This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Aksnes, D.W., van Leeuwen, T.N., & Sivertsen, G. (2014). The effect of booming countries on changes in the relative specialization index (RSI) on country level. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1391–1401.10.1007/s11192-014-1245-3AksnesD.W.van LeeuwenT.N.SivertsenG.2014The effect of booming countries on changes in the relative specialization index (RSI) on country level101213911401Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage. Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, 33, 99–123.10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.xBalassaB.1965Trade liberalisation and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage3399123Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, S. (1997). Cross-national comparison of frontier areas of research in physics using bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 40(3), 385–405.10.1007/BF02459288BhattacharyaS.1997Cross-national comparison of frontier areas of research in physics using bibliometric indicators403385405Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bouyssou, D., & Marchant, T. (2011). Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1761–1769.10.1002/asi.21544BouyssouD.MarchantT.2011Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner62917611769Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chen, G., & Xiao, L. (2016). Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 212–223.10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.006ChenG.XiaoL.2016Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods101212223Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). A general framework for general impact indicators. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science / La revue canadienne des sciences de l’information et de bibliothéconomie, 27(1), 29–48.EggheL.RousseauR.2002A general framework for general impact indicators2712948Search in Google Scholar
Engels, T.C.E., Ossenblok, T.L.B., & Spruyt, E.H.J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 93(2), 373–390.10.1007/s11192-012-0680-2EngelsT.C.E.OssenblokT.L.B.SpruytE.H.J.2012Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009932373390Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Frame, J.D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia, 2, 143–148.FrameJ.D.1977Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean2143148Search in Google Scholar
Glänzel, W. (2000). Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48(2), 121–150.10.1023/A:1005640604267GlänzelW.2000Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach482121150Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Guan, J.C., & Gao, X. (2008). Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 357–379.10.1007/s11192-007-1871-0GuanJ.C.GaoX.2008Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics752357379Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hu, X.J., & Rousseau, R. (2009). A comparative study of the difference in research performance in biomedical fields among selected Western and Asian countries. Scientometrics, 81(2), 475–491.10.1007/s11192-008-2202-9HuX.J.RousseauR.2009A comparative study of the difference in research performance in biomedical fields among selected Western and Asian countries812475491Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lamirel, J.C. (2012). A new approach for automatizing the analysis of research topics dynamics: Application to optoelectronics research. Scientometrics, 93(1), 155–166.LamirelJ.C.2012A new approach for automatizing the analysis of research topics dynamics: Application to optoelectronics research93115516610.1007/s11192-012-0771-0Search in Google Scholar
Li, F., Miao, Y.J., & Ding, J. (2015). Tracking the development of disciplinary structure in China’s top research universities (1998–2013). Research Evaluation, 24(3), 312–324.10.1093/reseval/rvv013LiF.MiaoY.J.DingJ.2015Tracking the development of disciplinary structure in China’s top research universities (1998–2013)243312324Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge: University Press.ManningC.D.RaghavanP.SchützeH.2008CambridgeUniversity Press10.1017/CBO9780511809071Search in Google Scholar
Nagpaul, P.S., & Sharma, L. (1995). Science in the eighties: A typology of countries based on inter-field priorities. Scientometrics, 34(2), 263–283.10.1007/BF02020424NagpaulP.S.SharmaL.1995Science in the eighties: A typology of countries based on inter-field priorities342263283Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, J., & Thavamani, K. (2015). Indian contributions to the field of leptospirosis (2006–2013): A bibliometric study. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 9(2), 235–249.10.1080/09737766.2015.1069962RamakrishnanJ.ThavamaniK.2015Indian contributions to the field of leptospirosis (2006–2013): A bibliometric study92235249Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rousseau, R. (2012). Thoughts about the activity index and its formal analogues. ISSI Newsletter, 8(4), 73–75.RousseauR.2012Thoughts about the activity index and its formal analogues847375Search in Google Scholar
Rousseau, R., & Yang, L.Y. (2012). Reflections on the activity index and related indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 413–421.10.1016/j.joi.2012.01.004RousseauR.YangL.Y.2012Reflections on the activity index and related indicators63413421Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sangam, S.L., Arali, U.B., Patil, C.G., & Rousseau, R. (2017). Growth of the hepatitis literature over the period 1976–2015: What can the relative priority index teach us? Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics, and Scientometrics (WIS) and 18th COLLNET Meeting, July 2017, Canterbury.SangamS.L.AraliU.B.PatilC.G.RousseauR.2017Growth of the hepatitis literature over the period 1976–2015: What can the relative priority index teach us?July2017Canterbury10.1007/s11192-018-2668-zSearch in Google Scholar
Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5–6), 281–291.10.1007/BF02017249SchubertA.BraunT.1986Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact95–6281291Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stare, J., & Kejžar, N. (2014). On standardization of the activity index. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 503–507.10.1016/j.joi.2014.04.004StareJ.KejžarN.2014On standardization of the activity index83503507Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2008). A structural analysis of publication profiles for the classification of European research institutes. Scientometrics, 74(2), 223–236.10.1007/s11192-008-0214-0ThijsB.GlänzelW.2008A structural analysis of publication profiles for the classification of European research institutes742223236Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vinkler, P. (2010). The evaluation of research by Scientometric indicators. Oxford: Chandos.VinklerP.2010OxfordChandos10.1533/9781780630250Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Glänzel, W. (2011). Document-type country profiles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 62(7), 1403–1411.10.1002/asi.21537ZhangL.RousseauR.GlänzelW.2011Document-type country profiles62714031411Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output. Scientometrics, 81(3), 839–857.10.1007/s11192-008-2255-9ZhouP.ThijsB.GlänzelW.2009Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output813839857Open DOISearch in Google Scholar