[
Battcock, G. (1968). Questions to Stella and Judd. interview by Bruce Glaser. In G. Battcock (Ed.). Minimal Art: A Critical Anthology (pp. 148–164). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braddick, O. (2018). Illusion research: An infantile disorder? Perception, 47(8), 805–806. doi:10.1177/030100661877465829783920
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Denis, M. (1890). Définition du néo-traditionalisme. Art et Critique. Cited in Bouillon, J.-P. (2006). Maurice Denis: Le spirituel dans l’art (in French, p. 21). Paris, France: Gallimard.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Winter, S. (2020). Flattened Intensities: An Empirically Informed Assessment of Frank Stella’s Fluorescent Paintings from the Sixties. [PhD Thesis]. KU Leuven.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Winter, S., Moors, P., Van Gelder, H., & Wagemans, J. (2018). Illusory depth based on interactions between fluorescent and conventional colours: A case study on Frank Stella’s Irregular Polygons paintings. Art & Perception, 6(2–3), 116–150. doi:10.1163/22134913-20181093
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
De Winter, S., Vissers, N., Bossens, C., & Wagemans, J. (2020). Instantaneous art? Investigating Frank Stella’s Moroccan paintings with a short-exposure-experiment. Art & Perception, 8(2), 121–157. doi:10.1163/22134913-bja10001
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
De Winter, S., & Wagemans, J. (2022). Tracking Frank Stella: An empirical evaluation of art-historical issues in an eye-movement and questionnaire study. Art & Perception. doi:10.1163/22134913-bja10038
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Elkins, J. (2003). What Happened to Art Criticism? Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T004330
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fried, M. (1965). Three American Painters: Kenneth Noland, Jules Olitski, Frank Stella. exhibition catalogue. Cambridge: Fogg Art Museum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fried, M. (1998). Shape as form: Frank Stella’s new paintings. In M. Fried (Ed.), Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. pp. 77–99). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original publication 1966).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenberg, C. (1993). The case for abstract art. In J. O’Brian (Ed.), The Collected Essays and Criticism, Vol. 4, Modernism with a Vengeance 1957-1969 (pp. 75–84). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original publication 1959).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judd, D. (1965). Specific objects. Contemporary Sculpture: Art Yearbook, 8, 74–82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kandinsky, W. (1912). Über das Geistige in der Kunst, insbesondere in der Malerei. München, Germany: R. Piper.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kennedy, B. P. (2010). Frank Stella: Irregular Polgons, 1965-1966 (exhibition catalogue). Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College, Hood Museum of Art.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koenderink, J. (2014). The all seeing eye? Perception, 43, 1–6. doi:10.1068/p4301ed24689127
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Koenderink, J. (2017). Visual illusions. In A. G. Shapiro & D. Todorović (Eds.), The Oxford Compendium of Visual Illusions (pp. 119–138). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794607.003.0008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (2017). Colors of the sublunar. i-Perception, 8(5), 1–30. doi:10.1177/2041669517733484562436828989697
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (2022). The space of colour & the colour of space. Gestalt Theory, in press.10.2478/gth-2022-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., Albertazzi, L., & Wagemans, J. (2015). Hue contrast and the sense of space. i–Perception, 8, 67–85. doi:10.1068/i0701495002028299165
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Krauss, R. (1968). On frontality. Artforum, 5, 40–46.10.1108/eb034358
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Küng, M. (Ed.). (2019). Pieter Vermeersch—Variations. Brussels, Belgium: Ludion.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linden, C., & Wagemans, J. (2021). Presenting TaMuNaBe: A taxonomy of museum navigation behaviours. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, in press. doi:10.1037/aca0000413
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Pagel, R. (2017). The duality of picture perception and the robustness of perspective. Art & Perception, 5(3), 233–261. doi:10.1163/22134913-00002065
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Pepperell, R. (2015). Artworks as dichotomous objects: Implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 295. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00295446054826106312
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Quétard, B., Linden, C., De Winter, S., & Wagemans, J. (2022, August). Uncovering modes of viewing abstract art works in museum contexts by analysing eye movements with hidden Markov models. In Poster Presented at the Visual Science of Arts Conference (VSAC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rose, B. (1967). American Art Since 1900: A Critical History. New York, NY: Praeger.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shapiro, A. (2018). Visual illusions: Nothing to lose but your chains—A reply to Oliver Braddick. Perception, 47(9), 901–904. doi:10.1177/030100661878596429954255
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Todorovic, D. (2018). In defence of illusions: A reply to Braddick. Perception 47(9), 905–908. doi:10.1177/030100661878761330001679
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Todorović, D. (2020). What are visual illusions? Perception, 49(11), 1128–1199. doi:10.1177/030100662096227933183136
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
van Buren, B., & Scholl, B. J. (2018). Visual illusions as a tool for dissociating seeing from thinking: A reply to Braddick (2018). Perception, 47(10–11), 999–1001. doi:10.1177/030100661879634830146943
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Wagemans, J. (2015). Historical and conceptual background: Gestalt theory. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization (pp. 3–20). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199686858.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wagemans, J. (2018). Perceptual organization. In J. T. Wixted (Series Ed.) & J. Serences (Vol. Ed.), The Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience: Vol. 2. Sensation, Perception & Attention (Chapter 18, pp. 803–872). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012a). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. doi:10.1037/a0029333348214422845751
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J. R., van der Helm, P., & van Leeuwen, C. (2012b). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1218–1252. doi:10.1037/a0029334372828422845750
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar