1. bookVolume 7 (2018): Issue 1 (January 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2336-9205
First Published
11 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Divisia and Simple Sum Monetary Aggregates: Any Empirical Relevance for Turkey?

Published Online: 23 Jan 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 7 (2018) - Issue 1 (January 2018)
Page range: 175 - 206
Received: 28 Jan 2017
Accepted: 03 Jun 2017
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2336-9205
First Published
11 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In consideration of channels through which monetary policy affects economic activity, the monetary aggregates have been mostly ignored by the monetary authorities instead of which shortrun interest rates have been given a priori role. These monetary aggregates are largely argued to fail in measuring the effectiveness of different monetary policy regimes in forecasting the macroeconomic fundamentals. Grounded on the “Barnett critique”, the formation of traditional simple-sum monetary aggregates assuming for perfect substitution among the components of the money supply is blamed for such a failure of money in explaining the real activity. Given increasing varieties of financial assets which have completely different “moneyness”, it is important to provide an alternative measure of the money supply. Hereby, the Divisia monetary aggregates which give different weights to different assets have arisen as an alternative approach. In this study, a Divisia index is constructed to test its predictive power on quantities and prices compared to its simple sum counterpart. Accordingly, a Divisia index is built-up for Turkish economy for the period 2006-2016 to see whether the utilization of the Divisia monetary aggregates in the conduct of monetary policy makes any difference compared to that of traditional simple sum money supply. Under different specifications, though the relative power of the Divisia aggregates in predicting quantity and price variables is found, still, it can be argued that theoretically well-rounded formation of the Divisia index is not that much empirically justified for the case of Turkey.

Keywords

1. Anderson, R. G., Jones, B. E., & Nesmith, T. D. (1997a). Introduction to the St. Louis Monetary Services Index Project. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 79(1), 25-29.10.20955/r.79.25-30Search in Google Scholar

2. Anderson, R. G., Jones, B. E., & Nesmith, T. D. (1997b). Monetary Aggregation Theory and Statistical Index Numbers. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 79(1), 31-51.10.20955/r.79.31-52Search in Google Scholar

3. Anderson, R. G., Jones, B. E., & Nesmith, T. D. (1997c). Building New Monetary Services Indexes: Concepts Data and Methods. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 79(1), 53-82.10.20955/r.79.53-82Search in Google Scholar

4. Bai, J., & Perron, P. (2003). Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 6, 72-78.10.1111/1368-423X.00102Search in Google Scholar

5. Barnett, W., A. (1978). The User Cost of Money. Economics Letters, 1, 145-149.10.1016/0165-1765(78)90051-4Search in Google Scholar

6. Barnett, W., A. (1980). Economic Monetary Aggregates: An Application of Index Number of Aggregation Theory. Journal of Econometrics 14, 11-48.10.1016/0304-4076(80)90070-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Barnett, W. A., & Chauve, M. (2008). International financial aggregation and index number theory: a chronological half-century empirical overview. Manuscript, University of Kansas.Search in Google Scholar

8. Bernanke, B. S. (1986). Alternative Explanations of the Money-Income Correlation. In K. Brunner and A. Meltzer, eds., Real Business Cycles, Real Exchange Rates, and Actual Policies, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, no. 25, Amsterdam, North-Holland.10.3386/w1842Search in Google Scholar

9. Blanchard, O. J., & Watson, M. (1986). Are All Business Cycles Alike? The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change. Edited by Robert J. Gordon. (pp. 123-156). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

10. Chrystal, A. K., & MacDonald, R. (1994). Empirical Evidence on the Recent Behavior and Usefulness of Simple-Sum and Weighted Measures of the Money Stock. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 73-109.10.20955/r.76.73-109Search in Google Scholar

11. Çelik, S. (1999). Divisia Monetary Aggregates: An Empirical Investigation of Their Usefulness for Turkey. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University Of Nebraska.Search in Google Scholar

12. Gottschalk, J. (2001). An Introduction into the SVAR Methodology: Identification, Interpretation and Limitations of SVAR models, Kiel Working Paper, 1072.Search in Google Scholar

13. Gürkaynak, R., S., Kantur, Z., Taş A., M., & Yıldırım, S. (2015). Monetary Policy in Turkey after Central Bank interdependence. CSF Working Paper Series. Center for Financial Series 520, Search in Google Scholar

14. Ishida, K. (1984). Divisia Monetary Aggregates and Demand for Money: A Japanese Case. Bank Japan Monetary and Economic Studies. 49-80.Search in Google Scholar

15. Karaman, D. (2009). An Empirical Study of Simple Sum and Divisia Monetary Aggregation: A Comparison of Their Predictive Power Regarding Prices and Output in Turkey. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Kansas University.Search in Google Scholar

16. Keating, J., W. (1992). Structural Approaches to Vector Autoregressions. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review. 37-57.10.20955/r.74.37-57Search in Google Scholar

17. Keating, J. W., Logan J. K., & Victor J. V. (2014). Solving the Price Puzzle With an Alternative Indicator of Monetary Policy. Economics Letters. 124, 188-194.10.1016/j.econlet.2014.05.012Search in Google Scholar

18. Kilian, L. (2013). Structural Vector Autoregressions. In N. Hashimzade and M.A. Thornton, eds., Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Macroeconomics, (pp. 515-55) Edward Elgar.10.4337/9780857931023.00031Search in Google Scholar

19. Kunter K. (1993). Turkiye’deki Parasal Buyuklukler icin indeks ve Bileşim Teorisinin Bir Uygulaması: Divisia ve Fisher indeksi. CBRT Discussion Papers, 1993. (in Turkish)Search in Google Scholar

20. Rua, A. (2010). Measuring comovement in the time-frequency space. Journal of Macroeconomics 32(2), 685-691.10.1016/j.jmacro.2009.12.005Search in Google Scholar

21. Özmen, U. M., & Sevinç, O. (2011). Price Rigidity in Turkey: Evidence from Micro Data. Working Paper Series. Central Bank of Turkey No.11/25, Search in Google Scholar

22. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrics, 48, 1-48.10.2307/1912017Search in Google Scholar

23. Sims, C., A. (1986). Are forecasting models useful for policy analysis. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 10, 2-16.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo