[BUEKENS, Filip: Faultless Disagreement, Assertions and the Affective-Expressive Dimension of Judgments of Taste. In: Philosophia, 2011, Vol. 39, pp. 637 – 655.10.1007/s11406-011-9318-5]Search in Google Scholar
[CLAPP, Lenny: A Non-Alethic Approach to Faultless Disagreement. In: Dialectica, 2015, Vol. 69, pp. 517 – 550.10.1111/1746-8361.12104]Search in Google Scholar
[DUŽÍ, Marie – JESPERSEN, Bjørn – MATERNA, Pavel: Procedural Semantics for Hyperintensional Logic: Foundations and Applications of Transparent Intensional Logic. Dordrecht: Springer 2010. 552 pp.10.1007/978-90-481-8812-3]Search in Google Scholar
[EGAN, Andy: There’s Something Funny about Comedy: A Case Study in Faultless Disagreement. In: Erkenntnis, 2014, Vol. 79, pp. 73 – 100.10.1007/s10670-013-9446-3]Search in Google Scholar
[GLANZBERG, Michael: Context, Content, and Relativism. In: Philosophical Studies, 2007, Vol. 136, pp. 1 – 29.10.1007/s11098-007-9145-5]Search in Google Scholar
[GUTZMANN, Daniel: If Expressivism Is Fun, Go for It! In: Subjective Meaning: Alternatives to Relativism. Eds. C. Meier and J. van Wijnberger-Huitink. Berlin: de Gruyter 2016, pp. 21 – 46.10.1515/9783110402001-003]Search in Google Scholar
[HUVENES, Torfinn Thomesen: Varieties of Disagreement and Predicates of Taste. In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2012, Vol. 90, pp. 167 – 181.10.1080/00048402.2010.550305]Search in Google Scholar
[KÖLBEL, Max: Truth without Objectivity. London: Routledge 2002. 150 pp.10.4324/9780203870181]Search in Google Scholar
[LASERSOHN, Peter: Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste. In: Linguistics and Philosophy, 2005, Vol. 28, pp. 643 – 686.10.1007/s10988-005-0596-x]Search in Google Scholar
[LÓPEZ DE SA, Dan: (2008). Presuppositions of Commonality: An Indexical Relativist Account of Disagreement. In: Relative Truth. Eds. M. García-Carpintero and M. Kölbel. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008, pp. 297 – 310.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234950.003.0014]Search in Google Scholar
[MACFARLANE, John: Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014. 344 pp.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682751.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[MARQUES, Teresa – GARCÍA-CARPINTERO, Manuel: Disagreement about Taste: Commonality Presuppositions and Coordination. In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2014, Vol. 92, pp. 701 – 723.10.1080/00048402.2014.922592]Search in Google Scholar
[RICHARD, Mark: When Truth Gives Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008. 184 pp.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239955.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHAFFER, Jonathan: Perspective in Taste Predicate and Epistemic Modals. In: Epistemic Modality. Eds. A. Egan and B. Weatherson. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011, pp. 179 – 226.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591596.003.0007]Search in Google Scholar
[SILK, Alex: Discourse Contextualism: A Framework for Contextualist Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016. 255 pp.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783923.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[STEVENSON, Charles Leslie: The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms. In: Mind, 1937, vol. 42, pp. 14 – 31.10.1093/mind/XLVI.181.14]Search in Google Scholar
[SUNDELL, Timothy: Disagreements about Taste. In: Philosophical Studies, 2011, Vol. 155, pp. 267 – 288.10.1007/s11098-010-9572-6]Search in Google Scholar
[TICHÝ, Pavel: Existence and God. In: The Journal of Philosophy, 1979, Vol. 76, pp. 403 – 420.10.2307/2025409]Search in Google Scholar
[WRIGHT, Crispin: Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1992. 262 pp.10.4159/9780674045385]Search in Google Scholar
[ZOUHAR, Marián: Conversations about Taste, Contextualism, and Non-Doxastic Attitudes. (Forthcoming in Philosophical Papers, 2018)10.1080/05568641.2018.1450159]Search in Google Scholar