Cite

INTRODUCTION

The onion (Allium cepa L.) is the third most important vegetable crop cultivated in the world after the potato and tomato (Semida et al., 2020). India stands first in onion cultivation and second in its production after China (Parimalarangan, 2020). Production in India during 2017–18 was estimated to be 22.42 million tons from 1.28 million hectare area (Barla & Upasani, 2019; Mahmadajaruddin & Mamani, 2020). Although the supply of onions for various culinary purposes is met with sufficient quantities, the demand for seeds is always high and both the public and private sectors seldom meet the increasing demands (Panacci et al., 2020; Meghana et al., 2021). The onion flowers are strongly protandrous and highly cross pollinated in nature (Baswana, 1984; Yucel & Duman, 2005), and due to presence of sticky pollen, pollination through insects inevitably produces high quality seeds (Gjorgji & Rukie, 1997; Chandel et al., 2004).

More than 267 insect species belonging to seven insect orders are known to pollinate the onion during its entire flowering period (Bohart et al., 1970; Walker et al., 2011). Among all the pollinators recorded, honey bees are reported to assist in 60–95% of pollination (Kumar et al., 1985; Chandel et al., 2004) and the bee pollinated umbels are reported to have a yield up to ten to eleven times higher than the closed control (Munawar & Muzaffar, 1999). However, the use of bees or other insects in controlled pollination for producing pure line hybrids is almost impossible due to the difficulty in having control over the pollination activity of insects. Mayer & Lunden (2001) and Yucel & Duman (2005) tested several other cross pollination methods for onion hybrid seed production with little success and concluded that, due to sticky pollen, the pollination in onion has to be facilitated by insects (either solitary bees or honey bees) for optimum seed set.

Therefore, in the present study, such cross pollination techniques as hand pollination, brush pollination and controlled insect pollination were practised and their efficiency was analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Additionally, the pollinator diversity of onions in Uttarakhand, Indian Himalayan conditions was analysed, and the pollinator density per unit area in onion crop was calculated. The Indian bee (Apis cerana indica), the most abundant pollinator of onion in Alpine and Humid subtropical climatic zone of India, was selected for understanding its pollination behaviour and pollination efficiency in onion. Moreover, the quantitative data including seed yield per umbel, test weight of 1000 seeds, seed yield per unit area and per cent fruit set under different pollination conditions were also assessed. The results of the current study to assess the yield enhancement through entomophily and artificial pollination in onion would form a strong scientific base for both researchers and farmers of Uttarakhand, Himalayas for utilizing the native bee species for attaining higher seed yield of onion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS
Study site and experimental materials

The pollination studies on onions were conducted at the Experimental Farm, Hawalbagh, ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan (VPKAS), Almora, Uttarakhand, India (29°38′01″ N and 79°37′49″ E, altitude 1250 amsl) in India's Alpine and Humid subtropical climatic zone. Onion bulbs of the VL Piaz-3 composite variety were directly sown in a 200 m2 field (14.0x14.3 m) on 12th December, 2020 (50th standard week) at a spacing of 50×50 cm. Fertilization, irrigation, earthing up, weeding and pest management were followed as per the agronomic practices recommended for VL Piaz-3.

Floral biology of onion

To study the floral biology of onion variety VL Piaz-3, flower colour, number of flowers per umbel, required time for umbel formation, first flowering and last flowering from the date of sowing were recorded. The total number of umbels per plant and total number of umbels per square metre were counted in order to obtain the quantitative yield data. The data was recorded from a total of twenty-five plants selected randomly from the field and the values were averaged and presented as mean±SD values.

Pollinator diversity

To assess the diversity of insects visiting onion flowers during the flowering period, the fields were monitored regularly for sixty-seven days (from initial flowering to seed set) through traversing zigzag manner three times a day (10.00, 13.00 and 16.00 h IST UTC+05:30). The traversing distance was up to 15 m in one direction and a total distance of 75 m (5 transect lines) was covered for the entire field once in a span of seven minutes. All the flower-visiting insects were counted and recorded in a field register. One representative specimen of each insect visitor was caught with a hand net and a repository of onion-flower visiting insects was prepared. For the characterization of coleopterans, the specimens collected from the fields were compared with the type specimen of the white grub beetles preserved in a Himalayan white grub species compendium at ICAR-VPKAS, Almora, Uttarakhand, India. However the technical bulletin on butterflies of Almora prepared by Stanley et al. (2018) was referred to for the identification of Lepidopterans. Furthermore, adult dipterans were identified through the pictorial, linear and dichotomous taxonomic keys designed by Buck et al. (2009) and Marshall et al. (2017). The hymenopterans were morphologically characterized through the literatures of Goulet & Huber (1993) and Seltmann (2004) with pictorial, interactive and dichotomous keys.

Pollinator density per unit area

In order to assess the density of flower-visiting insects per unit area, in-situ counts of the insects visiting the umbels were recorded. In this method of sampling, three plots of 1 m2 area were demarcated in the field and the insects visiting the onion umbels in one minute time were counted. The insects moving out of the marked area and returning back within a span of one minute were counted as fresh entry. The sampling was conducted three times a day (10.00, 13.00 and 16.00 h IST) for five consecutive days during the peak flowering period (>50% flowering). The five-day values of three time frames of pollinators’ visit into the demarcated area for a one-minute duration were averaged and presented graphically. The ANOVA was assessed at p<0.05 significance level, while F-values, SE(m) and CV (coefficient of variation) values were calculated through SPSS software to compare the means. The insects thus collected were classified into various groups based on the orders and families they belonged to.

Experimental design

After initial assessment of pollinator density and diversity, three major insect pollinators’ viz., A. c. indica, Apis mellifera and Bombus haemorrhoidalis were selected for assessing their pollination behaviour and foraging rate in onion. Additionally, such traditional artificial pollination methods as hand pollination with rubber and cloth gloves and both brush and sponge puff pollination were included in the experiment. Moreover, one positive control (open pollination) and one negative control (close pollination) treatments were also added in the study to assess the best pollination method to enhance the yield of onion seeds in a hybrid seed-production system. A total of thirty umbels were bagged separately per each treatment with a plastic mesh of 500 micron diameter prior to flower opening, and immediately afterwards the flowers were pollinated through different methods of pollination as described in Tab. 1 and covered with plastic mesh to avoid contamination.

Entomophily and artificial pollination methods followed for pollinating onion flowers

Treatments Procedure of pollination Treatments
T1- Indian bee (Apis cerana indica) One individual bee, actively foraging in onion fields was collected through a test tube and released on to a pre-marked umbel and bagged with plastic mesh of 500 micron diameters to prevent escape. One bee per umbel was released every day from initiation of flowering up to seed set. Duration of release 1 hour
T2- European bee (Apis mellifera)
T3- Himalayan bumble bee (Bombus haemorrhoidalis)
T4- Hand gloves (Cloth) The pollens were collected from un-bagged umbel through the cloth hand gloves and gently rubbed over the bagged umbel and covered with plastic mesh after pollination. Umbels were gently rubbed for 3 minutes
T5- Hand gloves (Rubber) The pollens were collected from un-bagged umbel through the rubber hand gloves and gently rubbed over the bagged umbel and covered with plastic mesh after pollination. Umbels were gently rubbed for 3 minutes
T6- Sponge puff The pollens were collected from un-bagged umbel through the puff and gently rubbed over the bagged umbel and covered with plastic mesh after pollination. Umbels were gently rubbed for 3 minutes
T7- Camel Brush The pollens were collected from un-bagged umbel through the camel brush and gently sprinkled over the bagged umbel and covered with plastic mesh after pollination. Pollens were sprinkled for 3 minutes
T8- Control (Open) The umbels were not covered and allowed for free cross pollination by all the pollinating agents
T9- Control (Close) The umbels were covered with plastic mesh and only self-pollination was allowed
Pollination behaviour and foraging rate of A. c. indica

Based on the results of pollinator density; the Indian bee (A. c. indica) was identified as the most efficient onion pollinator in the mid-Himalayas of Uttarakhand, India. In order to study the pollination behaviour of A. c. indica in the onion crop, such foraging activity of bees as number of flowers visited per minute, number of umbels visited per minute and time spent per flower by a single bee and a total number of pollen and nectar foragers visiting onion flowers at three different time intervals (10.00, 13.00 and 16.00 h IST) of a given day were estimated. For the present study, three flowering time-frames viz., pre-peak flowering (<25%), peak flowering (>50%) and post-peak flowering (<25%) were selected and the pollinator behaviour was observed for three consecutive days in three time-frames to obtain an averaged data. The ANOVA was calculated at p<0.05 significance level and F-values were calculated through post-hoc Tukey's-B test to analyse the statistically significant data.

Fruit set and yield parameter studies

To estimate the yield enhancement of onions through the entomophily and artificial pollination methods described above, the following yield data parameters were recorded: percentage of fruit set with respect to average number of flowers per umbel (842±132.51 number of flowers per umbel, average of 25 umbels), average number of seeds formed per umbel, weight of seeds obtained from each umbel, test weight of 1000 seeds in different treatments and yield per hectare (extrapolated values obtained from seed yield per 1 m2 area) in different treatments. A total of thirty umbels were bagged per treatment (each umbel was considered as a separate replication) and the data were recorded separately for each umbel under each treatment. For calculation of the test weight, seeds of all thirty umbels under each treatment were pooled and 1000 seeds randomly were counted and weighed. Moreover, to estimate the seed yield per unit area, the number of umbels per 1 m2 (36.66±11.43 umbels per 1 m2, average of 12 plots) was counted and the seed yield per umbel under different treatments was multiplied and the values were extrapolated as seed yield (in kg) per 1 hectare area.

Statistical analysis

All the field experiments were set up in a completely randomized block design (CRBD) with nine treatments and thirty replications each. The quantitative yield data was analysed through the calculation of the average values with Microsoft Office Excel 2019 (Microsoft corp., USA) and the ANOVA was assessed at p<0.05 level of significance. The F-values, SE(m) and CV (coefficient of variation) values were calculated with SPSS software to compare the means of density of insect flower visitors, and post-hoc Tukey's-B test was conducted to analyse the statistically significant data of the pollination behaviour and foraging activity of A. c. indica. Furthermore, the post-hoc Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT) was conducted with SPSS software for WINDOWS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago) for the comparison of statistically significant yield data in different treatments.

RESULTS
Floral biology of onion composite variety “VL Piaz-3”

Onion composite variety VL Piaz-3 is highly cross pollinated with strongly protandrous flowers, wherein anther dehisces occurs well before the stigma becomes receptive. The colour of the VL Piaz-3 flowers varied from whitish to light bluish in colour with six perianth segments arranged in two whorls. The numbers of stamens were six and arranged in two whorls. Anthers were bilocular and the ovary was superior. The colour of pollens varied from dark greenish to light purplish colour. The additional details of floral biology are furnished in Tab. 2.

Floral biology of onion composite variety “VL Piaz-3”

Floral Character Details
Time of flower opening From 6.20 h to 17.45 h (Throughout the day)
Anthesis Early morning hours from 6.25 to 7.25 h
Anther dehisces Observed from 7.45 h to 16.45 h
Stigma receptivity High between 9.15 h to 15.15 h (Examined through Hydrogen peroxide method proposed by Zeisler (1933))
Number of flowers per umbel Ranged between 682 to 1211 (842±132.51 average of 25 umbels)
Number of umbels per plant Ranged between 4 to 13 (7.32±2.29 average of 25 plants)
Number of umbels per m2 Ranged between 19–65 (36.66±11.43 average of 12 plots)
Days for umbel formation Ranged between 131–144 days (137.44±3.79 days* average of 100 plants) (19th February to 4th March, 2021)
Days for first flowering Ranged between 143–155 days (149.96±6.54 days* average of 100 plants) (3rd march to 15th March, 2021)
Days for last flowering Ranged between 203–216 days (209.92±3.96 days* average of 100 plants) (2nd May to 15th May, 2021)
Total flowering period of crop Ranged between 60–73 days (67.76±3.83 days* average of 100 plants) (3rd March to 15th May, 2021)
Total flowering period of each umbel Ranged between 13–19 days (15.92±1.98 days average of 25 umbels)

Values calculated from date of sowing of bulbs (12th December, 2020)

Pollinator diversity and abundance at three time frames of the day

The pollinator diversity of onion was recorded for sixty-seven flowering days, and through visual observations, more than 120 insect species were recorded to visit onion flowers during the entire flowering period. Fifty-five of these insect species belonging to four insect orders (Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, and Coleoptera) were considered as pollinators, because they spent ample time foraging on the umbels (>45 seconds) and traces of pollens were observed on their bodies. These fifty-five flower-visiting insects were collected through the in-situ sampling technique (Fig. 1) and identified up to species level using taxonomic keys. The hymenopterans were the most dominant flower visitors with nineteen known species, followed by lepidopterans with seventeen species, dipterans with fourteen species and coleopterans with five species respectively (details of insects up to species level are furnished in Tab. 3). The pollinator abundance study in the time frames 10.00, 13.00 and 16.00 h IST showed that (Fig. 2) syrphids and A. c. indica were the most abundant flower-visiting insects in onion during all three time frames, followed by megachilids. Moreover, the density of flower-visiting insects was statistically superior during the afternoon hours (13.00 h) followed by density in the morning hours (10.00 h). However, the density of insects declined drastically in the evening hours (16.00 h), except for those of moths and megachilids, which were found to visit onion flowers abundantly in the later part of the day. The other insects in Fig. 2 were hemipterans and diurnal coleopterans that visited the flowers actively throughout the day and foraged on pollen and nectar source of onion flowers.

List of insects visiting onion flowers under Himalayan conditions of Uttarakhand, India

Order of insect flower visitors List of insects visiting onion flowers
Hymenoptera (19 species) Apis cerana indica, Apis mellifera, Apis dorsata, Apis florea, Bombus haemorrhoidalis, Vespa tropica, Vespula vulgaris, Andrena hilaris, Megachile rotundata, Osmia inermis, Nomia incerta., Halictus sexcinctus, Ceratina smaragdula, Trigona iridipennis, Xylocopa latipes, Sceliphron curvatum, Megascolia azurea, Ceratina sutepensis, Lithurgus atratus
Lepidoptera (17 species) Celastrina argiolus, Chilades pandava, Danaus chrysippus, Pieris brassicae, Parantica aglea, Euploea core, Aglais caschmirensis, Vanessa cardui, Junonia lemonias, Papillio demoleus, Colias ladakensis, Helicoverpa armigera, Lymantria dispar, Acherontia styx, Pieris rapae, Chilades parrhasius, Danaus genetua
Diptera (14 species) Episyrphus balteatus, Metasyrphus corollae, Eupeodes luniger, Eristalis tenax, Macronomia spp., Calliphora vomitoria, Lucilia cuprina, Musca domestica, Eristalinus quinquelineatus, Sarcophaga carnaria, Helophilus trivittatus, Liosarcophaga dux, Eristalis horticola, Eristalinus megacephalus
Coleoptera (5 species) Oxycetonia versicolor, Clinteria kluge, Chiloba acuta, Heterorrhina elegans, Rhomborrhina spp.

Fig. 1

Diversity of insect pollinators of onion in Himalayas of Uttarakhand, India

Fig. 2

Insect pollinator density obtained through in-situ method of sampling in onion crop at three time frames of the day during peak flowering period (*F-values calculated at 5% level of significance)

Pollination behaviour and foraging rate of A. c. indica

Based on the pollinator density results, A. c. indica was identified as the most abundant onion pollinator in the study location. The studies were conducted to understand the pollination behaviour and foraging activity of A. c. indica, and the results showed that (Tab. 4) the pollen foragers visited a significantly higher number of flowers during the peak flowering period in comparison to the pre- and post-peak flowering periods. Wherein during the pre- and post-peak flowering periods (<25% flowering), the numbers of flowers per umbel were less, so, the pollen foragers visited more umbels and fewer flowers and spent more time in search of flowers. However, during the peak flowering period (>50% flowering) there were more flowers per umbel and pollen foragers spent more time on a single umbel collecting pollens and thus visited a significantly lower number of umbels during this period. A similar trend was observed in case of nectar feeders; due to profuse flowering during the peak flowering period and deep seated nectaries in onion, the nectar feeders spent more time on a single flower in order to collect nectar and thus visited fewer flowers and umbels per unit time. However, during the pre- and post-peak flowering periods, there were fewer flowers per umbels and thus the bees spent more time in search of flowers and visited a significantly higher number of flowers and umbels per unit time.

