This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Arsalan, M., Mubin, O., & Al Mahmud, A. (2019). Evidence-based nomenclature and taxonomy of research impact indicators. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019), 2–5 September 2019, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.ArsalanM.MubinO.Al MahmudA.2019In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019)2–5 September 2019Sapienza University of Rome, ItalySearch in Google Scholar
Bennett, S., Reeve, R., Muir, K., Marjolin, A., & Powell, A. (2016). Orienting your journey: An approach for indicator assessment and selection. Retrieved from https://www.csi.edu.au/media/Orienting_Your_Journey_-_Change_Collection.pdfBennettS.ReeveR.MuirK.MarjolinA.PowellA.2016Retrieved from https://www.csi.edu.au/media/Orienting_Your_Journey_-_Change_Collection.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Bernstein, A., Hicks, V., Borbey, P., & Campbell, T. (2006). A framework to measure the impact of investments in health research. Paper presented at the presentation to the Blue Sky II conference, What Indicators for Science, Technology and Innovation Policies in the 21st Century.BernsteinA.HicksV.BorbeyP.CampbellT.2006Paper presented at the presentation to the Blue Sky II conference, What Indicators for Science, Technology and Innovation Policies in the 21st CenturySearch in Google Scholar
Buxton, M., & Hanney, S. (1996). How can payback from health services research be assessed? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 1(1), 35–43.BuxtonM.HanneyS.1996How can payback from health services research be assessed?11354310.1177/135581969600100107Search in Google Scholar
Panel on Return on Investment in Health Research. (2009). Making an Impact: A Preferred Framework and Indicators to Measure Returns on Investment in Health Research, Canadian Academy of Health Sciences, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Panel on Return on Investment in Health Research2009Canadian Academy of Health SciencesOttawa, ON, CanadaSearch in Google Scholar
Deloitte Access Economics. (2011). Returns on NHMRC funded Research and Development. Commissioned by the Australian Society for Medical Research Sydney, Australia.Deloitte Access Economics2011Commissioned by the Australian Society for Medical Research SydneyAustraliaSearch in Google Scholar
Grant, J., Brutscher, P.B., Kirk, S.E., Butler, L., & Wooding, S. (2010). Capturing Research Impacts: A Review of International Practice. Documented Briefing. Rand Corporation, 92.GrantJ.BrutscherP.B.KirkS.E.ButlerL.WoodingS.2010Documented Briefing. Rand Corporation, 92.Search in Google Scholar
Hayat, K. (2014). Nomenclature and its Importance in microbiology. Retrieved from https://medimoon.com/2014/04/nomenclature-and-its-importance-in-microbiology/HayatK.2014Retrieved from https://medimoon.com/2014/04/nomenclature-and-its-importance-in-microbiology/Search in Google Scholar
Heller, C., & de Melo-Martín, I. (2009). Clinical and translational science awards: Can they increase the efficiency and speed of clinical and translational research? Academic Medicine, 84(4), 424–432.HellerC.de Melo-MartínI.2009Clinical and translational science awards: Can they increase the efficiency and speed of clinical and translational research?84442443210.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a7d8119318771Search in Google Scholar
Kuruvilla, S., Mays, N., Pleasant, A., & Walt, G. (2006). Describing the impact of health research: A Research Impact Framework. BMC Health Serv Res, 6(1), 134. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-134KuruvillaS.MaysN.PleasantA.WaltG.2006Describing the impact of health research: A Research Impact Framework6113410.1186/1472-6963-6-134163504617049092Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lewison, G. (2003). Beyond outputs: New measures of biomedical research impact. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 55(1/2), 32–42.LewisonG.2003Beyond outputs: New measures of biomedical research impact551/2324210.1108/00012530310462698Search in Google Scholar
Longabaugh, R., Fowler, D.R., Stout, R., & Kriebel, G. (1983). Validation of a problem-focused nomenclature. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40(4), 453–461.LongabaughR.FowlerD.R.StoutR.KriebelG.1983Validation of a problem-focused nomenclature40445346110.1001/archpsyc.1983.017900401070146601478Search in Google Scholar
Maliha, G. (2018). Obsolete to Useful to Obsolete Once Again: A History of Section 507 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Food and Drug Law Journal, 73(3), 405.MalihaG.2018Obsolete to Useful to Obsolete Once Again: A History of Section 507 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act733405Search in Google Scholar
REF. (2012). Panel criteria and working methods. Retrieved from https://www.ref.ac.uk/2014/media/ref/content/pub/panelcriteriaandworkingmethods/01_12.pdfREF2012Retrieved from https://www.ref.ac.uk/2014/media/ref/content/pub/panelcriteriaandworkingmethods/01_12.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Trochim, W., Kane, C., Graham, M.J., & Pincus, H.A. (2011). Evaluating translational research: A process marker model. Clin Transl Sci, 4(3), 153–162. doi:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00291.xTrochimW.KaneC.GrahamM.J.PincusH.A.2011Evaluating translational research: A process marker model4315316210.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00291.x312560821707944Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
United Way of America. (1996). Measuring program outcomes: A practical approach. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceeval/47United Way of America1996Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceeval/47Search in Google Scholar
Vinkler, P. (2010a). The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators: Elsevier.VinklerP.2010aElsevier10.1533/9781780630250Search in Google Scholar
Vinkler, P. (2010b). Indicators are the essence of scientometrics and bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 85(3), 861–866. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0159-yVinklerP.2010bIndicators are the essence of scientometrics and bibliometrics85386186610.1007/s11192-010-0159-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vinner, S., & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 356–366.VinnerS.DreyfusT.1989Images and definitions for the concept of function35636610.2307/749441Search in Google Scholar
VSNU, KNAW, & NWO. (2009). Standard evaluation Protocol 2009–2015: Protocol for research assessment in The Netherlands. Retrieved from https://www.knaw.nl/en/news/publications/standard-evaluation-protocol-sep-2009-2015VSNU, KNAW, & NWO2009Retrieved from https://www.knaw.nl/en/news/publications/standard-evaluation-protocol-sep-2009-2015Search in Google Scholar
Weiss, A.P. (2007). Measuring the impact of medical research: Moving from outputs to outcomes. Am J Psychiatry, 164(2), 206–214. doi:10.1176/ajp.2007.164.2.206WeissA.P.2007Measuring the impact of medical research: Moving from outputs to outcomes164220621410.1176/ajp.2007.164.2.20617267781Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wellcome Trust. (2009). How we are making a difference: Assessment framework report summary. Retrieved from https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wtx059577_0.pdfWellcome Trust2009Retrieved from https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wtx059577_0.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Wiegers, S.E., Houser, S.R., Pearson, H.E., Untalan, A., Cheung, J.Y., Fisher, S.G., . . ., & Feldman, A.M. (2015). A Metric-Based System for Evaluating the Productivity of Preclinical Faculty at an Academic Medical Center in the Era of Clinical and Translational Science. Clinical and translational science, 8(4), 357–361. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5351026/pdf/CTS-8-357.pdfWiegersS.E.HouserS.R.PearsonH.E.UntalanA.CheungJ.Y.FisherS.G.FeldmanA.M.2015A Metric-Based System for Evaluating the Productivity of Preclinical Faculty at an Academic Medical Center in the Era of Clinical and Translational Science84357361Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5351026/pdf/CTS-8-357.pdf10.1111/cts.12269535102625740181Search in Google Scholar
ARC. (2018). Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) 2018: Submission Guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov.au/sites/default/files/filedepot/Public/ERA/ERA%202018/ERA%202018%20Submission%20Guidelines.pdfARC2018Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov.au/sites/default/files/filedepot/Public/ERA/ERA%202018/ERA%202018%20Submission%20Guidelines.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Archambault, E., & Lariviere, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79(3), 635–649. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2036-xArchambaultE.LariviereV.2009History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences79363564910.1007/s11192-007-2036-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Aries, N.R., & Sclar, E.D. (1998). The economic impact of biomedical research: a case study of voluntary institutions in the New York metropolitan region. J Health Polit Policy Law, 23(1), 175–193. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9522285AriesN.R.SclarE.D.1998The economic impact of biomedical research: a case study of voluntary institutions in the New York metropolitan region231175193Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/952228510.1215/03616878-23-1-1759522285Search in Google Scholar
Boell, S.K., & Wilson, C.S. (2010). Journal Impact Factors for evaluating scientific performance: use of h-like indicators. Scientometrics, 82(3), 613–626. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0175-yBoellS.K.WilsonC.S.2010Journal Impact Factors for evaluating scientific performance: use of h-like indicators82361362610.1007/s11192-010-0175-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Buxton, M., & Hanney, S. (1996). How can payback from health services research be assessed? J Health Serv Res Policy, 1(1), 35–43.BuxtonM.HanneyS.1996How can payback from health services research be assessed?11354310.1177/135581969600100107Search in Google Scholar
CAHS. (2009). Making an Impact: A Preferred Framework and Indicators to Measure Returns on Investment in Health Research. Retrieved from Otawwa, Canada:CAHS2009Retrieved from Otawwa, Canada:Search in Google Scholar
Donaldson, N.E., Rutledge, D.N., & Ashley, J. (2004). Outcomes of adoption: measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 1 Suppl 1(s1), S41–51. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04048.xDonaldsonN.E.RutledgeD.N.AshleyJ.2004Outcomes of adoption: measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations1Suppl 1(s1)S415110.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04048.x17129334Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dougherty, D., & Conway, P.H. (2008). The “3T's” road map to transform US health care: the “how” of high-quality care. Jama, 299(19), 2319–2321. Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/181916/jco80037_2319_2321.pdfDoughertyD.ConwayP.H.2008The “3T's” road map to transform US health care: the “how” of high-quality care2991923192321Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/181916/jco80037_2319_2321.pdf10.1001/jama.299.19.231918492974Search in Google Scholar
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7EggheL.2006Theory and practise of the g-index69113115210.1007/s11192-006-0144-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Engel-Cox, J.A., Van Houten, B., Phelps, J., & Rose, S.W. (2008). Conceptual model of comprehensive research metrics for improved human health and environment. Environ Health Perspect, 116(5), 583–592. doi:10.1289/ehp.10925Engel-CoxJ.A.Van HoutenB.PhelpsJ.RoseS.W.2008Conceptual model of comprehensive research metrics for improved human health and environment116558359210.1289/ehp.10925236767618470312Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y.S. (2014). Top cited articles in adsorption research using Y-index. Research Evaluation, 23(1), 12–20. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvt018FuH. Z.HoY.S.2014Top cited articles in adsorption research using Y-index231122010.1093/reseval/rvt018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (2006). Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. Int J Epidemiol, 35(5), 1123–1127; discussion 1127–1128. doi:10.1093/ije/dyl189GarfieldE.2006Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 195535511231127discussion 1127–1128.10.1093/ije/dyl18916987841Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gordon, M., & Meadows, A. (1981). The dissemination of findings of DHSS funded research. Primary Communications Research Centre, Leicester: University of Leicester.GordonM.MeadowsA.1981Primary Communications Research Centre, LeicesterUniversity of LeicesterSearch in Google Scholar
Grant, J., Brutscher, P.-B., Kirk, S.E., Butler, L., & Wooding, S. (2010). Capturing Research Impacts: A Review of International Practice. Documented Briefing. Rand Corporation.GrantJ.BrutscherP.-B.KirkS.E.ButlerL.WoodingS.2010Documented Briefing.Rand CorporationSearch in Google Scholar
Grant, J., Cottrell, R., Cluzeau, F., & Fawcett, G. (2000). Evaluating “payback” on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: applied bibliometric study. Bmj, 320(7242), 1107–1111. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC27352/pdf/1107.pdfGrantJ.CottrellR.CluzeauF.FawcettG.2000Evaluating “payback” on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: applied bibliometric study320724211071111Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC27352/pdf/1107.pdf10.1136/bmj.320.7242.11072735210775218Search in Google Scholar
Hanney, S., Buxton, M., Green, C., Coulson, D., & Raftery, J. (2007). An assessment of the impact of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. Health Technol Assess, 11(53), iii–iv, ix–xi, 1–180.HanneyS.BuxtonM.GreenC.CoulsonD.RafteryJ.2007An assessment of the impact of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme1153iiiivixxi118010.3310/hta1153018031652Search in Google Scholar
Hanney, S. R., Grant, J., Wooding, S., & Buxton, M.J. (2004). Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: the impact of funding by the UK's’ Arthritis Research Campaign’. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2(1), 4. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC503400/pdf/1478-4505-2-4.pdfHanneyS. R.GrantJ.WoodingS.BuxtonM.J.2004Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: the impact of funding by the UK's’ Arthritis Research Campaign’214Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC503400/pdf/1478-4505-2-4.pdf10.1186/1478-4505-2-450340015272939Search in Google Scholar
Harzing, A.-W.K. (2010). The publish or perish book: Tarma software research Melbourne.HarzingA.-W.K.2010Search in Google Scholar
Haynes, B., & Haines, A. (1998). Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice. Bmj, 317(7153), 273–276. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9677226HaynesB.HainesA.1998Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice3177153273276Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/967722610.1002/9780470755891.ch10Search in Google Scholar
Haynes, B., & Haines, A. (1998). Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice. Bmj, 317(7153), 273–276. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1113594/pdf/273.pdfHaynesB.HainesA.1998Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice3177153273276Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1113594/pdf/273.pdf10.1002/9780470755891.ch10Search in Google Scholar
Heller, C., & de Melo-Martín, I. (2009). Clinical and Translational Science Awards: can they increase the efficiency and speed of clinical and translational research? Academic Medicine, 84(4), 424–432.HellerC.de Melo-MartínI.2009Clinical and Translational Science Awards: can they increase the efficiency and speed of clinical and translational research?84442443210.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a7d8119318771Search in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 102(46), 16569–16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102HirschJ. E.2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output10246165691657210.1073/pnas.0507655102128383216275915Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, C.P., Lutz, C., & Meckel, M. (2016). A relational altmetric? Network centrality on ResearchGate as an indicator of scientific impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 765–775. doi:10.1002/asi.23423HoffmannC.P.LutzC.MeckelM.2016A relational altmetric? Network centrality on ResearchGate as an indicator of scientific impact67476577510.1002/asi.23423Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Järvelin, K., & Persson, O. (2008). The DCI index: Discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), 1433–1440. doi:10.1002/asi.20847JärvelinK.PerssonO.2008The DCI index: Discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation5991433144010.1002/asi.20847Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jin, B.H., Liang, L.M., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese science bulletin, 52(6), 855–863. doi:10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9JinB.H.LiangL.M.RousseauR.EggheL.2007The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index52685586310.1007/s11434-007-0145-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kalucy, E.C., Jackson-Bowers, E., McIntyre, E., & Reed, R. (2009). The feasibility of determining the impact of primary health care research projects using the Payback Framework. Health Research Policy and Systems, 7(1), 11.KalucyE.C.Jackson-BowersE.McIntyreE.ReedR.2009The feasibility of determining the impact of primary health care research projects using the Payback Framework711110.1186/1478-4505-7-11268453019422717Search in Google Scholar
Kessler, R., & Glasgow, R.E. (2011). A Proposal to Speed Translation of Healthcare Research Into Practice Dramatic Change Is Needed. American journal of preventive medicine, 40(6), 637–644. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.023KesslerR.GlasgowR.E.2011A Proposal to Speed Translation of Healthcare Research Into Practice Dramatic Change Is Needed40663764410.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.02321565657Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kuruvilla, S., Mays, N., Pleasant, A., & Walt, G. (2006). Describing the impact of health research: a Research Impact Framework. BMC Health Serv Res, 6(1), 134. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-134KuruvillaS.MaysN.PleasantA.WaltG.2006Describing the impact of health research: a Research Impact Framework6113410.1186/1472-6963-6-134163504617049092Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Largent, M. A., & Lane, J.I. (2012). STAR METRICS and the Science of Science Policy. Review of Policy Research, 29(3), 431–438. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00567.xLargentM. A.LaneJ.I.2012STAR METRICS and the Science of Science Policy29343143810.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00567.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lavis, J., Ross, S., McLeod, C., & Gildiner, A. (2003). Measuring the impact of health research. J Health Serv Res Policy, 8(3), 165–170. doi:10.1258/135581903322029520LavisJ.RossS.McLeodC.GildinerA.2003Measuring the impact of health research8316517010.1258/13558190332202952012869343Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lewison, G. (2003). Beyond outputs: new measures of biomedical research impact. Paper presented at the Aslib Proceedings.LewisonG.2003Paper presented at the Aslib Proceedings10.1108/00012530310462698Search in Google Scholar
Lindsay, J. M. (2016). PlumX from plum analytics: not just altmetrics. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 13(1), 8–17.LindsayJ. M.2016PlumX from plum analytics: not just altmetrics13181710.1080/15424065.2016.1142836Search in Google Scholar
Maliha, G. (2018). Obsolete to Useful to Obsolete Once Again: A History of Section 507 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.MalihaG.2018Search in Google Scholar
Mankoff, S. P., Brander, C., Ferrone, S., & Marincola, F.M. (2004). Lost in Translation: Obstacles to Translational Medicine. J Transl Med, 2(1), 14. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-2-14MankoffS. P.BranderC.FerroneS.MarincolaF.M.2004Lost in Translation: Obstacles to Translational Medicine211410.1186/1479-5876-2-1442026115149545Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moed, H., De Bruin, R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33(3), 381–422.MoedH.De BruinR.Van LeeuwenT.1995New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications33338142210.1007/BF02017338Search in Google Scholar
Mostert, S. P., Ellenbroek, S.P.H., Meijer, I., van Ark, G., & Klasen, E.C. (2010). Societal output and use of research performed by health research groups. Health Research Policy and Systems, 8(1), 30. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-8-30MostertS. P.EllenbroekS.P.H.MeijerI.van ArkG.KlasenE.C.2010Societal output and use of research performed by health research groups813010.1186/1478-4505-8-30296471420939915Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nathan, D.G. (2002). Careers in translational clinical research—historical perspectives, future challenges. Jama, 287(18), 2424–2427. Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/194890/JCO20035.pdfNathanD.G.2002Careers in translational clinical research—historical perspectives, future challenges2871824242427Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/194890/JCO20035.pdf10.1001/jama.287.18.242411988063Search in Google Scholar
Pang, T., Sadana, R., Hanney, S., Bhutta, Z.A., Hyder, A.A., & Simon, J. (2003). Knowledge for better health: a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems. Bull World Health Organ, 81(11), 815–820. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14758408PangT.SadanaR.HanneyS.BhuttaZ.A.HyderA.A.SimonJ.2003Knowledge for better health: a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems8111815820Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14758408Search in Google Scholar
Penfield, T., Baker, M.J., Scoble, R., & Wykes, M.C. (2014). Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review. Research Evaluation, 23(1), 21–32. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvt021PenfieldT.BakerM.J.ScobleR.WykesM.C.2014Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review231213210.1093/reseval/rvt021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pober, J.S., Neuhauser, C.S., & Pober, J.M. (2001). Obstacles facing translational research in academic medical centers. FASEB J, 15(13), 2303–2313. doi:10.1096/fj.01-0540lsfPoberJ.S.NeuhauserC.S.PoberJ.M.2001Obstacles facing translational research in academic medical centers15132303231310.1096/fj.01-0540lsf11689456Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Raftery, J., Hanney, S., Greenhalgh, T., Glover, M., & Blatch-Jones, A. (2016). Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment programme. Health Technol Assess, 20(76), 1–254. doi:10.3310/hta20760RafteryJ.HanneyS.GreenhalghT.GloverM.Blatch-JonesA.2016Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment programme2076125410.3310/hta20760508659627767013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
RAND Europe. (2006). Measuring the benefits from research. Cambridge, England. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_briefs/2007/RAND_RB9202.pdfRAND Europe2006Cambridge, EnglandRetrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_briefs/2007/RAND_RB9202.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Sarli, C.C., Dubinsky, E.K., & Holmes, K.L. (2010). Beyond citation analysis: a model for assessment of research impact. J Med Libr Assoc, 98(1), 17–23. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.008SarliC.C.DubinskyE.K.HolmesK.L.2010Beyond citation analysis: a model for assessment of research impact981172310.3163/1536-5050.98.1.008280196320098647Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72(2), 253–280. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1722-zSidiropoulosA.KatsarosD.ManolopoulosY.2007Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks72225328010.1007/s11192-007-1722-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sung, N.S., Crowley, W.F., Jr., Genel, M., Salber, P., Sandy, L., Sherwood, L.M., . . . Rimoin, D. (2003). Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. Jama, 289(10), 1278–1287. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12633190SungN.S.CrowleyW.F.Jr.GenelM.SalberP.SandyL.SherwoodL.M.RimoinD.2003Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise2891012781287Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1263319010.1001/jama.289.10.127812633190Search in Google Scholar
