[Afonso, A. and Fernandes, S. 2008. Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of Local Government. Journal of Socio-Economics 37 (5).10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Akai, N. and Sakata, M. 2002.Fiscal Decentralization Contributes to Economic Growth : Evidence from State- Level Cross-Section Data for the Unites States. Journal of Urban Economics 52(1): 93-108.10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00018-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Alesina, A., Baqir, R., and Easterly, W. 2002. Redistributive public employment. Journal of Urban Economics 48: 219-241.10.1006/juec.1999.2164]Search in Google Scholar
[Balaguer-Coll, M.T., Tortosa-Ausina, E, and Prior, D. 2007. On the determinants of local government performance: A two stage nonparametric approach. European Economic Review 51 (2): 425-451.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.01.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Bird R.M. and Vaillancourt, F. 1998. Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries: An Overview. Cambridge University Press 1-48.10.1017/CBO9780511559815.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Bird, R.M. 2010. Subnational taxation in developing countries: a review of the literature. Policy Research Working Paper 5450. World Bank: Washington, DC.10.1596/1813-9450-5450]Search in Google Scholar
[Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J. 1980. The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Breton, A. 1983. Federalism versus centralism in regional growth. In Biehl, D., Roskamp, K.W., and Stolper, W.F., eds, Public Finance and Economic Growth: Proceedings of the International Institute of Public Finance Tokyo 1981. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brueckner, J.K. 1982. A Test of Allocative Efficiency in the Local Public Sector. Journal of Public Economics 19(1982): 311-331.10.1016/0047-2727(82)90059-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Burg, S.L.and Shoup, P.S. 1999. The War in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Ethnic Conflict and International Intervention. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cadez, S. and Czerny, A. 2010. Carbon Management Strategies in Manufacturing Companies: An Exploratory Note. Journal for East European Management Studies 15(4):348-360.10.5771/0949-6181-2010-4-348]Search in Google Scholar
[Conyers, D. 1984. Decentralisation and Development: A review of the Literature. Public Administration and Development Vol. 4.10.1002/pad.4230040207]Search in Google Scholar
[Canning, D. and M. Fay 1993. The Effects of Transportation Networks on Economic Growth. Columbia University Working Paper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dabla-Norris, E. 2006. The Challenge of Fiscal Decentralization in Transition Countries. Comparative Economic Studies 48: 100-131.10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100063]Search in Google Scholar
[Dabla-Norris, E. and Wade, P. 2002. The Challenge of Fiscal Decentralisation in Transition Countries. IMF Working Paper No.02/103.10.5089/9781451852707.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Davoodi, H. and Zou, H. 1998, Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study. Journal of Urban Economics 43:244-257.10.1006/juec.1997.2042]Search in Google Scholar
[Deprins, D. and Simar L. 1983. On Farrell measures of technical efficiency. Recherches Economiques de Louvain 49(2): 123-137.10.1017/S0770451800082178]Search in Google Scholar
[Easterly W. and Levine, R. 1997. Africa’s Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (4): 1203-1250.10.1162/003355300555466]Search in Google Scholar
[Ebel, R.D., and Yilmaz, S. 2002. On the Measurement and Impact of Fiscal Decentralization. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 2809, Washington, D.C.10.1596/1813-9450-2809]Search in Google Scholar
[Efendic, A. 2018. The role of economic and social capital during the floods in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In Dzihic,V. and Solska, M. (eds.) Crisis Governance in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Serbia. The Study of Floods in 2014. Bern: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Efendic, A. and Pugh G. 2018. The effect of ethnic diversity on income - an empirical investigation using survey data from post-conflict environment. Economics: The Open- Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 12 (2018-17): 1-34.10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-17]Search in Google Scholar
[Fjeldstad, O.H. and Moore, M. 2008. Tax reform and state building in a globalized world. In Deborah Braütigam, Odd-Helge Fjeldstad and Mick Moore eds. Taxation and state building in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490897.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Hayden, R.M. 2005. Democracy without demos?. The Bosnian constitutional experiment and the intentional Construction of non-functional states. East European Politics and Societies 19 (2):226-5910.1177/0888325404272679]Search in Google Scholar
[Jin, J. and Zou, H. 2002. How Does Fiscal Decentralization Affect Aggregate, National, and Subnational Government Size. Journal of Urban Economics 52 (2): 270-293.10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00004-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalb, A. 2010. The impact of intergovernmental grants on cost efficiency: Theory and evidence from German municipalities. Economic Analysis and Policy 40 (1).10.1016/S0313-5926(10)50002-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Kluggman, J. 1994. Decentralisation: A survey of literature from a human development perspective. United Nations Development Programme Occasional Paper 13, Human Development Report Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klun, M. 2004. Performance Measurement for Tax Administrations: The Case of Slovenia. International Review of Administrative Sciences 70 (3): 567-574.10.1177/0020852304046210]Search in Google Scholar
[Kolstad, I. and Fieldstad, O.H. 2006. Fiscal decentralisation and corruption: A brief overview of the issues. CHI CHR Institute, Bergen, Norway.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koopmans, T.C. 1951. Activity analysis of production and allocation. John Wiley: New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lane, J. E. 2000. New Public Management. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., 1999. The Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15: 222-279.10.1093/jleo/15.1.222]Search in Google Scholar