Foraging rate of pollen and nectar foragers of A. c. indica at three time intervals in a day during three flowering periods

Pre peak flowering (<25%) Peak flowering (>50%) Post peak flowering (<25%)
Bee foragers 10.00 h 13.00 h 16.00 h F-value p-value 10.00 h 13.00 h 16.00 h F-value p-value 10.00 h 13.00 h 16.00 h F-value p-value
No. of flowers visited by pollen foragers 24.52±1.91 a 23.52±1.44 b 19.71±1.63 c 1.79* 0.018 31.86±2.72 a 29.86±1.79 a 30.57±2.92 a 0.41 0.863 27.48±6.49 b 28.95±5.53a 25.71±5.82 c 0.14 0.0098
No. of flowers visited by nectar foragers 23.42±2.13 b 26.41±1.57 a 23.54±1.95 b 0.64* 0.0069 16.33±1.98 b 17.69±2.01 b 19.11±1.38 a 1.65* 0.021 26.14±1.63 ab 27.18±1.25a 24.69±1.87 c 0.36* 0.0089
No. of umbels visited by pollen foragers 4.95±1.28a 4.19±0.94c 4.57±1.10b 3.68* 0.0261 3.24±0.74a 3.60±1.01a 3.45±1.03a 1.31* 0.32 4.14±0.79b 4.71±1.31a 4.19±1.03b 5.06* 0.0083
No. of visited by nectar foragers 3.98±1.01b 3.87±0.69c 4.23±0.98a 0.42* 0.0085 2.13±0.47c 3.01±0.57a 2.94±0.73b 0.67* 0.0099 4.23±1.03b 3.99±1.07c 4.57±0.87a 0.89 0.0053

post-hoc Tukey's-B test conducted at 5% level of significance

Moreover, the studies conducted to assess the time spent by individual pollen and nectar foragers (Tab. 5) showed that the pollen foragers spent statistically on par time per each flower during the pre- and post-peak flowering periods, while they swiftly collected the pollen from flowers and spent significantly less amount of time per flower during the peak-flowering period. However in contrast, nectar foragers were recorded spending significantly more time per flower during the peak flowering period to collect nectar from deep seated nectaries in the flowers and significantly less time spent per flower during the pre- and post-peak flowering periods because of fewer flowers per umbel and more time spent searching for nectar bearing flowers. The number of pollen and nectar foragers visiting the onion flowers at three time intervals and three flowering periods were recorded (Tab. 6). The number of pollen foragers was noted to be significantly lower in the morning hours (10.00 h), increased drastically throughout the day and was statistically significant in the evening hours (16.00 h).

Time spent in seconds by individual pollen and nectar forager bee of A. c. indica on onion flowers during three time frames and three flowering periods

Pre peak flowering (<25%) Peak flowering (>50%) Post peak flowering (<25%)
Bee foragers 10.00 h 13.00 h 16.00 h F-value p-value 10.00 h 13.00 h 16.00 h F-value p-value 10.00 h 13.00 h 16.00 h F-value p-value
Pollen foragers 1.76±0.26 a 1.82±0.51 a 1.80±0.36a 1.91* 0.16 1.47±0.28a 1.34±0.31b 1.44±0.50a 0.80* 0.0058 1.79±0.4a 3 1.78±0.42a 1.77±0.45a 1.30* 0.32
Nectar foragers 3.04±0.61c 3.12±0.70b 3.30±0.62a 11.75* 0.0002 3.46±0.60b 3.28±0.62c 3.92±0.54a 2.57* 0.0077 2.96±0.63b 2.87±0.62c 3.08±0.62a 1.53* 0.0025

post-hoc Tukey's-B test conducted at 5% level of significance

Pollen and nectar foragers of A. c. indica visiting onion flowers at three time intervals in 1 m2 area in a span of one minute during three flowering periods (averages from 3 flowering days)

Pre peak flowering (<25%) Peak flowering (>50%) Post peak flowering (<25%)
Bee foragers 10.00 h 13.00 h 16.00 h F-value p-value 10.00 h 13.00 h 16.00 h F-value p-value 10.00 h 13.00 h 16.00 h F-value p-value
Number of pollen foragers 21.29±3.99 c 27.00±5.29b 30.71±5.99a 0.27* 0.0094 19.29±2.81c 39.00±7.90b 42.57±6.55a 1.72* 0.002 26.00±3.65c 43.43±4.79b 46.43±4.12a 1.96* 0.0014
Number of nectar foragers 78.71±3.99a 73.00±5.29b 67.86±3.34 c 0.69* 0.0006 80.71±2.81a 61.43±6.97b 57.43±6.55c 1.77* 0.0018 74.00±3.65a 56.57±4.79b 53.57±4.12c 0.87* 0.0048

post-hoc Tukey's-B test conducted at 5% level of significance

Similar results were recorded during all the flowering periods for the pollen foragers. Highly contrasting results were recorded for nectar foragers, while statistically significant numbers of nectar foragers of A. c. indica were observed to visit onion flowers during morning hours (10.00 h) and then drastically dropped in the evening hours (16.00 h) during all the three flowering periods. Moreover, the number of pollen foragers during the peak and post-peak flowering periods enhanced significantly in the afternoon as well as in the evening hours due to higher anther dehisces from 12.00 h to 16.00 h and the availability of ample pollen during this period in onions.

Fruit set and seed yield

The quantitative seed yield data obtained through the entomophily and artificial pollination methods in onion was analyzed and presented in Tab. 7. Open pollinated onion umbels were recorded to attract the maximum number of insect flower visitors which resulted in a higher percentage of fruit set, followed by A. c. indica and A. mellifera pollinated umbels, which also set a greater percentage of seeds per umbel in comparison to other treatments (Fig. 3). The average number of seeds per umbel was highest in open pollinated umbels, followed by A. c. indica and A. mellifera pollinated umbels. These results followed the trend of percentage of seed set per umbel pollinated by different methods. Moreover, the results of the parameters seed weight per umbel and test weight of 1000 seeds also showed similar trends, wherein, the open pollinated umbels recorded statistically significant values, followed by A. c. indica and A. mellifera, which were also statistically significant to other pollination treatments. Finally, the seed yield per hectare area showed a significantly superior yield in open pollinated treatments, followed by A. c. indica, A. mellifera and B. haemorrhoidalis pollinated umbels. In case of artificial pollination treatments, sponge puff pollinated flowers recorded significantly superior seed yield per hectare and percentage seed set per umbel, followed by camel brush, hand gloves (cloth) and hand gloves (rubber). In conclusion, all the cross pollination treatments were statistically significant during the close pollination treatment with respect to the entire yield parameters calculated.

Quantitative seed yield data of onion obtained through entomophily and artificial pollination methods

Treatments Fruit set (in %) Average number of seeds per umbel Seed weight per Umbel (in grams) Test weight of seeds (in grams) Yield per ha (in kg)
A. c. indica 46.79 394±6.35b 1.38±0.18b 4.2±0.01b 503.70
A. mellifera 36.46 307±9.02c 1.05±0.22c 3.9±0.02c 383.25
B. haemorrhodalis 21.26 179±4.36d 0.82±0.11d 2.8±0.02d 299.30
Hand gloves (cloth) 11.40 96±3.00f 0.38±0.11g 3.3±0.02e 138.70
Hand gloves (rubber) 8.79 74±3.61g 0.34±0.09h 2.9±0.03g 124.10
Sponge puff 17.34 146±4.73e 0.66±0.19e 3.1±0.02f 240.90
Camel brush 17.10 144±4.58e 0.59±0.15f 2.6±0.01h 215.35
Control (open) 85.99 724±7.00a 3.90±0.47a 4.7±0.01a 1423.50
Control (close) 7.84 66±4.04h 0.31±0.04i 2.2±0.01i 113.15

SE(m) 12.98 0.215 0.013
C.V. 3.141 64.95 6.913
F-values 2461.78* 27.41* 38.67*
p-values 0.00014 0.00007 0.000011

Note: F- values calculated at 5% level of significance,

DMRT- Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT) was carried out for comparing the significant differences in the mean values of various treatments

Fig. 3

Assessment of per cent fruit set with respect to total number of flowers per umbel under different pollination treatments.

DISCUSSION

Onion (Allium cepa) is a highly cross pollinated crop with a protandrous nature of flowering, wherein anthesis begins well before the stigma becomes receptive (Baswana, 1984; Devi et al., 2015). Despite the high scope for wind pollination (anemophily), due to the presence of sticky pollens, the pollination by insects (entomophily) becomes necessary for optimum seed set (Kumar et al., 1985; Sharma et al., 2001; Chandel et al., 2004; Klein et al., 2006; Saleh et al., 2021). The floral biology of onion is a varietal character, but the number of stamens, ovaries and florets, the colour of flowers and pollens, days for flowering, seed set and harvesting usually lie in a fixed range (Devi et al., 2015; Saleh at al., 2021).

Recently Walker et al. (2011), Devi et al. (2015) and Saleh et al. (2021) reviewed the floral biology of onion and importance of insect pollinators in improving seed yield of onion. Walker et al. (2011) reported a total of 18,407 individual insects belonging to 264 species and twenty-eight families of seven insect orders visiting the onion flowers during the entire flowering period, whereas Bohart et al. (1970) showed the presence of 267 species of insect pollinators visiting onion flowers. Our studies formed a close concurrence with the previous studies, in which through visual observations we recorded more than 120 species of insects from five orders visiting onion flowers. Out of which fifty-nine species were collected from fields and identified up to species level with the help of taxonomic keys.

Among all the insect pollinators visiting onion flowers, bees had an important role in efficient pollination and optimum seed set. Jadhav et al. (1981), Kumar et al. (1985) and Chandel et al. (2004) showed that 60–95% of onion pollination is assisted by honey bees of family Apidae. Moreover, Saeed et al. (2008) and Saeed & Masood (2008) reported four bee species and four wasp species and twelve true fly species to be the major insect pollinators of onion. However, Chandel et al. (2004), in the sub-temperate climates of India's Himachal Pradesh (altitude >1200 m) recorded two honey bee species (Apis dorsata and A. c. indica) and three syrphid species (Episyrphus balteatus, Metasyrphus conferator and M. corollae) to be important onion pollinators in the hilly terrains of the Indian Himalayas. These results were in close concurrence with our study carried out to assess the population density of onion pollinators in Uttarakhand, Himalayas, in which we recorded A. c. indica as the most dominant pollinator, followed by A. mellifera, syrphids, B. haemorrhoidalis, non-Apis bees, wasps and butterflies.

Based on the previous studies carried out by Rao & Suryanarayana (1989), Chaudhary & Sihag (2003) and Chandel et al. (2004) and the results of our studies, we selected the Indian bee (A. c. indica) to study its pollination behaviour and pollination efficiency in onions. Our results showed that immediately after anthesis and flower opening, both the pollen and nectar foragers of A. c. indica visited the onion flowers in large numbers and assisted in cross pollination during the their food-collecting process, thus indicating how rich onion flowers are in nectar and pollen source (Yucel & Duman, 2005; Saeed et al., 2008).

Although onion is a cross pollinated crop and insects play an important role in pollination, the exploitation of insects or domesticated bees in hybrid seed production system is still in infant stages in the temperate and sub-temperate areas of Indian Himalayas (Pratap & Pratap, 1997; Chandel et al., 2004). Moreover, the production of pure lines of breeder seeds is a very cumbersome procedure due to unavailability of suitable crossing techniques in onions (Van der Meer & Van Bennekom, 1968; Mayer & Lunden, 2001; Yucel & Duman, 2005). Therefore, several crossing methods were tested and it was noted that, only controlled pollination by insects helps in efficient pollination and optimum seed set. Similar crossing studies conducted by Matherson et al. (1996) and Sajjad et al. (2008) concluded that, honey bees were the most efficient onion pollinators and assisted in the production of high quality seeds. Quantitative yield analysis studies showed that the insect-pollinated umbels recorded superior yield data in comparison to other mechanical methods. Gjorgji & Rukie (1997) concluded that, the test weight of onion seeds pollinated by honey bees was 10.57% higher than those pollinated through hand pollination. Similar results were recorded in our study, in which A. c. indica and A. mellifera pollinated seeds recorded the highest test weight after open pollinated seeds accounting to 11.37% weight increase over closed control. Moreover, Munawar & Muzaffar (1999) recorded a 10–11 time yield increase of onion seeds pollinated through insects over closed control plots where no pollination was allowed. Our results had close concordance, in which 1423.50% yield increase was recorded in open pollinated umbels followed by A. c. indica and A. mellifera recording 345.16% and 238.71% yield increase respectively over closed umbels where, no cross pollination by insects was allowed.

As a result of this study, a total of 120 species of visiting insects were observed to visit onion flowers for collecting pollen and nectar, out of which Indian bee (A. c. indica) was identified as the most abundant and efficient pollinator of onion flowers in the Himalayas of Uttarakhand, India. The open pollinated flowers yielded the highest seed yield among all the treatments, and yield enhancement of more than 1400% was recorded over the control plots. However, several drawbacks still remain on how to produce pure hybrid lines of onion seeds through controlled insect pollination. These aspects require further research and field experimentations.

eISSN:
2299-4831
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Zoology, other