[Arioli, C., Pastori, P., Botton, M., Garcia, M., Borges, R. and Mafra-Neto, A. 2014. Assessment of SPLAT formulations to control Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in a Brazilian apple orchard. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 74: 184-190.10.4067/S0718-58392014000200009]Search in Google Scholar
[Arsequell, G., Fabrias, G. and Camps, F. 1990. Sex pheromone biosynthesis in the processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis and Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Thaumatopoeidae) by delta-13 desaturation. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 14: 47–56.10.1002/arch.940140106]Search in Google Scholar
[Athanassiou, Ch., Kavallieratos, N., Gakis, S., Kyrtsa, L., Mazomenos, B. and Gravanis, F. 2007. Influence of trap type, trap colour, and trapping location on the capture of the pine moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 122: 117–123.10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00490.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Athanassiou, C.G., Kavallieratos, N.G., Pardo, D., Sancho, J., Colacci, M., Boukouvala, M.C., Nikolaidou A.J., Kondodimas, D.C., Benavent-Fernández, E., Gálvez-Settier, S. and Trematerra, P., 2017. Evaluation of pheromone trap devices for the capture of Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae) in southern Europe. Journal of Economic Entomology, 110: 1087-1095.10.1093/jee/tox050]Search in Google Scholar
[Atterholt, C.A., Delwiche, M.J., Rice, R.E. and Krochta, J.M., 1999. Controlled release of insect sex pheromones from paraffin wax and emulsions. Journal of Controlled Release, 57: 233-247.10.1016/S0168-3659(98)00119-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Atterholt, C.A., Delwiche, M.J., Rice, R.E. and Krochta, J.M. 1998. Study of biopolymers and paraffin as potential controlled-release carriers for insect pheromones. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 46: 4429–4434.10.1021/jf980642u]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker, R., Caffier, D., Choiseul, J.W., De Clercq, P., Dormannsné-Simon, E., Gerowitt, B., Evtimova Karadjova, O., Lövei, G., Lansink, A.O., Makowski, D., Manceau, C., Manici, L., Perdikis, D., Porta Puglia, A., Schans, J., Schrader, G., Steffek, R., Strömberg, A., Tiilikkala, K., Coert van Lenteren, J. and Vloutoglou, I. 2009. Evaluation of a pest risk analysis on Thaumetopoea processionea L., the oak processionary moth, prepared by the UK and extension of its scope to the EU territory. EFSA Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Health. The EFSA Journal (2009), 1195, 1-64]Search in Google Scholar
[Barbaro. L. and Battisti, A. 2011. Birds as predators of pine processionary moth (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae). Biological Control, 56: 107-114.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.10.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Battisti, A. 1988. Host–plant relationships and population dynamics of the pine processionary caterpillar Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis and Schiffermuller). Journal of Applied Entomology, 105: 393–402.10.1111/j.1439-0418.1988.tb00202.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Battisti, A., Avci, M., Avtzis, D., Ben Jamaa, M., Berardi, L., Berretima, W., Branco, M., Chakali, G., Alaoui El Fels, M., Frérot, B., Hódar, J., Ionescu-Mălăncus, I., Ipekdal, K., Larsson, S., Manole, T., Mendel, Z., Meurisse, N., Mirchev, P., Nemer, N., Paiva, M., Pino, J., Protasov, A., Rahim, N., Rousselet, J., Santos, H., Sauvard, D., Schopf, A., Simonato, M., Yart, A. and Zamoum, M. 2015. Processionary moths and climate change: An update Chapter 2 Natural History of the Processionary Moths (Thaumetopoea spp.): New Insights in Relation to Climate Change. Roques A. (Ed.) 2015, XVII, 427 p.10.1007/978-94-017-9340-7_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Battisti, A., Holm, G., Fagrell, B. and Larsson, S. 2011. Urticating hairs in Arthropods: Their nature and medical significance. Annual Review of Entomology, 56: 203-220.10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144844]Search in Google Scholar
[Battisti, A., Larsson, S. and Roques, A. 2017. Processionary Moths and Associated Urtication Risk: Global Change Driven Effects. Annual Review of Entomology, 62: 323-342.10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-034918]Search in Google Scholar
[Battisti A, Stastny M, Buffo E., Larsson S., 2006. A rapid altitudinal range expansion in the processionary moth produced by the 2003 climatic anomaly. Global Change Biology 12: 662-671.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01124.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Battisti, A., Stastny, M., Netherer, S., Robinet, C., Schopf, A., Roques, A. and Larsson, S. 2005. Expansion of geographic range in the pine processionary moth caused by increased winter temperatures. Ecological Applications, 15: 2084–2096.10.1890/04-1903]Search in Google Scholar