Torres-Salinas, D., Moreno-Torres, J.G., Delgado-López-Cózar, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). A methodology for Institution-Field ranking based on a bidimensional analysis: the IFQ 2 A index. Scientometrics, 88(3), 771–786. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0418-6Torres-SalinasD.Moreno-TorresJ.G.Delgado-López-CózarE.HerreraF.2011A methodology for Institution-Field ranking based on a bidimensional analysis: the IFQ 2 A index88377178610.1007/s11192-011-0418-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Trochim, W., Kane, C., Graham, M.J., & Pincus, H.A. (2011). Evaluating translational research: a process marker model. Clin Transl Sci, 4(3), 153–162. doi:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00291.xTrochimW.KaneC.GrahamM.J.PincusH.A.2011Evaluating translational research: a process marker model4315316210.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00291.x312560821707944Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Trochim, W.M., Marcus, S.E., Masse, L.C., Moser, R.P., & Weld, P.C. (2008). The evaluation of large research initiatives—A participatory integrative mixed-methods approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1), 8–28. doi:10.1177/1098214007309280TrochimW.M.MarcusS.E.MasseL.C.MoserR.P.WeldP.C.2008The evaluation of large research initiatives—A participatory integrative mixed-methods approach29182810.1177/1098214007309280Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vanclay, J.K., & Bornmann, L. (2012). Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: a critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H-2 index as a possible alternative. Scientometrics, 91(3), 751–771. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0618-8VanclayJ.K.BornmannL.2012Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: a critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H-2 index as a possible alternative91375177110.1007/s11192-012-0618-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vinkler, P. (20 14). The use of the Percentage Rank Position index for comparative evaluation of journals. Journal of Informetrics, 8(2), 340–348. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.01.001VinklerP.2014The use of the Percentage Rank Position index for comparative evaluation of journals8234034810.1016/j.joi.2014.01.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang, L., Wen, H., & Liu, Y. (2016). AHP Based Quantitative Evaluation Index System of Teacher's Research Performance in the University. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 11(7), 391–402. doi:10.14257/ijmue.2016.11.7.39WangL.WenH.LiuY.2016AHP Based Quantitative Evaluation Index System of Teacher's Research Performance in the University11739140210.14257/ijmue.2016.11.7.39Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Weiss, A.P. (2 007). Measuring the impact of medical research: moving from outputs to outcomes. Am J Psychiatry, 164(2), 206–214. doi:10.1176/ajp.2007.164.2.206WeissA.P.2007Measuring the impact of medical research: moving from outputs to outcomes164220621410.1176/ajp.2007.164.2.20617267781Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Westfall, J.M., Mold, J., & Fagnan, L. (2007). Practice-based research—“Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. Jama, 297(4), 403–406. Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/205216/jco60049_403_406.pdfWestfallJ.M.MoldJ.FagnanL.2007Practice-based research—“Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap2974403406Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/205216/jco60049_403_406.pdf10.1001/jama.297.4.40317244837Search in Google Scholar
Williams, A.E. (20 17). Altmetrics: an overview and evaluation. Online Information Review, 41(3), 311–317. doi:10.1108/Oir-10-2016-0294WilliamsA.E.2017Altmetrics: an overview and evaluation41331131710.1108/Oir-10-2016-0294Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Williams, V., Eiseman, E., Landree, E., & Adamson, D. (2009). Demonstrating and Communicating Research Impact. Preparing NIOSH Programs for External Review. Retrieved fromWilliamsV.EisemanE.LandreeE.AdamsonD.2009Demonstrating and Communicating Research ImpactRetrieved fromSearch in Google Scholar
Woolf, S.H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. Jama, 299(2), 211–213. doi:10.1001/jama.2007.26WoolfS.H.2008The meaning of translational research and why it matters299221121310.1001/jama.2007.2618182604Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zerhouni, E.A. (20 07). Translational research: moving discovery to practice. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 81(1), 126–128. doi:10.1038/sj.clpt.6100029ZerhouniE.A.2007Translational research: moving discovery to practice81112612810.1038/sj.clpt.610002917186011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhai, L., Yan, X., & Zhu, B. (2013). The Hl-index: improvement of H-index based on quality of citing papers. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1021–1031. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1039-zZhaiL.YanX.ZhuB.2013The Hl-index: improvement of H-index based on quality of citing papers9821021103110.1007/s11192-013-1039-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar