Non-Signatories in International Commercial Arbitration: Contesting the Myth of Consent

Ad hoc award. Decided in 1991. ASA Bulletin, vol. 10, 1992, pp. 202-258. [online]. Avail­able at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 31.5.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Badia, A. Piercing the veil of state enterprises in international arbitration. The Hague: Wolters Kluwer, 2014. 280 pages. ISBN 9041151621.Search in Google Scholar

Blackaby, N. ; Partasides, C.; Redfern, A., et al. Redfern and Hunter on international arbitra­tion. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. 849 pages. ISBN 0199557195.10.1093/law:iic/9780199557189.001.1Search in Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. The Multinational Challenge to Corporate Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. 337 pages. ISBN 9780195361346.Search in Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. ; Strasser, K.; Gouvin, E., et al. Blumberg on Corporate Groups. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2004. ISBN 9780735542068.Search in Google Scholar

Born, G. International commercial arbitration (2014). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2014. 4260 pages. ISBN 9789041152190.Search in Google Scholar

Bowden, P. L‘interdiction des se contredire au détriment d‘autrui (estoppel) as a Substan­tive Transnational Rule in International Commercial Arbitration. In Bernardini, p. ; Gaillard, E. Transnational rules in international commercial arbitration. Paris, France: ICC Publications, 1993. 274 pages. ISBN 9789284201549.Search in Google Scholar

Brekoulakis, S. Rethinking Consent in International Commercial Arbitration: A General Theory for Non-signatories. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2017, no. 8, pp. 610-643.10.1093/jnlids/idx012Search in Google Scholar

Bundesgericht. Decided on 19.4.1994. Sammlung der Bundesgerichtsentscheide, vol. 120, 1994, pp. 155-172. [online]. Available at: www.bger.ch. Accessed 29.7.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Bundesgericht. Decided on 29.1.1996. ASA Bulletin, vol. 14, 1996, pp. 496-507. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 2.6.2014.10.1017/S0002021400015644Search in Google Scholar

Bundesgericht. Decided on 16. 10. 2003. Case number 4P 115/2003. Sammlung der Bun­desgerichtsentscheide, vol. 129, 2003, pp. 727-738. [online]. Available at: http://www.bger.ch. Accessed 2.1.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Bundesgericht. Decided on 22.1.2008. Case number 4A_244/2007. [online]. Available at: www.bger.ch. Accessed 8.5.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Bundesgericht. Decided on 25.8.2009. Case number 4A_160/2009. [online]. Available at: www.bger.ch. Accessed 1.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Bundesgericht. Decided on 7.4.2014. Case number 4A_450/2013. [online]. Available at: www.bger.ch. Accessed 1.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Bundesgericht. Decided on 16.2.2017. Case number 4A_473/2016. [online]. Avail­able at: http://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bger/170216_4A_473-2016.html. Accessed 20.11.2018.Search in Google Scholar

Bundesgerichtshof. Decided on 17.4.2008. Case number III ZB 97/06. [online]. Available at: www.jurion.de. Accessed 1.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Bundesgerichtshof. Decided on 8.5.2014. Case number III ZR 371/12. [online]. Available at: https://beck-online.beck.de/Dokument?vpath=bibdata%5Czeits%5Cschiedsvz%5C2014%5Ccont%5Cschiedsvz.2014.151.1.htm. Accessed 20.11.2018.Search in Google Scholar

Busse, D. Die Bindung Dritter an Schiedsvereinbarungen. SchiedsVZ - Zeitschrift für Schiedsverfahren, 2005, no. 3, pp. 118-123.Search in Google Scholar

Cour d´Appel de Paris. Decided on 30.11.1988. Revue de l‘arbitrage, 1989, p. 691. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 17.3.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Cour d´Appel de Paris. Decided on 14.2.1989. La Revue de l‘arbitrage, 1989, p. 691. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 17.3.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Cour d‘Appel de Pau. Decided on 26.11.1986. Case number N/A. Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, vol. XIII, 1988, pp. 149-151. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerarbitra­tion.com. Accessed 31.12.2013.Search in Google Scholar

Cour de Cassation. Decided on 6.7.2005. Case number 01-15912. [online]. Available at: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichJuriJudi.do?idTexte=JURITEXT000007050505. Accessed 1.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Cour de Cassation. Decided on 27.3.2007. Revue de l‘arbitrage, 2007, pp. 758-787. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 30.5.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Court of Appeal of England and Wales (Civil Division). Decided on 21.11.2008. Case number B2/2008/0489. [online]. Available at: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/1283.html. Accessed 7.6.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Court of Appeal of England and Wales (Civil Division). Decided on 20.6.2012. Case num­ber A3/2011/3093, 3270 and 3306. [online]. Available at: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/808.html. Accessed 1.7.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Derains, Y. Is there a Group of Companies Doctrine? In Hanotiau, B.; Schwartz, E. A. Multiparty arbitration. Paris: International Chamber of Commerce, 2010. 272 pages. ISBN 9284200830.Search in Google Scholar

Fouchard, P. ; Gaillard, E.; Goldman, B., et al. Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on internation­al commercial arbitration. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999. 1280 pages. ISBN 9789041110251.Search in Google Scholar

Gaillard, E. L‘Interdiction de se Contredire au Détriment d‘Autrui comme Principe Géné­ral du Droit du Commerce International. Revue de l‘arbitrage, 1985, pp. 241-258.Search in Google Scholar

Gross, D. Zur Inanspruchnahme Dritter vor Schiedsgerichten in Fällen der Durchgriff­shaftung. SchiedsVZ - Zeitschrift für Schiedsverfahren, 2006, no. 4, pp. 194-196.Search in Google Scholar

Halla, S.; Drličková, K. Zmeny v subjektoch hlavnej zmluvy a ich dopad na súvisiacu rozhodcovskú zmluvu. Obchodněprávní revue, 2014, no. 3, pp. 76-82.Search in Google Scholar

Hanotiau, B. Complex arbitrations. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005. xv, 392. ISBN 904112442X.Search in Google Scholar

Hanotiau, B. Non-signatories in International Arbitration: Lessons from Thirty Years of Case Law. In van den Berg, A. J. International Arbitration 2006. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2007. 957 pages. ISBN 9789041126917.Search in Google Scholar

ICC International Court of Arbitration. Decided on 23.9.1982. Case number ICC No. 4131. Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, vol. IX, 1984, pp. 131-137. [online]. Avail­able at: www.kluwerarbitration.com. Accessed 17.5.2014.Search in Google Scholar

ICC International Court of Arbitration. ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, vol. 2, 1991. [online]. Available at: www.iccdrl.com. Accessed 30.5.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Landrove, J. C. Assignment and Arbitration. Basel: Schulthess, 2009. 218 pages. ISBN 978-3-7255-5782-0.Lew, J. D. M; Mistelis, L.; Kröll, S. Comparative international commercial arbitration. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003. 953 pages. ISBN 9789041115683.Search in Google Scholar

Mantilla-Serrano, F. Multiple Parties and Multiple Contracts: Divergent or Comparable Issues? In Hanotiau, B.; Schwartz, E. A. Multiparty arbitration. Paris: International Chamber of Commerce, 2010. 272 pages. ISBN 9284200830.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, P. Extension of the arbitration clause to non-signatories under French law. In Perma­nent Court of Arbitration. Multiple party actions in international arbitration. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. 445 pages. ISBN 978-0-19-955172-9.Search in Google Scholar

Poudret, J.-F.; Besson, S.; Berti, S., et al. Comparative law of international arbitration. Lon­don: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007. 952 pages. ISBN 3725553785.Search in Google Scholar

Rau, A.S. Arbitral jurisdiction and the dimension of „consent“. Arbitration International, 2008, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 199-264.10.1093/arbitration/24.2.199Search in Google Scholar

Rubino-Sammartano, M. International arbitration law. The Hague: Kluwer Law Interna­tional, 2001. 1080 pages. ISBN 9789041114259.Search in Google Scholar

The High Court of Justice (Chancery Division). Decided on 4.10.1977. Yearbook Com­mercial Arbitration, vol. IV., 1979, pp. 317-319. [online]. Available at: www.kluwerar­bitration.com. Accessed 7.6.2014.Search in Google Scholar

The High Court of Justice (Queen‘s Bench). Decided on 4.2.2004. Case number [2004] EWHC 121 (Comm). [online]. Available at: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2004/121.html. Accessed 2.1.2014.Search in Google Scholar

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. Decided on 6.2.2013. Case number [2013] UKSC 5. [online]. Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/5.html. Accessed 1.7.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Trittman, R.; Hanefeld, I. Commentary on the German Arbitration Law (10th Book of the German Code of Civil Procedure). In Böckstiegel, K.; Kröll, S.; Nacimiento, P. Arbitra­tion in Germany. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2007. 1223 pages. ISBN 9041127186.Search in Google Scholar

Trittman, R.; Hanefeld, I. Part II - Commentary on the German Arbitration Law (10th Book of the German Code of Civil Procedure). In Böckstiegel, K.; Kröll, S.; Nacimien­to, P. Arbitration in Germany. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2007. 1223 pages. ISBN 9041127186.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Supreme Court. Decided on 6.3.1944. Supreme Court Reporter, vol. 321, 1944, 349 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 29.6.2014.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Supreme Court. Decided on 20.6.1960. Supreme Court Reporter, vol. 363, 1960, 564 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 1.7.2014.Search in Google Scholar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Decided on 6.9.1984. Case number 83-7034. Federal Reporter, 2nd series, vol. 741, 342 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Decided on 30.12.1993. Case number 91-9153. Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 10, 753 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Decided on 13.12.1988. Case number 87-1759 a 88-1501. Federal Reporter, 2nd series, vol. 863, 315 a násl. [online]. Avail­able at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 1. 8. 1960. Case number 25914. Federal Reporter, 2nd series, vol. 282, 231 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 1.5.2014.Search in Google Scholar

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 22.11.1993. Case number 93-7271. Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 9, 1060 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 1.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 24.8.1995. Case number 94-9118. Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 64, 773 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 1.1.2014.Search in Google Scholar

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 17.3.1999. Case number 98-7823(L), 98-7893(XAP). Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 170, 349 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 14.4.2005. Case number 02-9383. Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 404, 657 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 7.6.2014.Search in Google Scholar

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Decided on 21.10.2008. Case number 01-7899. Federal Reporter, 3rd series, vol. 217, 403 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Decided on 28.9.1981. Case number 80-2817. Federal Reporter, 2nd series, vol. 659, 836 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

United States District Court S. D. New York. Decided on 20.9.1966. Case number no. 66 Civ. 2072. Federal Supplement, vol. 259, 688 et seq. [online]. Available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/259/688/2293417/.Search in Google Scholar

United States District Court, S.D. New York. Decided on 11.8.2011. Case number 11 Civ. 00325 (RJH). Federal Supplement, 2nd Series, vol. 803, 270 a násl. [online]. Available at: www.westlaw.com. Accessed 20.8.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Vanderkerckhove, K. Piercing the corporate veil. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2007. 765 pages. ISBN 9041125914.Search in Google Scholar

White&Case; Queen Mary University of London. 2018 International Arbitration Survey. [online]. Available at: https://www.whitecase.com/publications/insight/2018-interna­tional-arbitration-survey-evolution-international-arbitration. Accessed 28.10.2018.Search in Google Scholar

Zöller, R.; Geimer, R. Zivilprozessordnung. Köln: O. Schmidt, 2007. 3083 pages. ISBN 3504470151.Search in Google Scholar