[Bengtsson, M., Karg, G., Kirsch, P.A., Lőfqvist, J., Sauer, A. and Witzgall, P. 1994. Mating disruption of pea moth Cydia nigricana F. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by a repellent blend of sex pheromone and attraction inhibitors. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 20: 871–887.10.1007/BF02059584]Search in Google Scholar
[Borchert, D.M. and Walgenbach, J.F. 2000. Comparison of pheromone-mediated mating disruption and conventional insecticides for management of tufted apple bud moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 93: 769–776.10.1603/0022-0493-93.3.76910902329]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, D.F, Knight, A.L., Howell, J.F., Sell, C.R., Krysan, J.L. and Weiss, M. 1992. Emission characteristics of a polyethylene pheromone dispenser for mating disruption of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 85: 910–917.10.1093/jee/85.3.910]Search in Google Scholar
[Byers, J.A. 2007. Simulation of mating disruption and mass trapping with competitive attraction and camouflage. Environmental Entomology, 36: 1328–1338.10.1603/0046-225X(2007)36[1328:SOMDAM]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Camps, F., Gasol, V. and Guerrero, A. 1990a. Inhibitory pheromonal activity promoted by analogs of sex pheromone of the processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis and Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 16: 1155–1172.10.1007/BF01021017]Search in Google Scholar
[Camps, F., Gasol, V., Hernandez, Z. and Montoya, R. 1990b. Inhibition of the processionary moth sex pheromone by some haloacetate analogues. Pesticide Science, 29, 123–134.10.1002/ps.2780290202]Search in Google Scholar
[Cardé, R.T. and Minks, A.K. 1995. Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints. Annual Review of Entomology, 40: 559-585.10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.003015]Search in Google Scholar
[Carus, S. 2004. Impact of defolation by pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa) on radial, height and volume growth of Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia) trees in Turkey. Phytoparasitica, 32: 459-469.10.1007/BF02980440]Search in Google Scholar
[Castagneyrol, B., Jactel, H., Brockerhoff, E., Perrette, N., Larter, M., Delzon, S. and Piou, D. 2016. Host range expansion is density dependent. Oecologia, 182: 779–788.10.1007/s00442-016-3711-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Cebeci, H.H., Oymen, R.T. and Acer, S. 2010. Control of pine processionary moth. Journal of Environmental Biology, 31: 357-361.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chamberlain, D.J., Brown, N.J., Jones, O.T. and Casagrande, E. 2000. Field evaluation of a slow release pheromone formulation to control the American bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 90: 183–190.10.1017/S0007485300000304]Search in Google Scholar
[Cork, A., De Souza, K., Hall, D.R., Jones, O.T., Casagrande, E., Krishnaiah, K. and Syed, Z. 2008. Development of PVC resin-controlled release formulation for pheromones and use in mating disruption of yellow rice stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas. Crop Protection, 27: 248–255.10.1016/j.cropro.2007.05.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Corley, J.C. and Jervis, M.A. 2012. Forest pest management: a global challenge. International Journal of Pest Management, 58: 193-194.10.1080/09670874.2012.701782]Search in Google Scholar
[Cuevas, P., Montoya, R., Belles, X., Camps, F., Coll, J., Guerrero, A. and Riba, M. 1983. Initial field trials with the synthetic sex pheromone of processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis and Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 9: 85–93.10.1007/BF00987772]Search in Google Scholar
[deLame, F.M., Miller, J.R., Atterholt, C.A. and Gut, L.J. 2007. Development and evaluation of an emulsified paraffin wax dispenser for season-long mating disruption of Grapholita molesta in commercial peach orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology, 100, 1316–1327.10.1093/jee/100.4.1316]Search in Google Scholar
[de Souza, K.R., McVeigh, L.J. and Wright, D.J. 1992. Selection of insecticides for lure and kill studies against Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 85: 2100–2106.10.1093/jee/85.6.2100]Search in Google Scholar
[Devkota, B. and Schmidt, G.H. 1990. Larval development of Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. and Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae) from Greece as influenced by different host plants under laboratory conditions. Journal of Applied Entomology, 109: 321–330.10.1111/j.1439-0418.1990.tb00059.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Devkota, B., Breuer, M. and Schmidt. G.H. 1992. Observations on the flight activity of the Pine processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. and Schiff.) in Greece, using synthetic sexpheromone and light traps (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae). Bolletino di Zoologia Agraria e di Bachicocultura, 24: 147–157.]Search in Google Scholar
[Erkan, N. 2011. Impact of pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni Tams) on growth of Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 4983–4988.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fabrias, G., Arsequell, G. and Camps, F. 1989. Sex pheromone precursors in the processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis and Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae). Insect Biochemistry, 19: 177–181.10.1016/0020-1790(89)90089-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Gordon, D., Zahavi, T., Anshelevich, L., Harel, M., Ovadia, S., Dunkelblum, E. and Harari, A. 2005. Mating Disruption of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Effect of Pheromone Formulations and Concentrations. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98: 135-142.10.1093/jee/98.1.135]Search in Google Scholar
[Guerrero, A., Camps, F., Cole, J., Riba, M., Einhorn, J., Descoins, C.H. and Lallemand, J.Y. 1981. Identification of a potential sex pheromone of the processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae). Tetrahedron Letters, 22: 2013-2016.10.1016/S0040-4039(01)92892-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Halperin, J. 1984. Pityolure traps as tools in macro-mapping of the distribution of the pine processionary caterpillar. La Yaaran, 34: 25–29 (in Hebrew).]Search in Google Scholar
[Halperin, J. 1985. Mating disruption of the pine processionary caterpillar by pityolure. Phytoparasitica, 133: 221–224.10.1007/BF02980672]Search in Google Scholar
[Halperin, J. 1986. Application of pityolure for detection and control of Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis and Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae) in Israel. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO, 16: 627–632.10.1111/j.1365-2338.1986.tb00334.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hegazi, E.M., Konstantopoulou, M.A., Herz, A., Mazomenos, B.E., Khafagi, W., Agamy, E., Zaitun, A., Abd El-Aziz, G., Showiel, S. and Abdel-Rahman, S.M. 2009. Is mating disruption effective in controlling the olive moth, Prays oleae? Crop Protection, 28: 181-189.10.1016/j.cropro.2008.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Hegazi, E.M., Konstantopoulou, M.A., Milonas, P., Herz, A., Mazomenos, B.E., Khafagi, W.E., Zaitun, A., Abdel-Rahman, S.M., Helal, I. and El-Kemny S. 2007. Mating disruption of the jasmine moth Palpita unionalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) using a two pheromone component blend: a case study over three consecutive olive growing seasons in Egypt. Crop Protection, 26: 837–844.10.1016/j.cropro.2006.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Hódar, J.A., Zamora, R. and Castro, J. 2002. Host utilisation by moth and larval survival of pine processionary caterpillar Thaumetopoea pityocampa in relation to food quality in three Pinus species. Ecological Entomology, 27: 292–301.10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00415.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Huchon, H. and Demolin, D. 1971. La bioécologie de la procesionnaire du pin. Dispersion potentielle—dispersion actuelle. Phytoma, 225: 11–20.10.4267/2042/20421]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacquet, J.S., Orazio, C. and Jactel, H. 2012. Defoliation by processionary moth significantly reduces tree growth: a quantitative review. Annals of Forest Science, 69: 857-866.10.1007/s13595-012-0209-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Jactel, H., Menassieu, P., Vétillard, F., Barthélémy, B., Piou, D., Frérot, B., Rousselet, J., Goussard, F., Branco, M. and Battisti, A. 2006. Population monitoring of the pine processionary moth (Lepidoptera : Thaumetopoeidae) with pheromone-baited traps. Forest Ecology Management, 235: 96–106.10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Johansson, B.G., Anderbrant, O., Simandl, J., Avtzis, N.D., Salvadori, C., Hedenstrom, E., Edlund, H. and Hogberg, H.E. 2001. Release rates for pine sawfly pheromones from two types of dispensers and phenology of Neodiprion sertifer. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27: 733–745.10.1023/A:1010302002735]Search in Google Scholar
[Kanat, M. and Ozbolat, M. 2006. Mass production and release of Calosoma sycophanta L. (Coleoptera: Carabidae) used against the pine processionally moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Schiff.) (Lepidoptera : Thaumetopoeidae), in biological control. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 30(2): 181-185.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kerdelhué, C., Battisti, A., Burban, C., Branco, M., Cassel-Lundhagen, A., Ipekdal, K., Larsson, S., Lopez-Vaamonde, C., Magnoux, E., Mateus, E., Mendel, Z., Negrisolo, E., Paiva, M.R., Pivotto, I., Rocha, S., Ronnas, C., Roques, A., Rossi, J.P., Rousselet, J., Salvato, P., Santos, H., Simonato, M. and Zane, L. 2014. Genetic diversity and structure at different spatial scales in the processionary moths. In A. Roques (Ed.), Processionary moths and climate change: An update. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9340-7_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Knight, A.L. 1996. Why so many mated female codling moths in disrupted orchards. Proceedings of the Washington State Horticultural Association, 92: 213–214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klun, J.A., Haynes, K.F., Bierl-Leonhardt, B.A., Birch, M.C. and Plimmer, J.R. 1981. Sex pheromone of female artichoke plume moth, Platyptilia carduidactyla. Environmental Entomology, 10: 763–765.10.1093/ee/10.5.763]Search in Google Scholar
[Lapointe, S. and Stelinski, L. 2011. An applicator for high viscosity semiochemical products and intentional treatment gaps for mating disruption of Phyllocnistis citrella. Entomologia Experimentalis and Applicata, 141: 145-153.10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01178.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Leonardt, B.A., Cunningham, R.T., Dickerson, W.A., Mastro, V.C., Ridgway, R.L. and Schwalbe, C.P. 1990. Dispenser design and performance criteria for insect attractants. pp. 113-130. In R.L. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein and M.N. Inscoe (Eds.), Behavior-modifying chemicals for insect management. Applications of pheromones and other attractants. Marcel Decker, New York, 761 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Masutti, L. and Battisti, A. 1990. Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. and Schiff.) in Italy Bionomics and perspectives of integrated control. Journal of Applied Entomology, 110: 229-234.10.1111/j.1439-0418.1990.tb00117.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mazomenos, B.E., Ortiz, A., Mazomenos-Pantazi, A., Stefanou, D., Stavrakis, N., Karapati, C. and Fountoulakis, M. 1999. Mating disruption for the control of the olive moth, Prays oleae (Bern) (Lep.: Yponomeutidae) with the major sex pheromone component. Journal of Applied Entomology, 123: 247–254.10.1046/j.1439-0418.1999.00337.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, J.R. and Gut, L.J. 2015. Mating disruption for the 21st century: Matching technology with mechanism. Environmental Entomology, 44: 427-453.10.1093/ee/nvv052]Search in Google Scholar
[Moffitt, H.R. and Westigard, P.H. 1984. Suppression of the codling moth populations on peach in southern Oregon through mating disruption with sex pheromone. Journal of Economic Entomology, 77: 1513–1519.10.1093/jee/77.6.1513]Search in Google Scholar
[Nicolini, G. 1987. Biologia della procesionaria del pino in Trentino. Lotta tradizionale e con attattiviti sessuali di sintesi. Dendronatura, 8: 8–49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rausell, C., Martinez-Ramirez, A.C., Garcia-Robles, I. and Real, M.D. 1999. The toxicity and physiological effects of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and formulations on Thaumetopoea pityocampa, the pine processionary caterpillar. Pesticide Biochemistry Physiology, 65: 44–54.10.1006/pest.1999.2426]Search in Google Scholar
[Roversi, P.F. 1985. Ossrvazioni sull’ impiego di trappole a feromone sessuale di Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis and Schiffermüller) sul promontorio del Gargano (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae). Redia, 68: 1–17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salman, M.H., Giomi, F., Laparie, M., Lehmann, P., Pitacco, A., Battisti, A. 2019. Termination of pupal diapause in the pine processionary moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa Physiological Entomology, 44 (1) 53-59.10.1111/phen.12277]Search in Google Scholar
[Semiz, G. Cetin, H. Isik, K. and Yanikoglu, A. 2006. Effectiveness of a naturally derived insecticide, spinosad, against the pine processionary moth, Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni Tams. (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae) under laboratory conditions. Pest Management Science, 62: 452–455.10.1002/ps.1181]Search in Google Scholar