[Levy, B. 2006. Governance, Corruption and cial Accountability. Presentation to the TFESSD Consultations. World Bank, Washington DC]Search in Google Scholar
[Loikkanen, H.A., Susiluoto, I., and Funk, M. 2011. The Role of City Managers and External Variables in Explaining Efficiency Differences of Finnish Municipalities. Helsinki Center of Economic Research Discussion Paper No.312.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lovell, C.A.K. 1993. Production frontiers and productive efficiency, in The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications (Eds.) H. Fried, C.A.K.10.1093/oso/9780195072181.003.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Lovell and S. Schmidt. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Mahabil, J. 2011. Measuring efficiency of local government expenditure; AN FDH Analysis of a sample of South African municipalities. In Technical report to financial and fiscal commission of SA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martinez-Vazquez, J. and McNabb, R. 2003. Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth. World Development 31.10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00109-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Mauro, P. 1995. Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 681-712.10.2307/2946696]Search in Google Scholar
[Meloche, J., Vaillancourt, F. and Yilmaz, S. 2004. Decentralisation or Fiscal Autonomy? What Does Really Matter? Effects on growth and public sector size in European transition countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3254]Search in Google Scholar
[Mill, J.S. 1861. Considerations on representative government in utilitarianism, liberty and representative government. J.M. Dent: London.10.1037/12186-000]Search in Google Scholar
[Musgrave, R. 1959. The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw-Hill]Search in Google Scholar
[Nieswand, M. and Seiferd, S. 2011. Some determinants of intermediate local government spending efficienc: Evidence from French departments. DIW Berlin discussion paper 1130.10.2139/ssrn.1858752]Search in Google Scholar
[Oates, W.E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prud’homme, R. 1995. The Dangers of Decentralization. World Bank Research Observer 10 (2): 201-220.10.1093/wbro/10.2.201]Search in Google Scholar
[Raboca, H.M., Lazar I., Lazar P.S. and Zagan-Zelter, D. 2010. An Exploratory Analysis of the Management Capacity Within the Local Public Administration from Romania. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, No. 31E: 133-146.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodriguez-Pose, A. and Gill, N. 2003. The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment and Planning, Government and Policy 21: 333-351.10.1068/c0235]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruggiero, J. 2007. A comparison of DEA and the stochastic frontier model using panel data. International Transactions in Operational Research 14 (3): 259-266.10.1111/j.1475-3995.2007.00585.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoepflin, G. 1993. The rise and fall Yugoslavia. In McGarry, J., O’Leary, B., The politics of Ethnic Conflict Regulation. Case Studies of Protracted Ethnic Conflicts. London and New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seabright, P. 1996. Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review 40 (1): 61-89.10.1016/0014-2921(95)00055-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Shah, A. 2004. Fiscal decentralisation in developing and transition economies. World Bank policy research working paper 3282.10.1596/1813-9450-3282]Search in Google Scholar
[Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. 1999, Of Course we can bootstrap DEA scores! But does it mean anything ? Logic trumps wishful thinking. Journal of Productivity Analysis 11: 93-97.10.1023/A:1007739507007]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, H. 1946. The Proverbs of Administration. Public Administration Review 6 (1).10.2307/973030]Search in Google Scholar
[Simonsen, S. G. 2005. Addressing ethnic divisions in postconflict institution-building: Lessons from recent cases. Security Dialogue 36(3): 297-318.10.1177/0967010605057017]Search in Google Scholar
[Smoke, P. 2013. Why theory and practice are different: The gap between principles and reality in subnational revenue systems. International Center for Public Policy Working Paper 13-13.10.4337/9781783474332.00017]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, F.W. 1911. The Principles of scientific management. New York: Harper and Brothers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thiessen, U. 2003. Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high income OECD countries. Fiscal studies 23(3).10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00084.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Tiebout, C. 1956. A pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416-424.10.1086/257839]Search in Google Scholar
[Treisman, D. 2002. Defining and Measuring Decentralisation: A Global Perspective, Working Paper, University of California Los Angeles, CA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tullock, G. 1969. Federalism: problems of scale. Public Choice 6: 19-29.10.1007/BF01718575]Search in Google Scholar
[UNDP 2008. Decentralization in the Europe and CIS Region. Discussion Paper, Democratic Governance Practice, Bratislava Regional Centre.]Search in Google Scholar
[Väyrynen, R. 1991. New Directions in Conflict Theory: Conflict Resolution and Conflict Transformation. London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber, M. 1922. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkley, California Press, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolff, S. 2012. Consociationalism: Power sharing and selfgovernance’, in Wolff, S. and Yakinthou, C. (eds.) Conflict Management in Divided Societies: Theories and Practice, London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203803004]Search in Google Scholar
[World Bank n.d. Decentralisation toolkit. Retrieved from: http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/toolkit9.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar