The Einstein-Elevator of the Hannover Institute of Technology (HITec) at the Leibniz Universität Hannover (LUH) is a novel earthbound facility for conducting large-scale scientific experiments under different gravity conditions such as micro-, hypo-, and hypergravity. The repetition rate represents a break-through compared with other drop towers. The facility will be capable of performing 100 tests per 8-h work shift as a result of its unique design and a specially developed drive and guide concept. This paper describes the concept of the Einstein-Elevator and the technical capacities it creates for future experiments.
The current strive toward space and the associated demand for research of new production technologies usable in weightlessness and other gravity conditions such as lunar or Martian gravity have driven the development of the Einstein-Elevator. Additionally, quantum optics experiments conducted at LUH require microgravity conditions to eliminate the masking influence of gravity for the observation of small effects at the quantum level. Currently, investigations on these topics are not feasible, as experiments that need fast access or high repetition rates for statistics are too complicated, too expensive, and allow limited access. Other gravitational conditions such as hypogravity are technically not possible for large-scale scientific experiments.
On a global scale, there are several earthbound facilities available for large-scale interdisciplinary microgravitational research, and they all differ primarily by the duration of the free fall and also by the quality of residual acceleration, payload, and setup dimensions. In Germany, the Bremen drop tower of the Center of Applied Space Technology and Microgravity (ZARM) has been in operation since 1990, comprising a 110 m high-vacuum tube with a free-fall time of 4.7 s (Dittus, 1991). A catapult was added to the system in 2004, creating a 9.3 s free-fall time in a vertical parabolic flight (von Kampen et al., 2006). This drop tower is unique due to its very long free-fall time, which enables interdisciplinary research under microgravity. In the United States, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) operates two facilities at the NASA Glenn Research Center: the Zero Gravity Research (Zero-G) Facility offers a free-fall time of 5.18 s (Neumann, 2006; Neumann, 2017), whereas the NASA Glenn 2.2 Second Drop Tower (Neumann, 2008) provides for a 2.2 s free-fall time. There are a number of other well-known facilities in the United States, Japan, China, Spain, Russia, and Australia (Fujita, 2009; Wan et al., 2010; Kommunarovich, 2016; Steinberg, 2016; DDT, 2017). All of these facilities are pure drop towers (including drop shafts) with the exception of the aforementioned Bremen drop tower with its integrated catapult. Table 1 presents an overview of the key properties of the largest and most known facilities with respect to the experimental execution and the type of capsule-experiment configuration together with the sources.
Characteristics of various drop towers for research under microgravity. This table is based on data from the following publications: [1] Neumann, 2008; [2] Neumann, 2006; Neumann, 2017; [3] Steinberg, 2007; Steinberg, 2016; Lämmerzahl and Steinberg, 2015; [4] Zhang et al., 2005; Lämmerzahl and Steinberg, 2015; Huang and Mao, 2013; [5] Mori et al., 1993; Koide, 2001; Zhang et al., 2005; [6] Iwakami and Nokura, 2005; Nokura, 2008; [7] Dittus, 1991; ZARM FABmbH, 2011; Lämmerzahl and Steinberg, 2015; [8] Lotz et al., 2014.
Name of facility | NASA Glenn 2.2 Second Drop Tower | Zero Gravity Research (Zero-G) Facility | Microgravity Drop Tower | Beijing Drop Tower | Drop Shaft Facility | Drop Exp. Facility | Bremen Drop Tower | Einstein-Elevator | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Research institution | NASA | NASA | QUT | NMLC | JAMIC | MGLAB | ZARM | HITec/LUH | |
Country | USA | Australia | China | Japan | Germany | ||||
Time in free fall in s | 2,2 | 5,18 | 2,0 | 3,5 | 10 | 4,5 | 4,7 / 9,3* | 2 / 4* | |
Free fall distance in m | 24 | 132 | 20 | 60 | 490 | 100 | 110* | 20* | |
Minimal residual acceleration | 10−3 | 10−5 | 10−4–10−6 | 10−3–10−5 | 10−5 | 10−5 | 10−6–10−7 | <10−6 | |
Maximum deceleration | 15–30 | 35–65 | 15–20 | 8–12 | 8 | 10 | 40–50 | 5 | |
Repetition rate per day | 12 | 2 | 15–20 | 2–4 | 2–3 | 1–2 | 3 | 100 | |
Experiment payload in kg | 487C/159E | 1130C/455E | 150E | 630C/90E | 5000C/500E | 1000C/400E | 500C/400C* | 1000C/515E | |
Experiment | Ø/□ | 960 × 400E | Ø1000C/Ø970E | Ø800E | Ø850C | Ø1800C/870 × 870E | Ø900C/Ø720E | Ø800C/Ø700E | Ø1700C/Ø1660E |
Dimensions in mm | height | 840E | 4000C/1600E | 1500C/900E | 1000C | 7850C/918E | 2280C/885E | 2107CL/1341CS* | 2000C/1790E |
Capsule-experiment configuration | DS | VC | DS | DS is VC | DS is VC | DS | VC +optional FF | comb. of DS, VC, FF | |
Source | [1] | [2] | [3] | [4] | [5] | [6] | [7] | [8] |
DS: drag-shield, VC: vacuum-chamber, FF: free-flyer,
capsule,
experiment,
long capsule,
short capsule,
catapult,
closed 2010.
In the course of selecting a suitable facility prior to executing the weightlessness experiments, it is necessary to take various properties of the specific facility into account and evaluate them with respect to the experiment's feasibility:
setup dimensions, payload free-fall duration residual/maximum accelerations repetition rate accessibility environment/atmosphere telemetry energy/media costs safety standards
The main problems with existing drop towers are the long times required for the test series and the associated high cost levels. To perform the number of tests required for statistical measurements, an active accelerated and guided system is needed. However, the guides in such systems generally create vibrations, which in turn influence the precision of the experiments. The Einstein-Elevator therefore represents a revolutionary concept compared with existing earthbound facilities for microgravitational research in drop towers.
This paper describes the concept of the Einstein-Elevator to achieve maximized experimental quality and minimized residual acceleration. Furthermore, the paper provides details of the engineering and technology required to enable a high repetition rate. It also focuses on the technical options available to scientists to enable planning and concept development for future experiments. The paper introduces the experiment carrier implemented in the Einstein-Elevator, describes the interfaces available during experiment execution to the experimental setup, and the details of the infrastructure provided for preparation of the experiment carrier.
To enable economically viable execution of statistical experiments as well as faster accessibility at lower costs across the various fields of aerospace, physics, mechanical engineering, etc., an innovative research environment is required. The newly built facility presented in this paper offers a high repetition rate with over 100 experiments per day (8-h work shift), a very low residual acceleration of less than 10−6
The development of the Einstein-Elevator started in 2009 with a proposal for the HITec building under the auspices of a team at LUH and the collaboration of all partners at the Center for Quantum Engineering and Space Time Research (QUEST), a former cluster of excellence. Together, the following unique mechanical concept was initiated. To describe the Einstein-Elevator's technical capabilities, this section first presents the general structure and the functional description. Next, the additional possible trajectories, the design structure, and technical measures to achieve minimum residual accelerations and high repetition rate are shown. Finally, the structure of the experiment carrier and the options for scientists are introduced.
To investigate scientific questions using the Einstein-Elevator, an experiment is fitted to the experiment carrier. For the test execution, the test setup is placed in a vertically movable vacuum chamber, called the gondola, which is made of carbon fiber reinforced plastic. Figure 1 illustrates the general structure of the Einstein-Elevator (for further details of the structure, see Lotz et al., 2014). A linear motor is used to accelerate these two components through a brief acceleration phase followed by sudden decoupling along a vertical parabolic trajectory. During the vertical parabolic flight, the gondola travels at a defined distance from the experiment carrier such that the carrier is fully decoupled from its environment and is in free fall. Unlike conventional drop towers, in which the drop path is fully evacuated (Dittus and Schomisch, 1990), the atmosphere in the gondola of the Einstein-Elevator is only a partial vacuum and travels with the experiment—this offers significant time saving when creating the vacuum and hence significantly reduces the preparatory times for experiments.
Figure 1
Design of the Einstein-Elevator. (A) Highlighted cut through the steel structure: the gondola with an empty experiment carrier. (B) Sketch of the tower with the division of areas in the tower building.

To guide the gondola and to affix the drive as well as the braking system and the peripherals, a complex steel construction is used. Furthermore, to avoid the transfer of vibrations between the emitting drive and the sensitive gondola, a tower-in-tower design is being implemented. The two independent towers stand on separate ringwall pile foundations. The only connection between the drive and the gondola is a specially mounted coupling rod. The rod transfers the vertical feed forces, while preventing vibrations in the horizontal direction. This design effectively minimizes the transfer of vibrations into the experiment carrier and also the excitation of the experiment during the acceleration phase.
The initial acceleration and the vertical parabolic flight are controlled by a linear motor along the drop path with a maximum power of 4.8 MW. The linear motor speeds up the gondola together with the integrated experimental setup with an acceleration of 5
The Einstein-Elevator is located in a 39-m-tall building. This overall height is divided into a number of different sections, such as the acceleration section, the section for decoupling the gondola and the experimental setup, and the drop sections. The drop section height
Because acceleration starts from the lower starting point, twice that length of time (4 s) is actually available. In the case of experimental setups that cannot withstand an initial acceleration of 5
The test sequence for a vertical parabolic flight in the Einstein-Elevator is illustrated in Figure 2. The test can been broken into seven sections. At the loading level, or the lower start position, the experiment is loaded into the gondola. Once the vacuum has been formed in the gondola (vacuum <10−2 mbar), the experiment is commenced from this position. The gondola is accelerated by the drive over a vertical distance of 5 m to 20 m/s (section I). This is followed by section II, in which the gondola separates from the experiment carrier located on the inside by a distance of 1 m. The controlled trajectory of the gondola and the automated centering mechanism for aligning the experiment carrier after the test execution implies that no gripping mechanism is necessary for the separation process as is generally used in other facilities (Dittus, 2001; Dittus, 2002). The experiment carrier stands on the floor of the gondola and is not strapped in place, such that the separation process consists exclusively of controlling the gap between the floor of the gondola and the base of the experiment carrier. The experimental setup then separates from the gondola and floats above at a height of 75 mm within the free fly zone of 150 mm during the subsequent free-fall phase. In the separation section and the following free-fall section, both roll and air resistance are compensated by the linear motor. After 4 s of microgravity (sections III and IV), the experiment and the gondola are brought back into contact during section V and then decelerated together in section VI. The necessary braking forces are created in a fail-safe system by a combination of switched eddy current brakes and short-circuited linear motor stators. A hydraulic cylinder (section VII) buffers the residual speed at the end of the test execution, such that the gondola ultimately comes to rest in the original start position.
Figure 2
Trajectory profile for microgravity conditions. The coordinate “z” stands for the direction of motion. Description of sections: I. Acceleration section: 5 m; II. Constant travel: 1 m, separation of gondola and experiment; III. Parabolic flight (upwards): 20-m free fall plus 2-m reserve (top); IV. Parabolic flight (downwards): 20-m free fall; V. Constant travel: 1 m, approach and contact between gondola and experiment; VI. Braking: 5 m short-circuited stators, effect of the eddy current brake, plus 2X 4 rows of switched eddy current brake of length 0.5 m each on 2-m onboard brake fins; VII. Contact with hydraulic cylinder.

In addition to the main purpose of experiments under microgravity, other experiments with hypogravity in the range of 0–1
To create constant acceleration profiles in the range of 0–1
The starting of the test execution from the lower position is similar to that of the microgravity experiments. The experiment carrier is integrated in the gondola and, if necessary, a vacuum is created. The linear motor then accelerates the gondola under profile dependent acceleration (less than 5
Figure 3
Position-speed diagrams for micro- and hypogravity experiments. The coordinate “z” stands for the direction of motion. (A) Microgravity in parabolic flight (profile P01), hypogravity in parabolic flight (profiles P02–P11). (B) Microgravity in free fall (profile P12), hypogravity in free fall (profiles P12–P22). The key area for the trajectory profiles is the light green area.

To start from the top position, the experiment is introduced into the gondola and, if necessary, a vacuum is created. The gondola is then transported to the upper start position using the integrated crane system. Next, the gondola is disconnected and subjected to constant braking by using the linear motor in accordance with the acceleration profile to match the 0–1
The test duration of experiments differing from microgravity conditions depends upon the required and programmed profile. The braked fall travel duration
Considering a trajectory with an acceleration
Experiments conducted under hypergravity conditions take place in the first 5 m of the acceleration section. Further acceleration with
Figure 4
Position-speed diagram for hypergravity experiments. The coordinate “z” stands for the direction of motion. Hypergravity (profiles P23–30). The key area for the trajectory profiles is the light green area. Besides the μ

Experiments in the range of 1–5
Considering a trajectory with an acceleration
To attain a minimum residual acceleration during the execution of an experiment, it is necessary to decouple any occurring vibrations from the experiment as much as possible. Due to limited experience in drop tower technologies with guided and driven systems, a mechanical simulation model was built to determine the influence of the structural design with the guides, drive, aerodynamic resistances, and other influences (Lotz and Overmeyer, 2013). Therefore, the experiments and simulations determined the required parameters, such as the aerodynamic resistance of the gondola and the drive carts at test execution, as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5
Gondola and drive carts in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. Results show how the airflow behaves around the moving parts and which pressure and reaction forces occur.

The gondola, the base of which is in contact with the experiment carrier under acceleration, is fitted with low vibration rollers. The rollers, used for guidance purposes, were characterized in prior experiments and tested for their suitability. Figure 6(A) shows the roller test rig developed to analyze the rollers. A characteristic vibration pattern recorded for an individual roller during a simulated test execution in the Einstein-Elevator is shown in Figure 6(B). As a result, the effects on the rollers of the excitation of the experiment carrier may be considered very low (Lotz et al., 2015).
Figure 6
Roller characterizations. (A) Test rig to analyze the behavior of two mounted rollers in combination with the disk surface. The disks represent the guide rails and can be made of different materials to achieve the best combination with the lowest vibration. (B) Vibration amplitudes of one roller and the speed of the driven disk for its movement sections: I. Acceleration; II. Constant travel; III. Parabolic flight (upwards); IV. Parabolic flight (downwards); V. Constant travel; VI. Braking; VII. Waiting for next test execution.

The gondola is only connected to the linear motor via a single coupling rod. Thus any horizontal vibration originating from the drive and its guides can be almost completely decoupled. Vibrations in the vertical direction, originating from the control of the feed forces, are effectively damped by the high inertial mass of the gondola, the traverse, and the drive carts, resulting in relatively low frequencies. The actual design as a deduction of the design sketch is illustrated in Figure 7.
Figure 7
Concept of the Einstein-Elevator. Design sketch to show the general structure of the system and the actual design to display its technical realization.

In addition to decoupling the gondola and drive carts using the coupling rod, the towers that guide the gondola and the drive carts are also separated from each other to create a tower-in-tower design without any points of contact. Both towers are built on separate ring foundations standing on piles rammed about 12 m into the ground. This design is intended to prevent the transfer of vibrations originating in the drive carts through the steel construction into the gondola, which is sensitive to vibrations. In addition to the actual design of the unit, the vacuum atmosphere inside the gondola and an experiment carrier with maximum rigidity and rapid vibration decay will also help in minimizing vibrational influences on the experimental setup.
The desire to conduct experiments with minimum effects on quantum level requires high levels of sensitivity and statistics to arrive at validated conclusions. To be able to subtract vibrations from a large number of experiments in a statistical fashion, the aim is to arrange for 100 experiments per 8-h work shift. Therefore, it will be necessary to perform a test every 4 min. This is applicable only under the assumption that the experimental setup does not need to be manually adjusted by opening the gondola, which would cause a long ventilation phase and subsequent vacuum pumping with a loss of approximately 1–2 h, depending on the duration for adjustments and the required vacuum quality. These requirements are only feasible by the innovation of novel drive technologies, a unique gondola concept, and automated test executions.
The Linear Synchron Motor (LSM) drive system (Intrasys GmbH, 2006) is installed along the length of the entire travel path. The stators (active component) are arranged in series along the tower, while the magnetic yokes (passive component) are located on the carts. This design eliminates the need for cable chains to provide power and allows the carts to be designed as passive components, as seen in Figure 8. The drive has two sections. The lower section has six rows in order to generate the high feed forces of approximately 132 kN that are required in the acceleration of the movable parts. In the top area, two rows are used to compensate the air and rolling resistances generated by the gondola and the drive carts. The repetition rate is limited by heating of the drive during the acceleration and braking phases. At the present time, it is assumed that 4 min are necessary and sufficient to allow for cooling. It is currently not intended to install an active cooling system, which would allow for shorter stops for cooling.
Figure 8
Detailed overview of the drive configuration. (A) Top view of the tower-in-tower construction. (B) Section with the highlighted drive configuration.

To achieve the intended level of precision of the experiments and reflect the maximum permissible residual acceleration during free fall, a vacuum is created within the gondola. To implement high repetition rates, the vacuum is created in the gondola just once prior to conducting the first test execution and is only restored if needed during the 4-min period. This is made possible due to the low leakage rate of the carbon fiber structure and the well-sealed vacuum flanges of the gondola.
To achieve an almost fully automated test execution, as is a prerequisite for the high repetition rates intended, a number of technical solutions have been anticipated, such as automatic centering of the experiment carrier in the closed, evacuated gondola, permanent data access to the experimental data in the control room, and uninterruptible power supplies. After each execution, the experiment carrier can be centered automatically inside the gondola and hence brought into position for the next test, as seen in Figure 9. The realignment of the experiment carrier with the center of the gondola (displacement of approximately 5 mm due to Coriolis force alone) is performed automatically by a lifting function that is controlled externally with mechanical powerless centering and re-lowering into position. Since processes such as necessary vacuum restoration and centering take a certain amount of time, it is not thought to be feasible to greatly increase the repetition rate of experiments above one every 4 min.
Figure 9
Gondola lower shell and automatic centering unit. (A) Gondola lower shell with its interior and marked cut a. (B) Cut a-a shows the details of the automatic centering unit. The rod with a ball mounted on top is being pushed upwards. Pyramid-shaped counterparts at the three legs provide the self-centering capability of the experiment carrier inside the evacuated gondola.

Permanent data access enables adjustments to be made within the 4-min parking time to prepare the experimental setup for the next test execution. The experimental data can be downloaded and new parameters can be uploaded. Data access is also enabled during the full experimental execution by way of optical data couplers between the experimental setup and the gondola as well as between the gondola and the base station. The power supply integrated into the experiment carrier is charged when in its lower start position and is fully recharged in the 4-min break. The combination of uninterruptible energy supplies and permanent communication means that access to the experiment is available without interruption throughout the test campaign. Further developments are in progress on enabling automatic coupling of additional media. The connectors required for this are planned to be installed near the lower start point.
The experiment carrier is the platform upon which the scientific experimental setups are affixed. The telemetry, power supply, and communications with the control room are integral components of this platform. A number of other drop towers operate on very similar designs. They are described in the following literature: Neumann, 2006; Könemann, 2009; Selig et al., 2010; Selig and List, 2011; Selig and Liorzou, 2013. These designs generally comprise a carrying frame made of light metal sections with floors arranged between them to allow assembly of the experimental equipment. A pressure-tight shell envelops the experiment carrier in the structure. The shell also serves to allow a normal atmosphere in its interior, since the vacuum atmosphere is actually in the gondola, which represents a source of interference that would hinder proper functioning of the electronics. Figure 10 illustrates the concept for the experiment carrier intended in the Einstein-Elevator.
Figure 10
Structure of the experiment carrier. (A) Closed with pressure-tight shell. (B) Opened with lifted shell. (C) Example of the arrangement of the components in the experiment carrier.

Figure 10(A) shows the experiment carrier in its closed state. The shell is made of aluminum sheeting. It is pressure-tight and has a slight electromagnetic shielding effect. Two rods are fitted on its base and top to serve as drift and twist stops. The rods of the experiment carrier do not touch the gondola during free flight. If the carrier drifts too far in the direction of the gondola's wall or twists by more than 4°, the rods come into contact with the rings, which are made of a damping material and fixed to the top and the bottom of the gondola, thereby protecting the experimental setup, the experiment carrier, and the gondola. Damping rings are also fitted below the base of the rods to buffer the experiment carrier in case of vertical impacts against the top of the gondola. The two rods not only prevent drift and twisting but also include contacts for the power supply to recharge the battery. The lower side of the experiment carrier includes a transparent window to allow for optical data transmission. Compressed air, gas, and cooling water connections are also attached to the base. In a future phase, it is intended that these are automatically coupled with the gondola when it is in its lower start position.
Figure 10(B) illustrates the carrier with the shell, which comprises a two-section design. It can be lifted either completely, as illustrated, or separately. The shell and carrier structure are connected with one another using twelve quick-release clamps. This allows for rapid opening with minimal handling. The shell itself is lifted and rests on special attachment points.
The frame of the experiment carrier is illustrated in Figure 10(C). It has a height of 2 m and a diameter of 1.7 m. The experimental setup and the supporting structure may not exceed a combined weight of 1,000 kg. It is made up of standardized aluminum sections. This allows both inexpensive construction as well as simple modification at any time. The floors are made of aluminum sandwich boards with an aluminum honeycomb structure intended to increase rigidity and the moment of inertia and therefore prevent bending during the test execution in the various acceleration phases. The number of floors can be adjusted according to their need. Only the bottom floor is a fixed part of the carrier structure. The floors are designed to carry loads of up to 250 kg. The lowest floor is reserved for telemetry and communication equipment.
The arrangement of the experiment carrier is shown schematically in Figure 10(C). The experiment carrier has an Ethernet connection via optical data couplers and offers a data rate of up to 100 Mbit/s between the control room and the experimental setup, even during test execution. The following interfaces are planned to the experiment: Ethernet and power supply (battery buffered) as well as clock and trigger signals to synchronize the various systems. The experiment carrier will also include a permanently installed computer system with an experiment control unit (ECU) and an inertial measurement unit (IMU). The IMU will collect the telemetry data and transfer them to the control room. The instrumentation includes accelerometers in various precision ranges, gyroscopes, pressure and temperature sensors in the experiment carrier, pressure and temperature sensors in the cooling water circuit, and a charge status display for the battery. Lights and a camera can be deployed when needed. The Ethernet link via the optical data couplers implies an option of permanent access to the experimental setup via the ECU. When the experiment carrier is in its closed shell and when the experiment carrier is outside of the gondola, all connections are also available as standard connections in addition to the automated couplings. For example, the Ethernet would be available and provide a direct link to allow for experimental control outside the gondola.
The facility will be open to national and international researchers. Individual access options can be arranged upon request in accordance with the rules of the German Research Foundation (DFG). Scientists will be able to use areas in the building for experiment preparation, the control room for experiment control, and office areas, if needed. The control room and test preparation area are described in the following sections.
Experiments are controlled via the control room. Four workplaces are intended, as shown in Figure 11(A). Of the four workplaces shown, two will be reserved for facility operating staff with two available for experimental scientists. Live video will be available from the tower, while the equipment system statuses will be shown on monitors or on a large screen projection visible to all operators. The control room will also monitor safety during test execution. This will include, for example, monitoring that all staff have left the tower, access to equipment is locked, all actuators have left the travel zone, and all defined systems are up and running.
Figure 11
Options for scientists. (A) Depiction of the workplaces in the control room with the areas for facility operating staff and scientists. (B) Test preparation area with two workplaces for scientists to finish the setup assembly (after Lotz et al., 2014).

The integrated communications system will allow access to the experiments at all times. When the experiment is outside of the tower, communication can take place directly via cable or Wi-Fi with the control room. After inserting the experiment in the gondola, the integrated communication system then takes over. During the test, the experiments are linked via optical data couplers between the gondola and the base station and between the gondola and the experiment carrier, such that control of experiment statuses and the transmission of start and abort commands can be made at any time.
It is also intended to provide an area for experiment preparation. This room will provide two fully equipped workplaces as well as the necessary counterbalance system (CBS) required prior to test execution. The configuration of the room is shown in Figure 11(B).
The workplaces are equipped with workbenches and are air-conditioned. Each workplace is equipped with compressed air, cooling water, technical gases, and various electrical lines. The prepared experiments are then transported at ground level through the anteroom into the Einstein-Elevator to run the experiment. In addition to the areas available for experiment preparation, research groups will have access to a professional infrastructure comprising temperature-stabilized laser laboratories, clean rooms, workshops, and offices.
The Einstein-Elevator is a unique facility, offering the possibility of 100 experiments per day (8-h work shift) under microgravity. Each experiment will be able to use 4 s in free fall. Furthermore, the simulation of hypo- and hypergravity conditions is possible. The facility can simulate space gravity conditions in the ranges between 0–1
HITec offers an excellent research environment for experiments under weightlessness or microgravity as well as hypo- and hypergravity on various topics of different scientific fields. Researchers have access to a professional infrastructure comprising laboratories, clean rooms, workshops, and offices, as shown in Figure 12. The Einstein-Elevator is currently under construction, with first experiments commencing in 2018.
Figure 12
Visualization of the Hannover Institute of Technology (HITec) and the Einstein-Elevator within the Hannover skyline. (1) Offices, (2) Laboratory building, (3) Tower building with the Einstein-Elevator.

Simulation of weightlessness/
On the other hand, conditions such as partial Earth gravity/
The current possibilities for the simulation of these difficult environmental conditions are trailing behind the development of high precision and specialized sensors, the qualification of production engineering processes for use in space, the development of new production techniques under novel gravitational conditions, and the testing of special equipment for use in space. To achieve the necessary technical advancements for performing applications-oriented research topics, basic physics research is a vital component. Many experiments executed in already established research facilities such as the Bremen drop tower are topics derived from the fields of quantum research, atomic interferometry, and investigations to confirm theories from the fields of relativity theory and quantum physics as well as proving the constancy of natural constants (Ahlers et al., 2016; Kulas et al., 2017). Research is also underway on the propagation of flames as well as the processes in bio-medical engineering and metal alloys (Breuer, 2010). In the future, applications will be feasible for Earth-based processes, which were previously not possible due to gravity.
The complex and high-tech experiments necessary today frequently require straightforward mechanical structures, easy accessibility for development work, and a high repetition rate for statistical evaluations. The goal, therefore, was to develop a cost-effective option in order to quickly test many different specimens with a straightforward test setup. These considerations are reflected in a new facility type that offers a high repetition rate with low minimal residual acceleration and high levels of accessibility for large and heavy experiment carriers with commensurate minimized test costs.
As a result of the disadvantages in terms of accessibility, costs, new focused gravitational conditions, and the extremely limited payloads available in the facilities described above, a number of new research environments are being planned and constructed. The proposed GraviTower Bremen (Könemann et al., 2015) and the scheduled modification of NASA's 5.2 Second Drop Tower (Urban, 2015) together with the Einstein-Elevator represent a new generation of drop towers, which will enable space research to be undertaken much more simply on Earth. The new Einstein-Elevator research facility closes this gap first and makes it possible to conduct fast, simple, and frequent micro-, hypo-, and hypergravity experiments at lower costs.
Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Figure 12

Characteristics of various drop towers for research under microgravity. This table is based on data from the following publications: [1] Neumann, 2008; [2] Neumann, 2006; Neumann, 2017; [3] Steinberg, 2007; Steinberg, 2016; Lämmerzahl and Steinberg, 2015; [4] Zhang et al., 2005; Lämmerzahl and Steinberg, 2015; Huang and Mao, 2013; [5] Mori et al., 1993; Koide, 2001; Zhang et al., 2005; [6] Iwakami and Nokura, 2005; Nokura, 2008; [7] Dittus, 1991; ZARM FABmbH, 2011; Lämmerzahl and Steinberg, 2015; [8] Lotz et al., 2014.
Name of facility | NASA Glenn 2.2 Second Drop Tower | Zero Gravity Research (Zero-G) Facility | Microgravity Drop Tower | Beijing Drop Tower | Drop Shaft Facility | Drop Exp. Facility | Bremen Drop Tower | Einstein-Elevator | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Research institution | NASA | NASA | QUT | NMLC | JAMIC | MGLAB | ZARM | HITec/LUH | |
Country | USA | Australia | China | Japan | Germany | ||||
Time in free fall in s | 2,2 | 5,18 | 2,0 | 3,5 | 10 | 4,5 | 4,7 / 9,3 | 2 / 4 | |
Free fall distance in m | 24 | 132 | 20 | 60 | 490 | 100 | 110 | 20 | |
Minimal residual acceleration | 10−3 | 10−5 | 10−4–10−6 | 10−3–10−5 | 10−5 | 10−5 | 10−6–10−7 | <10−6 | |
Maximum deceleration | 15–30 | 35–65 | 15–20 | 8–12 | 8 | 10 | 40–50 | 5 | |
Repetition rate per day | 12 | 2 | 15–20 | 2–4 | 2–3 | 1–2 | 3 | 100 | |
Experiment payload in kg | 487 | 1130 | 150 | 630 | 5000 | 1000 | 500 | 1000 | |
Experiment | Ø/□ | 960 × 400 | Ø1000 | Ø800 | Ø850 | Ø1800 | Ø900 | Ø800 | Ø1700 |
Dimensions in mm | height | 840 | 4000 | 1500 | 1000 | 7850 | 2280 | 2107 | 2000 |
Capsule-experiment configuration | DS | VC | DS | DS is VC | DS is VC | DS | VC +optional FF | comb. of DS, VC, FF | |
Source | [1] | [2] | [3] | [4] | [5] | [6] | [7] | [8] |