Challenges and risks of Serbian spruce (Picea omorika [pančić] purk.) in the time of climate change – a literature review

1Abdullah, H., Skidmore, A. K., Darvishzadeh, R., Heu-rich, M., 2019: Sentinel-2 accurately maps green-attack stage of European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) compared with Landsat-8. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 5:87–106.Search in Google Scholar

2Aleksić, J. M., Ballian, D., Isajev, D., Mataruga, M., Christian, T., Gardner, M., 2017: Picea omorika. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017:e. T30313A84039544.Search in Google Scholar

3Aleksić, J. M., Mataruga, M., Daničić, V., Cvjetković, B., Milanović, Đ., Vendramin, G. G. et al., 2022: High pollen immigration but no gene flow via-seed into a Genetic Conservation Unit of the endangered Picea omorika after disturbance. Forest Ecology and Management, 510:120115.Search in Google Scholar

4Aleksić, M. J., 2008: Genetic strucutre of natural populations of Serbian spruce (Picea omorika [Panč.] Purk.). PhD thesis, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.Search in Google Scholar

5Aleksić, M. J., Geburek, T., 2010: Mitochondrial DNA reveals complex genetic structuring in a stenoendemic conifer Picea omorika [(Panč.) Purk.] caused by its long persistence with in the refugial Balkan region. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 285:1–11.Search in Google Scholar

6Aleksić, M. J., Geburek, T., 2014: Quaternary population dynamics of an endemic conifer, Picea omorika, and their conservation implications. Conservation Genetics, 15:87–107.Search in Google Scholar

7Alfaro-Sánchez, R., Valdés-Correcher, E., Espelta, J. M., Hampe, A., Bert, D., 2020: How do social status and tree architecture influence radial growth, wood density and drought response in spontaneously established oak forests? Annals of Forest Science, 77:1–17.Search in Google Scholar

8Atondo-Bueno, E. J., López-Barrera, F., Bonilla-Moheno, M., Williams-Linera, G., Ramírez, N., 2016: Direct seeding of Oreomunnea mexicana, a threatened tree species from Southeastern Mexico. New Forests, 47:845–860.Search in Google Scholar

9Ayan, S., Yucedag, C., Simovski, B., 2021: A major tool for afforestation of semi-arid and anthropogenic steppe areas in Turkey: Pinus nigra J.F. Arnold subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe. Journal of Forest Science, 67:449–463.Search in Google Scholar

10Ballian, D., Longauer, R., Mikić, T., Paule, L., Kajba, D., Gömöry, D., 2006: Genetic structure of a rare European conifer, Serbian spruce (Picea omorika [Pančić] Purk.). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 260:53–63.Search in Google Scholar

11Ballian, D., Ravazzi, C., Caudullo, G., 2016: Picea omorika in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A. (eds.), European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Publ. Off. EU, Luxembourg, p. e0157f9+Search in Google Scholar

12Barredo, J. I., Strona, G., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Stan-canelli, G., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., 2015: Assessing the potential distribution of insect pests: case studies on large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L) and horse-chestnut leaf miner (Cameraria ohridella) under present and future climate conditions in European forests. EPPO Bulletin, 45:273–281.Search in Google Scholar

13Bigras, F. J., Ryyppö, A., Lindström, A., Stattin, E., 2001: Cold acclimation and deacclimation of shoots and roots of conifer seedlings. In: Bigras, F. J, Colombo, S. J. (eds.): Conifer cold hardiness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p. 57–88.Search in Google Scholar

14Bolte, A., Ammer, C., Löf, M., Madsen, P., Nabuurs, G. J., Schall, P. et al., 2009: Adaptive forest management in central Europe: climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 24:473–482. Search in Google Scholar

15Borůvka, V., Zeidler, A., Holeček, T., Dudík, R., 2018: Elastic and strength properties of heat-treated beech and birch wood. Forests, 9:197.Search in Google Scholar

16Bosela, M., Tumajer, J., Cienciala, E., Dobor, L., Kulla, L., Marčiš, P. et al., 2021: Climate warming induced synchronous growth decline in Norway spruce populations across biogeographical gradients since 2000. Science of the Total Environment, 752:141794.Search in Google Scholar

17Brázdil, R., Trnka, M., Dobrovolný, P., CHromá, K., Hlavinka, P., Žalud, Z., 2009: Variability of droughts in the Czech Republic, 1881–2006. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 97:297–315.Search in Google Scholar

18Buiteveld, J., 2012: First National Report on Forest Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, The Netherlands : country report for the FAO first state of the world’s forest genetic resources for food and agriculture, Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague, Wageningen CGN/DLO Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

19Burschel, P., 1965: Die Omoricafichte. Forstarchiv, 36:113–131. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

20Bůžek, V., Kvaček, Z., Holý, F., 1985: Late Pliocene palaeoenvironment and correlation of the Vildštejn floristic complex within Central Europe. Academia Nakladatelství Československé kademie věd, Praha.Search in Google Scholar

21Claessens, H., Oosterbaan, A., Savill, P., Rondeux, J., 2010: A review of the characteristics of black alder (Alnus glutinosa [L.] Gaertn.) and their implications for silvicultural practices. Forestry, 83:163–175.Search in Google Scholar

22Čihák, T., Hlásny, T., Stolariková, R., Vejpustková, M., Marušák, R., 2014: Functions for the aboveground woody biomass in Small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata Mill.). Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 60:150–158.Search in Google Scholar

23Čolić, D., 1951: Šumski rezervati (Picea omorica, Pančić) = Forest reserves of Picea omorica Pančić. Šumarstvo, IV(1):20–34. Summ.Search in Google Scholar

24Čolić, D., 1957: Neki pionirski karakteri Pančićeve omorike i njena uloga u sukcesiji biljnih zajednica. Archives des sciences bioloqiques, 9:51–60. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

25Čolić, D., 1966: Požar kao ekološki faktor u sukcesiji zajednica Pančićeve omorike i pri redukciji njihovih površina. Conservation Nature, Belgrade, 33:1–167. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

26Čolić, D., 1987: Spontana obnova Pančićeve omorike (Picea omorika Panč.) posle požara. Zaštita Prirode 40:37–56. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

27Crawford, R. M. M., 1989: Studies in plant survival: ecological case histories of plant adaptation to adversity. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

28Cukor, J., Zeidler, A., Vacek, Z., Vacek, S., Šimůnek, V., Gallo, J., 2020: Comparison of growth and wood quality of Norway spruce and European larch: effect of previous land use. European Journal of Forest Research, 139:459–472.Search in Google Scholar

29Dallimore, W., Jackson, A. B., 1961: A Handbook of Coniferae and Ginkgoaceae. Edward Arnold Ltd, London, third edn.Search in Google Scholar

30Dallimore, W., Jackson, A. B., 1967: A Handbook of Coniferae and Gingoaceae. London, Arnold & Co.: 730. David, A. J., Keathley, D. E., 1996: Inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in interspecific crosses of Picea glauca and Picea omorika. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26:428–432.Search in Google Scholar

31De Rigo, D., Houston Durrant, T., Caudullo, G., Barredo, J. I., 2016: European forests: an ecological overview. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A. (eds.): European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Publ. Off. EU, Luxembourg, pp. e01e873+.Search in Google Scholar

32Dimitrovský, K., Kupka, I., Popperl, I., 2007: Les jako důležitý fenomén obnovy průmyslové krajiny. In: Obnova lesního prostředí při zalesňování nelesních a degradovaných půd. ČZU v Praze, Kostelec nad Černými lesy, p. 20–27. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

33Dobrowolska, E., Wroniszewska, P., Jankowska, A., 2020: Density distribution in wood of European birch (Betula pendula Roth.). Forests, 11:445.Search in Google Scholar

34Doom, D., 1974: Nederlands bosbouw tijdschrift. 46:79. (In Dutch).Search in Google Scholar

35Duck, M. W., Cregg, B. M., Cardoso, F. F., Fernandez, R. T., Kehe, B. K., Heins, R. D. et al., 2003: Can antitranspirants extend the shelf life of table-top Christmas trees. In: XXVI International Horticulture Congress: Environmental Stress. Acta Horticulture, 618:153–162.Search in Google Scholar

36Duck, M. W., Cregg, B. M., Fernandez, R. T., Heins, R. D., Cardoso, F. F., 2004: Controlling growth of tabletop Christmas trees with plant growth retardants. Horttechnology, 14:528–532.Search in Google Scholar

37Dumroese, R. K., Williams, M. I., Stanturf, J. A., Clair, J. B. S., 2015: Considerations for restoring temperate forests of tomorrow: forest restoration, assisted migration, and bioengineerin. New Forests, 46:947–964.Search in Google Scholar

38Eisenhut, G., 1961: Untersuchungen über die Morphologie und Ökologie der Pollenkörner heimischer und fremdländischer Waldbäume. Paul Parey, Hamburg. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

39Farjon, A., 2010: A handbook of the world’s conifers. Brill EJ, Leiden/Boston.Search in Google Scholar

40Farjon, A., 2017: A handbook of the world’s conifers. Leiden : Brill, Second, revised edition, 1153 p.Search in Google Scholar

41Farjon, A., 2018: The Kew Review: Conifers of the World. Kew Bulletin, 73:1–16.Search in Google Scholar

42Farjon, A., Filer, D., 2013: An Atlas of the World’s Conifers. An Analysis of Their Distribution, Biogeography, Diversity, and Conservation Status. Brill Academic Pub.Search in Google Scholar

43Farsi, M., Kiaei, M., 2014: Wood physical properties and tracheid dimensions of non-native softwoods in Iran. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology, 48:445–454.Search in Google Scholar

44Finsinger, W., Morales-Molino, C., Gałka, M., Valsecchi, V., Bojovic, S., Tinner, W., 2017: Holocene vegetation and fire dynamics at Crveni Potok, a small mire in the Dinaric Alps (Tara National Park, Serbia). Quaternary Science Reviews, 167:63–77.Search in Google Scholar

45Fukarek, P., 1951a: Današnje rasprostranjenje Pančićeve omorike (Picea omorika Pančić) i neki podaci o njenim sastojinama. Godišnjak Biološkog Instituta u Sarajevu III/1–2:141–198. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

46Fukarek, P., 1951b: Staništa Pančićeve omorike nakon šumskih požara 1946/47. godine. Šumarski list 5:61C71. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

47Fukarek, P., 1956: Zaštita endemne Pančićeve omorike u NR Bosni i Hercegovini. Godišnjak Zemaljskog zavoda za zaštitu spomenika kulture i prirodnih rijetkosti NR Bosne i Hercegovine. Naše starine, III, p. 289–298. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

48Fukarek, P., 1975: Unterschiede in der Dendrofora der westlichen und ostlichen Gebiete der Balkanhalbinsel. In: Jordanov, D. (ed.): Problems of Balkan Flora and Vegetation. Publishing House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, So¢a, p. 64–91. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

49Gajić, M. (ed.), 1994: Omorika (Picea omorika [Pančić] Purkyne) na teritoriji Nacionalnog parka Tara (Monografska studija). Nacionalni park Tara, Bajina Bašta, Šumarski fakultet, Beograd. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

50Gajić, M., Vilotić, D., Karadžić D., Mihajlović, L., Isajev, V., 1994: Serbian spruce – (Picea omorika)[Pančić] Purkyne) on the territory of the National Park Tara. The National Park Tara, Bajina Bašta and the Faculty of Forestry, Belgrade.Search in Google Scholar

51Geburek, T. H., 1986: Some results of inbreeding depression in Serbian spruce (Picea omorika [Pane.] Purk.). Silvae Genetica, 35:169–172.Search in Google Scholar

52Geburek, T. H., Krusche, D., 1985: Wachstum von Hybriden zwischen (Picea omorika) und P. sitchensis im Vergleich zu den Elternarten. Allgemeine Forstund Jagdzeitung, 156:47–54. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

53Gossner, M. M., 2016: Introduced tree species in central Europe–consequences for arthropod communities and species interactions. Introduced tree species in European forests: opportunities and challenges. European Forest Institute, Freiburg, p. 264–282.Search in Google Scholar

54Gryc, V., Vavrčík, H., Gomola, Š., 2008a: Selected properties of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Journal of Forest Science, 54:418–425.Search in Google Scholar

55Gryc, V., Vavrčík, H., Rybníček, M., Přemyslovská, E., 2008b: The relation between the microscopic structure and the wood density of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Journal of Forest Science, 54:170–175.Search in Google Scholar

56Hamrick, J. L., Godt, M. J. W., 1996: Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Transaction of the Royal Society of London Series B, 351:1291–1298.Search in Google Scholar

57Hieke, K., 1978: Praktická dendrologie. I., Praha, SZN, 534 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

58Hieke, K., 1984: České zámecké parky a jejich dřeviny. Praha, SZN, 464 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

59Hieke, K., 1994: Lexikon okrasných dřevin. Helma, Praha, 742 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

60Hoadley, R. B., 1990: Physical and chemical properties Identifying Wood. Accurate Results with Simple Tools, Taunton Press, US, p. 46.Search in Google Scholar

61Holubčík, M., 1968: Cudzokrajné dreviny v lesnom hospodárstve. Bratislava, SVPL, 371 p. (In Slovak).Search in Google Scholar

62Humar, M., Fabčič, B., Zupančič, M., Pohleven, F., Oven, P., 2008: Influence of xylem growth ring width and wood density on durability of oak heartwood. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 62:368–371.Search in Google Scholar

63Isajev, V., 1987: Oplemenjivanje omorike (Picea omorika [Panč.] Purkyne) na genetsko selekcionim osnovama. Doktorska disertacija, Šumarski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

64Ivetić, V. Aleksić, J. M., 2019: Serbian spruce and climate change: Possible outcomes and conservation strategy. In: Šijačić-Nikolić, M., Milivanović, J., Nonić, M. (eds.): Forests of Southeast Europe Under a Changing Climate. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 65. Springer, Cham, p. 353–371.Search in Google Scholar

65Ivetić. V., Aleksić, J. M., 2016: Response of rare and endangered species Picea omorika to climate change: The need for speed. Reforesta, 1:81–89.Search in Google Scholar

66Jactel, H., Koricheva, J., Castagneyrol, B., 2019: Responses of forest insect pests to climate change: not so simple. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 35:103–108.Search in Google Scholar

67Janković, M. M., 1984: Vegetacija SR Serbije; istorija i opste karakteristike. 1–173. Vegetacija SR Serbije I. Srpska Akademija Nauka i Umetnosti. Beograd. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

68Janoković, B., 1985: Dendrologija. Beograd, Šumarski Fakultet: 558 p. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

69Jevtić, J., 1960: Neka zapažanja o urodu semena Pančićeve omorike na Tari. Šumartsvo, 13:79–87. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

70Jezdimirović, J., 2016: Reconstruction of Serbian spruce seed orchard in Godovik. 67 p. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

71Jovančević, M., 1962: Određivanje klijavosti polena šumskog drveća prema veličini, obliku i boji pole-novih zrnaca. Narodni Šumarstvo, 10–12:493–501. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

72Jovanović, B., 2000: Dendrologija. Udžbenik, šesto dopunjeno izdanje, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Šumarski fakultet. Beograd. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

73Kasesalu, H., 2002: Serbian spruce (Picea omorika [Pan-chic] Purkyne) in Estonia. Dendrological researches in Estonia III (Estonia). Estonian Agricultural University, Tartu, p. 171–177.Search in Google Scholar

74Keča, N., 2010: Characteristics of Armillaria species development and their growth at different temperatures. Bull. Fac. Forestry, 91:149–162.Search in Google Scholar

75Kiaei, M., 2013: Effect of cultivation methods on wood static bending properties in Alnus glutinosa/Utjecaj nacina uzgoja crne johe na njezina staticka savojna svojstva. Drvna Industrija, 64:265–272.Search in Google Scholar

76Kolarović, S., 1951: Nalazišta i stanje Pančićeve omorike u NR Srbiji - Šumarstvo, 4:27–34. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

77Kolström, M., Lindner, M., Vilén, T., Maroschek, M., Seidl, R., Lexer, M., J. et. al., 2011: Reviewing the Science and Implementation of Climate Change Adaptation Measures in European Forestry. Forests, 2:961–982.Search in Google Scholar

78Kommert, R., 1990: Selected wood properties of Serbian spruce (Picea omorika) from mountain sites in Saxony and Thuringia. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Technischen Universität Dresden, 39:119–123.Search in Google Scholar

79Koskela, J., Vinceti, B., Dvorak, W., Bush, D., Dawson, I.K., Loo, J. et al., 2014: Utilization and transfer of forest genetic resources: a global review. Forest Ecology and Management, 333:22–34.Search in Google Scholar

80Král, D., 2002: Assessing the growth of Picea omorika [Panč.] Purkyně in the Masaryk Forest Training Forest Enterprise at Křtiny Journal of Forest Science, 48:388–398.Search in Google Scholar

81Krstić, M., 1950: Morfološke i bometričke pojedinos ti fruktifikacije Picea omorika Panč. – Kvantitet semena. NSR, Beograd, Inst. za naučna istraživanja u šum.: 23. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

82Krstić, M., Stavretović, N., Isajev, V., Bjelanović, I., 2012: Crown structure of Picea omorika trees in the plantation. Archives of Biological Sciences, 64:605–611.Search in Google Scholar

83Krüssmann, G., 1972: Handbuch der Nadelgehölze. Berlin, Hamburg, Paul Parey, 368 p. (In German). Krüssmann, G., 1985: Manual of Cultivated Conifers. Timber Press, Portland.Search in Google Scholar

84Kuittinen, H., Muona, O., Karkkainen, K., Borzan, Ž., 1991: Serbian spruce, a narrow endemic, contains much genetic variation. Canadian Journal of Forestry Resources, 21:363–367.Search in Google Scholar

85Kuittinen, H., Savolainen, O., 1992: Picea omorika is a self fertile but outcrossing conifer. Heredity, 68:183–187.Search in Google Scholar

86Laborde, J., Corrales-Ferrayola, I., 2012: Direct seeding of Brosimum alicastrum Sw. (Moraceae) and Enter-olobium cyclocarpum (Jacq.) Griseb. (Mimosaceae) in different habitats in the dry tropics of central Veracruz. Acta Botánica Mexicana, 100:107–134.Search in Google Scholar

87Langner, W., 1959: Ergebnisse Einiger Hybridisierrungsversuche Zwischen Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. und Picea omorika [Pancic] Purkyne. Silvae Genetica, 8:138–143. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

88Maitah, M., Toth, D., Malec, K., Appiah-Kubi, S. N. K., Maitah, K., Pańka, D. et al., 2022: The Impacts of Calamity Logging on the Sustainable Development of Spruce Fuel Biomass Prices and Spruce Pulp Prices in the Czech Republic. Forests, 13:97.Search in Google Scholar

89Mataruga, M., Isajev, V., Gardner, M., Christian, T., Thomas, P., 2011: Picea omorika. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T30313A9532613.Search in Google Scholar

90Mataruga, M., Piotti, A., Daničić, V., Cvjetković, B., Fussi, B. et al., 2020: Towards the dynamic conservation of Serbian spruce (Picea omorika) western populations. Annals of Forest Science, 77:1–20.Search in Google Scholar

91Meyer, H., 1960: The Serbian Spruce, P. omorika, a species to supplement the scanty tree flora of Germany. Arch. Forstw., 9:595–614.Search in Google Scholar

92Mihai, G., Alexandru, A. M., Stoica, E., Birsan, M. V., 2021: Intraspecific growth response to drought of Abies alba in the Southeastern Carpathians. Forests, 12:387.Search in Google Scholar

93Mihai, G., Mirancea, I., 2016, Age trends in genetic parameters for growth and quality traits in Abies alba. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 9:954.Search in Google Scholar

94Mihaljević, S., Jelaska, S., 2005: Omorika spruce (Picea omorika). In Protocol for Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants, Springer, Dordrecht, p. 35–45.Search in Google Scholar

95Mikkola, L., 1972: Crossability between Picea omorika [Pančic] Purkyne and P. glauca [Moench] Voss Annales Botanici Fennici, 9:33–36.Search in Google Scholar

96Milovanović, J., Šijačić-Nikolić, M., 2010: Characterization of Serbian Spruce Variability Applying Isoenzyme Markers. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 24:1600–1605.Search in Google Scholar

97Mitchell, A. F., 1975: Conifers in the British Isles: A Descriptive Handbook. HMSO, London, 322 p.Search in Google Scholar

98Mitrović, A., Donaldson, L. A., Djikanović, D., Pristov, J. B., Simonović, J., Mutavdžić, D. et al., 2015: Analysis of static bending-induced compression wood formation in juvenile Picea omorika [Pančić] Purkyně. Trees, 29:1533–1543.Search in Google Scholar

99Møller, P. F., 2013: Opportunities and problems with introduced tree species in the Danish forests – in a historical perspective. Available at http://www.skogur.is/media/nordisk-skogshistorisk-konferanse/NSHReykjavik-Denmark.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

100Mondek, J., Baláš, M., 2019: Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco and its role in the Czech forests. Journal of Forest Science, 65:41–50.Search in Google Scholar

101Nasri, N., Bojović, S., Vendramin, G. G,, Fady, B., 2008: Population genetic structure of the relict Serbian spruce, Picea omorika, inferred from plastid DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 271:1–7.Search in Google Scholar

102Nedzved, A., Mitrović, A. L., Savić, A., Mutavdžić, D., Radosavljević, J. S., Pristov, J. B. et al., 2018: Automatic image processing morphometric method for the analysis of tracheid double wall thickness tested on juvenile Picea omorika trees exposed to static bending. Trees, 32:1347–1356.Search in Google Scholar

103Nielsen, U. B., Roulund, H., 1992: Sitkahybrider. Skoven, 24:72–75. (In Danish).Search in Google Scholar

104Nienstaedt, H., 1977: Mass production alternatives for fast-growing spruce hybrids. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Lake States Forest Tree Improvement Conference; Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-50. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, p. 56–71.Search in Google Scholar

105Novák, F. R., 1927: Zur fünfzigjährigen Entdeckung der Picea omorica. Mitt. D. D. Ges., 38:47–56. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

106Nymoen, H., 1978: Picea omorika is not an alternative to P. sitchensis in afforestation. Norsk Skogbruk, 24:15–16.Search in Google Scholar

107Oliva, A. G., Merino, V. B., Seco, J. I., García, M. C., Prieto, E. H., 2006: Effect of growth conditions on wood density of Spanish Pinus nigra. Wood Science and Technology, 40:190–204.Search in Google Scholar

108Ostojić, D., 2005: Ecological Factors of Natural Maintenance and Renewal of Cenopopulations of Serbian Spruce in NP Tara. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade.Search in Google Scholar

109Ostojić, D., Dinić, A., 2009: Experimental phytocoenological investigations of Serbian spruce (Picea omorika [Pančić] Purkyně) natural regeneration in the national park Tara. Šumarstvo, 1–2:23–35.Search in Google Scholar

110Ostojić, D., Dinić, A., 2012: Rezervati prirode sa omorikom u Srbiji – osnovne karakteristike i zaštita. Zaštita Prirode, 62:5–17. (In Serbian). Search in Google Scholar

111Pančič, J., 1876: Eine neue Conifere in den östlichen Alpen. Beograd. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

112Parzych, A., Mochnacký, S., Sobisz, Z., Polláková, N., Šimanský, V., 2018: Needles and bark of Picea abies [L.] H. Karst and Picea omorika [Pančić] Purk. as bioindicators of environmental quality. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A – Forestry, 60:230–240.Search in Google Scholar

113Petrović, D., Dukić, V., Popović, Z., Todorović, N., 2021: MOR and MOE of Serbian Spruce (Picea omorika Pančić/Purkyně) Wood from Natural Stands. Drvna industrija, 72:193–200.Search in Google Scholar

114Piętka, J., Gendek, A., Malaťák, J., Velebil, J., Moskalik, T., 2019: Effects of selected white-rot fungi on the calorific value of beech wood (Fagus sylvatica L.). Biomass and Bioenergy, 127:105290.Search in Google Scholar

115Pilát, A., 1964: Jehličnaté stromy a keře našich zahrad a parků. Praha, Nakladatelství ČSAV, 508 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

116Pintarić, K., 1970: Skladování semen Picea omorica v hermeticky uzavřených nádobách a vliv věku semene na klíčivost. Šumarstvo, 23 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

117Pintarić, K., 1999: Forestry and forest reserves in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In: Dijaci, J. (ed.): Virgin forests and forest reserves in Central and East European Countries, COST Action E4: Forest Reserves Research Network; Department of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources, Biotechnical Faculty Ljubljana, p. 1–15.Search in Google Scholar

118Podrázský, V., Remeš, J., Sloup, R., Pulkrab, K., Novotná, S., 2016: Douglas-fir – partial substitution for declining conifer timber supply – review of Czech data. Wood Research, 61:525–530.Search in Google Scholar

119Pokorný, J., 1981: Smrk omorika. Lesnická práce, 60:183–184. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

120Poleno, Z., 1985: Příměstské lesy. Praha, Státní zemědělské nakladatelství, 166 s. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

121Popović, A., Pantić, D., Medarević, M., Šljukić, B., Obradović, S., 2021: Impact of Mixing on the Structural Diversity of Serbian Spruce and Macedonian Pine Endemic to Relict Forest Communities in the Balkan Peninsula. Forests, 12:1095.Search in Google Scholar

122Purkyně, E., 1877: Eine asiatische Conifere in den Balkanländern. Oesterr. Monatschr. f. Forstw. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

123Pushka, I. M. 2022: Integrated assessment of I. Chernyakhovsky park in Uman, Cherkasy region and proposals for its restoration landscape gardening. Bulletin of Uman National University of Horticulture, 1:1–6.Search in Google Scholar

124Radonović, B., Šinžar-Sekulić, J., Rakić, T., Živković, I., Lakušić, D., 2014: Variation in needles anatomy of Picea omorika (Pinaceae) plants belonging to different gene pools in natural populations on Tara Mt. in Serbia. Botanica Serbica, 38:237–246.Search in Google Scholar

125Ramsay, J., Macdonald, E., 2013: Timber Properties of Minor Conifer Species A report to the Forestry Commission. Forest Research, Forestry Commission, UK. Ravazzi, C., 2002: Late Quaternary history of spruce in southern Europe. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 120:131–177.Search in Google Scholar

126Remeš, J., Zeidler, A., 2014: Production potential and wood quality of Douglas fir from selected sites in the Czech Republic. Wood Research, 59:509–520.Search in Google Scholar

127Remeš, J., Pulkrab, K., Bílek, L., Podrázský, V., 2020: Economic and production effect of tree species change as a result of adaptation to climate change. Forests, 11:431.Search in Google Scholar

128Roulund, H., 1971: Observations on spontaneous hybridization in Picea omorika [Pančić] Purkyne. Forest Tree Improvement, 2:1–17.Search in Google Scholar

129Schmidt, P. A., 1998: Picea A. Dietr. P. 1–14. In: Schütt, P., Schuck, H. J., Lang, U., Roloff, A. (eds.): Enzyklopädie der Holzgwächse. 14. Erg. Lfg., 12/95. Ecomed-Verlag, Landsberg. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

130Schmidt, P., Tegeler, R., 2014: Rare and other remarkable trees in nature and cultivation in Germany. Annals of Agrarian Science, 11:88–91.Search in Google Scholar

131Schönfelder, O., Zeidler, A., Borůvka, V., Bílek, L., 2017: Influence of site conditions and silvicultural practice on the wood density of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) – a case study from the Doksy locality, Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 63:457–462.Search in Google Scholar

132Seidl, R., Thom, D., Kautz, M., Martin-Benito, D., Peltoniemi, M., Vacchiano, G. et al., 2017: Forest disturbances under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 7:395–402.Search in Google Scholar

133Sippel, S., Otto, F., 2014: Beyond climatological extremes – assessing how the odds of hydrometeorological extreme events in South-East Europe change in a warming climate. Climatic Change, 125:381–398.Search in Google Scholar

134Slodičák, M. et al., 2005: Lesnické hospodaření v Jizerských horách. Hradec Králové, Lesy České republiky; Jíloviště-Strnady, VÚLHM: Jíloviště-Strnady, 232 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

135Slodičák, M. et. al., 2008: Lesnické hospodaření v Krušných horách. Hradec Králové, Lesy České republiky; Strnady, VÚLHM, 480 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

136Stanturf, J. A., Palik, B. J., Dumroese, R. K., 2014: Contemporary forest restoration: a review emphasizing function. Forest Ecology and Management, 331:292–323.Search in Google Scholar

137Stefanović, V., Beus, V., Burlica, Č., Dizdarević, H., Vukorep, I., 1983: Ecological and vegetational reonization of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Šumarski fakultet, Posebna Izdanja, 17:1–49.Search in Google Scholar

138Stern, K., Roche, L., 1974: Genetics of Forest Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

139Stevanović, V., Jovanović, S., Lakušić, D., Niketić, M., 1995: Diversity of the vascular flora of Yugoslavia with an overview of species of International importance. In Biodiversity of Yugoslavia-with an Overview of Species of International Importance; Faculty of Biology: Belgrade, Serbia, p. 183–217.Search in Google Scholar

140Stevanović, V., Vladimirov, V., Niketić, M., Vukojičić, S., Jakovljević, K., Lubarda, B. et al., 2014: Plant species and subspecies discovered by Dr. Josif Pančić 1-distribution and floristic importance. Botanica Serbica, 38:251–268.Search in Google Scholar

141Svoboda, P., 1952: Lesní dřeviny a jejich porosty. I. Praha, Státní zemědělské nakladatelství, 412 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

142Svoboda, P., 1953: Život lesa. Praha, Nakladatelství Brázda, 894 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

143Šilić, Č.,1990: Atlas drevća i grmlja. Sarajevo. Svjetlost. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

144Šimůnek, V., Vacek, Z., Vacek, S., 2020: Solar cycles in salvage logging: National data from the Czech Republic confirm significant correlation. Forests, 11:973.Search in Google Scholar

145Špulák, O., Kacálek, D., Balcar, V., 2019: Seven spruce species on a mountain site-performance, foliar nutrients, and forest floor properties in stands 20 years old. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 12:106. Thomsen, I. M., 2009: Precipitation and temperature as factors in Gremmeniella abietina epidemics. Forest Pathology, 39:56–72.Search in Google Scholar

146Timell, T. E., 1986: Compression wood in gymnosperms. Springer, Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

147Tošić, M., 1983: Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine. 72:267. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

148Toth, D., Maitah, M., Maitah, K., Jarolínová, V., 2020: The impacts of calamity logging on the development of spruce wood prices in Czech forestry. Forests, 11:283.Search in Google Scholar

149Tucić, B., Stojković, B., 2001: Shade avoidance syndrome in Picea omorika seedlings: a growth-room experiment. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 14:444–455.Search in Google Scholar

150Tucić, B., Pemac, D., Ducić, J., 2005: Life history responses to irradiance at the early seedling stage of Picea omorika [Pancic] Purkynhe: adaptiveness and evolutionary limits. Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology, 27:185–195.Search in Google Scholar

151Tucović, A., Isajev, V., 1988: Generativna semenska plantaža omorike u Godoviku, Izvođački projekat. Beograd, p. 1–40. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

152Úradníček, L., Chmelař, J., 1995: Dendrologie lesnická, 1. část – Jehličnany. Brno, MZLU, 130 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

153Vacek, S., Lokvenc, T., Balcar, V., Henžlík, V., 1994: Forest regeneration and stabilization in the Sudeten mountain regions. In: Paschalis, P., Zajaczkowski, S. (ed.): Protection of forest ecosystems, selected problems of forestry in Sudety Mts. Warszawa, Biuro GEF, p. 93–119.Search in Google Scholar

154Vacek, S., Prokůpková, A., Vacek, Z., Bulušek, D., Šimůnek, V., Králíček, I. et al., 2019: Growth response of mixed beech forests to climate change, various management and game pressure in Central Europe. Journal of Forest Science, 65:331–345.Search in Google Scholar

155Vacek, S., Zingari, P. C., Jeník, J., Simon, J., Smejkal, J., Vančura, K., 2003: Mountain forests of the Czech Republic. Prague, Ministry of agriculture of the Czech Republic, 320 p.Search in Google Scholar

156Vacek, Z., Cukor, J., Vacek, S., Linda, R., Prokůpková, A., Podrázský, V. et al., 2021: Production potential, biodiversity and soil properties of forest reclamations: Opportunities or risk of introduced coniferous tree species under climate change? European Journal of Forest Research, 140:1243–1266.Search in Google Scholar

157Vacek, Z., Prokůpková, A., Vacek, S., Cukor, J., Bílek, L., Gallo, J. et al., 2020: Silviculture as a tool to support stability and diversity of forests under climate change: study from Krkonoše Mountains. Central European Forestry Journal, 66:116–129.Search in Google Scholar

158Vacek, S., Vacek, Z., Cukor, J., Podrázský, V., Gallo, J., 2022: Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon and climate change: A literature review of opportunities, challenges, and risks in European Forests. Journal of Forest Science, 68:329–343.Search in Google Scholar

159Vakula, J., Zúbrik, M., Galko, J., Gubka, A., Kunca, A., Nikolov, Ch. et al., 2021: Is the double-spined bark beetle Ips duplicatus a new threat to Picea omorika in urban habitats? Plant Protection Science, 57:248–251.Search in Google Scholar

160Venäläinen, A., Lehtonen, I., Laapas, M., Ruosteenoja, K., Tikkanen, O. P., Viiri, H. et al., 2020: Climate change induces multiple risks to boreal forests and forestry in Finland: A literature review. Global Change Biology, 26:4178–4196.Search in Google Scholar

161Vidaković, M., 1963: Međuvrsno ukrštanje Pančićeve omorike (Picea omorika [Panč.] Purkyne) sa sitkanskom smrčom (Picea sithensis [Bong.] Cariére). Šumarstvo. Beograd, p. 337–342. (In Serbian).Search in Google Scholar

162Vidaković, M., 1991: Conifers morphology and variation. Croatia, Grafički zavod Hrvatske, 756 p. Vidaković, M., 1993: Conifers: morphology and variation. Tree Physiology, 12:319.Search in Google Scholar

163Viewegh, J., Kusbach, A., Mikeska, M., 2003: Czech forest ecosystem classification. Journal of Forest Science, 49:85–93.Search in Google Scholar

164Vujičić, R., Budimir, S., 1995: Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration in Picea omorika. In: Jain, S. M., Gupta, P. K., Newton, R. J. (eds.): Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants, Springer Netherlands, 3:44–46 of Forestry Sciences, p. 81–97.Search in Google Scholar

165Vujkovic, L., Matovic, M., Svilikic, B., 1993: Biological values of Serbian spruce (Picea omorika Panc./Purkyne) an important species in greening works. Sumarstvo (Yugoslavia), 46:67–73.Search in Google Scholar

166Wardle, P.,1956: Picea omorika in its natural habitat. Forestry, 29:91–117.Search in Google Scholar

167Zeidler, A., 2007: Zhodnocení vybraných vlastností dřeva borovice černé (Pinus nigra Arnold.). Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 52:14–20. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

168Zeidler, A., Borůvka, V., 2016: Wood density of northern red oak and pedunculate oak grown in former brown coal mine in the Czech Republic. BioResources, 11:9373–9385.Search in Google Scholar

169Zeidler, A., Borůvka, V., Schönfelder, O., 2017: Comparison of wood quality of Douglas fir and spruce from afforested agricultural land and permanent forest land in the Czech Republic. Forests, 9:13.Search in Google Scholar

170Zeidler, A., Vacek, Z., Cukor, J., Borůvka, V., Vacek, S., et al. 2022: Is European larch (Larix decidua Mill.) a suitable substitute for Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) for agricultural land afforestation? Forest Ecology and Management, 517:120257.Search in Google Scholar

171CABI, 2015: Hylobius abietis (large pine weevil) 2015: Invasive Species Compendium. http://www.cabi.org.Search in Google Scholar

172Conifer Specialist Group, 1998: (Picea omorika). 2007. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php/30313/summ.Search in Google Scholar