[Simonato, M., Mendel, Z., Kerdelhué, C., Rousselet, J., Magnoux, E., Salvato, P., Roques, A., Battisti, A. and Zane, L. 2007. Phylogeography of the pine processionary moth Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni in the Near East. Molecular Ecology, 16: 2273–2283.10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03302.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. 1989. Statistical Methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stastny, M., Battisti, A., Petrucco Toffolo, E., Schlyter, F. and Larsson, S. 2006. Host-plant use in the range expansion of the pine processionary moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa. Ecological Entomology, 31:, 481-490.10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00807.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Stelinski, L.L., Gut, L.J., Mallinger, R.E., Epstein, D. Reed, T.P. and Miller, J.R. 2005. Small plot trials documenting effective mating disruption of significant populations of oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck), using high densities of wax-drop pheromone dispensers. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98: 1267–1274.10.1603/0022-0493-98.4.1267]Search in Google Scholar
[Stelinski, L.L., Gut, L.J., Haas, M., McGhee, P. and Epstein, D. 2007A. Evaluation of aerosol devices for simultaneous disruption of sex pheromone communication in Cydia pomonella and Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Pest Science, 80: 225–233.10.1007/s10340-007-0176-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Stelinski, L.L., Miller, J.R., Ledebuhr, R., Siegert, P. and Gut, L.J., 2007B. Season-long mating disruption of Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by one machine application of pheromone in wax drops (SPLAT-OFM). Journal of Pest Science, 80: 109–117.10.1007/s10340-007-0162-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Suckling, D.M. 2000. Issues affecting the use of pheromones and other semiochemicals in orchards. Crop Protection, 19: 677–683.10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00090-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Tiberi, R. and Niccoli, A. 1984. Osservazioni pluriennali sull’ impiego di trappole con il feromone sessuale di Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. and Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae). Redia, 67: 129–144.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vega, J.M., Moneo, I., Ortiz, J.C.G., Palla, P.S., Sanchis, M.E., Vega, J., Gonzalez-Muñoz, M. Battisti, A. and Roques, A. 2011. Prevalence of cutaneous reactions to the pine processionarymoth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa) in an adult population. Contact Dermatitis, 64: 220–228.10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01884.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Weatherston, I. 1990. Principles of design of controlled-release formulations, pp. 93-112. In R.L. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein and M.N. Inscoe lEds.), Behavior·modifying chemicals for insect management. Applications of pheromones and other attractants. Marcel Decker, New York, 761 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilkins, R.M., McGuffog, D.R., Anerson, T.P., Plimmer, J.R., Pickett, J.A., Dawson, G.W., Griffith, D.C., Liu, X., MaCauly, E.D.M., Woodcock, C.M., Lie, R. and Meghir, S. 1984. Pesticides group symposium–recent developments in controlled release formulations for pest control. Pest Science, 15: 258–267.10.1002/ps.2780150308]Search in Google Scholar
[Witzgall, P., Kirsch, P. and Cork, A. 2010. Sex Pheromones and their impact on pest management. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36: 80–100.10.1007/s10886-009-9737-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Yilmaz, S., Karabőrklű, S. and Azizoğlu, U. 2013. Toxicity of native Bacillus thuringiensis isolates on the larval stages of pine processionary moth Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni at different temperatures. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37: 163-172.10.3906/tar-1201-21]Search in Google Scholar
[Zada, A., Falach, L. and Byers, J.A. 2009. Development of sol–gel formulations for slow release of pheromones. Chemoecology, 19: 37–45.10.1007/s00049-009-0007-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Zdarek, J., Vrkoc, J., Hochmut, R. and Kolk, A, 1988. Male confusion on the nun moth with dispalure at high and low population densities. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 14: 537–547.10.1007/BF0101390524276000]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Q.H. and Paiva, MR, 1998. Female calling behaviour and male response to the sex pheromone in Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. and Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 122: 353–360.10.1111/j.1439-0418.1998.tb01512.x]Search in Google Scholar