1. bookVolume 15 (2021): Issue 1 (June 2021)
Journal Details
First Published
26 Jun 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
access type Open Access

What is the current state of geoparticipation in Czech municipalities?

Published Online: 03 Jul 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 15 (2021) - Issue 1 (June 2021)
Page range: 90 - 103
Received: 14 Mar 2021
Accepted: 10 Jun 2021
Journal Details
First Published
26 Jun 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year

The active involvement of citizens in decision-making processes via geoparticipatory spatial tools is becoming a popular research field among geographers, GIScientists, environmental psychologists, political scientists and many others. This paper presents the idea of the Index of geoparticipation – an indicator-based index divided into three dimensions (communication, participation, transparency) that helps to evaluate the state of geoparticipation among Czech municipalities. It describes the current state of geoparticipation at the municipality level in Czechia. It aims to fill the research gap in finding which components of geoparticipation at the municipality level are being used, and how their use is affected by the size of municipalities and their membership of Local Agenda 21 networks. The paper builds upon an extensive dataset collected by the authors from all Czech municipalities (n=6 258) and presents various “shades” of geoparticipation in Czechia.

Highlights for public administration, management and planning:

• The highest average values of the Index of geoparticipation were obtained from the regions’ capital cities, followed by statutory cities, municipalities with extended powers, municipalities which are members of the Healthy Cities of the Czech Republic (HCCZ) network and cities.

• HCCZ member municipalities use geoparticipatory tools significantly more than the rest of the Czech municipalities

• The communication dimension is the most widely implemented pillar of the Index of geoparticipation

• There is no significant relationship between social exclusion and geoparticipation at the nationwide level


Agentura pro socialní začleňování (2021) Index sociálního vyloučení. Available at: <https://www.socialni-zaclenovani.cz/index_socialniho_vylouceni> Search in Google Scholar

Arnstein S (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4): 216–224.10.1080/01944366908977225 Search in Google Scholar

Bernard J, Šimon M (2017) Inner peripheries in the Czech Republic: The multidimensional nature of social exclusion in rural areas. Czech Sociological Review 53(1): 3–28.10.13060/00380288.2017.53.1.299 Search in Google Scholar

Chambers R (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 22(7): 953–969.10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4 Search in Google Scholar

Dahl RA, Tufte ER (1973) Size and democracy (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press, Stanford. Search in Google Scholar

Dalton RJ (2017) The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198733607.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Demerath N (1947) Ecology, framework for city planning. Social Forces 26(1): 62–67.10.2307/2572606 Search in Google Scholar

Elstub S, Escobar O (2019 eds.) Handbook of democratic innovation and governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.10.4337/9781786433862 Search in Google Scholar

Fung A (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review 66(s1): 66–75.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x Search in Google Scholar

Geissel B, Newton K (2012) Evaluating Democratic Innovations. Curing the democratic malaise? Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203155196 Search in Google Scholar

Gnat M, Leszek K, Olszewski R (2016) The use of geoinformation technology, augmented reality and gamification in the urban modeling process. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 9787: 484–496.10.1007/978-3-319-42108-7_37 Search in Google Scholar

Gomes W (2008) Internet e participação política em sociedades democráticas. Revista FAMECOS 12(27): 58.10.15448/1980-3729.2005.27.3323 Search in Google Scholar

Gomes W (2011) A democracia digital e o problema da participação civil na decisão política. Fronteiras - Estudos Midiáticos 7(3): 214–222. Search in Google Scholar

Guldi J (2017) A History of the participatory map. Public Culture 29(1 81): 79–112.10.1215/08992363-3644409 Search in Google Scholar

Hurlbert M, Gupta J (2015) The split ladder of participation: A diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary. Environmental Science and Policy 50: 100–113.10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.011 Search in Google Scholar

Hurtíková H, Soukop M (2019) Participative and deliberative democracy on the local level: How the political characteristics of municipalities in the Czech Republic relate to the use of selected democratic innovation within their territory? Lex Localis 17(2): 369–393.10.4335/17.2.369-393(2019) Search in Google Scholar

Inglehart R (1971) The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies. American Political Science Review 65(4): 991–1017.10.2307/1953494 Search in Google Scholar

International Association of Public Participation (2018) IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation. Available at: <https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/Spectrum_8.5x11_Print.pdf> Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of American cities. Random House, New York. Search in Google Scholar

Kar B, Sieber R, Haklay M, Ghose R (2016) Public Participation GIS and Participatory GIS in the Era of GeoWeb. Cartographic Journal 53(4): 296–299.10.1080/00087041.2016.1256963 Search in Google Scholar

Lysek J (2016) Participatory Democracy and local representation: A Czech Case Study. <https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/28794> Search in Google Scholar

Lysek J, Pánek J, Lebeda T (2020) Who are the voters and where are they? Using spatial statistics to analyse voting patterns in the parliamentary elections of the Czech Republic. Journal of Maps 17(1): 33–38. Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Regional Development (2021) Strategie regionálního rozvoje ČR 2021+. Search in Google Scholar

Olszewski R, Trojanowska H, Turek A, Kietlinska B (2017) Solving smart city revitalisation problems with geoparticipation process and fuzzy methods. In: ICNC-FSKD 2017 - 13th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 2497–2503.10.1109/FSKD.2017.8393168 Search in Google Scholar

Olszewski R, Turek A (2018) Using Fuzzy Geoparticipation Methods to Optimize the Spatial Development Process in a Smart City. In: 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), pp. 430–437.10.1109/CIC.2018.00065 Search in Google Scholar

Pánek J (2016) From mental maps to GeoParticipation. The Cartographic Journal 53(4): 300–307.10.1080/00087041.2016.1243862 Search in Google Scholar

Pászto V, Burian J, Marek L, Voženílek V, Tuček P (2016) Membership of Czech municipalities to rural and urban areas: A fuzzy-based approach. Geografie-Sbornik CGS 121(1): 156–186.10.37040/geografie2016121010156 Search in Google Scholar

Pateman C (1970) Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720444 Search in Google Scholar

Poplin A, Pereira GC, Rocha MCF (2013) The participatory cube: A framework for analysis of online participation platforms. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography 199649: 395–414.10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0_23 Search in Google Scholar

Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York.10.1145/358916.361990 Search in Google Scholar

Rocha EM (1997) A Ladder of Empowerment. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17(1): 31–44.10.1177/0739456X9701700104 Search in Google Scholar

Smith G (2009) Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511609848 Search in Google Scholar

Schlozman KL, Verba S, Brady HE (2013) The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.23943/princeton/9780691154848.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Taylor N (1998) Urban planning theory since 1945. Sage, London.10.4135/9781446218648 Search in Google Scholar

Thoneick R (2021) Integrating online and onsite participation in urban planning: Assessment of a digital participation system. International Journal of E-Planning Research 10(1): 1–20.10.4018/IJEPR.2021010101 Search in Google Scholar

Tulloch DL (2007) Many, many maps: Empowerment and online participatory mapping. First Monday 12(2).10.5210/fm.v12i2.1620 Search in Google Scholar

Economic Opportunity Act, 20 Public Law 88 (1964) Available at: <https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg508.pdf> Search in Google Scholar

Voženílek V, Kaňok J (2011) Metody tématické kartografie: vizualizace prostorových jevů. Univerzita Palckého v Olomouci, Olomouc. Search in Google Scholar

Zhang S (2018) Public participation in the Geoweb era: Geosocial media use in local government. University of Waterloo, Waterloo. Search in Google Scholar

Zhang S (2019) Public participation in the Geoweb era: Defining a typology for geo-participation in local governments. Cities 85: 38–50.10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.004 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo