://fortune.com/2012/10/03/the-mega-trend-that-swallowed-silicon-valley/ (accessed August 5, 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vincent, R. L. and Gaur, S. S. 2021. Luxury for hire: Motivations to use closet sharing. Australasian Marketing Journal 29(4): 306-319.10.1177/1839334921999502
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vinson, D. E., Scott, J. E. and Lamont, L. M. 1977. The role of personal values in marketing and consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing 41(2), 44-50.10.1177/002224297704100215
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R. and Ramirez, E. 2015. Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 44(1): 119-134.10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White, K., Habib, R. and Dahl, D.W. 2020. A review and framework for thinking about the drivers of prosocial consumer behavior. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 5(1): 2-18.10.1086/706782
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xiao, L. and Mou, J. 2019. Social media fatigue-Technological antecedents and the moderating roles of personality traits: The case of WeChat. Computers in Human Behavior 101: 297-310.10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zalega, T. 2018. Collaborative consumption in consumer behavior of Polish young people. Journal of Economics & Management 33: 136-163.10.22367/jem.2018.33.08
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, M., Geng, R., Huang, Y. and Ren, S. 2021. Terminator or accelerator? Lessons from the peer-to-peer accommodation hosts in China in responses to COVID-19. International Journal of Hospitality Management 92:102760.10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102760
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, Y., Phang, C. W., Gu, R. and Zhang, C. 2019. Antecedents and role of individual sociability on participation in mobile collaborative consumption. Internet Research 29(5): 1064-1089.10.1108/INTR-03-2018-0131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhu, X. and Liu, K. 2021. A systematic review and future directions of the sharing economy: Business models, operational insights and environment-based utilities. Journal of Cleaner Production 290: 125209.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125209
]Search in Google Scholar
and 