Open Access

Litterfall nutrient return in thinned young stands with Douglas fir


Augusto, L., Ranger, J., Binkley, D., Rothe, A., 2002: Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Annals of Forest Science, 59:233–253.10.1051/forest:2002020Search in Google Scholar

Berg, B., McClaugherty, C., De Santo, A. V., Johnson, D., 2001: Humus buildup in boreal forests: effects of litter fall and its N concentration. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31:988–998.10.1139/x01-031Search in Google Scholar

Binkley, D., Lousier, J.D., Cromack, K., 1984: Ecosystem effects of Sitka alder in a Douglas-fir plantation. Forest Science, 30:26–35.Search in Google Scholar

Blanco, J. A., Imbert, J. B., Castillo, F. J., 2008: Nutrient return via litterfall in two contrasting Pinus sylvestris forests in the Pyrenees under different thinning intensities. Forest Ecology and Management, 256:1840–1852.10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.011Search in Google Scholar

Bueis, T., Bravo, F., Pando, V., Belén Turrión, M., 2018: Local basal area affects needle litterfall, nutrient concentration, and nutrient release during decomposition in Pinus halepensis Mill. plantations in Spain. Annals of Forest Science, 75:21.10.1007/s13595-018-0699-5Search in Google Scholar

Chase, Ch. W., Kimsey, M. J., Shaw, T. M., Coleman M. D., 2016: The response of light, water, and nutrient availability to pre-commercial thinning in dry inland Douglas-fir forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 363:98–109.10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.014Search in Google Scholar

del Río, M., Bravo-Oviedo, A., Pretzsch, H., Löf, M., Ruiz-Peinado, R., 2017: A review of thinning effects on Scots pine stands: From growth and yield to new challenges under global change. Forest Systems, 26, 2:eR03S.10.5424/fs/2017262-11325Search in Google Scholar

Dong, Z., Driscoll, Ch. T., Johnson, S. L., Campbell, J. L., Pourmokhtarian, A., Stoner, A. M. K. et al., 2019: Projections of water, carbon, and nitrogen dynamics under future climate change in an old-growth Douglas-fir forest in the western Cascade Range using a biogeochemical model. Science of the Total Environment, 656:608–624.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.37730529965Search in Google Scholar

Erkan, N., Comez, A., Cem Aydin, A., Denli, O., Erkan, S., 2018: Litterfall in relation to stand parameters and climatic factors in Pinus brutia forests in Turkey. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 33:338–346.10.1080/02827581.2017.1406135Search in Google Scholar

Fried, J. S., Boyle, J. R., Tappeiner, J. C., Cromack, K., 1990: Effects of bigleaf maple on soils in Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20:259–266.10.1139/x90-038Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, K., Vesterdal, L., Schmidt, I. K., Gundersen, P., Sevel, L., Bastrup-Birk, A. et al., 2009: Litterfall and nutrient return in five tree species in a common garden experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 257:2133–2144.10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.021Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, T. A. R., Gilbert, J., Mackie, E. D., Matthews, R.W., 2012: Tree Species, A document listing the tree species included in the 2011 Production Forecast. Forecast technical document, Forestry Comission, 7 p.Search in Google Scholar

Kacálek, D., Novák, J., Dušek, D., Slodičák, M., 2018: Litter fall and forest floor under conifer stands: silvi-culture consequences – a review. In: A. C. Gonçalves: Conifers. IntechOpen, p. 77–89.10.5772/intechopen.79653Search in Google Scholar

Kantor, P., Knott, R., Martiník, A., 2001: Production capacity of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) in a mixed stand. Ekológia (Bratislava), 20 (Suppl.), 1:5–14.Search in Google Scholar

Kubeček, J., Štefančík, I., Podrázský, V., Longauer, R., 2014: Výsledky výzkumu douglasky tisolisté (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) v České republice a na Slovensku – přehled. Lesnícky časopis–Forestry Journal, 60:116–124.10.2478/forj-2014-0012Search in Google Scholar

Livingston, W. H., Kenefic, L. S., 2018: Low densities in white pine stands reduce risk of drought-incited decline. Forest Ecology and Management, 423:84–93.10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.047Search in Google Scholar

Longdoz, B., Yernaux., M, Aubinet, M., 2000: Soil CO2 efflux measurements in a mixed forest: impact of chamber disturbances, spatial variability and seasonal evolution. Global Change Biology, 6:907–917.10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00369.xSearch in Google Scholar

Maguire, D. A., 1994: Branch mortality and potential litterfall from Douglas-fir trees in stands of varying density. Forest Ecology and Management, 70:41–53.10.1016/0378-1127(94)90073-6Search in Google Scholar

Mcshane, M. C., Carlile, D. W., Hinds, W. T., 1983: The effect of collector size on forests litter-fall collection and analysis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13:1037–1042.10.1139/x83-138Search in Google Scholar

Menšík, L., Kulhavý, J., Kantor, P., Remeš, M., 2009: Humus conditions of stands with the different proportion of Douglas fir in training forest district Hůrky and the Křtiny Forest Training Enterprise. Journal of Forest Science, 55:345–356.10.17221/9/2009-JFSSearch in Google Scholar

Novák, J., Dušek, D., Slodičák, M., 2014: Quantity and quality of litterfall in young oak stands. Journal of Forest Science, 60:219–225.10.17221/2/2014-JFSSearch in Google Scholar

Podrázský, V., Čermák, R., Zahradník, D., Kouba, J., 2013: Production of Douglas-fir in the Czech Republic based on national forest inventory data. Journal of Forest Science, 59:398–404.10.17221/48/2013-JFSSearch in Google Scholar

Podrázský, V., Remeš, J., 2005: Retenční schopnost svrchní vrstvy půd lesních porostů s různým druhovým složením. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 50:46–48.Search in Google Scholar

Podrázský, V., Viewegh, J., 2005: Comparison of humus form state in the beech and spruce parts of the Žákova hora National Nature Reserve. Journal of Forest Science (Special Issue), 51:29–37.10.17221/11846-JFSSearch in Google Scholar

Podrázský, V., Remeš, J., 2008: Půdotvorná role významných introdukovaných jehličnanů – doug-lasky tisolisté, jedle obrovské a borovice vejmutovky. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 53:27–34.Search in Google Scholar

Podrázský, V., Moser, W. K., Novák, J., 2006: Changes in the quantity and characteristics of surface humus after thinning treatments. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 37:25–28.Search in Google Scholar

Podrázský, V., Remeš, J., Hart, V., Moser, W. K., 2009: Production and humus form development in forest stands established on agricultural lands – Kostelec nad Černými lesy region. Journal of Forest Science, 55:299–305.10.17221/11/2009-JFSSearch in Google Scholar

Podrázský, V., Kupka, I., 2011: Vliv douglasky tisolisté (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb] Franco) na základní pedofyzikální charakteristiky lesních půd. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 56 (Special):1–5.Search in Google Scholar

Ponette, Q., Ranger, J., Ottorini, J.-M., Ulrich, E., 2001: Aboveground biomass and nutrient content of five Douglas-fir stands in France. Forest Ecology and Management, 142:109–127.10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00345-5Search in Google Scholar

Roig, S., del Río, M., Cañellas, I., Montero, G., 2005: Litter fall in Mediterranean Pinus pinaster Ait. stands under different thinning regimes. Forest Ecology and Management, 206:179–190.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.068Search in Google Scholar

Settineri, G., Mallamaci, C., Mitrović, M., Sidari, M., Muscolo, A., 2018: Effects of different thinning intensities on soil carbon storage in Pinus laricio forest of Apennine South Italy. European Journal of Forest Research, 137:131–141.10.1007/s10342-017-1077-9Search in Google Scholar

Slodičák, M., Novák, J., Mauer, O., Podrázský, V. et al., 2014: Pěstební postupy při zavádění douglasky do porostních směsí v podmínkách ČR. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Lesnická práce, 272 p.Search in Google Scholar

Šarman, J., 1982: Vliv probírky na povrchový humus ve smrkovém porostu. Lesnictví-Forestry, 28:31–42.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, K. D., Prescott, C. E., 2000: Nitrogen availability in forest floors of three tree species on the same site: The role of litter quality. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 11:1698–1706.10.1139/x00-101Search in Google Scholar

Trofymow, J. A., Barclay, H. J., McCullough, K. M., 1991: Annual rates and elemental concentrations of litter fall in thinned and fertilized Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21:1601–1615.10.1139/x91-223Search in Google Scholar

Turner, J., 1981: Nutrient cycling in an age sequence of Western Washington Douglas-fir stands. Annals of Botany, 48:159–169.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086109Search in Google Scholar

Turner, J., Long, J. N., 1975: Accumulation of organic matter in a series of Douglas-fir stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 5:681–690.10.1139/x75-094Search in Google Scholar

Ulbrichová, I., Kupka, I., Podrázský, V., Kubeček, J., Fulín, M., 2014: Douglaska jako meliorační a zpevňující dřevina. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 59: 72–78.Search in Google Scholar

Viewegh, J., Kusbach, A., Mikeska, M., 2003: Czech forest ecosystem classification. Journal of Forest Science, 49:85–93.10.17221/4682-JFSSearch in Google Scholar

Wang, L., Zhao, G., Sun, Y., Yang, Y., Zhou, H., 2019: Effects of Thinning on Microbial Community Structure in the Organic Horizon of Chinese Pine Plantations in Badaling, Beijing, China. Forests, 10:828.10.3390/f10100828Search in Google Scholar

Wilhelmi, V., 1988: Düngung und Durchforstung als kombinierte Waldsanierungsmaßnahme. Allgeme-Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift, 159:844–846.Search in Google Scholar

Will, G. M., 1959: Nutrient return in litter and rainfall under some exotic conifer stands in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2:719–734.10.1080/00288233.1959.10422832Search in Google Scholar

Wright, T. W., 1957: Some effects of thinning on the soil of a Norway spruce plantation. Forestry, 30:123–133.10.1093/oxfordjournals.forestry.a063106Search in Google Scholar

Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Plant Science, Ecology, other